engineering (CE) materials course along with the other courses in the U.A. WhitakerSchool of Engineering (WSOE) at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) is taught in anintegrated lecture lab style. In this non-traditional setting, instructors use an integrated, active,and collaborative instructional technique. Also, unlike many other universities, there is not aseparate time slot allocated in the schedule to conduct the laboratory experiments for this CEmaterials course. Instead, the lab is embedded into the course structure. Although it has beendocumented in the literature that this technique represents effective teaching pedagogy only afew engineering programs have adopted this method. In addition, the WSOE is only in its thirdyear since students
applications. The objectives of the laboratory experiments werewell defined; however, the students determined the process of conducting the experiment. Theinformation provided to the students focused on the rationale behind developing standardizedlaboratory procedure and their broad ranging applications on the civil engineering industry.The transportation course, which is traditionally a lecture course, was redesigned to ensure thatevery student actively participates and understands the physical elements of transportationdesign. Throughout the course, the faculty conducted a stimulating and engaging exercise ofrequiring students to solve practical problems during class in teams of two immediately aftercovering the relevant theory. The practical
current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Mr. Alec William Maxwell, San Francisco State University Alec Maxwell is currently an graduate student in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Uni- versity (SFSU). Besides actively conducting research on innovative tools for engineering education in the Intelligent Structural Hazards Mitigation Laboratory at SFSU with Prof. Zhaoshuo Jiang, he also serves the community as the President of the American Society of Civil Engineers for the SFSU chapter.Prof. Zahira H Merchant, San Francisco State UniversityDr. Philip Scott Harvey Jr., University of Oklahoma Scott
. However, Allendoerfer et al. [15] foundthat student perceptions of faculty support are significantly influenced by class size andinstitution type. Astin [16] noted that institution type does not have a strong influence on theeffectiveness of undergraduate education, but that the environment created by faculty andstudents plays a stronger role.The purpose of this study is to examine several educational factors (i.e., institution type, classsize, class meeting time, class length and format, laboratory format, and faculty attributes) thatmay correlate with the amount of knowledge gained in the conceptual understanding ofgeotechnical engineering topics. The study was carried out at six institutions with civilengineering programs: The Citadel
, masters, anddoctoral levels with instructional opportunities in and out of the classroom. Practitionerengagement (e.g. agencies, consultants, contractors, material suppliers, private laboratories) hasbeen a key component of this process, and is the focus of this paper. Practitioner involvement is:1) important to the educational process; 2) not always easy to obtain; 3) not always easy toeffectively utilize; 4) a key to the presence or absence of balance; and 5) debated amongsteducation literature. Key items that resonate through this paper are the student opportunitiescreated by balance, and how practitioners fit into this balance.Industry and agency collaboration concepts are nothing new and are discussed in literature1-5.The amount or extent of
toward implementation on a broader scale.This introductory paper outlines the WEI framework as a work in progress vision consisting of aVirtual Classroom, Virtual Laboratory, and Virtual Studio as three pillars of the Virtual LearningEnvironment. At the time of the authorship of this paper, the Virtual Classroom model has beenlaunched and student assessment has been conducted at California Polytechnic State Universitiesat both Pomona and San Luis Obispo. Presented herein are details of the WEI framework, thepedagogy of the packaged curriculum with the available online streaming teaching modules,details of the launched pilot program, and students’ perceptions of the pilot program coursecontent and its delivery through the NEESacademy powered by
results demonstrated thatthe new teaching improvement is capable of adding students’ GIS knowledge.1. INTRODUCTION The GIS courses for graduate and undergraduate students are offered in Old DominionUniversity (ODU) via distance education mode. The distance courses are delivered to 15 states,50 higher education centers, and 4 oversee navy bases (Japan, Koera, Mid-East, and Canada) viaboth the regular classroom and ODU’s TTN (Tele-Tech-Net) system (active satellites, streamvideo, video tapes, DVD, etc.). One of the problems in the distance courses is that the remotestudents have difficulty to access the large volume of geospatial data for their homework anddistance laboratory via internet. The GeoBrain system, which is funded by NASA
1995, respectively.Mr. Nephi Derbidge, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA After completing my undergraduate studies at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, I worked for a private geotech- nical consulting firm in California for over 15 years. My consulting career provided a broad range of experience on mostly public works projects. Over the last 10 years I have managed the geotechnical laboratory which served more than 5 offices throughout the state for domestic and international projects. I have been teaching mostly geotechnical laboratory courses at Cal Poly for over 10 years. Utilizing Cal Poly’s ’Learn by Doing’ mantra, I share my practical project experience with my students during laboratory activities
firsthand how to conductwater quality testing in the field. This video was shown to the students after (and within the sameweek) the students participated in an in-person laboratory class period where the studentsexperimentally measured water quality parameters. Prior to reviewing this module, the studentswere briefly introduced to the various water quality parameters that can be measured in the fieldand the advantages of field testing. Two additional videos were created to introduce students totwo topics relevant to water and wastewater treatment, including nutrients and bacteria. Thesemodules were shown to the students prior to the in-person laboratory class period pertaining tothe experimental measurement of nutrients and bacteria in water and
ClassroomAbstractThis paper will describe recent innovations in the Fluid Mechanics course (CE3300) at theUniversity of Wisconsin-Platteville. The innovations include learning activities and feedbackmechanisms. Specifically, the innovations are: “Challenge Problems”; in-class “physicalmodels”; a “Create-A-Lab” exercise; and an effective grading rubric for laboratory reports.Significant Learning ExperiencesIn “Creating Significant Learning Experiences” (Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2003) by L. Dee Fink,guidelines are provided to help instructors create significant learning experiences for theirstudents. The basis of Fink’s model is the concept of “integrated course design.” In anintegrated course, the Learning Goals, Teaching and Learning Activities, and Feedback
areevaluated by some form of a final report. In the traditional civil engineering curriculum, undergraduate students take courses withboth lecture and laboratory formats. While the lecture courses provide the opportunity forstudents to absorb new information, the purpose of a laboratory is to expose students to thephysical problems associated with a course and reinforce course content. The traditional type oflaboratory has well-planned experiments, typically containing step-by-step guides leading thestudents through each experiment. Generally in groups of four or five, students in-turn conductthe experiment, regurgitate the results, and prepare a laboratory report, arguably fulfilling ABETstudent outcome (b) “an ability to design and conduct
Concrete Design Course by Linking Theory and Physical TestingAbstractThe paper presents a model for improving reinforced concrete design courses by incorporatingphysical beam testing. This model was implemented in a course that did not have a laboratorycomponent. The beams tested were full-scale and demonstrated two flexural failures of varyingductility, a shear failure, and an anchorage failure. The beams were tested throughout thesemester as appropriate with the material that had been covered in the course. A reportingprocess was followed that required students to submit laboratory reports for each beam test,address comments received on each report, and submit a final report covering all four tests. Itwas found that the
: thetechnical communications course, laboratory courses, and a series of project-based courses. Thetechnical communications course was changed to a rotating face-to-face model, for which lecturevideos and assigned activities were performed on out-of-class days and in-class days were reservedfor workshops. Workshops replaced the traditional guided learning activity approach with activelearning in a think-pair-share format. Students were given strong and weak examples of writing tobe able to give feedback to their peers and improve their own writing prior to submission. Studentsworked on improving their formal written assignments, and therefore improved their capacity fortechnical writing, during class rather than submitting their first writing
classroom demonstrations and illustrative laboratory and field experiences. He has served as an ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop mentor for five years as well as the founding coordinator for the Oregon Tech Excellence in Teaching Workshop.Dr. Dave Kim, Washington State University Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy of engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his
26.892.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impact of Upgrading Equipment for Strength of Materials Labs on Student Perceptions, Motivation, and LearningAbstractAn important component of teaching introductory Strength of Materials (Mechanics ofMaterials) concepts to undergraduate engineering and technology students is the inclusion oflaboratory experiments, which give the students the opportunity to conduct tests and collect dataon the materials to obtain relevant properties. These laboratory experiments also allow studentsto observe firsthand the behavior of materials under different loading conditions, thereby givingthem a greater physical feel for these different behaviors. The
as a technical course that requires a labcomponent. The underlying thought being that engineering students will have numerouslaboratory experiences within their engineering academic career and being able to get acourse on the history of modern engineering which counts toward a core requirementearly in their career will provide them an unique insight into engineering. Additionally,the creative hands-on laboratory experiences and associated data collection willencourage some of the non-engineering students to consider switching to engineering!The presentation of engineering in the modern world within ENGR 1200 at UT Tyler alsoincludes laboratory experiences for the freshmen engineering students. These laboratoryexperiences come from the Summer
supplements an individual course lecture series withhands-on laboratory exercises. These laboratory exercises tend to deal solely with the materialbeing addressed in the lectures for the particular course. Consequently, not only are theselaboratories limited to one Civil Engineering sub-discipline but also limited to the material beingtaught in the specific course. The Civil Engineering Department at our Institute developed andimplemented a Design Studio Lab (DSL) for use in the 2014-2015 school year. This experientialstudio linked several of the Civil Engineering sub-disciplines in a series of two-two hourstudios/labs and one lecture per week (three credits). Four Civil Engineering sub-disciplinesparticipated in this experiential studio with the
) promoting student enthusiasm, and 3) providingexposure to real-world engineering. The remainder of this paper discusses theseprinciples and provides examples of how they have been implemented into the hydraulicstructure design course.Lab and lecture integrationIt is apparent that the learning environment within the engineering classroom is enhancedand engineering concepts (the big picture) are more adequately retained when in-classlectures are coupled with related hands-on experience, such as laboratory exercises.When the topics and assignments of the lectures and laboratories are integrated, thelearning in the lab reinforces the principles taught in the classroom and vise versa. Aneffective inductive/deductive learning environment is
evaluating the performance civil infrastructure systems, both in the laboratory and the field. His work has included studies on image-based measurement techniques, crowd-sourcing, data analytics, condition assessment and structural health monitoring, and the application of innovative materials in civil infrastructure.Dr. Mehrdad Shafiei Dizaji, University of Massachusetts Lowell I am a postdoctoral researcher at University of Massachusetts Lowell in Structural Dynamics & Acoustic Systems Laboratory working with Dr. Zhu Mao. My recent ongoing research focused on Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring, Deep Learning, Signal Processing, Time Series, and Phase-Based Video Magnification. I received my PhD in Civil
process that is used extensively to removecontaminants from water and air. Environmental engineering faculty typically teach this topic bydescribing mathematical models that are used to quantify adsorption. This approach, by itself,may result in students having an incomplete understanding of adsorption because studentsfrequently have difficulty visualizing scientific phenomena such as the mass transfer process thatoccurs during adsorption. A hands-on laboratory experiment (cf. Speitel, 2001) where studentscollect and analyze adsorption data, may enhance students’ understanding of adsorption.Undeniably, hands-on experiences help students develop a deeper understanding of principlesstudied in and out of the classroom (Butkus et al., 2004; Pfluger
Architectural Engineering at the California Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) where he teaches courses on the analysis and design of structural systems including laboratory courses.Dr. Graham C. Archer P.Eng, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Graham Archer, P.Eng., is a Professor of Architectural Engineering at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) where he teaches courses on the analysis and design of structural systems.Dr. Cole C McDaniel, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Cole McDaniel, P.E., is a Professor of Architectural Engineering at the California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) where he teaches courses on the
, construction, and professional practice.Christopher Conley, United States Military Academy Chris Conley is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy. He earned a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Massachusetts (1978), and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from Cornell University (1980, 1983). He has served as a Member of Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories, a Senior Research Associate at Cornell University, and an Assistant Professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. In his 13 years on the USMA faculty he has taught a variety of courses in the civil and mechanical
requirements of the course which was disappointing tostudents and instructors alike.Previously, students in CE300 had been provided with a document prepared by our faculty titled“Standards for Technical Reports” which outlined the required format for various types of Page 13.1295.2reports (design, analysis, and laboratory). This resource provided minimal discussion andfocused primarily on required formats. The document did not discuss differences between othertypes of writing and technical writing, nor did it address grammar and general technical writingfundamentals. Its primary focus was formats. As such, it was a valuable reference to someonewith a
progressed. This paper presents the results and lessons learned through earlyimplementation. It focuses on explaining centrifuge technology, the tools used to build themodel, testing logistics, and methods adopted to resolve obstacles encountered during executionof the module. The student survey indicates that the developed module successfully addresses animportant educational gap - students' lack of understanding of the strong relationship betweensoil laboratory testing, system design, and field performance. The survey also highlighted thefact that students did appreciate the practical nature of the project. The educational module wasrevised and successfully implemented in the spring of 2012 at the three universities.IntroductionThe undergraduate
introduce students to qualitative and quantitative perspectives of four factorsthat affect design, construction and management of the structures we live and work in. Thesefour factors, Safety, Sustainability, Style and Society, comprised the four principle modules of thecourse. The course explores the modules separately, as well as their interconnectedness. Inaddition, the course focused on drawing as a language for communicating building design andperformance. The class was organized as a weekly 2.5 hour seminar course to allow time forfield trips, laboratory activities, and class discussion, which were designed to strengthenstudents’ ability to analyze and communicate ideas about building design across disciplines.Weekly readings shaped the focus
andrelationship of individual course components in the inverted model (recorded lecture videos,concept quizzes, problem sets, laboratory exercises, and design projects) are presented. Impactson faculty planning and preparation are discussed. A review of the changes made between eachsuccessive course offering based on lessons learned is also provided.In addition to the authors’ (faculty) perspective, the students’ perspective is also addressed basedon the results of extensive end-of-the-semester surveys asking students for feedback on theinverted model. Student responses to numerous multiple choice “rating” questions about courseformat and course components are provided. Student performance is also addressed through abroad comparison of examination grades
effectivesolutions to complex technical problems and an active learning environment is useful for studentsto learn practical skills. This includes problem-based learning and student designed laboratoryexperiments.The Civil Engineering Materials course at Manhattan College is a core course taken by all civilengineering students in the spring semester of the sophomore year or fall semester of the junioryear. Traditionally this course covers a variety of civil engineering materials, their sources,manufacturing processes, and behavior under different loading conditions. The content of thiscourse is flexible and includes a laboratory component. This is one of the core classes in whichactive learning techniques can be implemented successfully.A term project
Paper ID #8759An innovative way to teach sustainability in Civil engineering Material ClassDr. Goli Nossoni, Manhattan College Dr. Goli Nossoni specializes in the area of civil engineering structures and materials she has worked in multidisciplinary research laboratory. Her research recently expanded to include innovative green and recycled materials. She taught the Civil Engineering Materials course the last two years, and has tried to encourage her students to think critically about the environmental impact of the materials they use and be more creative. She recently has received an EPA-P3 grant for a multidisciplinary
is offered as co-requisite to the laboratory portion of the firstgeotechnical engineering course in both day and evening programs in the spring semester. Dayclasses meet three times a week (50 minutes each) and are populated by students of traditionalage. Evening classes meet twice a week (75 minutes each) and are populated with students wholive in the community, many of whom work full or part-time.Merrimack College is an independent college in the Catholic tradition with undergraduate andmaster’s programs in liberal arts, engineering, business, science, and education. This institutionhas a total enrollment of approximately 3,800 (3,200 undergraduate and 600 graduate students);in Civil Engineering, there are approximately 100 undergraduate
Rose-Hulman. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Design and Implementation of Experiential Learning Modules for Soil Mechanics and Foundation DesignIntroduction Geotechnical engineering undergraduate curricula typically consist of courses in soilmechanics and foundation design that include a variety of topics that are difficult for students tounderstand and master. Behavior of the below grade geomaterials discussed in these courses canbe difficult for students to visualize. Typically, the mechanisms of behavior are demonstratedusing small-scale laboratory tests, two-dimensional sketches, simple table-top models, or