about the first course in the sequence:CvEEN 1000 Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering, CvEEN 3100 TechnicalCommunications for Civil Engineers, and CvEEN 4910 Professional Practice & Design. CvEEN4910 is the capstone course for the program. All three classes are required for graduates of thedepartment’s baccalaureate programs. Each is a one semester experience. Table 1 Professional Skills Outcomes and Courses in the Utah CvEEN Program U. of Semester Course Title BOK Professional Related Outcomes* Utah CreditCvEEN Hours
context of the student’s temperaments as determined by the Keirsey Temperament Sorter.Results are presented discussing the impact of team composition on both team and peer ratings.Literature ReviewEngineering curricula have been historically very technically focused, with larger classes focusedon a specific engineering topic1. This style of instruction does not accurately reflect anengineer’s job requirements, which often include multi-disciplinary problem-solving andworking in groups. Under recent ABET guidance, there has been an increased push for project-based learning that integrates complex, group problem-solving to better align with employer’sneeds2. There is a large body of research related to how to best select individuals for
Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). She also completed a teaching certificate and was actively involved with the Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech. Her academic interests focus on two primary areas of sustainable transportation: (1) community-based design and planning and (2) strategic planning and policy development. Dr. Barrella is also interested in investigating how to best integrate these research interests into classroom and project experiences for her students.Mr. Thomas A. Wall, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Michael O. Rodgers, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael Rodgers is a research professor in the Georgia
, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering curriculum of an engineering department (Biological Systems Engineering) using Jerome Bruner’s spiral curriculum theory. Currently, Dr. Lohani leads an NSF/REU Site on ”interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering” which has already graduated 56 excellent undergraduate researchers since 2007. This Site is renewed for the third cycle which will be implemented during 2014-16. He also leads an NSF/TUES type I project in which a real-time environmental monitoring lab
organized. All REU fellows made final research presentations to all faculty and graduatementors at this ceremony. Several parents attended this ceremony. Students YouTube videos werescreened and all attendees voted for the best videos. This ceremony followed a group lunch andSite work officially ended after this ceremony.4.0 The Research ProgramInterdisciplinary research is the unique strength of our REU Site. Eleven faculty representingcivil and environmental engineering, engineering education, geosciences, biological sciences, andcrop and soil environmental sciences and their graduate students mentored the REU fellows.Figure 2 shows a word cloud of the keywords from REU fellows’ research papers in summer of2011. Each year, a Research Proceedings
serves on the National Board of Governors of the Order of the Engineer.Craig N. Musselman, CMA Engineers, Inc. Craig N. Musselman, P.E. is a practicing civil and environmental engineer and is the Founder and Pres- ident of CMA Engineers, a consulting engineering firm with offices in New Hampshire and Maine. He holds B.S.C.E. and M.S.C.E. degrees from the University of Massachusetts and has more than 35 years experience in the planning, design and construction administration of public works facilities. Mussel- man is a former member of the New Hampshire Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and was actively involved in the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES) through committee
professionals in the U.K. have been required to explicitly consider thesafety of construction workers in their designs since 1994, and PtD is now required throughoutthe European Union1, in Singapore, South Africa and Australia.14 The recognition of the valueof PtD and the diffusion of PtD practices has been much slower (due to factors that willdiscussed shortly), but there are signs the concept is gaining recognition among researchers,project owners,31 32 and design professionals.12 16 21 The Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration’s (OSHA) Construction Alliance Roundtable has had a working group thatfocuses on designing for construction safety since 2005 while the National Institute forOccupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has had a significant
•(g) an ability to communicate effectively •(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning •(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. • Table 2. Results of course evaluations for Reinforced Concrete Design (“Overall, how do you rate this course?”). Term Evaluation (out
engineering.The catalog description states that the course “Examines how constraints and considerations such Page 23.1106.2as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability influence engineering practice. How professional and ethical responsibility affectengineering. Places the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental,and societal context.” 1This course has no prerequisites, and is scheduled for convenience in the second semester of thesecond year of the curriculum. However, some students take it during the first year instead.Offering this course early in the
precise calculations Conducting experiments – incorporating empirical data into design decisionsOne of the best ways to stimulate this kind of system design thinking is to present students withcomplex problems that require them to address each of these areas as the part of a single project.In engineering education, these kinds of design problems are often presented to teams ofstudents, creating an environment in which questions are raised by others and there is a necessityto argue the advantages and disadvantages of alternative responses. These interactions not onlyaddress ABET criteria and increase communication skills, but also increase the likelihood of asuccessful design outcome, given a diverse team of students [1].For problem-based
practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. She is currently engaged in course development and instruction for the junior design sequence (ENGR 331 and 332) and the freshman design experience, along with coordinating junior capstone at JMU. In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University.Dr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel
scrutiny in thepast decade. As cited later, there have been concerns expressed that graduate programshave become less focused on preparing civil engineers for the professional practice ofcivil engineering and more focused on engineering research. An added concern in thisperceived trend has been that the future educators of civil engineers who graduate withPh.D.’s may be less prepared to foster the best possible learning in practical civilengineering design. These concerns may or may not be justified, but the current dialoguecertainly provides an opportunity for civil engineering departments to reexamine theirgraduate programs to identify whether they are doing to their best to prepare theirgraduates. Implied in the M/30 learning is the knowledge
curriculahave been based largely on an “engineering science” model, referred to as the “Grinter Model”,in which engineering is taught only after a solid basis in science and mathematics(1) .Theresulting engineering graduates were perceived by industry and academia, at the time, as being“ill-prepared” for the practice. Despite steps taken to remedy the situation, through greaterindustry-academia collaboration; both design faculty and design practitioners argue that furtherimprovements are necessary. Design faculty across the country and across a range of educational Page 12.92.2institutions still feel that the leaders of engineering schools( deans
Paper ID #22096Strategies for Flipping Geology for Engineers with Limited Time and Re-sourcesDr. Kristin M. Sample-Lord P.E., Villanova University Dr. Kristin Sample-Lord is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at Villanova University, with expertise in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. Her research focuses on soil barrier systems for protection of human health and the environment and geotech- nical aspects of stormwater control measures. Dr. Sample-Lord teaches a number of undergraduate and graduate courses, including Geology for Engineers, Soil Mechanics and
preparation of site plans; paving, grading, drainage, and utility plans; stormwater management design; sanitary sewer lift station design; and off-site improvements. In addition, Derrick is one of Kimley-Horn’s regional practice coordinators within the firm’s Wal-Mart development program. Derrick has a BS in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech.Robert Jansen, KB Home Robert F. Jansen is Vice President of Land Development for the Mid Atlantic Division of KB Home. He is responsible for overseeing all entitlement and land development activities for all of KB Home’s communities throughout the Mid Atlantic area. Bob has spent 26 years in the field of Land Development. Upon graduation from Virginia
through thesix milestones project assignments in tandem with the six course themes: Our Grand Challenges;Systems and Sustainability; Evaluating Sustainability; Creating- Sustainable Design Process;Creating- Sustainable Design Principles; and Creating- Finding Deep Simplicity. For thesemester project, students first identify their Grand Challenge and, optionally, form teams. Eachunit is required to perform background research to understand the Grand Challenge, its impact onsociety and stakeholders, inherent cultural or ethical considerations, and relevant cause-and-effect relationships. Students then define minimum requirements for success and constraints,create a best-case scenario, and develop criteria for which they can evaluate solutions
balance principles by incorporating a deliberate systematicapproach. Indeed, for our students to tackle the grand challenges of this century, they must beable to understand the inherent interconnectedness of global and regional environmental systems.Introduction The environmental engineering discipline employs fundamentals of mass balance alongwith engineering design principles to develop solutions for environmental challenges. A numberof these challenges are specifically addressed as grand challenges of the 21st century such asensuring a sustainable supply of food, water, and energy to underdeveloped areas, curbingclimate change while simultaneously adapting to its impacts, eliminating waste and waste-creating practices, and creating
acquire and apply new knowledge in this area astheoretical content and new practical applications emerge. Practitioners are meeting the needs ofsustainable infrastructure design in diverse ways, so it follows that understanding case studies ofsustainable infrastructure design provides innovation and insights as they occur. Servicelearning, a community-responsive expression of experiential learning, is a reciprocal learningframework which provides access to practitioner’s innovations alongside an opportunity forstudents to strengthen engineering design and analysis skills, with the potential for substantivecommunity impact [5]. In this case study, students reciprocate the insight gained from thepractitioners with ISI Envision credit assessments
foradditional questions. The best practice is to attach Table 5.1a to each transcript clearly showinghow each course on the student’s transcript satisfies the established curriculum, especially forelective courses. This can be particularly helpful for a practitioner PEV who does not deal withtranscripts on a daily basis. In cases where there is a variation from the established curriculum,attach a waiver or memorandum which acknowledges the variation and explains the reasoningbehind it.Finally, it is very important to remember that PEVs are volunteers. They give of their time toserve the profession on top of already busy schedules. As a courtesy among professionals, it isimportant that programs put forth their best effort via high quality and well
. Toaddress this, we developed a framework that helps students (1) understand the relevance ofcontent in lower-level civil engineering courses to real-life applications, (2) make connectionsthrough course content across civil engineering sub-disciplines, as well as non-engineeringcourses, and (3) understand impacts and create value in the broader, holistic perspective of theirprojects.Additionally, we created a common project platform upon which to build and further developproject objectives in selected required technical design courses. This will facilitate the synthesisof all sub-discipline components to fit together as part of the overall system. The framework wasintroduced in the freshman introduction to design course with the intent for it to be
laboratory are provided a digital scale for weight, a1000-mL graduated cylinder, freshwater, and saltwater. They are then asked to develop anexperimental procedure to determine the specific weight of each solution. This procedure mustbe designed to reduce experimental error as much as possible. Students typically revert tomaking multiple measurements, which is in-line with what they have been taught to do intraditional laboratory experiments. Consistently, the students arbitrarily pick a volume tomeasure. It is only through guided questions about other experiments such as measuring velocity,that students realize their impact of measurement error will be decreased by measuring thelargest volume possible. Students can understand how to reduce the
reviewed journal and conference publications. Along with his students and colleagues, he has made over 230 technical presentations at international, national, and regional conferences and at universities. One of Professor Nambisan’s passions is the development of the future workforce, including efforts at the pre-college level. He enjoys working with students. For his contributions as an educator, researcher, and leader, Professor Nambisan has received several awards and honors. Among the awards and honors he has received is a proclamation by the Governor of Nevada designating January 31, 2007 as the ”Professor Shashi Nambisan Day” in recognition of his leadership role in and contributions to enhancing transportation
years, eleven of which he spent as faculty at the United States Military Academy. Page 23.922.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 National Trends in the Civil Engineering Major Design Experience: Part DeuxIntroductionAccording to the 2012-2013 ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, “Studentsmust be prepared for engineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major designexperience based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporatingappropriate engineering standards and multiple
included in this category are: an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility; an ability to communicate effectively; the broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic,environmental, and societal context; a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage inlife-long learning; and a knowledge of contemporary issues. In addition, ASCE advocates theadoption of the Body of Knowledge (BOK) by civil engineering programs, which includesadditional “soft” outcomes on public policy and leadership. How to insure students are obtainingthese outcomes is obviously program specific and many programs struggle with how to includethese outcomes in an already “packed” technical curriculum. As such
running multi-disciplinary, PBL-based design courses are discussed.IntroductionIn 2005, Friedman published The World is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century,where he describes the rapidly changing and highly competitive marketplace that existstoday1. Friedman makes a strong case for the need to better prepare for this marketplace.However, the engineering and engineering education communities were aware ofFriedman’s “Flat World” well before the book was published. In the 1990’s, it had beenobserved that engineering graduates needed improvement in real-world skills such asdesign, teamwork, and communication, as well as a better understanding of howengineering projects fit into bigger pictures2,3. These skills are significantly differentfrom
: Application, Level 4: Analysis, Level 5:Synthesis, and Level 6: Evaluation. Only three of the 24 outcomes require Level 6 as the lowerbound acceptable level of achievement: Design, Technical Specialization, and Professional andEthical Responsibility.“The [bachelor of science in civil engineering] BSCE has been treated as the defacto terminaldegree for practice for over 100 years.”6 With the BOK2, successful attainment of the level ofachievement necessary for each outcome also relies on experience gained through a master’sdegree, or approximately 30 semester credit hours of graduate-level studies, as well as pre-licensure experience. Although the “fledgling engineer” is the one responsible for ensuringachievement, many entities are expected to assist
program in mechanical engineering at Ohio University, under the auspices of the Afghan Merit Scholars Program.Aziz Gulistani, Kabul University Aziz Ahmad Gulistani holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Kabul University in Kabul, Afghanistan. He has served as an Assistant Professor (Pohialay) at Kabul University for one year, an adjunct instructor at the National Military Academy of Afghanistan for one semester, and a practicing design engineer for eighteen months at 18 months at the Amu Construction Company. He is currently enrolled in the master’s degree program in civil engineering at Ohio University, under the auspices of the Afghan Merit Scholars Program
experiences.Constraints in curriculum expansion set by state mandates make it difficult to add additionalcourses as graduation requirements, even one credit hour seminar courses, so the program wasspecifically developed to tie into an existing course, CEE 463, “Civil Engineering Professions.”The combination of a general lecture and a course component allows for impact on the entireCEE student body while imposing a required component on graduating seniors. One potentialbenefit of this approach is that by the time students reach their senior year, they have a betterunderstanding of societal and global impacts than they would have if they were only exposed to aseminar class in their senior year.Program DevelopmentTwo components were developed to address the goals
creativity throughout the semester and apply it in ageneral sense to civil engineering design. This lab session is a good fit for this class, and afterhaving had the students “practice” their creative skills the entire semester, it seems prudent tobegin to bridge the general idea of creativity with the reality of implementation in engineeringdesign. The students really enjoy this final preliminary design project. For this lab assignment,students are tasked with putting together a preliminary civil engineering design of a newhospital. Students are given a fictitious piece of property (see figure 4) and told that the hospitalcan be located anywhere on the property map, with the exception of displacing the neighborhoodfarm house. The only other general
company. Some are university-wide and some are discipline (i.e., engineering) only. Most charge a fee to participate to cover overhead and some discretionary support for student programs. Industrial Partnerships Not Usually CultivatedResearch Teaching-focused schools have gifted faculty who can impact local industry through consulting that is research, analysis, or design support.Career Center Primary mission is career fairs, resume development, and search engines for internships and fulltime positions. These centers need to be a data