having an integrated lecture-labformat with continuous active participation of the students, immediate reinforcement of theengineering principles provided during lecture is offered. “Students learn best when they areactively involved in the process. Researchers report that, regardless of the subject matter, Page 12.1618.15students working in small groups tend to learn more of what is taught and retain it longer thanwhen the same content is presented in other instructional formats. Students who work incollaborative groups also appear more satisfied with their classes.”11Bibliography1. Vander Schaaf, R. and Klosky, J.L., “Show Me the Money!” Using
Paper ID #30757Examining Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Solving anIll-Structured Problem in Civil EngineeringSecil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University Secil Akinci-Ceylan is a PhD student in Educational Technology in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, Michigan State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Michigan State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of
geotechnical design report, which provided them an excellentopportunity to develop their communications skills.To encourage students to think about the material in greater detail and provide a goodopportunity to integrate what they were being taught into other areas, students were asked tokeep a weekly journal. They were asked to reflect on each exam, project, and weeklyassignments. At the end of each lesson, the One-Minute Paper5 was used to monitor studentlearning and address students’ misconceptions and preconceptions. Students were typicallyasked to write a concise summary of the presented topic, write an exam question for the topic, oranswer a big-picture question from the material that was presented in the current or previouslesson in 60
young minds to engineering careers includingtransportation. The literature documents that experiential learning approaches are extremelyeffective in this regard5. That is when context-based (or authentic) educational strategies that linkreal-world situations to concepts and principles are adopted by teachers. Such approaches areextremely effective at helping students attain a deeper and long-term understanding of thesubject materials, which in turn stir their interest in their learning environment.The Next Generation Science Standards emphasize inquiry-based curriculum, instruction, andassessment and provide guidelines for science teaching and learning. Science inquiry“encompasses not only an ability to engage in inquiry but an understanding of
industry.Hunt and Detloff5 conducted a case study of an interdisciplinary capstone engineering design andoutlined how it was associated with the recently revised ABET student outcomes (1 through 7).Padmanabhan et al6 describes how North Dakota State University has recently refined theircapstone course experience to use real-world projects that integrate students, faculty, andpracticing professionals.CE493/4 – Civil Engineering Capstone Design I & II (Design Build Project)Project Background: Fahnestock State Park is located on the east side of the Hudson Rivernear Cold Spring, NY, and about thirty minutes away from West Point. Several of the bridgeswere washed out or damaged during Hurricane Sandy in 2012. Some of the bridges werereplaced with
details the integration of Poll Everywhere into an engineering classroom whichallowed students to integrate their smartphones into the classroom discussion to provide instantfeedback to the instructor on their knowledge of a topic. Students in the classroom answeredtrue/false, multiple choice and free response questions created by the instructor before class or inreal time. Each response was sent to the instructor in the form of a text message that couldappear on a PowerPoint slide or the computer screen. The study saw an increase in studentmotivation and participation, as well as a more informed and confident instructor. This wasparticularly valuable due to diverse student body in the classroom, many of whom were reluctantto participate in hand
) at the U.S.Military Academy (USMA) scattered their various directions in pursuit of research activities,service endeavors, and much needed vacation, the Department convened a Strategic PlanningSession shortly after the 2016 graduation. Topics such as an update to the Department’s Missionand Vision, curriculum modifications, and budget constraints were on the agenda during themulti-day, off-site discussions. Unlike many organizations, the collaborative culture withinC&ME meant there was room at the discussion table for all members of the Department acrossall academic levels and support positions. The Department typically tries to conduct suchsessions every three to four years.Among the multiple strategic outcomes generated during this
(BOK) which directly references the capstone experience as an integral part of thetraditional pathway to attain basic skills in (5) “outcomes”. The narrative developed hereinpresents a brief literature review for historic cataloguing of past capstone inventories, describesthe design of a survey inventorying civil engineering and related field senior design coursesacross the country, summarizes the survey responses received, and presents findings on thepreparedness of programs’ ability to formally assess learning aligned with ASCE’s BOKoutcomes.Literature ReviewSenior Design or “Capstone” classes are a culminating academic experience for students,typically, at the end of their academic program. These courses prepare students for workfollowing
teaching and research interests in earthquake engineering and timber buildings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Development and Implementation of a Final Year Civil Engineering Capstone Project – Successes, Lessons Learned, and Path Forward1 Introduction and Overview of the Capstone ProjectThis paper covers the development and implementation of a final year Civil Engineering CapstoneProject at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. The Capstone project is based on a CivilEngineering design office experience, and allows students to experience authentic involvementwith a real-world, open-ended project. Students integrate their technical knowledge by workingin teams to deliver an
Paper ID #26223Factors Contributing to the Problem-Solving Heuristics of Civil EngineeringStudentsMr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil Engineering with a focus in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. He is currently conducting Engineering Education research while pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include problem solving, decision making, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an
this they gained the ability of being mobile to work in the international civilengineering business environment.Development and Organization of the Program The common ECEM-program is a unique program; it is a rather short undergraduatebachelor curriculum, but nevertheless it - offers a variety of different host countries; - integrates 1 year of study abroad; - includes some practical experience abroad; - gives the possibility of double diploma certificates. When ECEM started in 1992, the students had to study three semesters abroad, one ofwhich was a complete practical placement semester. At that time Poland was not an EU-member. So, it was extremely difficult to get a work permit for each of the students. At thattime
inthis paper) and geomatics. At that time, the infrastructure course was envisioned as includingwater and wastewater, solid waste and basic transportation, topics not covered elsewhere in thecurriculum due to our large and humanities-heavy core requirements. As part of this initial refit,it was thought that dynamics and electrical engineering would be covered in a consolidatedcourse, and we would work with the electrical engineering department to ensure that some powerand power distribution content, considered essential, would be included in the consolidatedcourse. By 2010, West Point’s Civil Engineering Program had undergone an ABET visit andconsiderable further work had been done on the curriculum reform, and the results of that workwere
feel that advantages of the MS management option described above include: (1) an effectivetreatment of issues faced in the management of a civil engineering company, (2) a valuablestructured leadership/mentoring/management experience for graduate students enrolled, (3) aforum that allows practicing engineers to share professional expertise directly with students, and(4) a strengthening of our department’s undergraduate culminating design experienceThe breadth and depth of the subjects covered in this two class sequence provides an adequatecoverage of the issues faced by graduates whose careers result in leading team efforts andmanaging an engineering office. Our current ABET accredited curriculum coupled with thebroad general education and
equipping students with relevant skills, an overviewof professional engagement, and a major project. The major project for the course involvedteams of 3-4 students working to design one of two civil engineering challenges: either a 20-footcantilevered wooden bridge or a 25-foot diameter wooden tripod. There were two fundamentalpurposes to the course: students were to learn more about their specific discipline so as toestablish realistic goals and motivations for their education and career, and students were tocomplete a major project in order to develop teamwork skills, integrate into the program, andbuild confidence in their ability to overcome intimidating challenges. These initiatives wereintended to improve student engagement with the course
resources.Project Integration into CourseIn Marshall University’s “Hydrologic Engineering” course (enrollment = 12), students learned ofthe course project on the first day of the course, when the basic principles of combined sewers,wet-weather flows, and rainfall-runoff relationships were also introduced in an introductory andqualitative way. The problem of combined sewer backups was used as a conceptual outline forthe course, highlighting different aspects of what contributes to the problem and how each can bequantified or understood. In a single 50-minute lecture, students were exposed to ideas such astemporal distribution of precipitation, time of concentration, degree of imperviousness of landcover, variation in infiltration capacity of soil, and
engineering curriculum byintroducing an activity into an existing course where students learned about unmanned aerialvehicles (UAVs) and aerial photogrammetry. Our use of UAVs was motivated by theincreasingly common industry practice of using aerial systems for monitoring buildings andenvironments. We integrated this activity into an existing civil engineering elective course titled‘Heavy Construction Methods.’ In the classroom, students learned about the principles of UAVsand aerial photogrammetry. Students then practiced these principles by observing a UAV flight(conducted by a FAA licensed drone pilot), setting and recording coordinates for ground controlpoints, collecting field data, and using Autodesk software (Recap, Recap Photo, and Civil 3d
developed that facilitates integration of these products inexisting civil engineering curriculum. The SHRP 2 Education Connection program serves as anexcellent pedagogical tool to each civil engineering student by providing knowledge of SHRP2products and their impacts on community before they start their careers as transportation engineer.In the first round of SHRP2 Education Connection, faculty members from Rowan University hadsuccessfully integrated (SHRP2) solutions and products in the CEE curriculum (i.e., in fall 2015and spring 2016 semesters). Mehta et al [1] reported that the vertical integration of SHRP2 products from freshman year todoctoral level resulted, not only in an increased understanding of the role of each SHRP2 productin
teaching design courses to be professionallylicensed, possess extensive professional experience in the fields being taught, and to maintaincontemporary knowledge by ongoing professional practice. Another means of achieving thisgoal is by effectively integrating practitioners into the faculty and curriculum to provide thenecessary practical experience.Desired Program Outcomes and the Need for Faculty with Professional Practice ExpertiseThe ABET, Inc. General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs18 contain eleven (a throughk) specific stated program outcomes. Although all apply to professional practice to a degree,several have a clear and direct connection:(c) An ability to design…within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental
AC 2012-3084: INTEGRATING THE CHARRETTE PROCESS INTO EN-GINEERING EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY ON A CIVIL ENGINEER-ING DESIGN CAPSTONE COURSEDr. Michelle Renee Oswald, Bucknell University Michelle Oswald, a LEED AP, is an Assistant Professor at Bucknell University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Her focus is in sustainable transportation planning and sustainable engi- neering education. She completed her doctoral degree in civil engineering at the University of Delaware, along with a master’s of civil engineering degree, and a master;s of arts in urban affairs and public policy. She received a bachelor of science in civil and environmental engineering from Lafayette College.Dr. Arthur D. Kney
Paper ID #21651Bridging the Gap: a Co-taught Field Course with Integrated History andCivil Engineering ContentDr. Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He imple- ments classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of an
bachelor’s curriculum that had not been comprehensivelyupdated in ten years, the time was right.The co-terminal program was crafted to appeal to students as they considered various institutionsfor transfer or from high school. An opt-out approach was chosen such that students would beconsidered master’s-seeking students from their freshman or transfer year and would declareeither the BS or the BS/MS in the spring of their third year. With a 3.0 GPA cutoff, the facultyfelt this would function as an incentive for students to focus on their academics earlier and moreearnestly in their first few years. It has the added benefit of marketing the profession’s intendedacademic credential, a graduate degree, directly to students entering college for the
knowledge, skills, and attitudes outlined by ASCE are obtained through formalstructured education, and other parts are obtained through focused professional experience aftergraduation. The Curriculum Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites forProfessional Practice (CAP3) was charged with two fundamental tasks regarding the formaleducation component, namely: ‚ Determine the current status of civil engineering education in relation to the formal educational component of the BOK, and ‚ Determine the nature of change necessary to support the formal educational expectations of the BOK. Presented in this paper is an extended summary of the work of the committee. The primarytopics addressed in the
Villanova University promise "to add its influence to the search for world peace and justice by means of its academic programs and the pastoral ministry it provides for the members of the community." In fulfilling this promise, the OIS views its mission as one that enhances and strengthens the University's commitment to diversity, intellectual growth, and a global perspective. Thus, the OIS is committed to ensuring that an international educational perspective is an integral part of a Villanova University education.The OIS mission statement segues with the academic strategic plan of the university (synopsiscan be found at http://www.vpaa.villanova.edu/academicstrategicplan/goals.pdf). Specifically,the
and structural engineerscompeting together in the AISC competition2 and architects from Iowa State and ARCE studentsfrom Cal Poly collaborating on the design of a building3. Two advanced electives in the collegecomprise excellent interdisciplinary experiences. ARCE x410 Building Cladding, is an electivecourse team taught by members of the ARCE, CM and ARCH departments where REVIT is thesoftware platform4. CM 431, Integrated Project Delivery which is offered every quarter andalready has an enrollment of over 50 ARCE, CM, and ARCH students is the most likelycandidate for expansion. In addition, ARCE 453 Senior Project includes a variety ofinterdisciplinary efforts. The project described herein is one example.The current plan is to develop a
analysis scripting tool, such as R. Use of a scriptlanguage was a challenge on its own. CEE students are required to take an introductorycomputing class in the CS department, which currently covers coding in Python and MATLAB,but this class was not a pre-requisite for the ER&U class in the considered semester. Therefore,my assumption was that the student body of the class (similar to those in previous semesters) hadlimited coding experience. For this reason, R was introduced as an “smart app, useful toscientists and engineers” and it was integrated in a guided form, using base R functions, asneeded for class purposes. R is taught through its use for the purposes of the class, not as anindividual class topic.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
years tofacilitate direct assessment of student outcomes. The RosE Portfolio is a web-based system thatallows students to electronically submit what they believe to be the best examples of their ownwork illustrating achievement of learning outcomes. In order to submit to the electronicportfolio, students access their portfolio using an internet browser. Students must log in toensure the integrity of the data. Once logged in, students choose from the list of criteria thatsupport the various outcomes. At this time we have 35 criteria that support 11 outcomes. Page 12.1525.3Students upload the pertinent file, provide a descriptive title, and
Executive Summary in the BOK2 is: “The manner in which CivilEngineering is practiced must change.”11 Recognizing the need to positively change a process, acurriculum, or even a specific course, is the essence of continuous improvement. Mapping theBOK2 outcomes to the capstone sequence was an important first step, but faculty recognized theneed to effect additional improvements.Although there is always an academic aspect to every assignment in an engineering curriculum,faculty decided that there needed to be a better academia/real world balance in the capstone.Faculty agreed that one way to strike this balance would be to revise the course deliverables tomore closely reflect actual project deliverables. Figure 3 is the revised deliverable timeline
Paper ID #16935Crowdsourcing an Outline for a Model Introductory Infrastructure CourseUsing a Modified Delphi ProcessDr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Philip Parker, Ph.D., P.E., is Program Coordinator for the Environmental Engineering program at the Uni- versity of Wisconsin-Platteville. He is co-author of the textbook ”Introduction to Infrastructure” published in 2012 by Wiley. He has helped lead the recent efforts by the UW-Platteville Civil and Environmental Engineering department to revitalize their curriculum by adding a sophomore-level infrastructure course and integrating
testing to become a Certified Construction Manager through theirtesting agency, Construction Manager Certification Institute. The basis of sitting for the CCMexam designation is meeting the requirements of graduation from an accredited university and 48months of Responsible-in-Charge project experience or no degree but 12 years of generaldesign/construction experience. Both organizations require member’s adherence to their code ofethics and both organizations require continuing education of their members to maintain theircertifications. Having either designation provides ample proof of the constructor’s commitmentto the industry and their integrity as a construction professional.The civil engineering constructor will be expected to lead
included critical thinking, analytical thinking,information literacy, interpersonal skills, safety, engineering economics, creativity andinnovation, information technology, legal aspects, systems engineering, civil learning andengagement, and licensure.Finally, the BOK3TC also considered the possible inclusion of both the cognitive andaffective domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy in the BOK3 [5, 6]. The cognitive domain, whichwas used in the BOK2, describes the development of intellectual skills, ranging from thesimple recollection of specific facts to the integration and evaluation of complex ideas andconcepts [3]. The affective domain, which was referenced in an appendix of the BOK2 butwas not formally part of the BOK2 outcomes, describes an