capstone course, found that a problem-based learning format requiredsignificantly more time due to the additional feedback for students, and that a team-building Page 26.1412.2exercise could strengthen communication between student teams and the instructor 7. Problem-based learning has also been implemented into an entire civil engineering curriculum at theUniversity of Colorado, reporting promising evidence for future pursuit 8. Some report thatstudents gain twice the learning from problem-based learning compared to traditional lecture 9.Several key studies examined the impact of the learning environment. Grulke et al. found thatstudents in a
their understanding of other countries andcultures (93% essential or very important). It is important to note that knowing this informationwill allow us to direct resources to fulfilling this high expectation for our incoming classes. Menare also interested in study abroad, thus this effort would have implications for the recruitment ofmen. During the focus group discussions, one man stated that he investigated each university hewas considering attending to be sure he could fit in study abroad with his curriculum. This wouldsuggest that study abroad is an important aspect in recruiting all students, but it may beespecially important to advertise these programs when recruiting women. Increasing studyabroad opportunities has been a focus of the
2008 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Pittsburg, PA.13. Hanus, J. P., Russell, J. S., (2007). “Integrating the Development of Teamwork, Diversity, Leadership, and Communication Skills into a Capstone Design Course.” Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Honolulu, HI.14. Meyer, F., Conley, C., Hanus, J., Klosky, L. (2008). “A Global Curriculum to Support Civil Engineering in Developing Nations.” Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Pittsburg, PA.15. Williams, K. and Pender, G. (2006). “Problem-Based Learning Approach to Construction
and appurtenancesmust be underpinned and supported in place to avoid damages. Additionally, on heavy civilprojects requiring heavy construction equipment, there is always the need for trestles andequipment bridges used as temporary access. What is unique about these topical areas is that theyfall under the subject area called temporary structures, which happens to fall outside the requiredcurriculum of the CM (construction management) and ConE or CEM (construction engineeringor construction engineering management) programs in the US. The objective of this paper istwofold. The first is to make the case for including temporary structures as a required part of theCM, ConE or CEM curriculum, and secondly, to recommend an instructional design
civil engineering curricula and to facilitate broad adoptionof the new BOK concepts in civil engineering education, CAP^3 established the BOKEducational Fulfillment Committee (BOKEdFC) in early 2008. This new committee was chargedwith (1) fostering the creation of a learning community of scholars interested in engineeringeducational reform, (2) reviewing the work products of the Body of Knowledge Committee andproviding feedback, and (3) documenting how programs can incorporate the Body of Knowledgeinto their curriculum. A key input to this work is the second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century. The “companion paper” by Nelson, Fridley, and Hallprovides an insight into this committee’s work.25The Body of
1995. His research interests are in the areas of knowledge modeling, water and energy sustainability, engineering learning modules for freshmen, and international collaboration. He leads a major curriculum reform project (2004-09), funded under the department-level reform program of the NSF, at Virginia Tech. A spiral curriculum approach is adopted to reformulate engineering curriculum in bioprocess engineering in this project. He co-authored an award winning paper with his PhD student at the 2007 annual conference of ASEE. He received the College of Engineering Faculty Fellow award in 2008.Chelsea Green, Virginia Tech Chelsea Green is a graduate student in the Department of Civil and
. Page 23.1106.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Student Projects in Engineering History and HeritageAbstractUniversity undergraduate engineering programs have technical components as well as generaleducation and liberal arts components. Often, the various components are not integrated well,and students may not see the relationships between technology and history. On the other hand,non-engineering students very rarely take engineering courses, and thus may graduate with verylimited understanding of engineering and technology and their roles in society. At ClevelandState University, a course entitled ESC 200 Engineering History and Heritage has beendeveloped to allow students to
topics. This multi-pronged effort aims to improve DEI outcomes througha variety of new practices in curriculum, course staffing, and logistics.2.3.1. Integration of historical and modern-day techno-social content and discussion. In a typicalintroductory computational science and engineering curriculum, the only “historical voices” thatappear are those people who have left their names on the subject's core algorithms andtechniques (e.g., Newton, Euler, Riemann, Dirichlet, von Neumann, Runge, Kutta). Althougheach of these individuals played an instrumental role in founding numerical computation,limiting the curriculum to these names creates the harmful misconception that this field onlycounts “dead white men” amongst its champions.To diversify the
. 90 no. 7 (Oct) p. 36-42 3. McKee, Sally A.; Kubarek, Diane M. Real-World Engineering: A Course for Masters Students Headed for Industry Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference. v. 2 (2003) p. F1E16-F1E21 Engineering as a Human Endeavor: Partnering Community, Academia, Government, and Industry. Westminster, CO, United States, Nov 5-8 2003. Sponsored by IEEE Education Society, IEEE Computer Society, And American Society for Engineering Education, The University of Colorado. Conference code: 62139 4. Aglan, H. A., Ali, S. F. October 1996,“Hands –On Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp 327-330. 5. Goldberg, D.E., April 1996, “Change in
Abstract A two semester senior level capstone design course has been restructured (Senior Design I and II) in response to the outcomes defined by the industry to assure job ready engineers and outcomes set by the academicians to assure math and science based fundamentals. The restructuring purpose was also to align the course outcomes with the college mission of graduating „Career- Ready‟ engineers. The department offers programs in civil engineering and construction engineering. Both program curriculums require a two semester course on a comprehensive design application. The courses are designed to meet specific ABET outcomes. Also to meet an additional program outcome of: students are able to explain
Engineering Program solution: a new course added to the curriculum toensure coverage of the professional topics in the title as well as other professional skillsat a time when the program was teaching its senior level courses for the first time duringthe ABET record year (2007-2008). The new course was CENG 4341 Leadership, PublicPolicy, Business Practices, and Asset Management which would provide coverage of thethree new outcomes in the BOK which are represented by program outcome 9 as well asdemonstration of parts of Outcomes 6, 7, and 8.9 Formal assignment of embeddedindicators to courses based on perceived ability to demonstrate an outcome to includeCENG 4341 provided the best odds at being BOK compliant and passing the ABET visit.The result
one.Modularization and Study Load (ECTS)In addition all curricula have to be taught or learned in modules, which is more an educationin a series of “pieces” rather than the former more “all-in-one” approach. All modules as wellas the total curriculum have to come with a description of the study load of the “normal”student. This study load is at least the time necessary for a “normal” student to fulfill thedemands of the study program and to successfully finish his studies. The study load of onesemester is 30 ECTS-credits, which are awarded to the successful student per semester. - ECTS stands for European Credit Transfer (and Accumulation) System. – The basis for anormal work load is very much comparable to the normal work time in any normalprofession
AC 2007-1513: ENHANCING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCE IN CIVILENGINEERINGShashi Nambisan, Iowa State University Shashi Nambisan, PhD, PE: Director of the Center for Transportation Research and Education and Professor of Civil Engineering at Iowa State University (ISU), Ames, Iowa. Prior to coming to ISU, Shashi was at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) from July 1989 to January 2007. He enjoys working with students and he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in the area of Transportation systems as well as the undergraduate capstone design course sequence. An active researcher, Shashi has led efforts on over 130 research projects that have addressed and responded to
engineers. Senior engineers commonlymentioned working extra hours on writing tasks when they started in practice, knowing that thehours could not be billed to a client but trusting that the effort would pay off later in being able towrite more quickly and easily. Finally, all the practitioners referred to looking at previousdocuments produced by the firm, using them at first to learn typical organization andexpressions, and later using them as templates for new documents. For most firms, much work isroutine. Thus, it is rare that an entirely new document with new organization and new ways ofdescribing content has to be created from scratch.Teaching ApplicationsBased on the findings of our research, we believe it is important to integrate writing
hadopportunities to work with two professional surveyors from an engineering company to gainreal-life engineering experience. In addition, two undergraduate student assistants were availableto facilitate students in the field work. The projects benefited the University by providingnecessary traverse and leveling surveying data to help create a baseline map for the easement.The projects were integrated into the curriculum as service-learning to enrich the studentlearning experience. It has accomplished an education goal by engaging students in a real-lifeproject applying the skills and knowledge learned from the class. As presented in Figure 2,students used advanced surveying equipment including total stations and automatic levels tomeasure the elevations
integrated into Gonzaga's existing civil engineering curriculum while at thesame time providing Spokane County with an opportunity to prepare for the 2018 NPDES permitchanges by having students evaluate different BMP monitoring systems and the effectiveness ofthe BMP . The project started in the fall of 2013 as a civil engineering capstone design projectwith a team of students designing a multi-cell bio-infiltration pond equipped with a differentmonitoring systems. Year one activities are described in the case study section of this paper.During the summer of 2014, construction of the bio-infiltration pond BMP and monitoringsystems will occur on Gonzaga's campus. Post construction plans for this project are described inthe Future Plans and
freshmancourse, Civil Engineering Concept Design Studio, for one of the three classes. The paper willbriefly describe the progress of trial teaching in the Fall semester of 2014 as well as that ofthe pilot curriculum in the Fall of 2015. Major elements of futures thinking and fundamentalcivil engineering design concepts extracted during the process of incorporation will bepresented along with an assessment of student learning. Suggestions for future curricularimplementation will also be made.Introduction This paper describes an experimental project that introduces futures thinking into afreshman cornerstone course in a civil engineering curriculum in response to calls for reformin engineering education. Through collaboration between civil
Delaware Valley Geo-Institute, and the Chair of the Continuing Education Committee for the Geo-Institute. Dr. Welker teaches a variety of geotechnical engineering courses and her research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures.Dr. Seri Park, Villanova University Seri Park, PhD, P.T.P., is an Assistant Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Villanova University. She is serving as a member of Villanova’s International Students and Schol- ars as well as a member of the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee for the CEE Department. She is also the faculty advisor of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Student Chapter at Villanova and member of Villanova’s
universities campuses will eventuallybelieve that civil engineering graduates should have the ability to perform PtD in order to fulfilltheir ethical duties, especially related to social sustainability. Third, the author believes thatteaching PtD provides instructors with a compelling context to teach underlying issues relating toengineering ethics, social sustainability, collaborative and integrated design, life cycle safety,and public policy.The author is a proponent of the PtD but not naive to the challenges of adding any to topic orcompetency to an already full civil engineering curriculum. The paper is intended to helpfacilitate the adoption of PtD into civil engineering education by summarizing the concept andprocesses of PtD, discussing
, I developed a strong interest in structural engineering. As a result, I decided to focus on this discipline for the remainder of my undergraduate career, learning as much as possible through my professors and related course-work. I opted to continue my education after having completed my Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering. As a result, I decided to return to my Alma mater to complete a Master’s curriculum with a focus in structural engineering. After completing my Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering in May of 2013, I accepted an internship opportunity with Walter P Moore in Dallas, Texas. During this internship, I worked with the Diagnostics Services Group analyzing structural issues and problems with
techniquessuch as the integration of teaming into the course, writing assignments, oral presentations, etc.This may not be apparent from looking at a course syllabus and it can also vary when there aremultiple sections of the same course. When the map is completed, it is possible to not onlyunderstand how well and in what ways the curriculum supports learning related to the outcome,but also enables the program to collect data in an efficient and meaningful way.Assessment methodologyAssessment is more than just collecting data. It includes the processes of making decisionsabout where to collect the data, how many data should be collected, development of thetechniques of data collection, analysis of data collected and developing the report of results
Paper ID #32697Software Strategies for Team Functionality Support in Capstone CoursesDr. Ryan Solnosky P.E., Pennsylvania State University Ryan Solnosky is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University at University Park. Dr. Solnosky has taught courses for Architec- tural Engineering, Civil Engineering, and Pre-Major Freshman in Engineering. He received his integrated Bachelor of Architectural Engineering/Master of Architectural Engineering (BAE/MAE), and PhD. de- grees in architectural engineering from The Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Solnosky is
an engineering discipline. Theengineers of tomorrow must be able to apply concepts from STEM, the humanities, and thesocial sciences in order to win and remain competitive in the marketplace.The unfortunate truth is that many college graduates enter the workforce without significantinterdisciplinary experience. In fact, some professions have traditionally excluded populationsfrom participation within their own community practices [5]. Even those college students that areexposed to a diverse curriculum often lack the ability to communicate effectively with audiencesoutside their discipline and to integrate their in-depth understanding of their area of expertise intoa broader, multi-disciplinary context to solve problems. This is not primarily
Page 25.957.6 “it’s hard to judge because this was the only lab where was behind the schedule in we hadn’t learned the curriculum yet.” terms of technical status of the Students thought the experience would have been course. better if done later in the course Students thought the experience was a helpful introduction to real world engineering work Students recommended that the experience start with a This method had been whole-class interactive video between campuses to integrated to other aspects of introduce the project the broader project when
a full-scale prefabricated lattice structure as a part of a two-day course on design and construction of spatial structures organised by ArchiVision Company in Shiraz, Iran 1.2. IntroductionDesign of structures, in general, and that of spatial structures, in particular, can be consideredas an integrated process involving the following main steps: Arrangement of the main structural components to satisfy the needs of a structural project referred to as the ‘Conceptual Design’, which
throughout a civil engineering curriculum. Course assessment, studentfeedback, and how just in time learning links to student learning styles will be presented.1.0 IntroductionWhat is just in time learning? As defined by Word Spy: “The acquisition of knowledge orskills as they are needed.”1 This definition sums up how many of the students currently inschool appear to learn. In fact, first the use of laptop computers and now the use of Appson phones are pushing this process to be the norm. When the author teaches a freshmanIntroduction to Engineering course, numerous students search their phones or laptops andprovide insightful information to the conversation. Of course, the freshman engineeringcourse is only an introduction and spends a lot of time
adapted to integrate into other courses. All course materials areavailable through the Canvas learning management system (LMS) at no cost.During the Summer of 2020, members in the CIT-E CoP began exploring the question “whatimpact has CIT-E had?” Intentional evaluation at our workshops had demonstrated that theworkshops were effective in meeting their outcomes, including building a sense of communityand helping attendees learn new skills. Another important and far-reaching impact was thecreation and use of the model introductory infrastructure course materials. And we could point topowerful anecdotes as an indicator of our impact, such as a colleague who has organized twonational infrastructure conferences in Ghana attributing his activity to the
Engineer in California and Missouri.Lt. Col. Brad C. McCoy, United States Military Academy Brad C. McCoy is a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army, and currently an Asst. Professor in the De- partment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering and the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He holds a BS degree in civil engineering from USMA (2001), and MS and PhD degrees in civil engineering from North Carolina State University (2011 and 2019). Brad is a licensed Professional Engineer (Missouri). His research interests include sustainable infrastructure development, sustainable construction materials, and engineering education.Col. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military
Paper ID #34013Gratitude and Graph Theory in the Time of CoronavirusProf. Gerald J. Wang, Carnegie Mellon University Jerry Wang is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Mechanical Engineer- ing (by courtesy) and Chemical Engineering (by courtesy), at Carnegie Mellon University. He received his BS in 2013 from Yale University (Mechanical Engineering, Mathematics and Physics), SM in 2015 from MIT (Mechanical Engineering), and PhD in 2019 from MIT (Mechanical Engineering and Computation). He performed postdoctoral research at MIT in Chemical Engineering. He is a member of the inaugural cohort
coaching, talent administration), (20).Appendix B is a detailed, small portion of the curriculum provided to illustrate additional detail.Books from which reading assignments are drawn during the MLCE program are listed inAppendix C.These topics are taught by different means, depending on the subject and on the faculty. Allsessions are both theoretical and practical and are directed by engineers in practice andprofessors from academia. Methods such case studies, group dynamics, debate groups,brainstorming, and open discussion are used. In addition, leaders from various companies andpublic sector organizations share their experiences with the students, communicate their ownvision of leadership, and discuss them in an open environment