to most complex. They are: knowledge,comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation, respectively. This taxonomy waslater revised by Anderson et al. (2001), who changed the category descriptors to verbs and swappedthe order of the two most complex categories. They also redefined the cognitive domain fromBloom’s original two dimensional hierarchy of increasing cognitive complexity to a threedimensional intersection of the Cognitive Process Dimension and the Knowledge Dimension. Thecategories defining each dimension are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Current Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy.Figure credit: Iowa State University, Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (Heer
capstone course, and licensure was not a commontopic in either the professional issues or capstone courses. As ASCE considers publishing a thirdedition of the Body of Knowledge (BOK), the profession should consider adding a new licensureoutcome. A professional licensure outcome would influence both the cognitive and affectivedomains of an engineer’s pre-licensure education and clarify that civil engineers must beknowledgeable of professional licensure laws and regulations prior to becoming a licensedprofessional engineer.IntroductionThe civil engineering profession has a very distinct skill set that must be obtained througheducation and experience. [1] The culmination of this process occurs when a state board presentsa civil engineer with a
years of engineering curricula had historically been devoted tothe basic sciences while the last two years had been devoted to engineering sciences. Based onan expressed desire from engineering employers that engineers not only be content experts, butalso have the abilities to communicate and work as a part of a team, some modifications wereintroduced to the traditional sequence to accommodate these needs [1]. Capstone courses wereintroduced into the senior year of engineering curricula in an effort to connect practicalapplications with the more theoretical nature of upper-level courses, helping prepare graduatesfor industry. This shift was moderately successful, but left many students still lacking exposureto practical information about
the survey content focused on technicalskills, these responses were removed from the sample, leaving a total of 95 completed surveys.The distribution of respondents by transportation agency type is summarized in Table 1. Not allquestions were completed by all respondents. For cases of missing data or where respondentswere unsure, those particular entries were removed from the analysis, although the otherquestions for which valid responses were obtained were included in final analysis.Table 1 – Summary of State-of-the-Practice Survey Respondents Agency Type Number of Responses Percent of Total State DOT 17 17.9 Local Agency 23 24.2 National Company 16
ability of future generations to meet their own needs” 1.Additionally, addressing social sustainability meets some of the eight Millennium DevelopmentGoals published by the United Nations in 2015, specifically, Goals 7 and 8, environmentalsustainability and global partnership for development respectively2. The broad vision of thesegoals are to fight poverty in developing countries. To achieve these goals, the United Nations iscurrently assisting developing countries to focus more on sustainable projects relevant to thecommunity. Hence, there is the pressing need to equip civil engineering students with thebroader understanding of sustainability concepts if the long-term goals are to be achieved.Many civil engineering programs now teach the three
in structural engineering education andpractice, including the following:1 Many of the routine tasks traditionally performed by U.S. structural engineers are now performed by computers or by low-cost engineers overseas. Thus, the practice of structural engineering in the U.S. is described as a “shrinking space.” The remaining non-routine structural engineering work is becoming increasingly complex, as a result of advances in building codes and standards, design aids and tools, project delivery methods, and construction materials. To an increasing degree, the graduates of today’s typical baccalaureate civil engineering programs are inadequately prepared for professional practice
such questions provide a “control” to which responses toquestions about sustainability can be compared, thus increasing the value of student surveys forevaluating sustainability in civil engineering education.Research Goal and Key QuestionsThe primary goals of the study described in this paper were to: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness ofeducation in sustainability topics in the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) departmentat Virginia Tech (VT) from the perspective of students by comparing survey responses betweensustainability and engineering mechanics subject areas. 2) Evaluate general student interest invarious sustainability related topics in order to identify which topics students may be mostinterested in learning about in CEE
promoteinnovation through real world projects that connect student to faculty research.1 The goal of theVIP program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering is to add project-based curriculumthroughout the four year undergraduate degree. Increasingly, engineering educators areidentifying this project-based curriculum sequence as the cornerstone to capstone courses – first-year intro to engineering and capstone design curriculum. Vertically Integrated Projects allowstudents to continue developing skills from the first-year engineering design projects:entrepreneurship, innovation, design, teamwork, and leadership. In addition to these professionalskills, these Vertically Integrated Project teams will develop hardware, software, data analysis,planning and
inthe summer and included both face-to-face and online components. Topic coverage fell into oneof three main categories: 1) university employment expectations, 2) course logistics andexpectations, and 3) effective interactions between Mentor TAs and students enrolled in thecourse. Workshop effectiveness was evaluated through a mixed method approach including theuse of pre and post workshop surveys and end of the semester focus group discussions withstudents serving as Mentor TAs as well as post course surveys of course-enrolled students. Acomplete discussion of the developed workshop and the future direction of the program is alsoincluded.Introduction and BackgroundOver the past three years, faculty at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) have
of the project description, listed below. 1. Describe the problem that is being solved, and provide a justification for using Mohr’s Circle as an appropriate approach to solve this problem. 2. Determine the necessary equations to convert the strain rate rosette to stress (in any system of coordinates). Identify key assumptions and limitations. 3. Determine the principal stress and principal planes with respect to the global system of coordinates xy, and plot the Mohr’s Circle by providing to the special MATLAB function the center and radius of the circle. 4. Implement the equations in MATLAB and comment the code accordingly. 5. Complete the provided table (see Appendix A) by following the considerations detailed
Paper ID #18289Growing and Training Effective FacultyDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in the Corps of Engineers for over 24 years including
cannot achieve these goals, unless their implementation is fully supported by all stakeholders which includes, citizens, civil society, private sector, and academia—just to name a few. SDG 6 is to ensure Clean Water and Sanitation (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg6) . It is estimated that nearly three‐quarters of one billion people do not have access to clean water, and this number is projected to substantially increase in the future. Partly spurred by the MDG, more than 2 billion people have been provided access to improved water and sanitation since 1 1990; however, the quality of the drinking water does not typically meet minimum standards2. For example, in Pakistan, access to
). Sadler and Good (2006) also recommended additional methods for measuring theconsistency between the students grades and the teacher grades: (1) rank and Pearson correlation,(2) t test comparing difference in mean grades, (3) effect sizes (difference in mean grades inunits of standard deviation), and (4) chi-square statistic (comparing grade categories). In thisstudy, the authors adopted the “t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means” data analysis using Excel.Sadler and Good’s (2006) found that students tended to assign lower grades to their peers than tothemselves, nevertheless only self-grading of assignments were used in this study to avoid anypotential conflict or violation of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) rulesand
The study was implemented in tandem at two different universities (denoted Univ 1 andUniv 2 in the data comparison tables). University 1 is a small, public, undergraduate onlybaccalaureate university with an art and sciences focus in a rural area of the Mid-Atlantic region.University 2 is a midsized, public, master's university in a medium density city in the West NorthCentral Region. The same semester-long project was assigned in a steel design class at university1 and a reinforced concrete design course at university 2. The background of the students wassimilar at both schools; the students had completed statics, mechanics of materials, and structuralanalysis courses. Most students at university 1 had already completed a reinforced
Mastering Engineering learning system for the textbook Mechanics ofMaterials, 10th Edition, by R. C. Hibbeler, was used together with that textbook for the course.Different educational components in the Mastering system available for use included:1) coaching activities in the form of instructional videos regarding how to solve problems,2) tutorials consisting of problems to be solved that provided a stated learning outcome andintermediate, optional hints to help students if they got stuck, and 3) end-of-section problems thatprovided no intermediate hints and were similar to the textbook homework problems. Inaddition, a “Continuously Adaptive Learning” feature could be specified that looks at studentperformance on the main homework assignment given
learning and group problem solving (Figure 1). These facilities havebeen an important component of producing pedagogical shifts in the KU SOE, but as morefaculty have shifted to student-centered teaching practices, a need for additional in-classinstructional support has become clear. Supporting the shift in teaching practices towardsstudent- centered models was a key motivation for creating the UGTF Program at KU. Figure 1: Active learning classroom in the KU SOEThe KU SOE program was piloted with four UGTFs in two classes in Spring 2015, and hassince grown to a cohort of 28 UGTFs supporting learning activities in 13 classes across theSOE in Spring 2017 (Table 1). A total of 3,603 student credit hours are being impacted
for each source: (1) Does the source affirm aspects of the ASCE BOK2? If so, what and how? (2) Does the source suggest things that may need to be revised or clarified in the BOK? If so, what, why, and how? (3) Does the source suggest things that are missing and should be considered for addition? If so, what, why, and how? (4) Does the source suggest things that should be removed from the BOK? If so, what and why?This paper provides a summary of the findings of the committee relative to the criticalreviews and, based on these findings, provides a well-justified answer to the question “Is ittime for a Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK)?” This paperconcludes with a discussion of the next
allows the introduction of severalintroductory engineering topics that are appropriate for first-year students and applicableto nearly all engineering and science majors, not just limited to civil engineering. Theseinclude conservation of mass and energy, materials selection, fluid flow, andprocess/product design. We were also able to introduce relatively straightforwardlaboratory experiments and a field trip consistent with experiential learning. Examples ofsome of the learning modules are shown in Table 1 below with details provided in thesubsequent text.Table 1: Examples of “Humanitarian Engineering Past & Present” modules related tosanitation in the developing world.Module Name Module TypeWaste
effective. 175 responses were received and analyzed. Evaluation of student responsesindicates broad agreement on the effectiveness of high-impact learning activities. A potentialconcern, however, is that certain critical elements of high-impact teaching strategies, such as“metacognitive thinking” and “questioning”, were not considered important by the students. Wesuggest that additional data be collected to account for variability in students’ learningexperiences and teaching preferences over a longer period of time. 1 IntroductionStudent learning and success is the core objective of any educational institution regardless of thelevel of education. There
experienceswhich makes it difficult to teach online as compared to other disciplines [1]. This leads to manyengineering educators to choose lecture capture—streamed and/or recorded— as a way to servedistance education students. However, this approach does not make use of the capabilities ofquality online learning and fails to engage distance education students [2]. To address thisconcern, an online graduate level civil engineering course was redesigned to increase interactionamongst students and engagement in the material which in return would encourage criticalthinking. This study aimed to explore patterns of interaction and level of critical thinking duringstudent-facilitated online discussions through social networking analysis and content
acquire and apply new knowledge. Interests include environmental engineering, sustainable development and the Envision rating system.Dr. Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech Tripp Shealy is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Sustainability Service Learning as a Mechanism for Acquiring New KnowledgeAbstractEvolving infrastructure needs of our society call for development of engineering students whohave “an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge using appropriate learning strategies,” asstated in ABET student outcome 7 [1]. Parallel to the learning strategy need is an
engineers (e.g. NAE Engineer of2020, [1]). Within the International Engineering Alliance’s ‘Graduate Attributes and ProfessionalCompetencies’ [2] innovation is included among five attributes of complex activities conductedby engineers (EA5, p. 8). The National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) lists among itseight values “innovation through creative application of math, science, and engineering” (p. 6),states that “tomorrow’s successful and relevant professional engineer” will need to be “creativeand innovative” (p. 12), and weaves the ideas of creativity and innovation into four outcomes(engineering science, problem solving, design, and professional attitudes) [3]. Creativity is linkedto design as an outcome in the Environmental Engineering
management experience to her work with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and graduate level education of civil engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The 5Ws of the Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of KnowledgeIntroductionThis paper is a follow-up to updates on the Third Edition of Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge (CEBOK3) that were presented at the 2017 [1] and 2018 [2] ASEE AnnualConventions, and provides a comprehensive overview of the Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge 3 Task Committee’s (CEBOK3TC) effort and the process it followed to complete itscharge. This will be done by focusing
through March2018, the ultimate goal of the initiative was to change state licensure laws, such that a master’sdegree or equivalent would become the academic prerequisite for licensure as a professionalengineer in the U.S. [1]During this period, the RTB initiative made substantial progress, as reflected in the followingaccomplishments: • In 2004, ASCE published the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CE-BOK)—a landmark document that, for the first time ever, articulated the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for entry into the practice of civil engineering at the professional level [2]. • In 2008 [3] and 2019 [4], ASCE published CE-BOK updates that improved the document’s usability and addressed changes in
Engineering Education, 2019 The CEBOK3 and ABET Accreditation Criteria: A Gap AnalysisIntroductionUndergraduate civil engineering curricula must satisfy a variety of constraints, notably anyinstitutional requirements and, to be accredited by ABET [1], the minimum requirements definedin the ABET General Criterion 3: Student Outcomes (see Appendix A), General Criterion 5:Curriculum (see Appendix B), and the Program Criteria for Civil and Similarly NamedEngineering Programs (also referred to as the civil engineering program criteria, or CEPC, seeAppendix C). The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) serves as the lead societyresponsible for content of the CEPC. ASCE also maintains and publishes the Civil
endless equations and an apparent jumble of theory andpractical application. Wankat and Oreovicz2 are one of many that state “classroomdemonstrations during lecture can provide a concrete learning experience and the chance fordiscovery.”Vander Schaaf and Klosky1 identified four primary reasons to integrate models and demos intoclassroom instruction, which are as follows: “1. Push students toward an active mode of learning; 2. Excite interest in the topic; 3. Link theory to the student’s natural knowledge; and 4. Engage global learners fully.”Using this crane rigging demonstration is one more way to positively engage with your studentsin the classroom.BackgroundThe crane rigging demo study included 60 students from two
proponentsof this initiative. Much has been learned from the experiences of the past – and these hard-learned experiences should guide the preparation of future editions of the CEBOK. A relevantquotation (from Adlai E. Stevenson) comes to mind: “We can chart our future clearly and wiselyonly when we know the path which has led to the present.”As the CEBOK has evolved, numerous papers have been published discussing various aspects ofits three different editions. A new paper titled “The Role of the Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge in ASCE’s Raise the Bar Effort” is also being published and presented at the 2019ASEE Annual Conference [1].Planting the Seeds (1995-2001)Although the origins of maintaining a current and relevant engineering education
Pennsylvania State Uni-versity and is a licensed Professional Engineer in the state of Maryland. Kelly is also currently pursuinga Master of Science in Management with a specialization in Nonprofit and Association Managementpart-time. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Role of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge in ASCE’s Raise the Bar EffortIntroductionThe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CE-BOK) prescribes the necessary depth and breathof knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of any and all civil engineers entering the practice ofcivil engineering at the professional level. As Abbott [1] and others have indicated, theimportance of the CE-BOK goes even
be required in the undergraduate civil/architectural engineeringcurriculum. The exclusion of this class is the result of one or more of the following factors: technical complexity of course topics, lack of modern textbooks that serve to adequately explain challenging concepts,1 limited perceived necessity based on the majority of undergraduate student career paths, availability of course at the graduate level for interested students, and/or undergraduate degree credit hour constraints that restrict offering advanced electives.Universities that have historically offered structural dynamics at the undergraduate level seem tobe located in a region with high earthquake hazard, at sites affiliated with a
breadth needed to be a licensed professionalengineer. Most engineering licensure boards, groups that are typically under state governmentcontrol, depend on accreditation organizations to enforce rigorous education standards.Ultimately, public safety is the common thread that connects engineering education toprofessional engineering licensure and the public. The public and their elected representativeswant safe infrastructure, designed and constructed by trustworthy engineers, but they also desireless expensive college education and higher graduation rates [1], [2]. State governments and statelegislatures are accountable to constituents who feel the cost of higher education is too expensive[3], [4]. A former university president stated, “Few