://www.jstor.org/stable/2782506[19] S. Maravilhas, J. Martins, “Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: Tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs,” Journal of Business Research, Volume 94, 2019, Pages 353-359, ISSN 0148-2963, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.061.[20] K. Sunder Raj, "Knowledge Management in Managing/Optimizing Performance of Power Generating Assets." Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Power Conference Joint With ICOPE-17 collocated with the ASME 2017 11th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, the ASME 2017 15th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, and the ASME 2017 Nuclear Forum. Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. June 26–30
students to manufacturing: Best practices guide and resources. [Online] Available: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Connecticut-Apprenticeship-and-Education- Committee/2018--Manufacturing-Guidelines.pdf[9] (2019). Advanced Manufacturing Toolkit - ManufacturingToolkit.pdf. [Online] Available: https://educateiowa.gov/sites/files/ed/documents/ManufacturingToolkit.pdf[10] (2017). America's next manufacturing workforce: Promising practices in education and skills building. [Online] Available: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/145154/WorkforceReport_Final.pdf ?sequence=1&isAllowed=y[11] S. Killi, W. Kempton, and A. Morrison, "Developing an experiential learning model for Additive
AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 14-17, 2009, Austin, TX.[7] H. Ibarra, “Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professionaladaptation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, 1999.[8] S. D. Sheppard, Educating Engineers: Design for the future of the field. Stanford, CA: TheCarnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2008.[9] A. Dehing, W. Jochems, and L. Baartman, “The development of engineering studentsprofessional identity during workplace learning in industry: A study in Dutch bacheloreducation,” Engineering Education, vol. 8, pp. 42-64, 2014. [Online]. Available:10.11120/ened.2013.00007.[10] F. Dehing, W. Jochems, and L. Baartman, “Development of an engineering identity in
all courses throughout the program • Minimum of “Satisfactory” on all work evaluations throughout the program • Meet program expectation as outlined in the Commitment Form that will be distributed at program orientationAn assessment plan was developed for the new degree program that is consistent with ETAC ofABET requirements for Student Learning Outcomes (SLO), as shown in Table 2. This plan iscurrently a draft, and will be revised to consider other course mappings/assessment tools.Table 2. Assessment Plan for the Advanced Manufacturing Technician Program Student Learning Outcome Course Mapping Assessment Tool (s) SLO 1. Ability to apply the EET 1321: ELECTRICAL Students
account for their own contribution.References[1] R. Hurst, 2012. Interview with Robert Durkin, NK Hurst Office, April 4.[2] J. Goodman and S. Newman, “Understand Customer Behavior and Complaints”, Quality Progress, pp. 51-55, January 2003.[3] R. De Veaux, P. Velleman, and D. Bock, Intro Stats: Fourth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2014[4] IUPUI Students, “SiPP Student Essay”, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Technical Report Assignment, July 2012, July 2013, and July 2014.[5] IUPUI Student, “NK Hurst Stats Honors Project”, Mechanical Engineering Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Technical
workforce? Onlyuniversity administrators think so,” Inside Higher Ed , February 27, 2014.[3] Jaschik, S., “Well-Prepared in Their Own Eyes,” Inside Higher Ed, January 20, 2015.[4] Selinger, C. “Stuff You Don’t’ Learn in Engineering School: Skills for Success in the RealWorld,” Wiley, 2004.[5] Lamb, T., & Tschillard, R., “Evaluating learning in professional development workshops:Using the retrospective pretest,” Journal of Research in Professional Learning, 2005.[6] Allen, J., & Nimon, K., "Retrospective Pretest: A Practical Technique for ProfessionalDevelopment Evaluation," Journal of Industrial Teacher Education , 44 (3), 27-42, 2007. 17
., Designing a Global Ethic for Engineers. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, 2003.3. Walter, S. and D. Walden, Associate systems engineering professional (ASEP) Page 26.709.10 certification: A credential tailored for sstudents and junior engineers. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, 2010. 94. Alungbe, G., et al., Professional certification in construction in USA. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, 2008.5. Bush, T. and L.J. Genik, The importance of the disciplinary society in leadership skill development and advancement. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, 2013.6. Hole, L.D., D.W. Radebaugh
build a professional network with the possibility of future employment. A potential long‐term benefit of this experience could be an increased number of off‐site internships. After past interns see the benefit of the program, they may offer similar opportunities to future interns, thus continuing to influence future curriculum, mentorship and ultimately ensuring an industry‐ready student pipeline. Acknowledgement This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers DUE‐1407160. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References
Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(2), (2010).5. Schmueser, D., Pisu, P., Prucka, R., Brooks, J., Ivanco, A., and McConomy, S., “Graduate Automotive Engineering Education Innovation-Deep Orange Collaborative Industry Partnerships Enable Systems Engineering Based Approach for Project-Focused Learning”, ASEE Annual Meeting, Columbus, OH, June 24-28, 2017.6. Quttawi, A., Mayyas, A.T., Thiruvengadham, H., Kumar, V., et al., Design Considerations of Flat Patterns Analysis Techniques when Applied for Folding 3-D Sheet Metal Geometries”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, DOI: 10.1007/s10845-012-0679-9 (2012).
build better relationships between universities andcompanies by opening communication between faculty and engineers.References[1] Cox, M.F., Zhu, J., Ahn, B., London J.S., Frazier, S., Torres-Ayala, A.T., and Guerra, R.C.C.“Choices for PhD’s in Engineering: Analyses of Career Paths in Academia and Industry”.Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2011[2] Cox, M.F., Zhu, J., London J.S., Ahn, B., Torres-Ayala, A.T., and Ramane, K.D.“Recommendations for Promoting Desirable Characteristics in Engineering PhD’s: Perspectivesfrom Industry and Academia”. Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.2012[3] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering – Phase 1: Synthesizing andIntegrating Industry
2009-304.8. W. Akili, Integrating practical experience in a geotechnical/foundation engineering class: The role of the adjunct faculty, proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 8423-8436. Page 22.862.109. S. Nasrazadani and R.A. Mirshams, Teaching heat transfer through industry participation, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-832.10. S.D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby and W.M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, Jossey-Bass, San
exchange of ideasbetween all participants. Annually implementation of outcomes will create a feedback loop,cultivating continuous growth of research and educational excellence.There currently exist several transdisciplinary NSF programs, such as REU and RET Sites, S-STEM, STEM+C, STELAR, INCLUDES and ITEST, which integrate STEM teaching, learning,and research for preK-post secondary students in formal and informal settings. The vision of theSTEM Culture of Excellence Center is to extend these programs by simultaneously bringingknowledge and innovation to school districts and community colleges, as well as broadeningparticipation, by supporting active research and mentorship opportunities between teachers, HS,UG, and graduate scholars, and provide
. ―Learning to Navigate.‖ In Chaiklin, S. and J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 35-63, 1996.15. Kusterer, Ken. Know-how on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of “Unskilled” Workers. Westview Press, 1978.16. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.17. National Academy of Engineering. (NAE) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press, 2004.18. Orr, Julian. Thinking about machines. Cornell University Press, 1996.19. Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge
evolvedaccording to government and industry demand. Agriculture, the mechanical arts, andmanufacturing dominated the 19th century needs, resulting in the development of shop courseswhere students gained hands-on experience with machine tools for farming and manufacturing.1With the rise of electrical engineering in the early 1900’s, combined with increasing promotion Page 22.913.3of a scientific approach to practice and the desire to “professionalize”1 engineering and establish it as a credible academic discipline, laboratory experience became the norm for practicalexperiences within the engineering
Paper ID #8648The Effect of Cooperative Education, Contextual Support, and Self-Efficacyon Male and Female Student RetentionProf. Joseph A Raelin, Northeastern University JOE RAELIN is an internationally-recognized scholar in the fields of work-based learning and leader- ship. He holds the Asa S. Knowles Chair of Practice-Oriented Education at Northeastern University’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business in Boston where is he also professor of management.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is the Principal Investigator (PI) for the Dr. Bailey is a Professor