provides the REPs with masterydigital badges. The curriculum guides REPs on utilizing mentoring as a leadership developmenttool that helps navigate career advancement in their respective engineering fields. Integrated intoeach of the three courses are best-practices designed to positively influence the development of aself-directed learning mindset and building leadership capacity among REPs as future engineeringleaders.Mentors often cite the ability to increase their professional skills as personal benefits gainedthrough the mentoring process, stating that serving as mentors caused them to reflect on andsharpen their own skills, including coaching, communicating, and introspection.2 We report on ourongoing efforts to scale a novel leadership
System(ROS), localization, auto-piloting, computer vision, object recognition, LiDAR control, andGPS. Following this training, these students were then paired with a local railway company,collaborating with professional engineers on the exploration of robotic solutions to addressvarious maintenance challenges in modern railway operation.The practice paper analyzes students' written reflections collected during the pilot run of theIES framework in 2023/24, revealing the impact of the framework and its various learningcomponents in preparing students for industrial collaboration. The insights from this studyoffer valuable lessons that can be applied to adapt to other technology domains in upcomingcohorts.KeywordsIndustrial collaboration
a stratified random sampling technique to select one female and one male from eachteam. A total of 16 students (8 females, 8 males) were invited to respond to several open-endedquestions as part of a self-reflection assignment at the end of the course. Specifically, theparticipants were asked the question, “How has industrial collaboration impacted you in thiscourse? Please discuss how the industrial collaboration (a) influenced your perception towardsproblem-solving, (b) influenced your opinion on ethics, and (c) affected your confidence as anengineer, i.e., self-efficacy.”Data AnalysisWe employed a qualitative inductive approach to analyze the data. Using an open-codingtechnique, two coders created descriptive codes to ascertain emerging
Collegesand Employers (NACE) Career Competencies framework into engineering courses. More thanthree quarters of engineering students are seeking career advancement or career changes withengineering degrees. The integration of NACE Career Competencies helps translate ABETstudent outcomes into practicable career readiness strategies. The courses used projects andguided reflection students to practice eight career competencies: Career and Self Development,Communication, Critical Thinking, Equity and Inclusion, Leadership, Professionalism,Teamwork, and Technology. Preliminary observations from student reflections and advisinginterviews suggest students are intrinsically motivated to connect course exercises to careercompetencies. This study provides a
from over 75 interns from across the JHU/APL,16 day-of volunteers/mentors, and 8 judges (a total of approximately 25 JHU/APL staff members).There was a diverse representation of race and ethnicity, with the majority of students identifyingas Asian and Black or African American. This reflected the high participation of students from theCIRCUIT and ATLAS internship programs. Survey responding students identified as 56% male,40% female, and 4% other/prefer not to say. Academic disciplines represented by students werediverse, unlike traditional hackathons which often see participation primarily from software-oriented majors. Table 1: Represented Academic Majors at Net-Hack 2022 Academic Majors Represented Aerospace Engineering
ormilestones. Then we describe how we had applied various theoretical constructs to our project andhow it helped to shape our thinking and propel the project forward. Next, we reflected on lessonslearned and presented a roadmap of the steps we took to achieve our project milestones. Wedemonstrate the realities and practicality of conducting our collaborative research process andbridging gaps between theory and practice, and this is a common principle communicatedthroughout the paper.BackgroundThis paper represents a derivative exploration within the broader context of a comprehensivelongitudinal study examining the Summer Engineering Experience for Kids (SEEK), an initiativedelivered by the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). NSBE has
solutions,career motivation, personal life attributes (e.g. persistence, adaptability), ethics, and professionalbehavior [3], [11]-[15].Particularly in engineering capstone senior design projects, activities with industry feedbackhave been identified as effective mechanisms to stimulate students’ motivation, improveprofessional skills, and to reflect on realistic contexts or limitations of proposed design solutions[16], [17]. Shah and Gillen [4] provided a systematic overview of university-industrypartnerships in capstone projects across engineering education and suggested identifying skillswith low performance indicators and improving those with additional focus in the curriculum.Although various ways of soliciting industry feedback on senior
) of the unfolding model of turnover.By creating and reflecting on Louise’s interpreted narrative and career journey map, we gain adeeper understanding of the tensions and difficult decisions Louise had to make along herengineering career journey. Without role models or career guidance, Louise experienced tensionin balancing the needs of her work and growing family. She felt pressure to decide between herfamily and work. She chose to stay home with her family and pursue part-time, flexibleengineering work; however, was unable to find a long-term position. Furthermore, she sought are-entry path into engineering for years, yet has never found a pathway back. If she could havefound a long-term, part-time engineering position she would likely
definitions of academic motivation as "the ability of the learnerto persist with the task assigned, the amount of time spent on the task, the innate curiosity tolearn, the feelings of efficacy related to an activity, or a combination of these variables" [12].Meltzer, et.al. defined student effort as a conscious attempt to achieve a particular goal throughpersistence over time [13]. The definition of effort for this study must reflect the amount of workdone in the PR Survey for their attempt to be placed at their project of preference, where asignificant amount of that should go towards describing the expected contributions for projectsuccess. Therefore, following the literature above, effort in this study is quantified by threefactors from the
]. Engineering education has to be able to reflect thedemands of the workforce to prepare entry-level engineers to succeed in a rapidly-changingglobal economy. Understanding the value professionals place on communication and otherprofessional skills is necessary when developing the next generation of microelectronicsengineers.3 Theoretical FrameworkThe theoretical framework used for the larger microelectronics workforce needs assessmentstudy included two models that illustrate a variety of competencies that are necessary fordeveloping students with professional skills that make them a career-ready engineer: ABETProcess and Awareness Skills and Engineering Habits of Mind (EHoM) [8]. The followingpreviews the theoretical framework used for this Work in
viewed the value of industry partnerships. Alimitation of this study is that the community partners were not surveyed, as the relationshipbetween industry and the community organizations is mostly indirect.The student survey contained both Likert-style and free response sections. The Likert-stylesection asked the students to rate seven questions on the value of industry engagement for theirpersonal development and team success. Five of these questions map directly to the assessedcourse outcomes: accomplishing project goals, utilizing the design process, teamwork/leadership,reflection and critical thinking, and communication, and the other two addressed one issueimportant to the community organizations, the quality of the deliverable, and the
actualpractice. A key finding of a Royal Academy of Engineering study (2006) is that engineeringcourses need to show how theory is applied to real problems [18]. Students want to know howthe theory is used in actual practice. Most engineering faculty are challenged to show thatconnection because they have not practiced in industry themselves. Failure to provide a suitablelink between theory and practice is de-motivating for students as they want to know what theywill be doing when they graduate and enter the workforce as engineers.A Royal Academy of Engineering report (2007) notes, “universities and industry need to findmore effective ways of ensuring that course content reflects the real requirements of industry andenabling students to gain practical
universities and research. But despite many graduates going intoindustry, the connection between university and industry in terms of graduate expectationsremains unclear. Even with skills identified, there are some significant hurdles to changing anengineering curriculum. As technologies, businesses, and economic cultures change, so tooshould the skills engineers be taught. However, these cultural shifts can be rapid and are oftentoo fast to be reflected in curriculum updates[1]. There is also the concept of balance in thecurriculum; students do require some amount of fundamental technical knowledge to apply toreal world problems. In the example of running simulation software, to truly be able to setup,run, interpret, and validate results, one must
survey were operationalized so that respondents had a shared understanding of what wasbeing asked. The online survey and Institutional Review Board-approved protocols for issuingthe survey were designed to preserve anonymity so that respondents could answer morecandidly. While termed a “Lightning Poll” to reflect a practicable survey design for busy deansand department chairs, the survey was more robust than that title indicates. The survey,conducted in Qualtrics XM (Qualtrics, Seattle, Washington), was issued in September 2022 andconcluded in October 2022. The survey and a de-identified data sample are available uponrequest to the corresponding author.Survey ResultsResponse DemographicsOf the deans and chairs that responded to the survey, 73 of
work in progress. This increased IAC engagement withcampus was spoken of favorably during the next advisory board meeting. Overall, the responsefrom the IAC members who participated was quite enthusiastic, and most have committed torepeating the process again.The technique is being repeated with the next set of students who started one term later. This setis a much smaller set of students, but again can help to refine the process.Going forward, the intent is to roll the assessment out to all senior design teams and then lookcloser at how this approach impacts the validity of the internal assessment. There is alsoconsideration of having students complete a follow-up reflection on the IAC feedback.References[1] M. El-Sayed and J. El-Sayed
) program under award number 2130515 to Rice University via a subaward to TheUniversity of Texas at Dallas and under award number 2130328 to Prairie View A&MUniversity. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] L.N.P Campbell Lauren, E.M. Torres, S.J. Zaccaro, S. Zhou, K.N. Hedrick, D.M. Wallace, C.R. Luning, and J.E. Zakzewski, “Examining multiteam systems across context and type: A historiometric analysis of failed MTS performance,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol 13, 2022. DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624 [2] R. Asencio and L.A. DeChurch, Assessing collaboration within and
fill out this form ahead of time. The IAB members were also givenlinks to the Engineering Unleashed website which showcased the Entrepreneurial MindsetFramework. The total time allotted for the workshop was about 2 hours and 45 minutes with 1hour and 40 minutes allotted to the workshop itself and the remainder of the time was spreadbetween welcome remarks, lunch, reflection, and concluding remarks.WorkshopOn the day of the workshop, we had a total of 12 participants in attendance consisting of 7 IABmembers and 4 faculty from the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. In addition,we also had a faculty from a collaborating university, Drexel University, as one of theparticipants. We split the participants into two groups with six
relative to their peers - reflecting opportunity gaps but notdeficits in capability. To normalize each applicant, students summarize their skills and interestsin an application consisting of demographic information, short answers, and eight 200-500 wordessays. The essays focus on the lived experiences of each student, offering students an opportunityto demonstrate their qualifications for the CIRCUIT program in their (1) potential for leadership 3 Table 1: A summary of the CIRCUIT pillars and benefits to stakeholdersPillar Description Student Benefit Nation BenefitHolistic Student selection Critical enabler for Evidence-driven