; Urban Design, CU Boulder d. Engineering Management Department, CU Boulder INTRODUCTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 Action Research (AR): CONCLUSION Involves a systematic process of acting, observing, reflecting, and re- PALAR is a valuable framework for engineering
community engagement programs for understanding the value propositionfor each stakeholder group. Such investigations can help researchers and practitioners betteroptimize programs to more closely meet their full potential.IntroductionLeading institutions in engineering education have been focusing on integrating experientiallearning into the undergraduate experience in recent years [1], which is a pedagogy that involveseducators purposefully engaging learners in direct experience and focused reflection [2]. Onesubset of the experiential learning approach is community-engaged learning, which is intended toincorporate the five elements of engagement, academic connection, reciprocal partnerships, mutuallearning, and reflection [3]. In engineering
IDIsoftware. These scores correlate to produce reports detailing individual and/or group results thatprovide insight into characteristics within each phase. These results were then assessed usingMicrosoft Excel’s statistical toolset to analyze the changes across the IDC continuum of theoverall group, subgroups, and individuals. Changes (+/-) 7 on the IDI scoring are consideredstatistically significant.Qualitative Data CollectionQualitative data were collected from a modified Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG)Survey, developed using the SALG assessment tool [20] with reflection activities guided by [21],and course artifacts including student assignments, focus groups, individual interviews, classdiscussions, reflection activities, and related
research team to acquire hands-on models that professional studentorganizations could use as a tool to increase engagement. This factor was also studied toascertain any insights into how the models enhanced the experiences of the event. Collegestudents wrote reflections after their interactions. This paper shares how community-engagedactivities not only change attitudes and outreach self-efficacy in all students but also might becritical in self-efficacy and motivation for minority women engineering students.I. IntroductionKennesaw State University (KSU) is thriving with nearly 43,000 students on two metro Atlanta,Georgia campuses. The adoption of strategies like providing incentives, such as scholarships andfinancial aid, for minority
reflected on why understanding redlining andother social justice issues are important to their future careers as civil engineers. This paper describeswhat was done in both classes and reflections from both students and instructors.IntroductionService-learning and community-based learning are proven pedagogical approaches used across multipledisciplines and educational levels to bridge teaching and community engagement (Billig, 2000; Kuh,2008). Over the course of decades, research demonstrates the benefits of service-learning (SL) to studentlearning (Warren, 2012), satisfaction (Drinkard & Tontodonato, 2019), engagement, and retention(Bringle, Hatcher & Muthiah, 2010). This paper describes how information on redlining wasincorporated into a
studies,methodologies, and frameworks for thinking about how to teach engineers about the nature oftheir work1. The American Society for Engineering Education has a separate Engineering EthicsDivision that has also tackled broader topics on how engineers should consider the ethical andsocietal implications of what they do. Our research paper here seeks to build bridges to some ofthat engineering education and ethics research by reflecting on recent efforts that have beenperformed from within a government agency, the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration (NASA), to reflect on the implications on the work of engineers. This event wascalled the Artemis and Ethics workshop, and it focused on bringing in social science andhumanities scholars
their needs.BackgroundThere is a long history of engagement of academics with communities [1-4]. Historically someof this work was termed service-learning (SL) where the goal was for students to reapeducational benefits from credit-bearing activities through a process of reflecting on their work,while community partners also benefited from the collaboration. SL work often faced challengeswith equitable benefits and power sharing. SL in engineering is now often being framed underthe larger umbrella of community engagement (CE). CE is a broader idea that encompassescommunity partnerships in co-curricular activities (such as Engineers Without Borders studentchapters). CE work can also be focused on scholarship and research, termed CommunityEngaged
plan to carry out study abroad opportunities, having community partners in eachlocation also allows for justification for travel for students in both the U.S. and India.Actionable changes for leveraging strengths - within or between teams, or in curricula:In addition to questioning short-term interactions and dynamics, and with the intent of challengingunjust systems toward “critical service learning,” [11] it may be helpful to establish social justiceand global relationship-based reflections [6], [7] toward systemic change. It is well establishedthat students cultivate empathy through partner interaction in service-learning projects, which isassessed by regular reflections [12]. Currently, students on the U.S. team are asked to reflect
approaches to • Student reflections community-engaged research • New programs and curricula • Disseminate community-engaged STEM • Research products graduate traineeship model. • Publications and conference presentations • Trainees publish papers with authors from • Collaborative grant proposals multiple disciplines; • Student placement statistics • New transdisciplinary collaborations. • Community of diversity recruitment • Trainees articulate and analyze the advocates
achievingcommunity engagement long-term goals. To use TOC, the long-term change needs to beidentified and the conditions necessary to achieve the change should be established. The TOCapproach has been used in a wide range of CBR projects, including those focused on healthpromotion and environmental sustainability. However, the difficulty of measuring intangibleoutcomes and the power dynamics between university and community partners can make theevaluation of community engagement challenging (Stoecker et al., 2010).An effective community-university partnership positively impacts students and CBR projectquality. Students involved in CBR engage in active learning. They engage in some activity thatforces them to reflect and think about what they are doing
countries. his student underscores a motivation for a more equitable world due to the perceived harmTcaused by their high-income country, particularly in terms of the environmental degradation that will affect low-resource communities.I n summary, while the motivations varied among students, this study identified all students at one point expressing a motivation for social justice, often using vocabularies such as justice and equality. While this exploration was not exhaustive in capturing the entirety of students' experiences, we found that students reflected on a spectrum of emotions. These include a sense of solidarity with marginalized populations they once lived with, drawing inspiration from the resilience and
dispositional changes in STEM self-efficacy and identity.Students completed surveys and reflections at multiple points throughout their internship,including a retrospective pre/post survey capturing dispositional shifts during the experience.The results of the internship experience on student intern participants educational andprofessional plans at the 3 sites are evaluated in this paper. Results show significant gains onitems related to professional discernment (desire to work in a STEM field, use technical skills,on open ended problems for the betterment of society) for participants at all sites. Additionally,there are differences by gender.OverviewBeginning in 2015, the College of Engineering researchers and staff at UNIVERSITYdeveloped, piloted
engineering as a professional wayof being [9] whereas Huff et al. discusses the importance of identity development in early careerengineers [10]. Initial findings from the open-ended questions from the questionnaire fromthematic analysis of the responses are analyzed fully in [2].Though not necessarily foundational to this work, the authors find inspiration from three otherstudies with similar objectives. First, Cech discusses an idea that beliefs of professional work canimpact intra-profession activities in the workplace [11]. Cech reflects that the engineeringideology of technical/social dualism may have a role in the gender wage gap in the field. Inrelation to this study, could involvement in HEPs cause students to reconsider their
ultimately help facilitate more effective interactions betweenacademia and community.One major limitation is evident within the body of outreach literature. The vast majority ofoutreach literature has historically addressed outreach in a top-down manner where academia isdelivering knowledge in a one-way exchange to recipients. Relatively recently, the research hasbeen reflecting the validity of the knowledge and expertise non-academic communities alreadyhold and that outreach should be a two-way exchange of knowledge. [8], [9]Additionally, most outreach studies focus on outcomes surrounding the recipients of outreachevents. [10] We aim to focus on the other side of outreach: those who participate in facilitatingthe outreach. This will act as a first
dynamics as a challenge when confronting discrimination or bias. Pressurefrom a group to avoid conflict or to not alienate oneself may be a strong driver of silence ininstances of prejudice.The last new code that emerged from the interviews was changed behavior. From the qualitativeanalysis of the open-ended responses in the surveys, the authors uncovered changed perspectiveas a code. There is a subtle difference between these two as defined by the researchers wherechanged behavior recognizes a new action or intended action from the participant based on anew learning or reflection whereas changed perspective might not result in an action. Thisdifferentiation is important for this study and the resulting goals as simply changing perspectivesor
. Theultimate goal is for this initiative to serve as a model and inspiration for universities andcommunities alike, highlighting the transformative power of collaboration between highereducation institutions, industry, and community partners to drive meaningful improvements inour communities, fostering growth, innovation, and social well-being.1. IntroductionOverview of Community Engagement in Engineering EducationIn recent years, the field of community engagement in engineering education has been growing,reflecting a shift towards a more holistic approach that extends beyond theoretical knowledge.Building sustainable and resilient communities is a core purpose of civil engineering andeffectively engaging with communities is vital. Such engagement is
educational and professional opportunities should reflect and support these values. Futureresearch on this topic could include power sharing structures and opportunities within SUCCs, thequantitative impact of an intervention program like DeSIRE on student academic outcomes or teacherretention rates, or community and parent perceptions of SUCCs (especially in conjunction with theservice mission of public universities).ConclusionThe purpose of this study was to understand how a school-university-community collaboration coulduse existing community assets to support the reduction of rural flight, or “brain drain,” by influencingstudent and teacher perceptions of local workforce opportunities. Through meaningful relationshipbuilding between various
these participants. We will also enhanceour recruiting strategies and assess what prevents students from volunteering. We will continueto expand our data size and we will continue to collaborate with more local community partnersand student organizations within Wright College to organize volunteering opportunities. Withmore activities and larger data size, we will compare the impact of all terms on the STEMidentity and STEM efficacy of volunteers.V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience
, Reflective Writing in Medicine and Healthcare, Engineering Leadership and Team Building, and Engineers in the Community, among other courses. She believes that education can be a force for liberation and freedom, and through engineering, we can build a more just and equitable world.Sandra Payton Matteucci ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engagement in Practice: Innovating a Project-Based, Community Engaged Course for Engineering Students that Fosters Ethical ThinkingAbstractThe killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri (a suburb of St. Louis) catalyzed the BlackLives Matter movement, underscoring the need for students to explore how privilege andsystemic injustice have physically
participants using an evaluation atthe conclusion of the unit, and 3) the engineering students using a reflective journal. Both theparents of the elementary school students and the engineering students failed to complete theirassessments. This indicates that reliance on intrinsic motivation is not enough.Programs #3 and #4Institutional ContextThe next two outreach programs were developed at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, a large public land-grant university with a strong research foundation andundergraduate/graduate student engagement in service learning and outreach.Curriculum/Learning GoalsThe first program combines a two-semester graduate course and outreach to high school studentsenrolled in the AVID (Advancement Via Individual
through avariety of roles and organizations. By using multiple survey items in our analysis, we are able tooffer a more sophisticated map that better reflects the complex array of nodes through whichvaluable resources like E-Corps become accessible to communities. Then, our interpretation ofqualitative items informed on the specific ways the flow of information worked through thenetworks. This offers an informed point of departure for other, more sophisticated analyses tomap the complex array through which people come to take part in consequential resources,including environmental remediation programming available through Project Local. A limitation on interpretation, the composition of the sample does not necessarily meanthat the
commitment to RT transformed into effective RT for communities 5 1.5 RT is not supported nor 2.5 Academic advisors can help students required by academic institutions circumvent institutional barriers to RTRT in Academic Research Program: Student Case Studies in HES @ MinesAs reported in our ASEE 2022 paper [1], graduate students’ journey to RT begins with an in-depth process of formation which includes a self-reflection of their perspectives as historical andsocial agents, extensive critical readings of the history of engineering, development, and the roleof engineers in development. Once they