by the engineer in the design.ConclusionLaser scanning technology has been used in various engineering fields. However, thistechnology is not widely used in education due to the high cost of the hardware and the hightechnical expertise required for data processing. The continuous evolution of this technologyover the years made it more affordable for use in the classroom. Laser scanning providesexcellent opportunities to enhance the construction engineering management curriculum. Thispaper presents an extensive literature review on laser scanning technology applications andevaluates the feasibility of integrating it in the construction engineering managementcurriculum. It was found that seven out of the 20 student learning outcomes required
Austin. Dr. Al-Aubaidy is certified by the Center for Policy Dispute Resolution at The University of Texas School of Law. She was also the President of the Central Texas Section of AACE-International, 2013 – 2014. She served as an Education Board Member of AACE-International (formerly the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering) from 2012-2016. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrating Micro-House Design and Construction into the Construction Management and Engineering CurriculumThis paper shows how micro-house design and construction projects are integrated into thecurriculum in Norwich University’s Civil Engineering and Construction Management
Technology in Construction(ITcon), vol. 21, (17), pp. 250-271, 2016.[7] A. Anderson, C. S. Dossick and L. Osburn, "Curriculum to Prepare AEC Students for BIM-Enabled Globally Distributed Projects," International Journal of Construction Education andResearch, vol. 16, (4), pp. 270-289, 2020.[8] S. M. Ahmed et al, "Key attributes and skills for curriculum improvement for undergraduateconstruction management programs," International Journal of Construction Education andResearch, vol. 10, (4), pp. 240-254, 2014.[9] A. Ghosh, K. Parrish and A. D. Chasey, "Implementing a vertically integrated BIMcurriculum in an undergraduate construction management program," International Journal ofConstruction Education and Research, vol. 11, (2), pp. 121-139, 2015.[10
praised by students and department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Rachel D. Mosier, Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University and is licensed as a
Paper ID #27493Construction Curriculum of the Future: Changes and ChallengesDr. Ihab Mohammad Hamdi Saad P.E., Northern Kentucky University Dr. Ihab Saad is Professor of Construction Management and an alumnus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington where he received his Ph.D. in 1996 from the department of Civil Engineering and Construc- tion. He has over 25 years of experience in the construction industry primarily in the civil/construction project management area. Dr. Saad received his Bachelor of Science and Master’s degrees in Civil En- gineering from Cairo University in his native country Egypt in 1984, and 1993
Paper ID #21114Outcomes Assessment in an ACCE Construction Management ProgramDr. David L. Batie, East Carolina University David L. Batie is an Associate Professor and ECU Scholar-Teacher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Outcomes Assessment Development in an ACCE Construction Management ProgramThis paper presents the various perspectives on and levels of outcomes assessment developed bya construction management program implementing the new American Council for ConstructionEducation (ACCE) Student Learning Outcomes accreditation requirements. The variouselements of assessment
intra-disciplinary curriculum, which acts as a nexus to developskills with real-world implications [5]. This approach is student-centered, and it fostersintegrative learning and performance-based assessment; thus, it shows a significant potential toimprove CM pedagogy and develop students’ soft skills [6]. A similar vertically integrativeproblem-based learning framework was implemented between undergraduate CM students andgraduate civil engineering students at Arizona State University in a face to face environment;through such learning framework, students’ soft skills improved, as well as their intent to pursuean advanced degree and to stay in the major [7]. Such an integrative approach has also beenfound to be effective in other studies
of Architecture programs. He has also developed undergraduate curriculum in construction management using BIM technology. Currently, he is working on developing BIM certification programs at the graduate level. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Advancing HBCU Students’ Interests in Residential Construction Careers through an NAHB program: An Industry-University CollaborationEmployers are implementing various strategies to improve construction students’ interests inresidential construction careers to address workforce shortages. In order to advance constructionstudents’ learning experiences and residential career interests, the National Housing Endowment,National
CurriculumAbstractEnrollment figures for the construction program at Texas State University indicate an imbalancein the ratio between pre-majors and matriculated majors. The pre-major program is designed totake three semesters but contains two-thirds of the majors in the construction program. Thispaper reports on the work in progress self-study to determine the stumbling points for studentsin this pre-major program. Institutional research data will be used to identify courses in the pre-construction curriculum with the highest rates of students receiving unsatisfactory grades (D, F,or W) for credit in order to identify any courses creating an unintended gate to matriculation. Inaddition to the examination of course grades, student enrollment and retention data will
Paper ID #24757Developing a Request for Qualifications Activity to Integrate ConstructionTopics at the Sophomore LevelDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development
design principles recognize that drivers shouldbe aware of the changes that will occur along their path with sufficient time to adequately reactto the changing environment. TTC zones could also include buffer spaces to consider the safetyof the workers and the integrity of the equipment that performs construction activities on thetraffic lanes. Positive protection devices can also be placed to provide workers appropriateprotection from the traffic that goes through the TTC zone. Future engineering professionalsmust learn to analyze road users’ behavior in the context of the work zone to decide the adequateprotection needed for the TTC to increase worker safety.Instructional VideosInstructional videos have become an integral part of higher
of locating, discovering, and studying local, state, and federal regulations/codes. The curriculum is integrated with laboratory exercises that emphasize blueprint reading, quantity takeoff and learning software packages used in cost estimating and project scheduling and controls.”Table 1 summarizes major course parameters that may affect student engagement and learningfor falls 2017 and 2018. Except not using poll (2017) and using poll (2018), both semesters weresimilar for most of the parameters. The course content consisted of three parts: (i) projectmanagement concepts and cost estimating; (ii) project financial evaluation; and (iii) projectscheduling and controls. As the summative assessments of these three parts, three
construction professionals deal with adiverse group of professionals in architecture, engineering and construction. In addition, there isan expectation within the construction industry of 18% growth in the use of Design-Builddelivery method over the years of 2018 to 2021 [2]. Design-Build can be considered a morecollaborative delivery method than Design-Bid-Build due to the engagement of contractor anddesigner during the initial development of a project. The rise in use of more collaborativedelivery methods, such as Design-Build, Construction Management at Risk, Integrated ProjectDelivery, as well as previous research [3], [4] indicates the need for improving collaborationfrom an industry perspective. Additionally, construction programs are aware of
environment b. A quiet environment with one-on-one instruction 6. Are site visits an integral part of your CM coursework and do they occur often (more than once a month)? a. Yes and Yes b. Yes and No c. No and Yes d. No and No 7. Have you heard of virtual reality (VR)? a. Yes b. No 8. Have you been involved in a virtual design or constructability review session using VR? a. Yes b. No 9. Have you used an Oculus Rift S headset before today? a. Yes b. No 10. Compared to the level of technology currently used in society, do you feel that it has been used to its full potential in your education? a. Yes b. No 11. If chosen to do
ARCE curriculum requires upper-division students to complete three structural design labcourses on steel, timber/masonry, and concrete. In each, students have a culminating projectwhere they assemble a complete calculation and drawing package for an assigned building; thesesubmittals often involve 2-3 students and hundreds of pages of documents. The ARCE 451faculty elected to grade student submittals in Bluebeam (a tool utilized in the industry review andpermitting process) to provide feedback to the students. Adopting this grading methodologymeant that hardcopy paper student submittals were replaced by PDF files containing drawingsand scans of hand calculations, which the students organized in Bluebeam and then uploaded toPolyLearn.Student
and laboratories that willbe included as part of the academic preparation. The involved team is developing a targetedcurriculum to achieve these goals.To implement this initiative, the three university campuses established a collaborativeintercampus cooperation platform. This agreement will allow faculty from the campuses todevelop an integrated curriculum that will enhance the educational experience. Each of thesecampuses offers a different educational component relevant to the interaction required to trainstudents to provide integrated design solutions. One campus offers a bachelor’s degree onEnvironmental Design. Another one offers degrees in Civil, Electrical, and Materials Scienceand Engineering, among others. The third campus (the
] H. Interactive, Bridge That Gap: Analyzing the Student Skill Index. 2013.[10] M. Andrade and J. Westover, “Engaging Millennial Students through Community-Engaged Experiential Learning,” Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 21– 44, Jan. 2020.[11] A. Karji, S. Bernstein, M. Tafazzoli, A. Taghinezhad, and A. Mohammadi, “Evaluation of an Interview-Based Internship Class in the Construction Management Curriculum: A Case Study of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln,” Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, Art. no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10040109.[12] S. K. W. Chu, “Internship in Higher Education,” in Social Media Tools in Experiential Internship Learning, S. K. W
desired program outcomes will also be outlined.2.0 Curriculum OverviewFigure 1 presents an overview of the new architectural engineering program. Highlights of thisprogram include the following: 1) the students alternate between academic and coop work terms,with the exception of having two back-to-back academic terms in their fourth year; 2) each termfeatures a studio course – as mentioned earlier, each of these courses will involve the planningand execution of a series of design projects that integrate and put into practice concepts coveredin the other courses the students will be taking; 3) the core courses in the first two years are builton the established civil, environmental, and geological engineering programs at the sameinstitution, and
design, and landscape designprograms are historically based on the studio model of education. However, studio-basedcurricula are an anomaly in construction education; there are only two construction programs inthe U.S. with a studio- or project-based curriculum. Despite this, construction managementprograms present an ideal environment in which to apply the studio pedagogical model. Thecomplexity of the construction industry and its processes and the fact that project-based learningis appropriate to a process that requires multiple players to collaborate to design, create, produce,and provide physical buildings underscores the appropriateness of this educational model.Studios are based on several key unique characteristics of their relative
50% of universityprograms in construction had a dedicated course in construction. In 1998, a surveyinvestigation by Coble et al. [11] looked at 4-year ACCE-accredited construction programsand the extent with which safety is integrated in their curriculum. The results showed that atthe time 45 of the 55 programs had a dedicated course in safety, primarily offered at thejunior/senior level, concentrating on OSHA standards for construction. Less than half of theprograms at the time provided an OSHA outreach training certificate to the students, while75% of the program faculty surveyed stated that they address safety in other courses.A survey of employers from 27 firms was conducted in 1998 by Smith and Arnold [12],which focused on the
Paper ID #31713A Course in the Human Factors Approach to Construction Engineering andManagementDr. Kelli R. Kopocis-Herstein, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Kelli Kopocis-Herstein is an Industrial Engineering and occupational safety and health scientist. She is currently an assistant professor of practice in the College of Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln (UNL) and holds a courtesy appointment at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Dr. Kopocis-Herstein teaches university level courses in research methods, human factors, productivity, occupational safety and health, ergonomics, engineering
Paper ID #26480Delivering Multidisciplinary Experiences in Education: A Study of Construc-tion Program Practices to Meet Accreditation RequirementsDr. Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University Tom Leathem is an Assistant Professor in the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn Univer- sity where he teaches courses in Estimating, Construction Documents, Scheduling, and Project Delivery. He has 11 years industry experience in commercial construction management, holds a Ph.D. in Educa- tion, an M.S. in Integrated Design & Construction, and a B.S. in Construction Management. His areas of research include construction
, healthcare, residential, industrial, infrastructure etc.). The teams are formed basedon their listed interest (students with similar interest are grouped together). As further detailedlater in the paper, this problem-centered approach, is based on and consistent with theconstructivist educational assumption that encourages social and cognitive interactions [5], [6],[7] in the capstone class.Related literature discusses the concept of an integrated senior capstone course stressingparticipatory learning and creative problem solving [8]. In the past two years, senior capstonestudents have collaborated with the students from the Computer Graphics Technology (CGT)department. The CGT teams work with the design-build teams in a capacity of
exploratory studyto evaluate the student’s perception in the BIM adoption in the construction management curriculum andused students’ perception of BIM modules in their curriculum. The authors concluded that the exploratorystudy of students’ perceptions provides motivations for integrating BIM in the construction managementcurriculum. Moreover, Azhar et al. analyzed perceptions of students in an ACCE accredited constructionprogram who completed a BIM centered capstone project (thesis) at the culmination of their undergraduatedegree [6]. Through the survey with students who completed the BIM in the undergraduate capstone project,the authors found that the students lack understanding of all aspects of the BIM technology and the BIMallows them to
whileparticipation in a focused STEM program in college further increases this persistence (Ikuma etal., 2019).Self-efficacy and confidence are recognized as important factors in the effective teaching andlearning of math and science, especially for women and minorities (Alhaddab and Alnatheer,2015). As noted by Bandura (Bandura 1977), self-efficacy, “the strength of people's convictionsin their own effectiveness”, is likely to have a significant impact in STEM education (Tärning etal., 2019, Hanifa et al., 2020). Over the years, several methods and technologies have beenutilized to increase the effectiveness of mathematics curriculum including, integrated subject-based methods (Chai et al., 2019), mobile technologies (Menon et al., 2017), computer
comprehensive research agenda related to issues of curriculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served pop- ulations of students and teachers and in assessing the impact of operationalizing culturally responsive teaching in the STEM classroom. As executive director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, she collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiatives through NASA MUREP and NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and NSF DUE . Araceli holds Engineering degrees from The University of Michigan and Kettering University. She holds a Masters degree in Education from Michigan State and a PhD in Engineering
curriculumreform focuses on disseminating recent advanced practices while fostering the development ofcritical skills among CM students. To achieve this, approximately 59 undergraduate and graduatestudents are introduced to an advanced contract delivery module on ways of gaining competitivebenefits during procurement and construction project delivery of infrastructure projects. Aquestionnaire survey evaluated the necessity of integrating recent, novel, and advancedconstruction practices in the curriculum. The obtained data is analyzed through Ordinary leastsquare regression analysis by utilizing machine learning techniques such as Pearson’s correlationheat map, train-test split, and cross-validation to develop a logistic regression model. The
architectural design course is one of two design options offered by theconstruction division, and has been taught since 1990. Moreover, the construction engineeringdiscipline is the integrating element of this program curriculum (see [7] for more background).Over the years, both architects and civil engineers have taught the course. The ArchitecturalDesign course replaced an older architectural drafting course and focused on residential designfrom 1990-2014. Students designed a house for a client or their future selves as a vehicle tolearn computer-aided drafting (CAD). As CAD programs evolved and became more powerful,the students were able to create more elaborate and often unrealistic “dream houses” in a singlesemester.While the course was very
training [11]. Thus, some students pursuing undergraduate and graduate courses inconstruction management may struggle to fully comprehend advanced concepts of programmingand AI languages. As such, during the development of a curriculum about automationtechnologies, programming, and AI techniques, socio-demographic background, and previousexperience in handling robotics technology should be considered to make the learning processeasier for CM students.Few studies have explored the benefits of integrating automation and simulation-relatedcurriculum that fosters technological skills among STEM students. For instance, an academicinstitution established a Robotics Academy to investigate the efficacy of various AI-basedlearning curriculum in the form of
, and P. D. Zuraski, “Integrating construction into a civil and environmental engineering curriculum,” in ASCE Construction Congress VI, 2000, pp. 253–262, doi: 10.1061/40475(278)28.[8] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[9] L. D. Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.[10] K. Bain, What the Best College Teachers Do. Harvard University Press, 2004.[11] S. Khorbotly and K. Al-Olimat, “Engineering student-design competition teams: Capstone or extracurricular?,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference