design) and designintegration and presentation. The students learn how architects and engineers work together inmulti-disciplinary teams to complete a building design project. The course is assessed each yearthrough course assessment plans, course assessment reports, student course critiques andprogram graduation surveys. Quantitative and qualitative assessment data are presented. Itsupports multiple ABET student outcomes and criteria. Students rate it among their favoriteundergraduate courses. More importantly, it prepares them for their future roles in designing andmanaging real building projects.Keywords: ABET, architecture, civil engineering, engineering design, interdisciplinary, BIMIntroductionUndergraduate civil engineering programs
constructionmanagement curriculum; and (2) impact of the module for graduating construction managementstudents. The survey results indicated that only six students had learned about the ATC methodin their workplace and the rest of the 50 students reported not being aware of such contractdelivery practice. For the first question, approximately 22 students reported that advanced projectdelivery practices adopted in construction sites should be part of both undergraduate andgraduate studies curricula as shown in Figure 6. While around 10 students also indicated thatsuch methods are more complex and should only be part of the graduate studies curriculum.Since the primary goal of the ATC concept is to improve project quality, reduce project costs andpropose a design
) Fellowship, Aggies Commit to Professional Student Educational Experiences, Graduate Teaching Lecturer Fellowship, and Climate Award. She was also the only academic recipient of the Texas and Louisiana Engineering News Record (ENR) Top Young Professional Award in 2017. Dr. Kermanshachi is currently directing a very vibrant construction engineering and education research group and advising several Ph.D. and Master’s students c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Analysis and Assessment of Graduate Students’ Perception and Academic Performance Using Open Educational Resource (OER) Course MaterialsMs. Thahomina Jahan Nipa, University of Texas at Arlington Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil
Pro- tocols), SDR-based Ad Hoc Space Networks (Positioning and Routing Protocols), Internet of Things, Machine Learning and STEM Education. Currently, Dr. Pineda-Brise˜no in member of the National Sys- tem for Researchers (SNI) by the CONACyT in Mexico since 2017.Dr. Jesus A Gonzalez-Rodriguez, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Jesus Gonzalez is currently a lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering of the College of Engineering and Computer Science. He holds a PhD from The University of Sheffield in United Kingdom in Materials Science and Engineering. During the PhD, he received the Foster Research Prize given to the best PhD thesis related to glass technology. His research
prefer this overa paper test. Some of the positive findings identified from research participants include: • Reduces anxiety • More enjoyable to sit through • Leaves a bigger impact on the user • Better for memory retention and recall of information • Incorporates real-life relatability, which is essential for positive learning outcomes • Gives a good overall sense of the environment that will be working in Few drawbacks are also mentioned, which led the remaining individuals to prefer a papertest. These drawbacks include: • Too much time can be spent on navigating around the site and not enough time on testing of the material • Added
transform our educational system to better prepare students to livein and address this changing world [10].MethodologyIn this study, the researchers conducted a survey of undergraduate and graduate students from twouniversities, Kennesaw State University (KSU) and the University of Colorado Denver (CUDenver), in construction. The objective of the survey is to figure out how students think aboutsustainable design and construction, also how sustainable education affects students. The surveytime was October 2020 and conducted a survey to the students through Qualtrics Software. Afterthe students finish the survey, data were exported to excel, and then tables and charts wasdeveloped. And compare the data for both universities and analysis the
helps smooth the transition fromacademic education to professional practice. To implement the initiative, the project created acollaborative platform among three campuses of the University of Puerto Rico System. Each ofthese campuses offers a different educational component relevant to the enriching educationalinitiative. We expect this approach to create a new breed of professionals ready to face thechallenges posed for the development of robust infrastructure. The strategy fosters readiness inenvironmental design in engineering and construction through evidence-based design andinter/transdisciplinary problem solving. Thus, this research contributes to the body of knowledgeby presenting a collaborative effort to train future professionals to
Paper ID #27217Student Perspectives on the Use of iPads for Navigating Construction Draw-ings: A Case StudyDr. Tom Michael Leathem, Auburn University Tom Leathem is an Assistant Professor in the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn Univer- sity where he teaches courses in Estimating, Construction Documents, Scheduling, and Project Delivery. He has 11 years industry experience in commercial construction management, holds a Ph.D. in Educa- tion, an M.S. in Integrated Design & Construction, and a B.S. in Construction Management. His areas of research include construction education, assessment, accreditation
Paper ID #24757Developing a Request for Qualifications Activity to Integrate ConstructionTopics at the Sophomore LevelDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development
motivating, leading, and communicating with workers. Academicprograms should develop their programs to promote the development of these skills in theirstudents.The construction industry is expanding its use of technologies on construction projects as awhole, and safety practices and management specifically. Technological skills are becomingmore important for new graduates looking to enter the industry. New hires should be familiarwith technologies in the following areas: design and jobsite visualization (e.g., BIM, VR,AR), mobile communication, wearable sensors, smart sensors, and the various productionequipment and technologies used on projects. Incorporation of these technologies intocoursework should be a priority for academic programs. Emphasis
; sleep-wake cycles; and body core temperature tracking and relationship to alertness and human performance. Students receive case studies in fatigue and impacts to safety, productivity, and performance. During this first day of the module students take the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [18] to determine their own sleepiness and then learn principles of sleep hygiene so they can become better sleepers and improve their own productivity. In the second day of the module, shift work and schedule rotation are defined, and best practices discussed. Student volunteers agree to wear wrist actigraphs every night for two weeks to measure their sleep. The student volunteers also agree to have their results shared with the
students may predominantly learn from on-the-job experience, as different from a combination of on-the-job experience and in-classroom experience. The necessary prerequisites should be made available tostudents to fill the learning gaps, and the coverage of the prerequisites should go farenough. The objective of this paper is to evaluate current practice and make necessarymodifications to the construction materials and methods course (a lower-level course) tobetter prepare students in the construction related programs. The research follows aqualitative research method. The research evaluated the need for prerequisites, as wellas the need to design prerequisite courses with relevant course content. A synthesis ofcurrent materials covered in the
not thefocus of most construction programs and are not discussed to a satisfactory extent in constructionclassrooms and laboratories, some students do not even have the chance to seriously consider thoseroles and even decide if they would prefer to work in those roles in the future. Unfamiliarity andmisconceptions about professional roles brings conflicts during practice and also increasesstudents’ doubts about their level of knowledge and capabilities [4]. Construction graduates havefound themselves working on transportation and infrastructure projects, instead of the typicalcommercial construction building projects that they are mostly prepared for through typicalconstruction programs. It is not uncommon to find students who have graduated
graduatingengineers.Introduction Culminating design events serve as a hallmark of most undergraduate engineeringprograms [1], [2], and many undergraduate programs leverage a quarter, semester, or evenyearlong capstone course to meet this objective. This paper presents a case study of a novelapproach to conduct a compressed-timeframe culminating event just prior to graduation, in thecontext of a two-semester capstone sequence. The culminating event is designed to leverage best practices in literature related to team-building, competitions, student leadership, real-project case studies, and high-impact practices.Literature related to these practices is embedded throughout the paper as it describes the overallstructure and design. The event also helps achieve
the ansewr to thequestion “why” is more important than the “how”. A certain level of specialization is desired,however, curricula should provide a good foundation of general knowledge and practiceallowing for lateral moves of the graduates among the different industry segments (residential,specialty, commercial, heavy, and industrial) if and when needed.A repetitive cycle for program design, delivery, assessment, and review should coincide with thestandard 6 year cycle of accreditation by ACCE. The first three years are used to design, deliverand collect data, whereas the second three years are used to review the collected data, assess itagainst the intended goals/objectives, and make proper adjustments to the program. The changeprocess
, each from Auburn University. Ms. Simons has been a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Alabama since 2014.Prof. Scott William Kramer, Auburn University Scott W. Kramer, Ph.D. is a Professor in the College of Architecture, Design, and Construction at Auburn University. He received his B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Auburn University and Ph.D. in Learning Design & Technology from Purdue University. Since 1993, he has taught undergraduate and graduate classes in scheduling, project management, and information technology. His research and con- sulting work involves international construction and designing study abroad classes for university stu- dents. His project management experience includes
Paper ID #28509Student Construction Sustainability Evaluations: A LEED Lab Case StudyDr. Jeyoung Woo P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Jeyoung Woo is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona). He is a registered Professional Engineer (Civil - Construction) in Texas. He has worked in the industry for nine years as a project manager, a corporate quality manager, a field engineer, and a designer. Also, he conducted several research projects about construction labor productivity, construction safety, engineering
, Mississippi State University Michelle Garraway rejoined the Mississippi State family as the Center for Community-Engaged Learn- ing’s (CCEL) Program Coordinator in August 2013. After graduating from MSU with a bachelor’s degree in Secondary Education in 2003, Michelle spent some time teaching in Alabama before moving to Hat- tiesburg, MS. There she served over 20 different area nonprofit agencies in her position as Community Impact Coordinator with the United Way of Southeast Mississippi. In 2010, Michelle and her husband David moved back to Starkville where she worked in the Starkville-Oktibbeha Consolidated School Dis- trict before coming on board with CCEL. Michelle enjoys connecting faculty with community partners
education. Dr. ElZomor has been integrating innovative and novel educational paradigms in STEM education to support student engagement, retention, and diversity.Mr. Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University Piyush grew up in Kathmandu, Nepal. Following college graduation in 2016 from Tribhuwan University (TU) in Kathmandu, he worked for a leading real estate corporation of Nepal on a project worth over ten million USD. He then joined a Research firm based in London where he worked as Engineering Graduate Researcher. Piyush now is a Ph.D. Candidate at Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Teaching/Research Assistant at Moss School of Construction, Sustainability and Infrastructure, Florida
SEEDCO to present at its annual ”HBCU Community Development Partnership for the Future” and its success was displayed at SEEDCO’s con- ference. Furthermore, the HUD Telecommunications Grant directed by Dr. Pyle won the HUD’s Best Practice Award at the state level. With 30 years of working with the city residents and local agencies, he is knowledgeable of HUD requirements at the University, city, county and state levels. Dr. Pyle headed the Leadership and Community Development Research Cluster for several years at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. His experience and expertise has been invaluable to the University in acquiring numerous grants over the past 20 years. He is a Certified
workforce research characterizing, expanding, sus- taining, measuring and training the technical and professional construction workforce in the US. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, productive, diverse, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people.Meltem Duva, Michigan State University Meltem Duva is a PhD student and graduate research assistant in the Construction Management Program in the School of Planning Design and Construction at the Michigan State University. She holds a B.S. de- gree in architecture and M.S. degree in construction management. She has worked for several companies and projects prior to starting PhD. Meltem Duva pursues
engineering, engineering practices, and quality control. Quality oriented with a strong sense of integrity c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Evaluating the Evolution of Construction Management Students’ Conflict Management Styles as a Result of Andragogical Methods David W. Martin, Ph.D, CPC Central Washington University Ellensburg, WA Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is becoming common in construction thought and practice. Although IPD has its success stories and continues to grow, IPD failures exist. Much of the research on IPD focuses on both the
quizand a survey immediately following the assignment. Following this, after a waiting period of twoweeks, all students will be given an unannounced pop quiz about the Dayanta, with the resultsbeing compared between the groups to look at the impact of the interactive system on both short-term and longer-term memory. Given this heuristic study, the authors believe this research willcontribute to a better understanding of the use of 3D models and interactive media containingthem in undergraduate instruction.7. AcknowledgmentsThis research is supported by the Construction Laboratory for Automation and SystemSimulation (CLASS) of The Ohio State University. The authors wish to thank the ASEEreviewers, whose comments have considerably improved this
engineers and their projects in collaboration with space agencies.(2) Principal design challenges of microgravity and partial gravity, cosmic radiation, micrometeoroids, lunar dust, and extreme temperatures.(3) Design for extreme environments which will be useful for designing for extreme environments on earth as well.(4) Human factors in extreme environments.(5) Local materials and suitable structural systems and concepts for space.(6) Survival, well-being, and space medicine.An OSA specialization in an architecture or AE program may be best offered as a combination ofdesign studios and seminars. The teaching model would be based on intensive research on:planetary conditions, relevant architectural applications, structural systems and
objectives [1]. Overthe last year, the U.S. electricity generation from renewable resources has doubled from 19% to38% by 2050 [2]. Decreasing the overall energy consumption became a crucial goal for thebuilding industry. Researchers, developers and practitioners, dedicated to improving the builtenvironment [3]. This paper disseminates the lessons learned and best practices from a verticalcourse that focuses on Sustainable Design and the LEED initiative. Where the curriculum isaimed at advanced understanding of the theory and principles relating to design, energyconservation, and research methods applicable in different climatic regions throughout the world.The methodologies include climate responsive design, energy conservation, passive solar
representatives through guest lectures, sitevisits, and direct mentoring as part of a case study assignment. Students all take four shortquizzes throughout the semester. Graduate students have one additional assignment, whichconsists of developing a research paper, with support throughout the semester of the courseinstructor. Table 2 highlights the software systems utilized for each teaching module.Table 2 – UT-Austin’s Teaching Modules Software SystemsTeaching Module Software System(s) Utilized(1) Model-Based Cost Estimating Assemble, Revit, RS Means Online(2) Scheduling and 4D Simulation Revit, MS Project, Navisworks, Synchro(3) Design Coordination BIM360, Navisworks(4) As-built modeling
, studentsfound the intensive method more interesting, and rated this format higher overall. On the contrary,some researchers have expressed their concerns about the negative impacts of intensive courses. Theybelieve academic quality is compromised by the efficiency of time and cost. Additionally, another issuereported about intensive courses is their intrinsic requirement for a high level of self-discipline and self-regulation which impacts the success of students lacking self-management skills as compared withtraditional course formats. However, there are not ample research studies addressing the preference ofcourses with physical activities and hands-on experiences in an intensive format offered in a regularsemester. In this narrower area, two
Engineering Education (ASEE). He has also been inducted into Tau Beta Pi, the National Engineering Honor Society, and Chi Epsilon, the Civil Engineering National Honor Society. He has carried out research in several areas, including advanced traffic signal control, construction management, and sustainability in construction and civil engineering. Michael has also worked in the engineering industry for several years, as both a design engineer and construction inspector. He is a licensed professional engineer in New Jersey and Texas, and a LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Accredited Professional in Building Design and Construction. c American Society for Engineering Education
interaction at various levels was analysed andspecific examples for how such an approach improved the development process presented. Thestudy concluded that students were intellectually stimulated by the module design, enhancing theoverall teaching and learning process.Naufalin et al. (2016) concluded that experiential learning is an effective model to improvestudents’ soft skills in the subject of entrepreneurship. The study showed that it increased thedimension of confidence by 52.1%, result-oriented by 22.9%, being courageous to take risks by10.4%, leadership by 12.5%, originality by 10.4%, and future-oriented by 18.8%. Coker et al.(2017) conducted a 5-year study of graduating seniors (n=2,058) to evaluate the impacts ofexperiential learning depth
, and inappropriate construction practices [3], [4]. Furthermore, proper planning forinfrastructure projects, or better-called infrastructure management (IM), is often not met due tothe complexity of such projects, thus causing schedule overruns and failure to meet theforecasted budgets. Research shows that, despite the usual practices, the best way to deliver aproject is focusing on the Front-End Planning (FEP) phase, prior to authorizing its funding andsubsequent construction [5], [6]. The FEP of a project is a fundamental process of scopedefinition so that the stakeholders can address and minimize risks to accomplish improvedproject outcomes [7]. Applying FEP practices to infrastructure projects is vital for thedevelopment of these projects