,which revolved around three major themes.Seminar Impact 1: Engaging with CommunitiesAn area of emphasis across multiple seminars was the importance of building relationships withmembers of the community that a project is meant to serve. Those ideas resonated with the Fellows,who expressed that many of the seminars expanded their understanding of what it means to trulywork with communities in meaningful ways. The fellows’ reflections on the seminarsdemonstrated how they are moving beyond the basic view that working with communities isimportant, toward a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics that underlie any partnership: Sometimes, a new technology might sound good to the people who develop it because they have the data and
essential to foster a sense of belonging andreduce dropout rates [5]. Comprehensive DEI initiatives should reflect the needs and experiencesof disabled individuals; however, students with disabilities may have vastly different—or evencontradictory—needs. For example, prior research has found that testing accommodations andsupportive environments are particularly effective in closing the achievement gap for studentswith learning disabilities in higher education [6]. Conversely, other research in the field hasfound that presuming student competence and encouraging students to self-advocate can improvesense of belonging, and therefore retention [7]-[8]. Therefore, it is important to examine disabledstudents not as a monolith, but rather as a diverse
justice is not servicing students. In order to changeperspectives and for students to develop the skills and competencies through a critical lens,integration to solve this challenge is paramount [18].Other barriers were more geared to ensure that the students were able to ease into the discussionsand topics by first understanding their positions through reflexive conversations and writtenwork. The barriers discussed did not reflect impediments geared towards faculty, but how as aprofessor Armanios et al. [19] could help mitigate any negative feelings and ensure theclassroom was ‘safe’ and comfortable’.Moving forward in the exploration of concrete steps, perhaps understanding the ease of gettingpermission to discuss the subject of DEIJ and the
expressed in this material are those of the author and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] N. Walker, Neuroqueer heresies: Notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press, 2021.[2] N. Walker, “Throw Away the Master’s Tools: Liberating Ourselves from the Pathology Paradigm,” in Loud Hands: Autistic People, Speaking, Washington, DC: The Autistic Press, 2012, pp. 225–237.[3] R. Chapman, “Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability,” in The Bloomsbury companion to philosophy of psychiatry, Ş. Tekin and R. Bluhm, Eds., London, UK ; New York, NY: Bloomsbury
arguments and consumable as capital. This abstraction of life into quantified energy and materialflows, unaccompanied by locally specific social, historical, and geopolitical contexts and understandings,is itself a death-making practice supporting global environmental injustices. The quantifications becomeanalyses of death, holding fixed a background of Global Racial Empire that assures access to land whileseparating land from life to plunder resources. This is reflected in the way that impact categories are allgeared toward understanding damage that would result from product making, forefronting sets ofrelationships in which humans are inherently damaging to the environment. Figure 1: a) Construction of validity for LCA, where increasing the
woman (she/her) Engineering Yes Dr. O Black woman (she/her) Engineering Yes Dr. Wu Black woman (she/her) Natural Science YesData AnalysisThe data was analyzed using a general inductive analytic plan, meaning we analyzed theinterviews in line with the conceptual framework and study’s objectives [63], [64]. The first stepof the data analysis involved reading through the transcripts so the lead researcher couldfamiliarize themselves with the data. Next, the lead researcher identified significant statements ineach of the interviews pertaining to codes reflective of the Collins’ [11] domains of powerframework. The interpersonal domain code was created to describe when a participantmentioned
experiment with a pass/fail and/ormastery learning approach for the base requirements of the course.4.2 Instructor 2 Reflection Starting in Fall 2022, I began teaching at Loyola with a primary audience of adult learnersthrough the school of continuing studies. Before my current role, I held roles at both an R1institution and a small private institution. The latter was focused on expediting students into theworkforce by offering associate degrees centered around computer science. Neither my currentinstitution nor the ones I previously mentioned required prerequisite for CS 1. Through a variety ofinstitutional contexts, I was able to observe students succeeding in CS 1 without having taken theprerequisites that are widely required in CS
and how they're doing many things to try to make it more inclusive for us nonwhite individuals of the school... I think inclusive teaching includes making sure that examples you see in the classroom have our races introduced to these classes. So sort of making sure that we're heard as well, making sure the examples aren't only focused on white individuals. [Student 8 Interview]In addition, students voiced beliefs about the importance of seeing themselves reflected in theirpeers and faculty. They expressed that this fosters a sense of community among individuals whoshare similar backgrounds and perspectives. For instance, one student highlighted the importanceof female representation in STEM classes
of Appearance and Reflected Appraisals forMixed-Race Identity: The Role of Consistent Inconsistent Racial Perception,” Sociology of Raceand Ethnicity, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 569–583, Oct. 2016.
demographic data.AcknowledgmentsThis study is funded and supported by two sources, the National Science Foundation (NSF) andPurdue University. The study is based on work supported by the NSF under the Graduate ResearchFellowship Program (GRFP). The study was also supported by a Seed Grant for InnovativeApproaches to Enhancing Inclusive Excellence and Sense of Belonging through PurdueUniversity’s Office of Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging (ODIB). Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect those of the NSF or Purdue University.References[1] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences
metacognitive processes.Bielefeldt (2014) emphasizes that female students’ reflective essays have significantlyimpacted students’ own perception of engineering and the profession’s role within society. A second strand of scholarly work emphasizes the role of experiential learning throughsummer programs (Groppi & Tappero, 2015), student exchange programs (Fox et al., 2018),mentored grant-funded research projects (Espiritu et al., 2021; Perez & Plumlee, 2022), andinternships (National Academies, 2017). Groppi and Tappero (2015) analyze a team-basedsummer program on renewable energy (culminating in service-based learning projects) whichthey find serves to increase the retention rate of students from underrepresented minoritygroups as well
playing field for the production of texts in standard English. The power of GenAIas a writing tool is based on its large training data set; however, that apparent diversity belies theprimacy of language practices from younger, white, more affluent users in the training data(Bender et al. 2022). GenAI programs like ChatGPT utilize machine learning, organizinglanguage into tokens, representing units of meaning, often phrases, each assigned vectors tocharacterize relationships between tokens. Trained on vast text data, initially supervised byhumans, then refined through a reward model, these systems predict the likelihood of tokens in atext stream. Despite their capabilities, they predominantly reflect white mainstream AmericanEnglish, with limited
also experienced by students in the class. The authors found that a simple,extended pause after asking a question can be a wonderful place to start promoting studentengagement. Usually (eventually) someone spoke up to start a dialogue when the silence wasallowed to linger. Active learning strategies are the next step, shown to increase studentengagement and knowledge retention [28] active or cooperative learning strategies consist ofpauses and time for students to reflect on and further absorb course content. These methods arevaried by discipline and take many forms, but the result is a delineation from traditional lectures[29] to combat fatigue experienced by both students and educators [19].Building positive student-centered learning
conducted theinterviews. The first author’s experience created a bias that undoubtedly informed their responseto the participants and motivated the probing questions they offered. The first author engaged inself reflection in the attempt to recognize their assumptions between interviews. They are stillworking to identify their implicit biases. The first author provides an in-depth consideration oftheir current and historical understanding of their positionality on their websitedcbeardmore.com.The second author (she/her/hers) has experienced dis/ability through close family members’challenges with depression, cancer, anxiety, ADHD, and hearing loss. She has also workedclosely with students facing an array of dis/abling conditions and non-normative
andthe R.O.S.E Research Group at the University of Cincinnati. Without your support and guidanceduring the writing process, this document would not be what it is. We are honored to be a part ofthese outstanding groups of scholars.This work is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation Grant Awardunder Grant No. 2212690. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. References[1] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion,” J. Eng. Educ., vol
, College Station, Texas 77843; Telephone: 979-845-2716; email:cstanley@tamu.edu and Reuben May, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 3120 LincolnHall, Urbana, Illinois, 61801; email: rabm@illinois.edu, faculty, staff, and campus coordinatorsat every four universities for their assistance with this research. Any opinions andrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of theNational Science Foundation (NSF). The authors thank correspondence concerning this articleshould be addressed to América Soto-Arzat, Texas A&M University, 4351 TAMU 2935Research Parkway, Suite #311 College Station TX 77843-4351; email: americaarzat@tamu.eduand/or Jennifer Ackerman, Texas A&M University, office address, and
problems to solve, defining the problem space, making design decisions toprioritize certain technical features over others, etc. - are always shaped by cultural norms. Theengineers' social and political beliefs are always reflected in their practices and their work [16],[17]. Engineering as a heterogeneous practice should be aware of its entangled social justiceissues and work with the communities when creating designs [11], [18], [19].Engineering education is moving towards perceiving engineering as a sociotechnical field notonly because of the shifting ideology described above but also because the movement can betterengage students’ identities, hence broadening participation in engineering [8], [20]. Becauseengineering has been heavily
. It represents a behavioral aspect of well-being and has beenrecognized as a significant predictor of various learning behaviors and achievement outcomes[11, 12]. According to Renshaw and Bolognino (2016) [6], academic efficacy encompasseselements of both cognitive and behavioral well-being. However, their analysis suggests that itpredominantly reflects behavioral well-being rather than cognitive well-being. This implies thatacademic efficacy is more closely associated with the persistent pursuit of goals anddetermination rather than solely cognitive abilities or beliefs about one's capabilities.3. METHODOLOGY3.1 Methods Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently for the concurrentmixed-methods study as
between modules within courses. The positivism createdand perpetuated by this silo in engineering education ultimately positions rightness as a hidden,structural, exclusionary force rather than something constructed by the people in the room. Theauthors conclude that students are working at a boundary condition created over years ofseparation between the physical and social sciences and this itself is another barrier. Studentsstruggle with their engineering identity when centering public welfare or justifying nontechnicalwork after experiencing partial integration of social impacts in technical courses, and “[this] kindof negotiation [reflects] the tensions and unsettled boundaries between what students [consider]to be inside or outside the scope
questionnaire refers to emotions you may experience as part of this class (EGR 210 - Electric Circuits). It is divided into three sections: (a) your emotions related specifically to testing in this course, (b) your emotions related to Circuits class in general, and (c) your experience as part of the larger Engineering program. Please reflect on your experiences during this semester as you answer the questions below.* Required Unique Identifier 1. Copy and paste the unique identifier you received in your email: *Emotions during Electric Circuits testing and examsAttending college classes can create different feelings. This part of the questionnaire refers specifically to emotionsyou may experience during exams in EGR 210 - Electric Circuits. Before
efforts. However, despite someparticipants either leading or being engaged in formal programs that coached men on how to beeffective allies, there remained an uncertainty around which strategies to focus on, how tosuccessfully implement them, and generally, how to best serve the women that they seek tosupport. The fear of not responding appropriately or discomfort that can arise from reflecting onone’s own role, as a member of the majority, in perpetuating oppression or challengingproblematic views espoused by colleagues should not deter men from engaging in gender equitywork. This self-doubt described by participants indicates that mentorship, further education, andengagement in formal ally training programs may be beneficial, as normalizing the