Conference Session

Design Tools and Methodology I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Guerra, NASA; David T. Allen, University of Texas, Austin; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin; Cheryl Farmer, UTeachEngineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Identify solution(s) designs tradeoffs 4 Choose the Select the most Select best Model the Select the best Choose & best solution promising solution design possible justify your solution solution(s) optimal design 5 Create a Construct a Construct Execute the Construct a Develop a prototype prototype prototype design prototype prototype 6 Test and Test and Test and Test and Test and evaluate evaluate

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven C. Zemke, Gonzaga University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

apparent during the first designcycle, or were of second tier importance, can be remedied in the redesign cycle. This safety netof the second cycle allows students to succeed on challenging design projects. Finally, a doublecycle provides another aspect of authenticity to a design course. Professional designers learnfrom prototypes with the intent of redesign for many of these same reasons.The author thanks the students whose participation, creativity, and follow-through made thisstudy possible. The author also thanks the reviewers for offering thoughtful perspective andimprovements. Finally, the author thanks Dr. Diane Zemke for her helpful critique of thedeveloping manuscript and embedded ideas.References1. Viswanathan, V. K., and Linsey, J. S

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Anders Wahlquist, US Air Force Academy; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood P.E., Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD); Kyle Fitle, U.S. Air Force Academy; David Carte, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed orimplied, of the United States Air Force Academy or the US government.Bibliography[1] ABET, "ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012 - 2013," 7 Jan 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/.[2] S. Howe, "Where Are We Now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2010.[3] K. Wood, D. Jensen, J. Bezedek and K. Otto, "Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally and Systematically Teach Design," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 363-374, July 2001.[4] M. Z. Hasan, "Trend Analysis of Capstone Design Projects for Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education," in ASEE

Conference Session

Making in Design Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew Wettergreen, Rice University; Joshua Brandel

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

defined as whether a tool was used correctly, for example, whetherthe correct power and speed settings were used on a laser cutter to pierce 4mm plywood.Technique was defined as whether the student achieved the intended outcome with thetool/technique, such as applying a plasma cutter correctly to execute a clean and detaileddesign. A heavy focus was placed on whether the student/s recovered based on an error andproduced a final part that met the expectations for the homework assignment. Additionally,students’ willingness to modify their design to make better use of the machine weighed heavilyon the technical proficiency score. This scoring system was developed by two independentscorers based on an iterative revision of the rubric after

Conference Session

Impact of COVID-19 on Design Education 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sheng Lun (Christine) Cao, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design Teams 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Amarto Pramanik, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Valerie Vanessa Bracho Perez, Florida International University; Anilegna Nuñez Abreu, Florida International University; Ameen Anwar Khan, Florida International University; Luis Enrique Guardia, Florida International University; Indhira María Hasbún, Florida International University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, Indiana, Jun. 2014, p. 24.360.1-24.360.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--20251.[8] A. García-Aracil, S. Monteiro, and L. S. Almeida, “Students’ perceptions of theirpreparedness for transition to work after graduation,” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol.22, no. 1, pp. 49–62, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1469787418791026.[9] A. E. Coso and A. R. Pritchett, “Role of Design Teams in the Integration of StakeholderConsiderations,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1136–1145, Jul. 2015, doi:10.2514/1.C032796.[10] M. Lande, “Methods for Assessing Epistemic Identities

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ivan Cardoso Monsão, PPGM-UFBA/BiLab-Business and Innovation Lab; Jes Fiais Cerqueira P.E., Federal University of Bahia (Brazil); Augusto Cesar Pinto Loureiro da Costa, Universidade Federal da Bahia; Jose Siqueira Dias, University of Campinas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

practical projects.Since the publication of those documents, very little has happened in terms of concrete solutions,mainly due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles and the amount of effort required toimplement the proposed changes. Meanwhile the economy is still increasingly demanding morequalified engineers both for industry and nowadays for so called technological entrepreneurship,which happens when a technological idea is combined with a business opportunity, a way tomarket it and escalate its growth. To support this process, resources in the form of capital andtalent are paramount. Among the talents necessary is engineering, which has been one of its mostimportant driver3.Implementing a new curriculum to develop the student´s abilities

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Sophia L. Poulos, Smith College; Laura Mae Rosenbauer, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

benefit for all; ensuring students are ready for industry; accomplishment withExpectations 20 high stakes evaluation (time and/or process); teaching evaluations; ABET assessment andEvaluation 17 requirements mentoring many different disciplines; need for diverse set of projects given student interests; keeping current in the field(s); variety from year to year; Variety/ translating design terminology and language across disciplines; incorporating Breadth 17 entrepreneurship; Course overall coordination with other departments, schools, institutions; Logistics 16 continuous improvement

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

April M. Bryan, Western Washington University; John Andrew Lund, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Studies in Engineering Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicky Wolmarans, University of Cape Town; Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kurt Stephen Stresau, University of Central Florida; Mark W. Steiner, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design Cognition III

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean-Celeste M. Kampe, Michigan Technological University; Douglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Empathy and Human-Centered Design 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cristian Eduardo Vargas-Ordóñez, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

(s) Source STEM area Population focus Design conception Social justice conception Educational focus Non-formal education: “advocacy for those in our society who areAcharya 12 medical practitioners Training in contextual L Health sciences User-centered economically, socially, politically

Conference Session

Early Engineering Design Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University; David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Mark Barker, Louisiana Tech University; Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, which of the “Ten Faces” do you think best describes you? Why?This assignment is completed and turned in during the next class period and is designed to startthe students thinking about the role(s) where they feel they can contribute in a team environment.Official team roles are not assigned, but effective team management techniques are discussed.Project Selection: At the end of the first three weeks of the course, each team of four studentshave developed an extensive list of “bugs”, approximately 28 total bugs per team. The teamsthen choose one of their bugs (or a variant thereof) to explore further. The teams write a memo tothe instructor describing the bug, but are encouraged to remain open to the actual solution totheir bug. It is

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Teaming in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tristan Utschig, Kennesaw State University; Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University; Valmiki Sooklal, Kennesaw State University; Eduardo Farfan, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

.[7] Kotche, M., and S. Tharp, Interdisciplinary Medical Product Development Senior Capstone Design, Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015.[8] Redekopp, M., Raghavendra, C., Weber, A., Ragusa, G., and T. Wilbur, A Fully Interdisciplinary Approach to Capstone Design Courses, Proceedings of the 116th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009.[9] Seaward, G., Converting Single Disciplinary Capstone Projects to Interdisciplinary Experiences, Proceedings of the 108th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, June 24-27, 2001.[10] Sirinterlicki, A., Interdisciplinary Capstone Projects, Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louise Chan, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Mark Ahrens, Normandale Community College; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

division grades, collectively andindividually, do not predict upper-division design grades, we still require a minimum level ofexposure to the math, science, and, engineering concepts without which students are doingdesign outside of an engineering context. These results may also be indicative of the relationshipfor traditional capstone design experiences. Additional research is necessary to see if theseeffects hold true in that context. The implications for the study are that additional information inprogram applications must be included to effectively predict a student’s performance.References 1. S. Singer and K. A. Smith, “Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and

Conference Session

Capstone Design Courses II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University; Jacob William Leachman, Washington State University; Michael Richey, The Boeing Company

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, theauthors will attempt to provide some insight on what worked, as well as what could useimprovement, through contrast of the three projects.Individual Team Member and Group Composition DynamicsProject 1Not surprisingly, Project 1’s team membership might be described as a ‘Dream Team.’Motivated Ph.D. students, with a combination of strong technical expertise, as well aspast, hands-on experience building and flying R/C aircraft, and buttressed by aparticipatory faculty member, created a tested solution that maximized both reliabilityand validity. What do these terms imply? In Martin’s book on Design Thinking, TheDesign of Business, [12] he develops an argument of the difficulty in creating solutionsthat are both reliable – function as intended; and

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

94.1 (2005): 103-120. 4. Bucciarelli, Louis L. Designing engineers. MIT press, 1994. 5. Sheppard, S. D. "A description of engineering: an essential backdrop for interpreting engineering education." Proceedings (CD), Mudd Design Workshop IV. 2003. 6. Savransky, Semyon D. Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. CRC Press, 2000. 7. Goel, Parveen S., and Nanua Singh. "Creativity and innovation in durable product development." Computers & Industrial Engineering 35.1 (1998): 5-8. 8. Suh, N. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press, UK. 9. Fellows, Sharon, et al. "Instructional tools for promoting self-directed learning skills

Conference Session

Research on Design Learning

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew E McFarland, University of Virginia; Reid Bailey, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

studyincludes analysis of the individual contributions (both verbal and physical) of students to each team tounderstand how individual students might have influenced the patterns of team behavior presented. Page 26.1038.15REFERENCES[1] C. Dym, A. Agogino, O. Eris, D. Frey, and L. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[2] C. Dym, “Design and design centers in engineering education,” AI EDAM, vol. 12, no. 01, pp. 43–46, 1998.[3] R. S. Adams, L. Mann, S. Jordan, and S. Daly, “Exploring the Boundaries: Language, Roles and Structures in Cross-Disciplinary

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Teaming in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark W. Steiner, University of Central Florida; Kurt Stephen Stresau, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, which consists ofthe types of information that would customarily be found on a job application. The informationprovided by students is used to compile and understand their capabilities and interests, whichincludes major(s), grade point average or GPA, past or current internship and/or coopexperiences, undergraduate research projects, technical skills, leadership experiences, careerinterests, project preferences, etc. As a result of using this process, over a period of many years,we have acquired a significant amount of data and insights into the factors that may contribute tocapstone team success.In parallel with the process of collecting and compiling information on student interests andcapabilities, project descriptions are developed that are

Conference Session

Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kaylee A Dunnigan, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering; Amy Dunford, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Jack Bringardner, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

UndergraduateEngineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review. J. Eng. Educ., 106: 475-526.doi:10.1002/jee.20171[3] Woods, D.R.,Problem-Based Learning: Helping Your Students Gainthe Most fromPBL,Woods, Waterdown ON ISBN 0-9698725-1-8, 1996,Chapter 3, distributed on the WWWthrough http://chemeng.mcmas-ter.ca/problem based learning/.[4] Engineering Criteria 2000, 2nd Ed., Engineering Accreditation Commission of theAccreditation Board for Engineering Technology (ABET), Baltimore, MD, 1996.[5] Sternberg, R.J., “Criteria for Intellectual Skills Training,”Educa-tional Researcher, Feb., 1983,pp. 6-12.[6] Robin S Adams, Jennifer Turns, Cynthia J Atman, Educating effective engineering designers:the role of reflective practice, Design Studies, Volume 24, Issue 3, 2003

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew E. McFarland, University of Virginia; Reid Bailey, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[2] C. Dym, “Design and design centers in engineering education,” AI EDAM, vol. 12, no. 01, pp. 43– 46, 1998.[3] R. S. Adams, L. Mann, S. Jordan, and S. Daly, “Exploring the Boundaries: Language, Roles and Structures in Cross-Disciplinary Design Teams,” in About: Designing: Analysing Design Meetings, 2009, pp. 339–361.[4] M. Lih, “Educating future executives,” ASEE Prism, 1997.[5] National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies, Educating the engineer of 2020 : adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC, 2005.[6] National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies, The engineer of 2020 : visions of

Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robb E. Larson, Montana State University; David A. Miller, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

project details, which may have affected your design. Did you do a better job of design, including design for manufacture, as a result of this arrangement? Please give example(s) if so. 6. One potential advantage of this methodology is that knowledge gained is passed along directly to new group members, as is the ‘culture’ of the project. Was this apparent? Examples? 7. Would you recommend that this methodology be discontinued or continued for competition projects? Why? 8. Do you think that this methodology should be expanded to include non-competition projects, where the build phase might involve a completely different project than the subsequent design project

Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; John Nastasi, Stevens Institute of Technology; Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

who will work directly for DoD and for their suppliers, develop SEcompetencies that they can successfully apply to military systems development and deployment.In order to achieve this goal, DoD sponsored, via the Assistant Secretary of Defense forResearch and Engineering (ASD(R&E)), a consortium of 14 universities and military academiesto pilot various projects whose results can help establish a framework for building SE into thecapstone design courses of engineering programs nationwide. Each school chose their project(s)to address one or more focus areas identified by DoD as providing a scope for SE whileaddressing a need of some value to DoD. Our institution addressed the focus area of “green”expeditionary housing, specifically a

Conference Session

Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina White, Columbia University; Austin Talley, University of Texas, Austin; Daniel Jensen, United States Air Force Academy; Kristin Wood, George Washington University; Andy Szmerekovsky, US Air Force Academy; Richard Crawford, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

different patents • “God gave them to me” he would say about his ideas, “How Characteristics: can I sell them to someone else?” •Seek out economical ways to uniquely use The generalizability of his ideas agricultural resources & ways to conserve soil made a meaningful impact on •Intent on learning science, a willingness & society. determination to lead in education as the •Use a negative byproduct(s) of a

Conference Session

Project-Based Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oscar G. Nespoli, University of Waterloo; Harry Tempelman, Hitachi Construction Truck Mfg Ltd.; Ryan Spencer; Steve Lambert, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

0 0 Strongly  Disagree No Opinion Agree Strongly  Disagree Agree Figure 7: Q5 - “Small group discussion(s) of the case helped me understand the specific course topics” 30 25 2009 2010 20 20 Total 15 12 10 10 10 8 5 4 4

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah Howe, Smith College; Robin Ott, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Cristian Hernandez; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech; Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech; Francesca Giardine, Smith College; Anne Kary, Smith College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Design for Community and Environment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Green, LeTourneau University; Julie Linsey, University of Texas-Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad; Kathy Schmidt; Kristin Wood, University of Texas-Austin

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

contextual questions to be answered 3. Gather customer needs and factor values 3.1. Gather customer needs 3.2. Gather factor values 4. Aggregate customer needs into weighted list 5. Aggregate factor values into context scenario(s) Page 11.403.10 Figure 2: Contextual Needs Assessment Methodology Table 5: Context Factor Identification Techniques ‚ Use context factor checklists, such as the template provided (Appendix A) ‚ Translate customer needs and product reviews into factors

Conference Session

Making, Hacking, and Extracurricular Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

question and aided inproducing a thick and rich dataset. The first question asked about the project(s) the student wasworking on and the second asked why he or she chose to participate in the extracurricularproject(s). The next four questions asked the students to discuss how their learning, engagement,confidence, and career prospects are affected by the project(s). The seventh question asked themto describe, in detail, the project building process, while the last two questions had them reflecton the value of the experience and the support they received. After each interview, codingcommenced using a constant comparative technique. Heuristic, discrete units of data was codedand categorized, initially through the note-taking process within the