c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Quantitative Survey and Analysis of Five Maker Spaces at Large, Research-Oriented UniversitiesAbstractTechnical universities around the world are opening makerspaces on their campuses: facilitiesand cultures that afford unstructured student-centric environments for design, invention, andprototyping. Consequentially, there is a growing need to survey and understand emergent trendsand best practices, to compare and contrast them. Towards this end, we have conductedinterviews at five university maker spaces: Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology, Georgia Tech, Technical University of Berlin, and at Arizona State University. Thecomparison of
McKilligan, Iowa State University Dr. McKilligan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of different factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different univer- sities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site
of Graduate Professional Studies, Pennsylvania State University, where she concentrated on problem solving in science and engineering and completed her professional paper on the creative style of products of invention. Page 13.1094.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Sorting Out “Creativity” in Design AssessmentAbstractThis paper describes the early development of a practical framework for the assessment ofproducts of design that is aimed at resolving some of the confusion surrounding “creativity”within that field. In particular, key concepts from problem solving theory are used to
Jiaotong University, and B. Eng. from Xi’an University of Technology, all in Mechanical Engineering. He also received a graduate minor in Applied Statistics from Purdue and an undergraduate minor in Com- puter Science. His research interests lie in systems integration and design informatics, with the goal of building the decision-centric science foundations for complex systems engineering and design. Particular emphasis of his research is on: i) complex systems and complex networks; ii) artificial intelligence in en- gineering design; and iii) decision-based enterprise-driven design. Dr. Sha is the recipient of NSF CMMI Conference Fellowship in 2012, ASME Robert E. Fulton Best Paper Award in 2013, and ASME CIE Best PhD
Paper ID #34160Decades of Alumni: What Can We Learn from Designing a Survey to Exam-inethe Impact of Project-based Courses Across Generations?Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s
Paper ID #10509Learning about Learning and Engineering: Engineers, Students, and Educa-tors Co-Design Challenges for a Science CenterJennifer Wang, University of California, Berkeley Jennifer Wang is a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate Group in Science and Mathematics Education, fo- cusing on Engineering Education at the University of California, Berkeley. She also obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Berkeley. Her primary interest is in informal learning environments and educational technologies. She currently conducts research with the Lawrence Hall of
university-based entrepreneurship and innovation programs. Brent’s expertise also includes the design and leadership of impactful collegiate engagement programs for universal learners.Mr. Eric Prosser, Arizona State University Eric Prosser is the Engineering and Entrepreneurship Librarian with the ASU Library. Eric is the liaison to the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and provides research services for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students along with instruction in critical analysis and information literacy, including the legal and ethical use of information. Eric has a Bachelor of Science in Physics from Harvey Mudd College, a Master of Information Resources and Library Science from the University
it had the unfortunate impact thatassignment questions with more scope for students to make decisions were shifted later in theterm as this type of question is much easier to write for functions than for arrays. This also meantthat students had less practice with programming questions requiring the use of their judgement.The course project in MTE121 was scaled back significantly, becoming closer to a two partassignment rather than an open-ended design project. Accordingly, the weighting of theassignments and projects changed in the course syllabus (assignments increased from 10% to19% in 2020, and the project decreased from 15% to 6% in 2020)2.2.2 AssignmentsThe most significant change to the weekly assignments for 2020 was the shift away
discussed: Creating a sustainable world that provides a safe, secure, healthy life for all peoples is a priority for the US engineering community [Source: Dialogue on the Engineers Role in Sustainable Development – Johannesburg and Beyond (held at the National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, June 24, 2002)].Finally, the sustainability related recommendation, as below, in the latest ABET criteria wasdiscussed: The engineering curriculum must prepare students for engineering practice Page 11.1182.4 culminating in major design experience based on knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework and incorporating
to help students absorbthe content and refine their knowledge of these topics. Figure 1. Socially Engaged Design Academy (SEDA) Learning Block ModelThe learning block model integrates asynchronous online learning and face-to-face interactions and wasdeveloped by incorporating best practices in educational research. Upon creating a SEDA account, students areable to track and monitor their progress throughout the stages of completing individual learning blocks. Eachblock consists of five components: (1) The “Prior Knowledge Review” asks students to reflect on theirpreconceptions and their motivations for learning about the topic. (2) The “Core Content” outlines the learninggoals for the block, supplies readings and videos from
AC 2012-4883: TOUR GUIDE ROBOT: A PLATFORM FOR INTERDISCI-PLINARY ENGINEERING SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTSDr. Kumar Yelamarthi, Central Michigan University Kumar Yelamarthi received his Ph.D. and M.S degrees in electrical engineering from Wright State Uni- versity in 2008 and 2004, and his B.E degree in instrumentation and control engineering from University of Madras in 2000. He is currently an Assistant Professor of electrical engineering at Central Michigan University. His research interest is in the area of RFID, timing optimization, nanometer circuit design, computer-aided design, and engineering education. He has served as a technical reviewer for NASA, IEEE/ASME/ASEE international conferences and journals, served
alumnus of Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and recipient of Harvard’s prestigious Rice Prize for the Integration of Architecture and Engineering, Nas- tasi is currently directing interdisciplinary research in sustainable engineering for both the Department of Defense and Department of Energy.Mr. Eirik Hole, Stevens Institute of Technology Eirik Hole has since 2004 held the position of lecturer in systems engineering and engineering man- agement in the School of Systems & Enterprise at Stevens Institute of Technology. Prior to this, he held systems engineering positions in a number of companies, primarily in the automotive and aerospace fields, in Norway and Germany. He obtained a master’s degree in aerospace
Mechanical Engineering and the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He holds a BS degree in civil engineering from USMA (2001), and MS and PhD degrees in civil engineering from North Carolina State University (2011 and 2019). Brad is a licensed Professional Engineer (Missouri). His research interests include sustainable infrastructure development, sustainable construction materials, and engineering education.Col. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a
the educa- tional success of students. She has taught at the undergraduate and graduate level, re-imagining traditional pedagogical practices and engaging students in intra- and intergroup dialogue.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating
which several of the student authors have been involved. Dr. Beyerlein has been active in research projects involving engine testing, engine heat release modeling, design of curricula for active , design pedagogy, and assessment of professional skills.Dr. Matthew John Swenson P.E., University of Idaho, Moscow After graduating from Oregon State University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1999, I im- mediately pursued a career in industry, quickly excelling and continuously accepting roles of increasing responsibility. The first five years, I worked at GK Machine, Inc., a small company south of Portland, designing customized agricultural equipment. Next, I worked at Hyster-Yale Material Handling, most re
solutions address societal needsand how technology impacts people is an important factor relative to addressing shortfallsin students choosing to pursue an engineering education. We contend that it is importantfor engineering students to understand how engineering design affects society and howsociety may affect how we as engineers do design.The remaining ABET program outcomes call for a foundation of knowledge thatfacilitate, enable and essentially support the practice of engineering design. Theseinclude an ability to; (a) apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering,(b) design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, (k) use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
attention on contextual competence for engineers, Karnov,Hauser, Olsen, and Girardeau [8] found that engineering students were generally lacking in keyaspects of this skill. Notwithstanding faculty reports of increased curricular emphasis onunderstanding the organizational, cultural, and environmental contexts and constraints ofengineering practice, design, and research, a 2006 study reported that 48 percent of engineeringemployers found recent graduates to be inadequately prepared in these areas [9]. Efforts toremedy this deficiency have identified a number of approaches for integrating contextualcompetence into the curriculum. For example, students‟ immersion in a real-world communitycontext is a key component of Purdue‟s NAE-recognized
liaisons and feedback from many faculty project mentors, a “how-to”guide was developed as a resource for liaison engineers. This guide includes an overview of theIntegrated Product and Process Design program, roles and responsibilities for variousstakeholders, a collection of best practices, and a frequently asked questions section.A checklist for faculty project mentors was developed as a companion to the liaison engineer’sguide. This checklist helps to build rapport between the faculty mentor and the liaison engineer,and informs the liaison engineer about the Integrated Product and Process Design programmilestones, travel dates, and available resources.1. IntroductionThe Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program1-4 is an innovative
AC 2008-2808: DESIGN PORTFOLIOS FOR OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT ANDPROGRAM VISIONMichael Plumley, US Coast Guard Academy LT Michael Plumley is on active duty in the U.S. Coast Guard and is a faculty member and 1998 graduate of the Mechanical Engineering program at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy where he has served as course coordinator for a variety of courses including Machine Design, Heat Transfer, and Modeling and Control of Dynamic Systems. He holds Masters of Science degrees in both Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut. His previous
Paper ID #16102Fostering Learning Principles of Engineering DesignMr. Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma Jackson Autrey is a Master of Science student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma from Tulsa, Oklahoma. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and currently is involved with research into design-based engineering education. After completion of his Master’s degree, Jackson plans to pursue a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering.Prof. Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh’s passion is to have fun in providing an opportunity for highly
. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4-course graduate-level module focused on problem solving lead- ership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. She also founded and directs the Problem Solving Research Group, whose 50+ collaborating members include faculty and stu- dents from multiple universities (e.g., Penn State, Temple, Virginia Tech, U. Florida), as well as industrial representatives, military leaders, and corporate consultants.Philip Samuel, BMGI Dr. Phil Samuel is a Senior Vice President at BMGI, Inc., a management-consulting firm specializing in performance excellence and design thinking. An integral part of BMGI’s management team since 2005, Phil brings more
AC 2011-926: IDEALS: A MODEL FOR INTEGRATING ENGINEERINGDESIGN PROFESSIONAL SKILLS ASSESSMENT AND LEARNINGDenny C. Davis, Washington State University Denny Davis is Professor of Bioengineering and Director of the Engineering Education Research Center at Washington State University. He has led multi-institution collaborations developing and testing assess- ments and curricular materials for engineering design and professional skills. He has been a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education since 2002.Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University Dr. Michael S. Trevisan is Professor of Educational Psychology and Associate Dean for Research and External Funding in the College of Education at Washington
Technology Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Dr. Dan Moore is the associate dean of the faculty and professor in the Electrical and Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received his PhD in Electrical Page 12.235.1 Engineering from N. C. State University in 1989 in the area of compound semiconductors. He directed the departmental senior design program for several years and now oversees externally sponsored multidisciplinary graduate and undergraduate projects. His current research interests include engineering design methodologies
Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at
research interests include; design education, product architecture, mechanical reliability, design for manufacture and quality. Mark graduated from Rensselaer with a B.S. in mechanical engineering in 1978 and a Ph.D. in 1987.Prof. Junichi Kanai, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Junichi Kanai received a B.S. in EE, and a Master of Engineering and a Ph.D. in CSE from RPI (Rensse- laer Polytechnic Institute) in 1983, 1985, and 1990, respectively. He was an Assistant Research Professor at the Information Science Research Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, from 1990 to 1997. Dr. Kanai joined Panasonic Information and Networking Technologies Lab in Princeton, NJ in 1998. He was a senior scientist developing and
. Grading:Letter grades are assigned at the successful completion of the course objectives. Gradingconsists of two components: group (same grade for each group member) and individual (distinctgrade for each individual). Each group member will be required to submit an evaluation of allhis partners. This evaluation will be used in determining both peer and supervisor ratings.Senior Design Projects to Aid Individuals with Disabilities:One of the overall purposes of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Act of 1950 is to promoteand advance national health through its engineering programs. The NSF provided a mechanismin 1988, through the Bioengineering and Research to Aid the Disabled (BRAD) program of theEmerging Engineering Technologies Division and
B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and a M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of California, Berkeley. She is also a LEED AP. Page 14.790.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 International Service Learning Projects for Senior Capstone ProjectsAbstractService learning is being adopted in many engineering programs at various course levels.International service learning experiences can provide senior level engineering students withopportunities to practice the required skills of engineering graduates as detailed by the ABETCriteria for Accrediting
, this paper provides the results of a study in which two separate groups of similardemographics were tasked with developing creative solutions to two posed problems. For oneproblem, the group utilized the IdeaKeg tool, for the other problem they worked using atraditional brainstorming process.Introduction:Engineering and creativity have always had a love-hate relationship. On the one hand, we ownan overarching social contract, to create products, services, and infrastructure which are safe anduseful for a public who must trust us. We draw on first principles and best practices wheneverwe can. We critique each other's work rigorously toward that end. And each team of engineerstends to build upon their own experience, repeating successful design
. Her research is focused on collaborative design of products and materials, multiscale design, topology design, and robust design. Some of her design projects include cellular or honeycomb heat sinks for microprocessor applications, actively cooled components for gas turbine engines, robust mesostructure design for rapid manufacturing, deployable structures, and resilient structural panels that absorb impact. She teaches a course in mechanical engineering design methodology for undergraduates, in which she has implemented a new 'learning journal' initiative to encourage reflective learning. For graduates, she has created a new course on design of complex engineering systems.Kathy
courses,experiential learning can promote lifelong learning, a common goal for many higher educationinstitutions.6 The research also found that professional skills are best cultivated and enhanced bypracticing them through real experiences.6 Davis et al. also stated that it is difficult for studentsto achieve leadership skills in a lecture format.11ReflectionExpanding on the experiential learning theories, reflection is an increasingly important elementthat must be discussed in student learning. Self-reflection is a way to bridge connectionsbetween elements of specific experiences and contributes to true learning and positive changes.4Similarly, Wong et al. stated that reflection integrates theory with practice and appreciation ofthe world.14