, construction modeling and visualization. Meanwhile, the Central Valley hasseen a slow but steady rising trend in green building and adoption of BIM. Industry recruitershave clearly indicated strong market demands for new graduates with knowledge and skills insustainability and BIM. It is a high priority of the program to sustain a nimble and practicalcurriculum that is responsive to industry trends and able to cultivate the desired talent for localemployers. Hence, in this study the course redesign was purposely aligned with the programstudent learning outcomes (SLOs) and emerging industry needs. The goal was to develop studentcompetencies with effective means and better prepare them for their future career roles in aninterdisciplinary project-based
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, the statistical evaluation of assessment in- struments, and increasing student engagement with hands-on activities. He has received a NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Dr. Kay C. Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C. Dee received a B.S. degree in chemical engineering, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in biomedical engineering. A past member of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Tulane University, Dr. Dee is now a Professor of Biology and Biomedical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She served as the founding Director of the
accumulate a broad range ofskills.MetricsEngineering design self-efficacy: We previously measured engineering self-concept (self-association with engineering) as a psychological construct, and found that it did not change overthe course of a single semester, and possibly not even over the course of an entire career [16].Thus, in the intervention year we instead measured self-efficacy – self-perceived ability orwillingness to engage in engineering – using the 36-item “Engineering design self-efficacyinstrument” [17] – that is, whether students believe they will be: 1. Able, and 2. Motivated to engage in engineering design tasks, whether they feel they will be 3. Successful in doing so, and how 4. Apprehensive they would be in
for a price customers were willing to pay. The decision to abandon the projectdoes not mean that the time and effort of the students and faculty were wasted. Projectparticipants learned a great deal from the effort. It is important to remember that preparingstudents for successful careers is the purpose of these classes. A few companies continue todevise products to exploit this opportunity. Former students often send describe productsdeveloped to fulfill this need. These former students are always quick to analyze the product andhandicap its chances of success.The Business OpportunitySince one of the goals of this system is economic development it is important that successfulprojects are handed off to individuals or organizations that can
students are skillful with another CAD program, they may take theproficiency exam using another program.Lectures:There are really three kinds of lectures and activities that occur during the semester. Sometimesthe entire class meets during the lecture period. Most of these periods have a guest lecturer, sothe entire class meets together. The schedule of these lectures is shown below. Week Topic 1 Tuesday Introduction, Course Outline, & Creativity, Course Instructor 1 Thursday Design Synthesis and Design Methodology, Course Instructor 2 Tuesday Product Evolution, Course Instructor 2 Thursday Career Center, Ms Dianne Russell 12 Tuesday Professionalism, Tampa Brass &
2006-1543: INTRODUCING ‘TOTAL DESIGN’ IN AN ENGINEERING DESIGNCURRICULUM: A PILOT EXPERIENCERashmi Jain, Stevens Institute of Technology RASHMI JAIN is Associate Professor of Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Dr. Jain has over 15 years of experience of working on socio-economic and information technology (IT) systems. Over the course of her career she has been involved in leading the implementation of large and complex systems engineering and integration projects. Dr. Jain is currently the Head of Education and Research for International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE). She teaches systems integration, systems design and architecture, and rapid systems
practice from widely disparate fields2.Many first year engineering students are undecided about which field of engineering appeals tothem and are unsure about what engineers do. Many have interests that go far beyondengineering and are eager to explore a wide range of options. PDI offers an attractivealternative. Students who choose PDI often have strong backgrounds in art, humanities anddesign along with strong preparation in math and science. PDI gives students of this kind aflexible engineering program that is responsive to societal needs and satisfies a broad range ofintellectual, practical and career interests3. Page
indicators suggest that the changes to the water turbine project were successful inachieving the course director’s goals. Course-end feedback is collected on all courses at WestPoint. The students are asked a series of open-ended questions. The students are asked “If youwere course director, what would you keep in the course next year? Why?” The following arerepresentative of the answers received for this question with regard to the water turbine. “The water turbine project- it assimilated everything and I learned more about engineering from it than anything in my engineering career so far.” “…I'd also keep the Water Turbine Project because it allows students to enhance their skills of the machines.” “The Water Turbine
review of corporate social responsibility,in which employees volunteer for and companies support community service, Fombrun,Gardberg, and Barnett claim that employees gain a “broader repertoire of cultural, relational, andself-leadership competencies.”11Furthermore, these collaborations can be beneficial to the learners in many ways: the publicgains positive attitudes towards science and engineering,1 view the technical fields as moreapproachable and relevant,10 are more aware of previously unknown careers, and retain scienceconcepts.2 However, despite the strong support for such scientist-educator collaborations,6-9,12-14these collaborations can often be difficult for science centers because of the scarce resourcesrequired to keep these non
Page 25.372.4In China, discipline-based education tends to cultivate specialists who are extremely deep andconfined to one aspect, rather than T-shaped professions, who are, on the contrary,knowledgeable, comprehensive or interdisciplinary and thus well-equipped to both a first joband a final career. In some colleges, the engineering curriculum is limited, withoutconsideration for the integrity of different disciplines; the so-called general education turnsout to be some superficial electives, which fail to attract students and faculty as well. The Whole T is not Solid Enough: Restrained Open InnovationEducation patterns in Chinese colleges tend to cultivate talent experts in studying the worldas it is rather than creating the world that
AC 2012-3128: DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM IN A MATERIALSENGINEERING COURSEMr. Fredrick A. Nitterright, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Fred Nitterright is a lecturer in engineering at Penn State, Erie, the Behrend College. He received a A.A.S. in mechanical drafting and design in 1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, a B.S. in mechanical engineering technology in 1991 from Penn State, Erie, the Behrend College, and a M.S. in manufacturing systems engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Nitterright is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Nitterright began his career as a machinist at Elliott Support Services in Donora, Penn., in 1986. He was employed as a
screening of the movie Apollo 13.During his lecture, Prof. England spoke to students about the problems that arose during thatparticular space mission and the way he and his teammates employed engineering designprinciples to innovate solutions in a high-pressure situation. He also spoke of his research as aNASA scientist and his space flight experience as a crew member of STS-51F Spacelab-2. Fromthis lecture, students gained insight into engineering career opportunities and the practicalapplication of research, design, innovation, and critical thinking.additional activitiesBeyond the introduction and application of critical engineering concepts mentioned earlier in thispaper, larger goals around college student development were also achieved. . The
”, I had the opportunity to attendseveral training sessions. In those training sessions, references to YouTube Channels,podcasts, and blogs were listed as external references and/or additional training for thespecific SolidWorks tool being presented in the session. June 2011, I attended a UACTE(Utah Association for Career and Technical Education) Conference. At this conference, thetraining for all the state CAD instructors included how to access and use free web-basedtraining material. All the instructors were eager to view and sample the training. Most of theinstructors were eager to implement the training into their class rooms.Keeping this in mind, in this paper I describe changes implemented in my web-based CADtraining used at a university
, and career advice each semester and would be supervised directly by a faculty mentor.Students who demonstrated skills in the area of research were given the opportunity to performsuch paid activities in summer.While the primary goal of the study was to increase the number of minority students enteringSTEM at CSUN, goals also included increasing this student base who transfer from JCs ,monitoring their progress and ensuring they graduate in a timely manner, and creating atemplate, or model for other institutions to use in the future.As shown in figure 1, the number of minority students at CSUN, and in particular Hispanicstudents, is increasing. These students enter CSUN (1) as freshman (2) as upper divisiontransfers from JCs
courses into creating a solution, learn methods to integrate knowledgeobtained in college with future careers, provide service to personal and public life, demonstrateknowledge of contemporary issues, demonstrate knowledge of engineering ethics, demonstrate aneed for lifelong learning, and grasp the impact of engineering in society. The students generallyperform at or above our expectations on those outcomes.However, senior design projects have been known at our university and at other universities tohave project management problems. In the 23-year history of projects at our university, projectshave suffered unless an experienced student or advisor fills the role of project manager. Whilesome students overcome, others falter under misguidance or
existent uncertainties. For the most part,student’s work and graduate careers have been framed in closed-end problem solving. So there isa balancing16 between preserving ambiguity and eliminating uncertainty, as shown in Figure 11,that is difficult for students to manage. The Design Thinking activities value ambiguity whereasthe Engineering Thinking activities don’t worry so much about the existence of ambiguity butrather the elimination of uncertainties. Figure 11. Visualization of balancing ambiguity and uncertainty.Catalysts for Design LearningWith observations of student teams several emergent themes have arisen as supports and barriersto the students successfully adapting a design thinking and prototyping culture. As
collaborative research for senior students in theComputer Engineering Technology and the Industrial Design. Both courses are considered partof the capstone design classes in the two programs. The authors have piloted the project, thepreliminary results were obtained, and the analysis of the design is underway. It is too early todraw any concrete conclusions about how students will use the experience gained once they starttheir professional careers. The authors plan to continue communicating with the seniors aftergraduation to gauge how effective the experience had been.References[1] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (TUES),http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5741, (last accessed on
team-building and conflict management skills. Instead of trying to avoidteam conflict by selecting members based on their personalities and ambitions, teachersand the IST specialist give students tools to improve teamwork regardless of the context.In their future careers as engineers and architects, students will inevitably have to workon teams in sometimes difficult circumstances.Course objectivesThe objectives of the ING4901 course for engineering students are as follows:1) Define and understand the role of the engineer in terms of sustainable development.2) Increase knowledge of sustainable development and the ability to apply this knowledge through real case studies.3) Identify, evaluate and implement best practices in terms of eco
findingsStudents experience in the senior design industry-sponsored projects has been very positive.Students enjoyed the experience of working on a "real-world" problem, mentoring and feedbackfrom professional engineers and access to company resources where appropriate. Theexperience has enabled students to be a part of the intellectual process of real-world applications,instill a sense of fulfillment and confidence, and impart life-long benefits. It has aided inpreparing students for advanced degrees. Also, of particular importance is how theseexperiences help to make better engineers and lead to a broad range of successful career paths inacademia and industry.Examples of the projects 1. Air Bearing Tester: The goal of this Capstone Project is to
a richer understanding of the kinds ofteaching and learning that happen in capstone courses, which suggests key areas for facultydevelopment efforts. Capstone faculty view the course as a means to provide students with anopportunity to apply what they have learned throughout their undergraduate career through anopen-ended design project in an environment that simulates the real world. Such an emphasissuggests a strong need for faculty themselves to have such experience or to integrate partnersfrom industry or elsewhere who can provide perspective. In terms of faculty roles, guidance andmentoring are critical skills. Capstone faculty view their role in this process as a guide to thestudents, helping them define the project scope and find
and disciplines. Consequently, this work should be useful to a large audience and Page 15.736.8may provide methods for various adaptations and implementations.AknowledgmentThis work was funded by a generous grant from the Engineering Information Foundation.http://www.eifgrants.org/.Bibliography1. Anderson, Arvid, Preparing Engineering Students to work in a Global Environment to co- operate, to communicate and to compete. SEFI Conference 20032. Burke, J. D. (1991). The emergence of career wellness programs. Chemical and Engineering News, 76, 77–783. Sageev, P. & Romanowski, C. J. (2001). A message from recent engineering graduates in
phase, students divide the system into subsystems, and design andimplement subsystem modules and components. At this phase, students conduct unit testing andinterface verification. Then, at system assembly and integration phase, students assemble andintegrate individual modules and components to achieve specified system requirements. Next, inthe validation and test phase, students need to complete system testing and validation testing anddemo system functions to NASA technical experts. In addition to that, students are required todocument the full project in a high-quality final report and make a final presentation anddemonstration to NASA technical experts.This project helps our students to pursue their careers in aeronautics, space and
15.89.3ImplementationA simplified approach to documentation control is desirable in an academic setting. Asimple structure mimics the limited scope that novice engineers encounter when startingtheir careers. A simple structure also allows for a standardized list of deliverables whichfacilitate assessment of diverse project work using a common rubric.This work is targeted as an aid to those who have studied design methodology in anacademic setting, or have only been involved in design in a research and developmentcapacity. Acting as instructors for students who may be employed as field, line orapplication engineers who might interface with a purchasing department, a manufacturingfacility or an external consulting organization will require a different skill set
, such as visibility, feedback and mapping.7,10 These few topics, inparticular, provide students with the vocabulary they will need to work as, and with, experienceddesigners in their academic and professional careers. Toward the middle of the term, as studentstransition from completing lab and homework assignments to conceiving and prototyping theirown projects, lecture topics shift to implementation, including usability, the ease of use andlearnability of a product or its interface;8 interaction design, a product’s physical, digital, behav-ioral and social considerations;13 and hacking and prototyping, including the history and re-sources available through the do-it-yourself community.3The technical sessions introduce students to the
SYSTEM USED IN THIS COURSE… LEVEL OF AGREEMENT 1. made the course objectives relevant. 2. motivated me to do well in the course. 3. will help me towards reaching my future career goals. 4. was an effective way to assess my learning. 5. required too much effort. 6. was useful in my pursuit of other goals. 7. made me frustrated and anxious. 8. required too much time. 9. helped me better understand my learning. 10. increased my level of responsibility for my own learning. 11. represented how the real world assesses success and failure. 12. limited my ability to be successful in the course. 13. accurately measured the understanding I gained on the course
requires practice and mentoring – something faculty with industry experience often bring, but which may be less available for individuals with academic career paths.The topics noted above point to the need for workshops and resources that support faculty’s ownability to manage and negotiate conflict. But perhaps even more most importantly, the limitedextent to which capstone faculty in this study trained individuals on the team to resolve theconflict themselves also points to the need to help faculty learn to teach these skills – anapproach which includes providing faculty with resources that they first understand themselves,but second, can explain to and model for student design teams.Interestingly, the analysis of approaches to team
is to bean expert in this area, rather than letting novices construct this knowledge independently. Byhelping students develop in real-time the tacit knowledge necessary to succeed in a skill, career,or position, an expert can cultivate the proper behaviors and skills. A trade-off withapprenticeship models is their commitment to a long-term relationship between the novice andexpert, rather than the shorter-term learning models described above.Course OverviewThe Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen (OEDK) facility at Rice University hosts courses aspart of the first credentialled engineering design minor in the United States. One of the requiredcourses in the minor is ENGI 210: Prototyping and Fabrication. This course introduces studentsto a
—also influences the course of human action. Those of low self-efficacy are easilyconvinced of the futility of effort when they come up against institutional impediments, whereasthose of high self-efficacy figure out ways to surmount them.” These mechanisms can be used inthe classroom when designing student projects/activities; and due to the broad-reaching benefitsof increased self-efficacy, providing students early in their university careers with experienceswhich target its development has been a priority of the authors for over a decade.The remote teaching environment poses several challenges in implementing these mechanisms,however. A key element of a mastery experience is that it must be challenging, wherecompleting the task successfully
hands-on, multi-faceted “tools” and marketable skills they can use to pursueengineering careers ranging from entrepreneur in a startup venture, to intrapreneur working in acorporate enterprise, to senior executive leading a multinational organization.The course centers around the creation of an “Innovation Playbook,” which is a semester longgroup project. It begins with students individually identifying problems and drafting needstatements [27] for a problem they would want to work on over the course of the semester. Oncestudents individually identified need statements, students would then pitch their statements as aone-minute elevator pitch to the class and then would be given time to self-create teams of fiveto six individuals per team. They
inclusion in engineering. Before coming to Stanford, she was a bilingual educator at low-income elementary schools in Texas. Prior to starting her career in education, Greses was an engineer project manager in the Caribbean. She holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Santo Domingo Technological Institute, a M.Eng. in Civil Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez, and a M.Ed. in School Leadership from Southern Methodist Uni- versity. Her work seeks to improve education for students who experience a cultural mismatch between the ways of knowing and speaking in their communities and those in STEM.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical