AC 2012-3512: STUDENT PERSPECTIVES OF ENGINEERING DESIGNEDUCATIONRichard J. Aleong, Queen’s University Richard Aleong is a master’s of applied science candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. His research interests are in engineering design, qualitative research methodology, and teaching and learning in higher education.Prof. David S. Strong, Queen’s University David Strong joined Queen’s as the NSERC Chair in Design Engineering in March 2003 and is currently in his second term as Chair. In this faculty-wide appointment, his goal is to enhance student’s engineering design and professional skills by working collaboratively on educational
. Page 25.884.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Learning Sciences Guided High School Engineering Curriculum DevelopmentEngineering education is increasingly appearing in high school courses—as either astand-alone course or a component of a science course. In either context, engineeringmodules are tasked with multiple goals. In particular, as synthesized in the NationalResearch Council’s13 review of K-12 engineering education, it is expected thatengineering education will: 1.) focus on design and problem solving; 2.) incorporateappropriate STEM concepts and 3.) “promote engineering habits of mind.” High schoolengineering curriculum invariably addresses these goals
Design Specifications (partial list)producing an operational prototypeOnce all design considerations were accounted for, final design with dimensions had beendetermined, and parts received, the engine was assembled. There were many factors that neededto be adjusted in the commissioning process. At first, the steam valve and the water sprayerwere operated manually. After basic functioning was confirmed, the engine was automatedthrough the use of solenoid valves for steam and water spray and a computer-based controlsystem. Page 25.1325.18The engine was designed with adjustability in mind. Components such as valves and
,Austin. Page 25.118.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Unique Approach to Characterizing the Engineering Design ProcessIntroductionWhile engineers frequently refer to “the engineering design process,” they rarely have thesame representation of that process in mind. This paper describes an effort to generate arepresentation of the process that accurately describes engineering design at multiplelevels, across engineering disciplines, and in industry and academia.This design process representation was born of necessity when an interdisciplinary teamof
) instructors should keep in mind that learning newconcepts builds on previously learned concepts when developing a course1. EngineeringEducators strive to create environments that promote learning on a deep level in engineeringclassrooms. Many papers have been written by engineering educators with the conceptsidentified by the National Research Council as their underlying themes2, 3, 4. EngineeringEducators understand the need for students to transfer their knowledge of a concept from oneclass to another. Many of the courses in an engineering curriculum build on one another. If astudent does not have a deep understanding at the beginning, it will be hard for them to succeed
AC 2012-3431: DESIGNING NOVEL NONDESTRUCTIVE ATTACHMENTMETHODS: A METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATION TO ENERGY HAR-VESTING SYSTEMSMr. Sumedh Inamdar, University of Texas, AustinKrystian Zimowski, University of Texas, Austin Krystian Zimowski graduated from Northwestern University with a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engi- neering. He is currently pursuing a master’s degree in mechanical engineering with an emphasis in design and manufacturing. His research topic is to develop innovative wind energy harvesters to power remote bridge sensors under the studies of Dr. Kristin Wood and Dr. Richard Crawford.Lt. Col. Kevin A. Gibbons Ret., U.S. Air Force Academy, NexOne, Inc., and CAStLE Kevin Gibbons is a Senior Scientist for
AC 2012-3885: STUDENT LEARNING IN MULTIPLE PROTOTYPE CY-CLESDr. Steven C. Zemke, Gonzaga University Steven Zemke is the Director of the Center for Engineering Design and Entrepreneurship at Gonzaga University. This center is chartered to enhance the design courses throughout the School of Engineering and Applied Science. Zemke teaches the mechanical design courses at Gonzaga. His area of research is the pedagogy of design with an emphasis on practically improving student learning. Page 25.1185.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Student Learning in
AC 2012-4004: A SYMPHONY OF DESIGNIETTES: EXPLORING THEBOUNDARIES OF DESIGN THINKING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONProf. Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin Kristin L. Wood is currently a professor, Head of Pillar, and Co-director of the International Design Center (IDC) at Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering (Division of Engineering and Applied Science) at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in Sept. 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing
keywords, identified by thestudents in their first week of study, that in their minds exemplified quality engineering design(e.g. “elegant”, “safe”, “usable”, etc.). Instructors would circulate and ask probing questions ofthe students, however those questions were based on the individual instructor’s background andinterests.Based on informal instructor and student feedback, a number of issues with the activity wereidentified, and formed the basis of the gamification initiative. Foremost among these issues wasstudent focus. Because there was neither formal structure nor scaffolding, student attentionvaried depending largely on their intrinsic interest in deconstruction and gaining understanding.While intrinsic motivation was adequate for a majority
: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2).3. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 90, 85, 86.4. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100, p.90.5. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain New York: Longmans, Green.6. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking
. When I hear or read a new word or phrase, I look it up and make a note of it. I know a lot about other cultures and am always learning more. I know or am involved in learning a language other than my native one. I solicit feedback from my friends, relations, and colleagues. I love learning.Many of Leonardo’s instructions, if followed, would enhance our creativity and our lives! Notethat many of Leonardo’s ideas follow the ones presented in this paper.Bibliography: 1. Dixon, John, “Design Engineering: Inventiveness, Analysis, & Decision Making” McGraw Hill, New York, 1966, (USF Library, TA174.D5) 2. William Speed Weed, “Mind Games: Seven ways to make your brain better, faster, smarter
AC 2012-3797: EVALUATING IDEATION USING THE PUBLICATIONSPOPULAR SCIENCE, POPULAR MECHANICS, AND MAKE IN COOR-DINATION WITH A NEW PATENT SEARCH TOOL AND THE 6-3-5 METHODDr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dan Jensen is a professor of engineering mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy, where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (mechanical engineering), M.S. (applied mechanics), and Ph.D. (aerospace engineering science) from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies
conditioner). With this in mind, we are beginning theimplementation of a novel, potentially transformative approach to integrating courseworkthrough five semesters of the core mechanical engineering curriculum.The centerpiece of this research is a long-term design/build/test project that will be developed bystudents over the course of five semesters. The project, a bench-scale hybrid powertrain, isimplemented in modules, so that parts of the project may be completed in disparate courses suchas Thermodynamics, System Dynamics and Control, and Fluid Mechanics. This paper describeseach module, and provides information on how the modules are integrated into a cohesivesystem at the end of the project.IntroductionThe authors have embarked upon a study
Identifying and Leveraging a DfXIdentifying and leveraging a DfX has three possible benefits. First, identifying a DfX that bestserves a given sector and corporation can be invaluable to an engineering designer or designfirm. The appropriate application of said DfX can provide a competitive edge to the firm whileproviding benefits to both the consumer and society[2]. Kimberly-Clark (K-C) is one firm that hasbenefitted from implementing DfE. In the mind of Ken Strassner, Vice President for GlobalEnvironmental, Safety, Regulatory, and Scientific Affairs[4]:“Design for the Environment will continue to be an important area of activity for Kimberly-Clarkbecause it can be a point of differentiation for us and can help deliver value for our business ...We
which best facilitates transfer. Alsothere is a need to examine whether a student’s ability to transfer is innate or can be taught. Itis hoped that a pedagogical framework will stem from this study which will outline the keyapproach needed to teach transferable skills in the future.Bibliography1. Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development.2. Carty, A. and P. Phelan, The Nature and Provision of Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 2006. 18(1).3. Pink, D.H., A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. 2005, New York: Penguin Group.4. Williams, J., Engineering: good for Technology Education?, in PATT-22 Conference Delft
. Page 25.1502.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 YouTube: An Effective CAD Training Resource1. IntroductionThis paper is a continuation of my research in the area of web-based CAD training. Phase I(Ethicomp2008 conferencei) of my research was where I addressed the “Feasibility of Web-Based Training for CAD”. Phase II (Ethicomp2010 conferenceii) of my research was “Whatis Quality Web-Based CAD Training”. This paper is organized in the following order: 1.Introduction, 2. Overview of this Research, 3. Methodology, 4. Results/Data, 5.Conclusionand Future Direction followed by References. Section 2 (Overview of this Research)describes the main motivation behind my research.2. Overview
AC 2012-5186: EVALUATION OF DESIGN WORK AND THE ACHIEVE-MENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES IN SENIOR CAPSTONE COURSESProf. Carl D. Sorensen, Brigham Young UniversityDr. Robert H. Todd, Brigham Young University Robert H. Todd is a professor of mechanical engineering at Brigham Young University and the Founding Director of BYU’s capstone program Integrated Product and Process Design. Todd received his Ph.D. from Stanford University in mechanical engineering design, where he also received a postdoctoral fel- lowship, taught engineering courses, and served in department and college administration at BYU, Idaho (then Ricks College), before spending 10 years in industry in senior engineering and management posi- tions with both
AC 2012-5385: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF STUDENTS’ INDIVIDUALHEURISTICS WHEN SOLVING TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEMSMr. Jonathan Gerard Spillane, University of LimerickDr. Niall Seery, University of LimerickMr. Donal Canty, University of LimerickDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Page 25.986.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Observational study of students’ individual heuristics when solving technological problemsAbstract:The overall aim of education is the development of creative, critical thinking and problem-solvingfuture citizens who will be able to positively contribute
design product lines. Page 25.355.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Creating Actionfunction Diagrams for User Centric DesignIntroductionUsers are perhaps the most important aspect of consumer product design. There is a significantbody of research about the ways to measure and achieve user-friendliness in a product. Acustomer-driven approach to product design aims for greater user comfort and better productexperience. Design tools that keep the user in mind during early stages of design can greatlyimprove the usability of the end product.Systematically breaking down a product into
AC 2012-3039: EXPERIENCING CAPSTONE DESIGN PROBLEM STATE-MENTSDr. Gene Dixon, East Carolina University Gene Dixon teaches aspiring engineers at the undergraduate level at East Carolina University. He has held positions in industry with Union Carbide, Chicago Bridge & Iron, E.I. DuPont & deNemours, West- inghouse Electric, CBS, Viacom, and Washington Group. He has spoken to more than 25,000 people as a corporate trainer, a teacher, and a motivational speaker. He received a Ph.D. in industrial and sys- tems engineering and engineering management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a master’s of business administration from Nova Southeastern University, and a bachelor’s of science in materials
AC 2012-4698: A CASE STUDY IN CAPSTONE ORGANIZATION FORCONTINUOUS DESIGN/BUILD PROJECTSProf. Robb E. Larson, Montana State University Robb Larson is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, in the College of Engineering at Montana State University. He has been with the department since 1993 and teaches the interdisciplinary ME/MET capstone course, as well as courses in alternative/renewable energy, instrumentation, and computer applications.Dr. David A. Miller, Montana State University David A Miller is Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Mont
leave projects overdue, over budget, and even ultimately fail to produce a successfulproduct. However, we believe that there are overarching factors in prototyping that can be Page 25.1091.3applied across all development endeavors, and that by keeping these factors in mind, engineerscan more efficiently and successfully bring products from concept to completion. It is the goalof this work to examine any current strategies and see where and why they fall short, as well asto present an initial attempt at a method to strategically approaching engineering prototyping.The Business ApproachWhile businesses recognize the importance of innovation, the
AC 2012-4850: ON THE BENEFITS OF USING THE ENGINEERING DE-SIGN PROCESS TO FRAME PROJECT-BASED OUTREACH AND TORECRUIT SECONDARY STUDENTS TO STEM MAJORS AND STEMCAREERSDr. Jean-Celeste M. Kampe, Michigan Technological University Jean Kampe is currently Department Chair of engineering fundamentals at Michigan Technological Uni- versity, where she holds an Associate Professorship in the Department of Materials Science and Engi- neering. She received her Ph.D. in metallurgical engineering from Michigan Tech, M.Ch.E. in chemical engineering from the University of Delaware, and a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Michi- gan Tech. She was employed as a Research Engineer for five years at the Naval Research Laboratory in
AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
AC 2012-4544: INOCULATING NOVICE SOFTWARE DESIGNERS WITHEXPERT DESIGN STRATEGIESDavid R. Wright, North Carolina State University David Wright earned his Ph.D. in computer science from North Carolina State University. He is currently a Research Associate in the Computer Science Department, overseeing the day-to-day operations of four different research projects. Wright has taught a variety of undergraduate courses at NCSU and other local institutions. His research interests include software design and engineering education, focusing on ways to help students think more like engineering professionals than students, as well as developing teaching and learning tools and strategies that help keep students interested in