ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying all 22 results

Teaching Applied Engineering Through Practicum Courses

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Pete Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Wendy Otoupal-Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

activities in some and prepare them for activities in team, with some assistance. significant aspect of the team. the teamThe greatest difficulty in implementation of the experiential learning practicum courses in thisMotorsports Engineering program, involved getting the students to keep in mind that they neededto strive to meet these objectives. Their tendency was to focus on completion of the racecardesign and construction and its subsequent competition at the track. Students tended to losetrack of exactly what they were demonstrating to the faculty in terms of individual learningobjectives while this was occurring. To aid in this, a worksheet was constructed which studentswere supposed to

Relevance Score: 0.3936645

Rethinking Automotive Engineering Education – Deep Orange as a Collaborative Innovation Framework for Project-Based Learning Incorporating Real-World Case Studies

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ala A. Qattawi, Automotive Engineering Department at Clemson University –International Center for Automotive Research (CU-ICAR); Paul J. Venhovens, Clemson University; Johnell Brooks, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

problem that requires the students to explore and search for different design alternatives on both the system and component level. The DO students learn in an opposite order compared to the traditional educational approaches, where the students search for answers, derive conclusions, make decisions, and should be able to justify their design choices within managerial, economic, social, and engineering contexts. At this phase, the students are divided into different team including but not limited to major vehicle subsystems such as interior, chassis, powertrain, vehicle body, vehicle electronics, and project management. Visualization and Demonstration. Initializing the design with the customer wants/needs in mind, the DO

Relevance Score: 0.32607064

Introducing Sustainability into Engineering Design: A First-Year Course

Conference Session: DEED Melange
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

includes two group projects: a smaller, minor, hands-on project where thestudents build, test, and redesign an engineering system and a larger, major project, which ismore theoretical with extensive research and design to solve an engineering problem. The groupsconsist of 3-4 students. Both projects follow the students through the engineering design cyclebut with different goals and lessons in mind. The minor design project is more hands on and the Page 24.811.3students get to test their designs and realize their mistakes, which is detailed in a paper by Jaeger,et. al2. This project is given mid-way through the semester and the students have 2

Relevance Score: 0.2979032

Reframing Engineering Capstone Design Pedagogy for Design with Communities

Conference Session: Capstone Design
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Briana Lucero, Colorado School of Mines; Cameron J Turner P.E., Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Figure 4 HCD process and objectives21ConclusionsThis paper attempts to meld design curriculum with the methodologies of designing with humansin mind. No longer able to design simply for humans, the problem facing new design engineers ishow to exercise inclusionary design practices for a global market. As the opportunities afforded Page 24.1034.16to students continues to allow for greater interactions with society, students need to develop anew toolset that uses both their technical and their social skills.All the programs reviewed in this study offer various takes on the standard design pedagogies.The programs agree that interdisciplinary work

Relevance Score: 0.2979032

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Conference Session: Capstone Design
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University; Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University; Jacob T Allenstein, The Ohio State University; Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9172Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone DesignProgramMr. Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University Bob Rhoads received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University and his Masters in Business Administration from Regis University. He is also a P.E. He is the Engineering Capstone Program Coordinator for The Ohio State University.Dr. Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University Cliff Whitfield has a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and is currently working as an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and

Relevance Score: 0.29631662

Measuring Qualities of Different Engineering Design Process Models: A Critical Review

Conference Session: Assessment
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: James Logan Oplinger, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9921Measuring Qualities of Different Engineering Design Process Models: A Crit-ical ReviewJames Logan Oplinger, Arizona State UniversityDr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Micah Lande teaches human-centered design innovation at Arizona State University and researches how engineers learn and apply a design process to their work. He is an assistant professor in the Depart- ment of Engineering on Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. Page 24.893.1

Relevance Score: 0.2952484

On Engineering Design Education: Exposing Students to Design Knowledge

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Waddah Akili, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

.,, ASEE Conf.& Exhibition. Page 24.948.1122. de Graaf, E., and Kolmos, A.,(2003), “ Characteristics of Problem- Based Learning,” International Journal of Eng. Education, Vol.19, No.5, pp.657-662.23. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R.,(1999), “How People Learn: Brain, Mind , Experience and School,” Wash. .D.C.: National Academy Press.24. Wessel, D., “Building a Better Engineer,” Wall Street Journal, December 20, 2003, p.B1.25. Saddler, P.M., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M.,(2000), “Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges,” Journal of

Relevance Score: 0.2952484

K-WIDE: Synthesizing the Entrepreneurial Mindset and Engineering Design

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Charles Kim, Bucknell University; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Characteristic Roles Page 24.837.4Throughout K-WIDE students were encouraged to be mindful of several different archetypal roles.The idea of an archetype was popularized by Carl Jung, but has been co-opted by several others.For example, De Bono created the Six Hats brainstorming technique 32 to balance convergent anddivergent thinking. Likewise IDEO has published the Ten Faces of Innovation that describes thekey personnel of a creative and productive team 33 .Six idealized roles emerged from K-WIDE. Some are more associated with engineering, whileothers are associated more with the entrepreneurial mindset. The goal for the student, however, isto be

Relevance Score: 0.29418018

Reinforcing a “Design Thinking” Course by Restructuring Student-Instructor Interactions

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ang Liu, University of Southern California; Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9697Reinforcing a ”Design Thinking” Course by Restructuring Student-InstructorInteractionsDr. Ang Liu Dr. Liu is a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow and Manager of Viterbi iPodia Program at University of South- ern California.Dr. Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California Dr. Lu is the David Packard Chair in Manufacturing Engineering, Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science, and Industrial and Systems Engineering, and Director of Viterbi iPodia Program, at University of Southern California

Relevance Score: 0.25819287

Elements of Teaching Design under Uncertainty

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stephen Ekwaro-Osire, Texas Tech University; Fisseha Meresa Alemayehu, Texas Tech University; Haileyesus Belay Endeshaw, Texas Tech University; Ricardo Cruz Lozano, Texas Tech University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

. Page 24.468.21. Introduction1.1. BackgroundTeaching and learning engineering design is rather unique since the necessary skills are difficultto attain directly from conventional teaching-learning processes. Unlike other engineeringcourses, which mostly require science and mathematics to solve mainly close-ended problems,engineering design demands additional skills of solving open-ended problems, decision makingand effective communication in design teams. Designers are expected to be team players to solveengineering problems in an iterative manner while always keeping in mind the main designobjective and the concept of uncertainty. Dym1 indicated that one of the attributes that designersexhibit in their design thinking is the ability to assume

Relevance Score: 0.25496247

An Experimental Study of Team Effectiveness and Satisfaction in an Engineering Design Course

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nausheen Pasha-Zaidi, The Petroleum Institute; Jaby Mohammed, The Petroleum Institute
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Mohammed, The Petroleum Institute Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE. He received his PhD in Indus- trial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a master’s in business administration from Indira Gandhi National Open Uni- versity (2001). His research interests include advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and engineering education. He previously taught at Indiana Purdue Fort Wayne, IN and at Morehead State University, KY. He is a member of IIE, SME, ASQ, ASEE, and Informs

Relevance Score: 0.25240695

The Development of Competencies in a Design Course from a Student Perspective

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Warren F. Smith, UNSW, Canberra, Australia; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9046The Development of Competencies in a Design Course from a Student Per-spectiveDr. Warren F Smith, UNSW, Canberra, Australia Warren Smith is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of NSW, Canberra at the Australian Defence Force Academy. He joined the University in 1998 after spending 20 years as a practicing Naval Architect with the Australian Department of Defence. He is also an Affiliate Research Scholar at the University of Oklahoma. He is passionate about project-based authentic and immersive learning in engineering design education, believing design is

Relevance Score: 0.25141466

From Idea to Prototyping A Hands-on, Engaging Undergraduate Design Experience

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Anthony Radzins, Florida Atlantic University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9293From Idea to Prototyping A hands-on engaging undergraduate design expe-rienceDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityAnthony Radzins, Florida Atlantic University Page 24.631.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 From Idea to Prototyping: A Hands-On Engaging Undergraduate Design Experience Daniel Raviv and Anthony Radzins Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida Atlantic University

Relevance Score: 0.25133875

A Study on the Factors Influencing the Usage of Environmentally Friendly Products

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicole Elise Esposito, Halliburton Energy Services; Vimal Viswanathan, Tuskegee University; Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Affairs. The Government of United Kingdom, 2004.[5] Kollmuss, A., and Agyeman, J.," Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?", Environmental education research Vol. 8, No. 3, 2002, pp. 239- 260.[6] Dahlstrand, U., and Biel, A.," ProEnvironmental Habits: Propensity Levels in Behavioral Change1", Journal of Applied Social Psychology Vol. 27, No. 7, 1997, pp. 588-601.[7] Fuad-Luke, A., "The eco-design handbook: a complete sourcebook for the home and office": Thames and Hudson, 2005.[8] Elias, E.W., Dekoninck, E., and Culley, S.J.," Designing for ‘use phase’energy losses of domestic products", Journal of Engineering Manufacture Vol. 223, No. 1

Relevance Score: 0.25027052

An Ethos of Sharing in the Maker Community

Conference Session: Design Realization
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chrissy Hobson Foster, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

and share their technical recipes with those interested. Done outsidethe confines of established engineering education curricular activities, Making comes from animaginative, creative mind-space and is a shareful practice. Making is defined by a do-it-yourself ideal and is historically rooted in efforts likePopular Mechanics magazine who demystified everyday stuff for hobbyists and the Whole EarthCatalog: Access to Tools5 who surveyed everyday tools for the counterculture movement of the1960s. Additional real-world touchstones are the growth of Radio Shack stores and the 1980stelevision program MacGyver where the lead character would resolve each episode’spredicament by fashioning an escape plan out of found objects6. Technology and

Relevance Score: 0.23469982

Immersive Experience Impact on Students' Understanding of Design

Conference Session: Developing the Design Skillset
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #10069Immersive Experience Impact on Students’ Understanding of DesignMs. Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University Antonette Cummings is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and

Relevance Score: 0.23099938

The Discourse of Design: Examining Students’ Perceptions of Design in Multidisciplinary Project Teams

Conference Session: Assessment
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Qin Zhu, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor

Relevance Score: 0.23099938

Design Ability Assessment Technique

Conference Session: DEED Melange
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Libby Osgood P. Eng, Dalhousie University and University of Prince Edward Island; Clifton R Johnston P.Eng., Dalhousie University
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2 Gelmon,S.B. (2000). How do we know that our work makes a difference? Metropolitan Universities, 11(2), 28-393 ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2010). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2008- 09%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-04-07.pdf.4 Schuburt, T. F., Jacobitz, F. G., & Kim. E. M. (2012). Student perceptions and learning of the engineering design process: an assessment at the freshmen level. Research in Engineering Design, 23, 177-190. DOI 10.1007/s00163-011-0121-x5 Carberry A

Relevance Score: 0.22737566

Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and Behaviors Matter?

Conference Session: Assessment
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Benjamin David Lutz, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9982Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and BehaviorsMatter?Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com