Paper ID #33001Engineering Ethics in Engineering Design Courses: A PreliminaryInvestigationDr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He leads the Improving Decisions in Engineering Education Agents and Systems (IDEEAS) Lab, which uses multi-modal data to characterize and improve decision-making processes throughout engineering education ecosystems.Ms. Isil Anakok, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Ms.Anakok is Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia
); and Professionalism (ethics). Atthe freshmen and sophomore levels, students experience their initial team design project and thena second project with more technical expectations. They are learning and practicing all of theProfessional Plan components, with the goal that juniors/seniors will be independently capable ofimplementing more rigorous team projects, and will be prepared to implement design and buildprojects subject to ever more realistic constraints and external customer needs.This paper will provide specific details of our adjustments to the freshman and sophomore designsequence in the 2020-21 academic year, based on the original implementation of these classes,the rapid changes required in spring 2020, and the ongoing current
engineering design course that aims to enhance theengineering design and engineering disciplines for first-year students in liberal arts universities.Specifically, we examined what learning objectives in this course motivated students. Moreimportantly, the study explored whether these motivations aligned with teacher’s perceptions ofmotivation, and how these motivations varied based on student demographics. The course isdesigned as a highly interactive seminar-style course that explores all aspects of the engineeringprofession, including engineering disciplines, education, creativity and design process, andengineers’ professional and ethical responsibilities. Students here implement the engineeringdesign process to develop prototypes that solve
design thinking and problemsolving in a virtual environment, and to integrate ethics into the project-based course. This fall-term course enrolled the first-year class of approximately 140 chemical, civil, electrical,mechanical, and general engineering students. Interdisciplinary teams worked on projects in thegeneral theme of “Engineering for Social Good.” Project topics included: designing smarter andmore resilient cities, developing therapeutic devices, designing shelter for refugees in flight, andmaking fuel from food waste. The faculty designed and led their own section’s projects whilehaving a set of common activities and deliverables with similar timelines and baseline rubrics.To build community among the students, every project team had
past few decades, there has been a push for engineering curriculum to better engagewith the global, ethical, and societal impacts of the field and to prepare students to engage in amulticultural and diverse workspace and world. In an effort to introduce diversity in design andto troubleshoot the concept of the universal user, we adapted the display compatibilityquestionnaire from Smith’s study of display-control stereotype designs, and presented the samedesign questions to 21st century first-year engineering students, non-engineering students, andnon-engineering professionals. This work explores current societal impacts such as gender, age,and occupation on the user expectation of a control’s display and user-interface design.Additionally, the
Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of identities in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Asset-based Approaches to Engineering Design Education: A
content instructor at the Department of Mechatronics. He was on the man- agement team of the Amman Design Week in its inaugural year in Jordan, launched by Queen Rania–a pioneering platform that harnessed creativity, revived the conversation about design, and instilled a spirit of collaboration and exchange.Prof. Andrew David Maynard, Arizona State University Andrew Maynard is a scientist, author, and a leading thinkers on socially responsible and ethical innova- tion. As Director of the ASU Risk Innovation Lab, he is working at the boundaries of how we think about risk and learn to succeed as we develop increasingly complex technologies. Andrew’s work spans both emerging and converging technologies, from
students in somatic awareness exercises will enhance their empathicperspective-taking ability and ultimately their skill in ethical reasoning and engineering design”(p. 1769).Two specific design approaches have potential to accommodate the limitations mentioned above.The first approach is participatory design [38]. Participatory design “attempts to actively involvethe people who are being served through the design process to help ensure the designedproduct/services meet their needs” [38]. The goal is to “involve those who will become the usersthroughout the design development process to the extent that this is possible” ([38], p. 14). Thesecond approach is generative design [38]. Generative design approach “empowers everydaypeople to generate and
developing campus digital twin through collaboration with companies such asAutodesk and Amazon Web Service (AWS). The presented pilot project results and discussionscan be used for larger application at the other campuses and communities, while addressing awide range of privacy, security, and ethical concerns.Introduction The global smart cities market is growing. From $99 billion in 2020 to almost $460billion in 2027. This is a global movement for improving the quality of life and tackling some ofthe most challenging issues such as climate change, by using information and communicationtechnology Universities have a critical role in growing implementation through training theworkforce with cutting-edge skills and knowledge and conducting
analyzeswhich career readiness competencies employers value most in their new college hires [3].Employers rank each competency as more than essential, essential, or somewhat essential in thesurvey. In the Job Outlook 2019 Survey, employers ranked critical thinking, oral and writtencommunication, teamwork and collaboration skills, and professionalism/work ethic as more thanessential competencies in new hires [3]. While the training in this project did not address thecritical thinking competency, it addressed the other top three skills cited in the NACE survey:oral and written communication, teamwork and collaboration skills, and professionalism/workethic.Recognizing that we had two groups from distinctly different disciplines that shared a
. • Identify and acquire new knowledge and understanding required for design, and subsequently apply it to a civil engineering project.Evidence for these outcomes will include student data as part of regular formative andsummative course assessment. We will also explore future questions related to studentoutcomes that may involve interviewing or observations as sources of evidence.Current Status and Future WorkWe have recently processed ethics approval and are limited in the results we can report at thistime. Although the focus of this initial stage is on the organizational shift, future work willencompass additional research questions to help us meet our goals and contribute to the bodyof knowledge around capstone design
purpose. We argue that when such design problems fall short, it notbecause they are not authentic, but because they may be missing other elements. Perhapssurprisingly, even in the popular culture design problems, this missing element may bemeaningfulness or relevance [15], a central tenant of constructionist learning [6].Engineering courses tend to privilege the technical aspects of engineering [16], though analysisof authentic engineering design practice characterizes this work as sociotechnical [17, 18], andresearch has increasingly suggested reflecting this in engineering programs is valuable [19, 20],providing students with opportunities to grapple with complex factors and ethics [21, 22]. Suchproblems create opportunities to connect with the
% Totals 215 100% 181 100%4.1 Self-Efficacy BeliefsTo collect data on student self-efficacy beliefs, students were asked in both the SOT and end ofterm (EOT) survey in both years to rate their level of ability from 1-8 in 11 areas including1 This study was conducted with Office of Research Ethics approval, ORE# 30293programming, design, and teamwork. Table 3 summarizes the mean and standard deviation forstudent self-efficacy beliefs at start, and end of term.Table 3 Summary of student self-efficacy beliefs, mean (std dev.) SOT EOT Programming Design Teamwork Programming Design Teamwork 2019 3.28 4.20
professionals. She is passionate about improving engineering education and practice and has been working in the areas of innovation, leadership development, diversity, equity, and inclusion, ethics, and, faculty development. Previously, she also worked for companies including Deloitte, Sprint, ProStem and Credit Suisse, both as an internal and external research consultant focusing on areas of leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to develop STEM workforce both in universities and companies.Dr. Carol B. Muller, Stanford
tell me about one of your experiences speaking up/sharing your opinion in this team? IQ8. Was there ever confrontation or conflict within this team? If so, how did the team deal with this? IQ9. How, if at all, did you feel your gender identity and/or racial/ethnic identity impacted your experience on your team?IQ10. Could you describe any instances of feeling respected and/or disrespected on the team?IQ11. If you felt disrespected, what were the reasons for any lack of respect? Personality? Work ethic? Technical Skills? Ethnographic or Economic Background?IQ12. To what extent did you socialize with any team members outside of the project work?IQ13. How much did you enjoy being together with the team as a whole?IQ14. Were
rubrics.In particular, the following ABET outcomes have components that are included in this activity: • 2. Ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors • 4: An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsFuture work includes a robust and modular ABET-style assessment exercise that faculty can useto gather this data. At the time of publication, a first draft was
and approved by thehuman research ethics board at the University of Toronto.In the feedback survey, demographic data were collected on students’ gender, previous hands-onexperience, as well as preferred learning styles by asking students to self-identify based on theVARK model categories: Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic [9]. The amount oftime it took the students to complete each activity module was also collected. In the main sectionof the survey, the students were asked to rate their subjective perception using a 5-point Likertscale: Strongly agree (5), agree (4), undecided (3), disagree (2), strongly disagree (1).These perception questions were divided into two sections:Overall experience: 1. I found the assembly
engineering process. 4. Ethical problem solving is an 1 2 3 4 5 important part of engineering design.Section VI:For each of the following items, rate how much you agree with each statementSurvey questions taken from [12] Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Somewh Somewha Strongly Disagre Strongly disagree at agree t Strongly Agree e Disagree agree 1. Solving a challenging 1 2 3 4 5 6 engineering problem is rewarding2. I like engineering design projects 1 2
. 159, 1977, doi: 10.2307/2529310.[35] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20175.[36] C. D. Batson, S. Early, and G. Salvarani, “Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 751–758, Jul. 1997, doi: 10.1177/0146167297237008.[37] M. H. Davis et al., “Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another?,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1625–1635, 2004, doi: 10.1177/0146167204271183.[38] M. H
not only focuses on the noveltyand usefulness of a product, but also morality and ethicality [8]. In addition, every field tends todefine creativity differently as it relates to that field, but most people view creativity as highlyvaluable [9].Creativity in Engineering. Creativity is increasingly essential to engineering. It is listed as thethird most important skill for an engineer to have [10]. The core of engineering is to solve real-world problems. In order to do this, engineers have to apply scientific principles in creative waysto develop effective and efficient solutions [11]. The problems we face today are becoming morecomplex as technology advances, therefore the solutions to these problems are required to bemore creative [12, 13
, thereby providing opportunities for all current and prospective engineers to reach their maximum potential. Dr. Hess’s primary research interests including exploring the functional role of empathy in various domains, including engineering ethics, design, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the 2021 division chair-elect for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing Ways of Experiencing
statement and lookedcarefully for overlap and differences. Items that appeared in multiple places and those the groupresonated with were integrated into a concise set of objectives. The specific format for theresulting aspirational statement was a bullet list with a word followed by a short description ofhow that trait (word) applies to a program graduate. An example is: “Aware - we recognize thesocial and ethical dimensions of engineering.”There were multiple rounds of discussion and negotiation during the weeks that followed until arough consensus was reached. This process was not without disagreement and not all of the ideaswere included. The ideas for the basis of the program that were related to the traditional traits ofan engineer were more
speculative futures and sci-fi-inspired prototypes. She is currently an artist- in-residence at Nokia Bell Labs and an assistant professor at the University of Michigan teaching Sci-Fi Prototyping, a course combining sci-fi, prototyping, and ethics. Her ongoing objective is to combine her background in art, design, and engineering to inspire a more positive future.Dr. Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan Colleen M. Seifert is an Arthur F. Thurnau Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Michigan. She received her Ph.D. in psychology at Yale University. She was an ASEE postdoctoral fellow at the University of California – San Diego and the Navy Personnel Research Development Center. Her research
influencing other people, so they conscientiously performnecessary work to a mutually agreed schedule” (Trevelyan, 2007). This finding grounded most of Trevelyan’sfuture work, which focused on the importance of social interactions within engineering practice (Trevelyan,2009, 2010b). Beyond the overarching themes of the practice of engineering, research has also focused on thecompetencies required for an engineer. In a 2007 study, Passow and Passow conducted a literature review inwhich they evaluated 52 studies that described various engineering competencies (Passow & Passow, 2017).Through their analysis, the team synthesized the findings into 16 competencies that included: communication,ethics, design, management, and more. In an empirical study
focused on identifying and developing leadership and other socio-technical capabilities among engineering students and professionals. She is passionate about improving engineering education and practice and has been working in the areas of innovation, leadership development, diversity, equity, and inclusion, ethics, and, faculty development. Previously, she also worked for companies including Deloitte, Sprint, ProStem and Credit Suisse, both as an internal and external research consultant focusing on areas of leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering
engineering programs [4].Significance and impactChanges in the ABET accreditation criteria for engineering education also indicate a significantneed for educational reform. The new criteria include a need to demonstrate training andexperience in areas specific to design methodology. These skill requirements, such as teamwork,technical communication, economics and ergonomics of system or product design, civicengagement and ethics, reveal that the mere acquisition of technical knowledge is insufficient fora robust, modern engineering education [2].Goals and objectivesThere are several core goals involved in this paper, all centered on improving student experience,learning, and satisfaction in undergraduate education. Content creation for this paper