solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 24.410.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development and Implementation of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Threshold Concepts in Thermodynamics
semesters. The work is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.Students at Rowan University have built almost all of the “hardware” for the HPT (air engine,planetary gearset
solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Erick Jacob Nefcy, Oregon State UniversityDr. Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a postdoctoral scholar in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University. Debra has an M.BA, an M.S, and four years of industrial experience including a position in sensor development. Sensor development is
December 2013, data was gathered from an end of semester survey given to the 55academically at-risk first-year and second-year engineering students. Table 3 describes thesurvey responders and Table 4 summarizes how they responded. Recall that 33 of the 55students voluntarily participated in the retention counseling sessions and the professionalworkshops. These 33 belong to the “Participant” categories shown in Table 3. The other 22comprise the “Non-participant” categories. Furthermore, first-year students who did not placeinto calculus started behind in the curriculum and are in the category “Start Behind”. Second-year students who are behind their cohort by up to two courses are in the “Fall Behind” category.The survey was a formative assessment
assuming constant specific heatsThe goal of this work is to develop an experimental apparatus which can be used to generate datafor use by students in a Model Eliciting Activity. We believe this effort will provide valuabletools to promote thermodynamics learning for both students and faculty alike.MEA BasicsThe following is an introduction to a comprehensive four-year effort by a team of researchersfrom six universities that focuses on models and modeling as a foundation for undergraduateSTEM curriculum. This effort is focusing on improving engineering education, with the presentdiscussion focusing developing Model Eliciting Activities with a laboratory component. MEAresearch, which originated in the mathematics education community5, uses open
engineering program was established totrain well-rounded employees for business and industry employers in eastern North Carolina [10].In order to achieve the goal of training general engineers with specialized skills, a curriculumstructure consisting of an engineering core curriculum and concentration-specific courses wasimplemented.Constrained by the broad nature of a general engineering program, only two courses(ENGR2514— Circuit Analysis and ENGR3050—Sensors, Measurements, and Controls) in thecore curriculum introduce EE topics and two others have some EE content (ENGR1016—Introduction to Engineering Design and ENGR2050—Computer Application for Engineers). Outof these EE-related courses, ENGR3050 is a hybrid course that covers two major
focused our efforts toward developing the Agent-basedTutor and Simulator System (ATSS). The ATSS is still under the development, these tutorialsbeing an integrant part of it. The purpose of this system with an embedded-intelligence andknowledge base is to guide and support students in remote operations within the safety and Page 24.421.8functional boundaries of the equipment. Its main function is to aid remote users in lieu of the 6teacher’s absence through the graphical projection of process plan and process knowledge inmachining and
Paper ID #10784A Case Study: How Collaborative PBL Affects Learning of Minority Stu-dents in Engineering Courses at Senior LevelDr. Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los AngelesDr. Pearl Chen, California State University, Los Angeles Page 24.22.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Case Study: How Collaborative PBL Affects Learning of Minority Students in Engineering Courses at Senior LevelAbstractThis paper presents the current progress and preliminary findings of an NSF
2006-1293: A PROPOSED PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY (PIV) SYSTEMFOR INSTRUCTIONAL PURPOSES IN A MODERN MECHANICALENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATE LABORATORY PROGRAMAfshin Goharzadeh, The Petroleum Institute AFSHIN GOHARZADEH, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the petroleum Institute. An expert in experimental fluid mechanics, Dr. Goharzadeh obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Le Havre in France (2001). After his Ph.D. he joined the prestigious Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen (Germany) as scientific researcher. He characterized experimentally the flow at water-sediment interface. Using the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Refractive Index
, we describe the implementation of the integrated undergraduatetelecommunications laboratory at Southeast Missouri State University. The new laboratoryintegrates traditional telephone network, VOIP, data network and backbone fiber optic networkwhere data, voice and video traffic (to be added in) will coexist. Our goal for the lab is to allowstudents to see an integrated telecommunication system, rather than many isolated parts. Thehands-on experiences obtained through such a complete system will also enhance the theoryknowledge from our integrated curriculum, no matter what topic they are learning.Following the testing, we will interconnect the different networks. Additionally, we will developnew courses and lab activities to fully utilize
TechUniversity, we began our own engineering curriculum reform in 1995. Through the support ofthe College and the National Science Foundation we have implemented and revised multipleIntegrated Engineering Curricula.One obstacle to implementing an active-learning, laboratory experience at the freshman level isthe required infrastructure and setup time. These barriers can lead to either poorly implementedprojects with no connection to the curricula or to time-intensive preparations by the faculty andstaff. Through multiple iterations of our freshman curriculum, we have developed an active,hands-on lab-type experience at the freshman level that is both tightly integrated to the coursecontent and does not require extensive set up and tear down time by the
; Soloway, 1998) and implement an engineering course re-design.Re-designing curriculum using an inquiry-based learning approach is a vital step in addressingthis serious gap in student achievement (Brooks & Brooks, 1993; Brown, Collins, & Duguid,1989; Fosnot & Perry, 2005). A recent national report (Katehi, Pearson, & Feder, 2009)advocates identifying and introducing engineering content in school curricula to improve STEM Page 24.242.3learning by integrating mathematics and science education through engineering applications.This report correlates with the NRC’s recent release of the aforementioned A Framework for K-12 Science
Laboratoryfor the School Preview and Summer Program for High School Students. The equipment willbecome an important part of our outreach events and summer program for promising high schoolstudents from backgrounds underrepresented in the engineering profession.Reference:1. SFSU Civil Engineering Curriculum Mission Statements, Internal Report by School of Engineering, San Francisco State University (2003).2. Sabatini, D.A., Teaching and Research Synergism: the Undergraduate Research Experience, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 123, No.3, 98-102 (July 1997).3. Jenkins, S. R., Pocock, J.B., Zuraski, P.D., Meade, R.B., Mitchell, Z.W. and Farrington, J.J., Capstone Course in an Integrated
design course. As a direct result ofthese curricular modifications, goal-oriented and design-focused projects have become the norm,rather than the exception. Within a year of the reform, students taking courses as part of therevised curriculum were designing projects using the very latest available integrated circuits andsoftware. As student projects increased in sophistication, a growing need for state-of-the-artSurface Mount Technology (SMT) facilities and Printed Circuit Board (PCB) etchingcapabilities was recognized. To support these projects, an SMT facility with PCB etchingcapability was developed. The use of SMT and PCB etching techniques enables students topursue much more complex and creative design projects using current, industry
Paper ID #9705Evidence for the Effectiveness of a Grand Challenge-based Framework forContextual LearningDr. Lisa Huettel, Duke University Dr. Lisa G. Huettel is an associate professor of the practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University where she also serves as associate chair and director of Undergraduate Studies for the department. She received a B.S. in Engineering Science from Harvard University and earned her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Her research interests are focused on engineering education, curriculum and laboratory development, and
AC 2007-1224: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING VIRTUAL CIRCUIT SIMULATIONLABORATORIESRobert Szlavik, California Polytechnic State University Page 12.316.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Biomedical Engineering Virtual Circuit Simulation LaboratoriesAbstractCircuit simulators, such as SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis) areuseful tools that can enhance the educational experience of students in many subject areas withina biomedical engineering curriculum. Courses on biomedical instrumentation are venues forwhich virtual laboratory experiments, using circuit simulators, can be readily developed. Theinstructor can use the circuit simulation
addition, engineers with better communication and teamworkskills are needed to ensure U.S. competitiveness in today’s global economy.In order to address this competency gap a team of faculty members (consisting of faculty fromboth ME and EE departments) started work in the late nineties to integrate Mechatronics-basedactivities at all levels of the undergraduate engineering curriculum at University of DetroitMercy. These included a new senior level technical elective in introductory mechatronics alongwith mechatronic activities in freshman design and in the introductory electrical engineeringcourse for non-EE majors. This effort has been very successful, and now mechatronics activitiestake place in many pre-college programs that the school
industries. The discussion will also identify how the “need” for thistype of project based curriculum became obvious. Four prerequisite courses are brieflydescribed before focusing on the project based capstone course. These four coursesprovide the students with the technical skill sets needed to succeed in the senior levelcapstone course. Accomplishments and outcomes from the student perspective, theUniversity perspective, and the industry perspective will also be shared.Our advancing world of computer integration, process control, industrial automation, andtelecommunications requires technical problem solvers and knowledgeable decisionmakers. “The activities of problem solving and decision making are closelyintertwined”,1 and both skills can
prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 24.366.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Design for Impact: Reimagining Inquiry-‐Based Activities for Effectiveness and Ease of Faculty Adoption Standard lecture-‐based educational approaches are of limited effectiveness in repair of
courses were first offered on an experimental basis in the Fall 2014 semester. We foundthe students to be very interested and engaged and all expressed positive impressions of theirlearning experience. Additionally, we gained insight into what the students were taking awayfrom their introductory coursework.We envision these courses as emerging as part of an on-going incremental development in ourembedded computing curriculum. For example, one of the outcomes of the “Design Your OwnEmbedded Experiment” is a new sequence of experiments that will be merged into our existingcourse enabling us to broaden our options for this course and perhaps develop new courseworkthat may be more focused for students from other majors such as Computer Science
experience into the pre-engineering and technology-based classrooms, the collab- oration with community colleges to develop interactive games in empowering students with engineering literacy and problem-solving, the integration of system-on-chip concepts across two year Engineering Science and four year ECE curricula, and the implementation of an educational innovation that demon- strates science and engineering principles using an aquarium. Her work has resulted in over 90 journal and conference papers and book chapters.Dr. Steven H Chin, Rowan University Steven H. Chin is currently the Associate Dean of Engineering at Rowan University. He has been in this position since 1997, while serving as Interim Dean from 2010-2012
. Page 24.636.3Virtual Facility and Tutor SystemBased on the development of 3D Virtual Facility, the authors have conducted an experiment toexplore if the use of operating the RP simulator is performing as good as the use ofimplementing the real FDM 3000 machine. The experiment reveals that students who have usedthe RP simulator perform not as good as students who have an instructor in the laboratory,particularly in the comprehensive exam and the calibration operation31. Consequently, theauthors would like to conduct further investigation to learn about (1) If integration of VF andTutor System (TS) can achieve similar performance as a real instructor in the classroom;and (2) What components should be incorporated in the TS to enhance
consists of three road-legal vehicles which are used for hands-on learningactivities by the students in the HEV Engineering curriculum, and can also be used for a widerange of outreach and community education opportunities. The vehicles, a Chevy Volt ExtendedRange Electric Vehicle (EREV), a Chevy Malibu Belted Alternator Starter (BAS), and a SaturnVue Mulit-Mode HEV represent a majority of the technology currently available in Hybrid andelectric automobiles today. Data acquisition is done with ETAS hardware running INCAsoftware. The data acquisition system interfaces with the vehicles CAN bus through the OBD-IIconnector. Plans are underway to utilize a National Instruments CAN module running in aCompact DAQ chassis as an alternative to the ETAS
selection for engineering design.DESIGN OF THE CURRICULUM FOR GPMT EDUCATIONManufacturing technology is integrally tied to advancements in materials science andtechnology. Materials science and technology have played a critical role in the technologicalevolution of our society, from structural steels to optoelectronics and robotics technology.We have enhanced the five current core courses within the current project (NSF AWRARDNo.: DUE- 1044794): that is, materials technology, mechanical engineering technology lab,plastics processing technology, solid modeling and design, and robotics in manufacturing.Also, we established an intensive undergraduate research program for co-op students in themanufacturing and mechanical engineering technology programs
microcontrollers to controlvarious devices. Read input from sensors, perform analysis through software, and then providecorresponding control signals. Currently, students perform labs on stand-alone project MPUproject boards. Another course is CPET 4381 Digital Signal Processing Applications Lab,experiments in signal processing using commercial DSP processors for performing variousimage and speech processing task. Previously, the lab is made through MATLAB simulation,and TI DSP 6416 boards just become available recently. We are planning (4) To introduce LabVIEW to integrate the Freescale or TI board with the software. Embedded project manager is an add-on toolbox to make teaching embedded systems using DSPs or MPUs easy and affordable
will determine what must be used.Conclusions & Future PlansA flexible CIS laboratory environment employing multi-boot and virtual computing is describedin sufficient detail for implementation. An almost entire CIS laboratory curriculum can besupported by such an environment. Major benefits are: flexibility, space savings, equipment costsavings, and an increase in student learning through practical experiences in a familiar laboratorylearning environment. However, our experience shows that such integral laboratoryenvironments might be prone to malware, thus needing the best anti-malware software available.In addition, lab development requires considerable faculty time. While faculty and studentsappreciate such an environment, some students
several awards for outstanding research and teaching at Penn State, including the 2007 Penn State University President’s Award for Excellence in Academic Integration. He is a Fellow in ASME and an Associate Fellow in AIAA. He currently serves on the ASME Design Education Division Executive Committee and is former Chair of both the ASME Design Automation Executive Committee and the AIAA MDO Technical Committee. He is also a Department Editor for IIE Transactions: Design & Manufacturing and serves on the editorial boards for Research in Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Design, and Engineering Optimization.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Gul E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania
materialand thereby integrated into examinations and homework. We developed set of remotely controlled laboratories covering optical circuits concepts. Thelaboratories are currently implemented in the Engineering Technology Department at the Universityof Houston in an upper division undergraduate course, The experiments have also been used at theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder. Formative assessment provides numerous benefits to measurestudent learning outcome. Other researchers have explored the use of formative assessment toguide online learning. To the best of our knowledge, embedded formative techniques have not beenpreviously used in online laboratories. This paper will present results of embedded assessmenttechniques conducted in this
apply to any RAL learning activity. Theyare used for the evaluation of the RAL activities in other disciplines in the body of the study.Slangen and Sloep12 suggest that it is important to provide an “environment in which the pupilcan construct knowledge and can reflect upon his interactions and thinking” and highlights that“learning implies the initiation of a thinking process” (p. 228). The integrated thinking model ofJonassen13 cited by Slangen & Sloep12 highlights three general thinking tasks, i.e. basic, criticaland creative thinking that are part of a complex thinking process. Slangen & Sloep12 suggest thatthe effective use of mind tools promotes fluency in different ways of thinking described in themodel.For a laboratory learning
position tracking, Fig. 9 Square-wave position tracking, X=20 ms/div, Y=2 rev/div X=100 ms/div, Y=2 rev/divFollowing the design and implementation of the PI controller, the student is introduced to thedual loop controller (proportional position with an inner proportional-integral speed loopcontroller).This controller represents a modification of the PI controller. The dual loop controlleris employed frequently in servo position loops found on numerically controlled machines andhas been chosen for this reason. The Simulink model implementing the dual loop controller isshown in Fig. 10. The students, with no difficulty, modified the values of the controller’s threeparameters-the proportional gain in the