Engineering Education, and Fellow, Discovery Learning Center at Purdue University West Lafayette. He has been at the University of Minnesota since 1972 and is in phased retirement as Morse-Alumni Distinguished Teaching Professor of Civil Engineering. Karl has been active in the Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) for over 25 years and has served in many capacities, including Chair of the Division. His Bachelors and Masters degrees are in Metallurgical Engineering from Michigan Technological University and his Ph.D. is in Educational Psychology from the University of Minnesota. He has co-written eight books including Cooperative
and bachelor’s degrees in International Studies, Anthropology and Latin American Studies from Macalester College.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University Press of America, 2005), Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (Morgan &Claypool, 2010), Engineering
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. She has served in the United States Army for the last 8 years as an officer and Army Engineer. She is a graduate of West Point (BS in Civil Engineering), Missouri Science & Technology (MS in Engineering Management) and the University of Vermont (MS in Civil & Environmental Engineering).Christopher Thomas Duling, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States MilitaryAcademy at West Point Major Chris Duling is currently an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He has served the United States Army for the last 11 years
Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Social Dialogue in the Engineering Classroom: The Effect of
Paper ID #12382Reflecting on reflection: How educators experience the opportunity to talkabout supporting student reflectionDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of WashingtonDr. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Dr. Sattler is a Research Scientist for the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) and a Multi-Campus Coordinator for the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE) at the University of Washington. Her research interests include understanding and promoting self-authoring engineers.Dr. Lauren D. Thomas, University of WashingtonDr. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington
Paper ID #7352International Engineering Education Journals: Past, Present and PotentialResearch DirectionsDr. Leticia Anaya, University of North Texas Leticia H. Anaya, PhD, ETEC Graduate Program Coordinator UNT College of Engineering Department of Engineering Technology 3940 N. Elm, #F115U Denton, TX 76207 Lanaya@unt.edu (940)565-2022 Lucian Visinescu, Ph.D. Student Information Technologies & Decision Sciences College of Business University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle Denton, TX 76203-5017 Office: BA 233A Phone: (940) 565-3128 Fax: (940) 565-4935 lucian.visinescu@unt.edu
instructors understand the role of exploring technology/society interactions in engineering education? ≠ How do faculty describe the process they use in exploring technology/society interactions in their own teaching? ≠ Are there challenges or barriers to teaching about technology/society interactions in engineering education?Where “society” includes both social issues (such as poverty, or environmentalconservation) and social structures (such as political and economic systems).As a lecturer of education and technology & society studies, and an education specialistwithin an engineering faculty, I have become intrigued with the beliefs behind curriculumselection, and also how professors choose to contextualize their
AC 2009-1678: HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS ENGINEERING DESIGN LESSONPLANNING THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTCameron Denson, Utah State University Cameron Denson is a post doctoral research associate for the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education at Utah State University. He earned a Ph.D. in occupational studies from the University of Georgia. His research interests include diversity initiatives and increasing student self-efficacy in science and math through infusing engineering design into 9-12 technology education. Previously, he was a middle school technology educator in North Carolina, active in the community activism and grassroots initiatives.Nathan Mentzer, Utah State University
the United States (US) K-12 setting is an idea that has been gainingattention as professional and educational groups push for its inclusion into the pre-college STEMclassrooms 1-4. Other countries such as the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, New Zealand, andCanada include design and technology in their pre-college curriculum 5-8.The International Technology Education Association (ITEA) places engineering design withintechnology education classrooms and describes engineering design as demanding “criticalthinking, the application of technical knowledge, creativity, and an appreciation of the effects ofa design on society and the environment” 1. The National Research Council (NRC)3 recognizesthe importance of the relationship between the
. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Professor of Information Sciences and Technology at George Mason University where he also directs the Engineering Education and Cyberlearning Laboratory (EECL). Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in
Paper ID #8586Advanced Student-Centric Learning Practices in Applied Engineering Pro-gramsProf. Ben D Radhakrishnan, National University Prof. Ben Radhakrishnan is currently a full time Faculty in the School of Engineering, Technology and Media (SETM), National University, San Diego, California, USA. He is the Lead Faculty for MS Sus- tainability Management Program. He develops and teaches Engineering Management and Sustainability Management graduate level courses. Ben has taught Sustainability workshops in Los Angeles (Army) and San Diego (SDGE). His special interests and research include teaching methods (specifically
Paper ID #21616Lean LaunchPad and Customer Discovery as a Form of Qualitative ResearchDr. Cory Hixson, Rowan University Cory is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He earned his B.S. in Engineering Science (2007), M.S. in Industrial and System Engineering (2014) and Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2016). Cory has experience as both a professional engineer and high school educator. His professional interests are understanding the interaction between engineering educa- tion pedagogy and entrepreneurship, faculty technology commercialization experiences, and institutional
Paper ID #17703Evaluating Freshman Engineering Design Projects Using Adaptive Compar-ative JudgmentDr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Dr. Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue University My interests revolve around adaptive
global reach. Capacity building has also been aided by thecreation of PhD-granting departments of Engineering Education at several US and internationalinstitutions.NSF recently funded a new project to continue and expand the work done by RREE and ISEE.Expanding and sustaining research capacity in engineering and technology education: Building onsuccessful programs for faculty and graduate students (which we will call the RREE2) (DUE-0817461) broadens the Community of Practice (COP) model successfully used to develop the RREEand ISEE programs. Page 15.280.2The RREE2 project has three goals: 1. Design and deliver a new generation of programs to
) Develop newcourses for engineers that integrate liberal arts using FLCs.KeywordsLiberal arts, engineering education, faculty learning communities, general engineering paths,sustainabilityIntroductionEngineers are charged with creating, developing and implementing technological solutions tocontemporary challenges, and innovating solutions for tomorrow’s. Yet, engineering training isprimarily focused on comprehension of the mathematical, physical and sometimes, chemicalequations governing the behavior of systems and their components and applications of these,often with little attention to humanistic inquiry. This can lead to engineers who are not trained tothink critically about human and social dimensions of challenges nor integrate them fully
, and theyquestioned whether the reviewers check references 80.Bibliography1. M. Molenda, “On the origins of the ‘Retention Chart’,” Educational Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2004, p. 64.2. D.G. Treichler, “Are you missing the boat in training aids?,” Film and Audio-Visual Communications, vol. 1, Feb. 1967, pp. 14-16, 29-30, 48.3. J.E. Stice, “Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 77, no. 5, Feb. 1987, pp. 291-296.4. J.E. Stice, “Socony-Vacuum retention study,” email communication to Robert Befus, May 12, 2007.5. E. Dale, Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, 3rd ed., NY: Dryden Press, 1969.6. R.V. Krivickas, “Active learning at Kaunas University of
(NAE)1 asks for more interdisciplinary knowledge and cross-disciplinary collaboration inengineering to address future grand challenges. In 2003, National Institutes of Health (NIH) hasissued new policies2 to impose the implementation of research data sharing on NIH granteesfunded $500,000 or above a year. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)established a Scientific Data Lifecycle Management Working Group3 in 2009 to harness digitaldata and improve data dissemination. National Science Foundation (NSF) also announced policychanges4 in 2011 to enforce dissemination and sharing of research results by requiring all grantapplicants include a plan of data management in any proposal submitted.In Engineering Education Research (EER
experiencesmay be limited to the audiovisual interaction with the instructor and the blackboard and may beenriched by modern technology-enabled classrooms that can deliver impressive intensity ofknowledge transfer through the use of various audio-visual tools, while seamlessly incorporatingactive learning techniques [1,2]. In this paper, we focus on an evidence-based practice study thathas been carried out in an Engineering course for Juniors, Introduction to Thermodynamics (seeFigure 1), to assess the effectiveness of the technology-enabling (E-Learning) environmentlabeled as Google-Classroom (GC), into enriching classroom teaching. We show ways to use anintegrated online homework delivery system based upon the Google online ecosystem, anintegrated
potential) of current engineering-related efforts in a variety of contexts (e.g. political, economic, social…). Together these form apicture of both student awareness of issues and the impacts of those issues in the world. Ofcourse, other departments may have their own sub-criteria developed for 3j, however as will beseen in this study, such a division between issues and impacts lends itself to using distinct sets ofboth broad-based and case-specific quiz questions. Outcome Description J Knowledge of Contemporary Issues Criteria J1 Knowledge of contemporary issues in engineering/technology J2 Knowledge of the impacts of contemporary issues in engineering/technology Table 1: Criteria used by
Paper ID #27069Engineering Students’ Self-Reflections, Teamwork Behaviors, and AcademicPerformanceMs. Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette Saira Anwar is a third-year doctoral student at School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. She is interested in exploring the effects of using technology to enhance students’ learning. Further, she is interested in understanding the ways and interventions that can be designed to deal with conceptually hard concepts in STEM courses especially programming and software engineering courses. Prior to Purdue University, Saira worked as Assistant Professor in Computer
Paper ID #14626Sources of Anxiety among Engineering Students: Assessment and MitigationDr. Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University Dr. Paul Yanik is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Western Carolina University. His areas of research include human-robot interactions, assistive devices, pattern recognition, machine learning, and engineering education.Dr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Harbin Institute of Tech- nology (China), and the M.S. degree in Applied Statistics and the Ph.D. degree in
promote institutional change in engineering education.”Shawn S Jordan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Shawn Jordan is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education and MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. His research interests include virtual cross-disciplinary engineering design teams in industry and pre-college engineering design pedagogy.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She led the Institute for Scholarship on Engineering Education (ISEE) as part of the Center for the Ad
Magana is a Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and an affil- iated faculty at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.E. in Information Systems, a M.S. in Technology, both from Tec de Monterrey; and a M.S. in Educational Technology and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research is focused on identifying how model-based cognition in STEM can be better supported by means of expert technological and computing tools such as cyber-physical systems,visualizations and modeling and simulation tools.Dr. Paul Parsons, Purdue University Paul Parsons is an Assistant Professor in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. His research
Paper ID #18471The Variation of Nontraditional Teaching Methods Across 17 UndergraduateEngineering ClassroomsMr. Kevin A. Nguyen, University of Texas, Austin Kevin Nguyen is currently a doctoral student in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education program at University of Texas at Austin. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environmental Engineering both from Texas Tech University. As an engineering and STEM education researcher, he draws on a variety of social science research methods from ethnography to regression modeling. He is currently working on two projects: engineering faculty’s use of active
motivated to remain in engineering by a love for technology, or adesire to solve puzzles and think conceptually [5], [6]. Although many of these workforcestudies are qualitative, with generalizability yet to be proven, it appears that the strongest andmost powerful factors that motivate engineers to persist in the workforce are inconsistent withwhat drives the major challenges that face engineering today. Given the importance of thesegrand challenges [1], engineering must attract individuals who are invested in the benefits andoutcomes of meeting those challenges.Among women engineers, motivation and opportunity to pursue social good are especiallyimportant. Although key predictors of female retention in the engineering workforce includehigh self
, Page 15.869.2Ford Partnership for Advanced Studies, Full Option Science System, The Infinity Project,Materials World Modules, and Project Lead the Way. The sample for this study was drawnproximal to Utah State University which resulted in the inclusion of students from Project Leadthe Way (PLTW) programs. The National Academy of Engineering highlighted three significantbenefits of improving the public understanding of engineering: 1. Sustaining the U.S. capacity for technological innovation. A better understanding of engineering would educate policy makers and the public as to how engineering contributes to economic development, quality of life, national security, and health. 2. Attracting young people to careers in engineering
Paper ID #13105Institutional Responses to the Bologna Process in Danish Engineering Edu-cationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He also serves as the current Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; a member of the Society for the
AC 2012-5072: LEARNING THROUGH COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: EN-GINEERING STUDENTS USE OF ”PSEUDO PEER DIAGRAMS”Ms. Sensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sensen Li is a Ph.D. student in the engineering education program at Purdue University. She holds a M.S.Ed. in educational technology from Purdue University.Dr. Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 25.885.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Learning through Cognitive Dissonance: Engineering Students Use of
into how students process knowledge when provided withsimulation tools and computational methods for solving design problems. Page 24.582.2IntroductionComputer modeling and simulation are emergent pedagogical tools implemented for teachingconcepts in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Onepedagogical objective for integrating computer modeling and simulation within learningenvironments is to help students develop deeper understanding of a physical phenomenonthrough visualization and dynamic interaction of abstract concepts or complex systems. Whenmodeling and interacting with numerical simulation, a student must
Paper ID #32823Exploring Engineering Faculty’s Use of Active-learning Strategies inTheir TeachingDr. Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu, Iowa State University Dr. Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at Iowa State University. Her background is in Curriculum and Instruction, and her research interests include online learning, hybrid learning, and technology integration in higher education.Dana AlZoubi, Iowa State University Dana AlZoubi is a PhD candidate, majoring in Educational technology and co-majoring in Human- Computer Interaction at