Paper ID #21351Examining a Novel Theory-to-practice Effort in Engineering Education throughMultiple Theoretical Lenses of Systems and ChangeDr. Stephen Secules, University of Georgia Stephen received a PhD in education at the University of Maryland researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught an introduction to engineering to undergraduate engineers and to practicing K-12 teachers. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of engineering education.Mr
Paper ID #23241Research on Comprehensive Quality Evaluation System of Engineering Un-dergraduates Based on Developmental Evaluation: Taking X University asan ExampleMs. Zhi Fang, Beihang University Zhi Fang is a Ph.D. candidate in School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University, Bei- jing, China. She received M.Ed. in Beihang University, and B.E. in School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Southwest Jiaotong University, China. Her academic and research interests in Research and Methods of Higher Education. She works in Beihang University.Prof. Shuiting Ding, Beihang University Shuiting Ding is a
Paper ID #15061Engineering Design Self-Efficacy and Project-Based Learning: How Does Ac-tive Learning Influence Student Attitudes and Beliefs?Mr. Justin Charles Major, University of Nevada, Reno Justin Major is an Undergraduate Research Assistant in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. He is currently working towards dual Bachelors of Sci- ence degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Math Education and expects to graduate May of 2017. His research interests include students development of self-efficacy and identity in math and engi- neering, and active learning
Paper ID #14639The Interplay Between Engineering Students’ Modeling and Simulation Prac-tices and Their Use of External Representations: An Exploratory StudyHayden Fennell, Purdue University Polytechnic Institute Hayden Fennell is a Ph.D. student in the department of Computer and Information Technology at Pur- due University. He holds an M.S.E. degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of South Carolina.Mr. Camilo Vieira, Purdue University PhD Candidate at Purdue University Master of Engineering in Educational Technologies - Eafit
Paper ID #11853Using an Instrument Blueprint to Support the Rigorous Development of NewSurveys and Assessments in Engineering EducationMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a
AC 2008-690: ARE WE ACCEPTING THE RIGHT STUDENTS TO GRADUATEENGINEERING PROGRAMS: MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF ACCEPTEDSTUDENTS VIA DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSISElif Kongar, University of Bridgeport Elif Kongar received her BS degree from the Industrial Engineering Department of Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, in June 1995. In June 1997, she received her MS degree in Industrial Engineering from the same university where, she was awarded full scholarship for graduate studies in the USA. She started the graduate program in Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA in September 1998 and obtained her Ph.D. degree in June
engineering will be as well. There is both a sense inwhich Nicole’s experience of shame is lived by her and a sense in which her engineeringenvironment establishes the context for her to live in the experience of shame. Our previousresearch [1,6,7] has provided a more extensive review of how shame has been examined in prioreducation research.With this individual-in-environment connection in mind, we chose to examine Nicole’s case ofexperiencing shame within the context of engineering education. Nicole, who identifies as aWhite woman, was a junior-level mechanical engineering student at the time of our interview.She also holds an identity as a student-athlete at the university. These multiple identities arepresent in different social situations in
on human action, communication, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education
Instructor Implements Project-Based Learning 1. Introduction & Objectives In the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Manitoba, Canada, a novice instructor with more than a decade of industry experience in consulting engineering practice re-designed a third-year structural engineering design course around a project- based instructional method. The impetus for changing the course was twofold: his own industry experience that drove his desire to educate students with the engineering knowledge and skills, and foster in them the engineering mind-set to succeed in industry; as well as the fact that the structural course that he was charged with teaching had
assign students a B if they simply complete the assignment and then I assign higher grades based on a loose definition in my mind of the “thoughtfulness” of the reflection. Since the interview I have been wondering if this is an appropriate metric for grading and whether I should grade the reflections at all. It would be wonderful to remove the extrinsic motivation of grades from the equation and have students reflect simply from the desire to improve themselves as people and as engineers. However, I worry that many students will not put the energy and thought into reflections if there is not a grade attached to it. Perhaps I will have to experiment with this in the future. Adam Carberry, Arizona State University
research and study directly. While most engineering educatorsacknowledge that they make some explicit decisions, most of their decisions are invisible andunspoken. As researchers, we cannot “see” or “witness” a decision, and therefore must inferfrom observable behavior or participants’ self-reported comments that a decision has been made.The study of the decision-making process is also made more difficult by the ephemeral nature ofdecisions which happen quickly in people’s minds. The challenges related to conducting researchabout making decisions may have contributed to the paucity of studies that examine teacherthinking and teacher decision-making in higher education.Although little has been published regarding teaching decisions within the
Paper ID #25276Using Topological Data Analysis in Social Science Research: Unpacking De-cisions and Opportunities for a New MethodDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
Paper ID #27505An Exploration of Course Design Heuristics Identified from Design Meetings,Design Artifacts, and Educator InterviewsDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is a postdoctoral research associate in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Indus- trial Design at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education from Purdue University. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, engineering design, instructional design
Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. She was awarded the 2020 WEPAN Founders Award
course size either does or does not affect course grades, the researchers leftthis question unanswered in the literature. In order to address this question, we opened thequestion to present the answers to the community at large. While the topic of engineering grades remains an important one to our community,[2-9] itcould be easily argued that the subject of the effect of class size on grades is even moreuniversally debated – both outside [10-13] and within the sphere of higher education.[14, 15] Somestudies actually shirk the question of the effect of class size on grades altogether and opt to probeclass size’s effect on teacher evaluations![16] More general and historically-minded reviews of thesubject in higher education are beyond the
difficulty in writing items for the ICAP framework was designing items thatcould be used across all STEM disciplines. The item writers hoped that if the SCAEI couldmeasure across science, engineering, and mathematics classrooms, it could begin to describedifferences between STEM classrooms in terms of how students self-perceive the frequency ofclassroom activities. However, given the diverse disciplinary focuses across the STEMdisciplines, it was a challenge to ensure that all discipline specific habits of mind were addressedby the SCAEI. To address this challenge, the item writers had collective disciplinary expertise inscience, engineering, and mathematics.Methods to Initially Assess the SCAEIIt is important to note that instrument development
Paper ID #30306It’s the End of the World as We Know It, and I Need a Job: A QualitativeExploration of Mid-Year Engineering Students’ Future Possible CareersDr. Catherine McGough, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine McGough is an Assistant Professor at the Iron Range Engineering Bell Program through Min- nesota State University, Mankato. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson University. Her research interests are in undergrad- uate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineering problem solving skill development and
home(work) about: An analysis of writing exercises in fluid mechanics textbooks. Proceedings of the ASEE 2015 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: ASEE. Paper ID #12150 31. Valenzuela, M., & Stein, V. A. (2015). Minding the gap: How engineering can contribute to a liberal education. Proceedings of the ASEE 2015 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: ASEE. Paper ID #12526 32. White, C. K., Breslow, L., & Hastings, D. E. (2015) Understanding curricular approaches to communication as a global competency: An interdisciplinary study of the teaching and learning of communications. Proceedings of the ASEE
AC 2011-312: TIERED SCAFFOLDING OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARN-ING TECHNIQUES IN A THERMODYNAMICS COURSENancy K. Lape, Harvey Mudd College Assistant Professor Nancy K. Lape joined the Engineering Department at Harvey Mudd College in 2005 and serves as the Director of the Patton and Claire Lewis Fellowship in Engineering Professional Practice. Her research focuses on energy-efficient composite gas separation membranes, chemical transport across human skin, and engineering education. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the Univer- sity of Massachusetts at Amherst, a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and completed her postdoctoral studies at the Laboratoire des Sciences
collaborative learning. In IEEE International Professional CommunicationConference, IEEE, 214-218.[12] Lin, C. P., Liu, K. P., & Niramitranon, J. (2008). Tablet PC to support collaborative learning:an empirical study of English vocabulary learning. In Wireless, Mobile, and UbiquitousTechnology in Education (WMUTE), IEEE, 47-51.[13] Avery, Z., Castillo, M., Guo, H., Guo, J., Warter-Perez, N., Won, D. S., & Dong, J. (2010).Implementing Collaborative Project-Based Learning using the Tablet PC to enhance studentlearning in engineering and computer science courses. In 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE), 1-7.[14] Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge: Harvard
unsteady and steadystate transport problems. Keith, Morrison, and King7 have developed COMSOLMultiphysics® problems for introducing fuel cell concepts in fluid mechanics, heattransfer, or mass transfer courses. In this paper, we build upon this concept but utilize theMultiphysics® mode with two applications in mind: microfluidics and fuel cells.A special topics course in chemical engineering entitled Analytical MicrodeviceTechnology was developed for undergraduate upper-classmen and beginning graduatestudents. One challenge when discussing microfluidics in microdevices is facilitatingstudent visualization of the mathematical expressions and physical behaviors observed inthe micron length scales. A microscale module is described that involves fluid
Paper ID #18811The Predictive Quality of High School Grade Point Average on the Outcomesof Under-prepared Students in a Mathematics Intervention Course for First-year Engineering Students: How Motivation and Effort Correlate to StudentSuccessDr. Anthony Bourne, Wright State University Dr. Bourne is the Director of Enrollment Management and Center for Equity in Engieering Education at Wright State University and completed his PhD in Engineering at Wright State. He holds a BA in Economics and MPA. His research focus is in engineering education and student success measures in engineering curriculum.Dr. Craig Baudendistel, Wright State
, college cumulative GPA, and motivation tobe positively correlated with enrollment in engineering. Tyson18 examined student grades inPhysics and Calculus courses and found indications that low grades in these courses couldpredict a student leaving engineering. However, he also correlated earning an A in Calculus IIwith switching from engineering to computer science18. With these college and engineeringretention and dropout factors in mind, we present an initial method for identifying potential riskfactors for overpersistence.MethodSample. The sample for this initial study comes from a single land grant institution in thesoutheast over the period 1987-2004. Once a procedure is established, it will be applied to morerecent data. We use six-year
AC 2012-3119: SUPPORTING SELF-AUTHORSHIP DEVELOPMENT: THECONTRIBUTION OF PREPAREDNESS PORTFOLIOSMs. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Brook Sattler is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Her dissertation focuses on mechanisms for supporting engineering student development, specifically self-authorship.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of WashingtonMs. Kathryn Ann Mobrand, University of Washington Kathryn Mobrand is a doctoral candidate in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department at UW. She investigates engineering undergraduates’ conceptions of the communication they will engage in as practicing engineers
focus. Throughthis instructional culture, students are increasingly well equipped to tackle complex, ill-defined problems and to develop the mindsets necessary for making meaningfulcontributions to society as confident engineers.PurposeThis work communicates the contents and design of a preliminary instrument suite with apurpose of enhancing student learning and development as engineers as informed by data.The data will span student- and faculty-generated assessments with a mind towarddeveloping a holistic view of learning, development, and performance in engineering anddesign. Innovation stems directly from identifying problems without known solutions andin spaces with current solutions that aren’t acceptable. This is how engineers
2006-848: COGNITIVE LEARNING IN INTRODUCTORY COLLEGE SCIENCEEDUCATIONEileen Kowalski, U.S. Military Academy Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry and Life SciencesJoe Manous, U.S. Military Academy Academy Professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering Page 11.325.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Cognitive Learning in Introductory College Science EducationINTRODUCTION Webster’s Dictionary1 defines education as “… discipline of mind or character throughstudy or instruction” and includes “teaching and learning” or more simply the providing andgaining of knowledge. Unfortunately, this
Paper ID #11898An Analysis of Engaged Thought through the Lens of Undergraduate Re-searchNathan Hicks, University of Florida Nathan Hicks is a Materials Science and Engineering graduate research assistant at the University of Florida working under Dr. Elliot P. Douglas.Dr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Associate Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Dean’s Fellow for Engi- neering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of active learning pedagogies, problem-solving, critical thinking, diversity in
Paper ID #12186Concepts in roundabout resources: A comparison between academic andpractical text using content analysisLauren Suzanne WallaceFloraliza Bornilla Bornasal, Oregon State University Floraliza B. Bornasal is a doctoral candidate in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. Her research explores engineering practice and learning in workplace contexts. She received her bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Saint Martin’s University and her master’s degree in civil engineering - with a focus in transportation - at Oregon State University. Address: School of Civil and
AC 2008-1091: ASSESSING STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES DURINGSUMMER UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCESOlga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests are cardiovascular fluid mechanics and engineering education research, which includes engineering assessment, undergraduate research, design education methodologies, epistemologies of interdisciplinary education, and K-12 engineering education.Maura Borrego, Virginia Polytechnic
including an“array of ideas” into the work that she does, to be undermined by the competitive, individualisticnature of the curriculum. Towards the end of her sophomore year, she described her experiencesin her pre-engineering classes: “It just seemed like there was just a different frame of mind and the whole ‘me succeeding,’ like ‘me, me, me,’ and really not wanting to help people, and I didn’t understand that, because I really, if I know something, I’m gonna help you figure it out, and I would hope that if I didn’t know something, it would be the same way.”Asked where this different frame of mind comes from, Bryn said