Asee peer logo
Displaying results 451 - 480 of 525 in total
Conference Session
Engineering Student Experiences
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott Blum, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
relevance ofstudent engagement to the desired outcomes of educational institutions. However, all of thisresearch has been directed at civilian institutions, generally within one or both of the objectivesof academic performance and persistence. This study uses a convergent parallel mixed methodsapproach to examine engagement by cadets at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) todetermine whether the mediators of student engagement developed by researchers are applicableto a military academy that has identified specific outcomes other than performance andpersistence as developmental objectives for graduates who will go on to become officers in theAir Force. Specifically, the objectives of the Air Force Academy go beyond the commonuniversity
Conference Session
Contextual Competencies
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David B. Knight, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
besuccessful in the workforce of 2020. Producing graduates with the attributes of the engineer of2020 (hereafter referred to as the “E2020 attributes”) who are prepared for this dynamic,competitive global workforce is the current challenge for engineering education. Researchers aretasked to empirically identify ways in which undergraduate engineering programs can adjusteducational offerings to reach such a goal.Studies to date have largely focused on ABET criteria and the policies and practices that fosterthe development of each of these student outcomes. Given the newness and non-mandatorystatus of the E2020 attributes relative to the ABET accreditation criteria, little research hasinvestigated engineering student outcomes vis-à-vis the Engineer of
Conference Session
Problem Solving and Misconceptions
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gerard Rowe, University of Auckland; Chris Smaill, University of Auckland
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. 4. Mazur, E. (1992) Qualitative versus quantitative thinking: are we teaching the right thing? Optics and Photonics News, 3,pp 38-39. 5. Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, pp 64-74. 6. Strevler, R., Miller, R., Reed-Rhoads, T. & Allen, K. (2007) Best Practices in the Design and Use of Concept Inventories. Workshop presented at 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. 7. Notaros, B. M. (2002). Concept inventory assessment instruments for electromagnetics education. Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International
Conference Session
Motivation and Engagement
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University; Denny C. Davis, The Ohio State University; Sarah Winfree, The Ohio State University ; Kaycee Ash, The Ohio State University; Bashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
design and led multi-institution teams in the development and testing of curriculum materials and assessments for engineering design learning. He is also the owner of Verity Design Learning LLC, a publisher of instructional materials for design reviews and teamwork development. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Davis received his PhD in Agricultural Engineering at Cornell University.Ms. Sarah Winfree, The Ohio State University Sarah Winfree is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She joined the University in August 2013 working towards a Bachelor of Science degree in Food Engineering. Her career includes
Conference Session
Classroom Engagement
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Monica Cardella, Purdue University; Heidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University; Amber Oliver, Purdue University; Matthew Verleger, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
effective when theinstructor recognizes that there may be multiple approaches and understandings and that forcingstudents towards a solitary solution path may not be beneficial. Due to the open-ended nature ofMEAs, students and TAs are encouraged to be creative and unique in their methods for solvingproblems.This study is part of a larger research effort to develop pedagogical approaches around feedback Page 14.742.3on open-ended problem solving that (1) improve instructor and peer feedback and (2) helpstudents learn to interpret and respond to feedback. In this paper, we begin to investigate theexperiences of Graduate Teaching Assistants who
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Learning
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Collura, University of New Haven; Samuel Daniels, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; W. David Harding, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Education, 2007 The Current Generation of Integrated Engineering Curriculum - Assessment After Two Years of ImplementationAbstractIn September of 2004 our university adopted the Multidisciplinary Engineering FoundationSpiral Curriculum as the basis for disciplinary engineering programs in Chemical, Civil,Electrical, Mechanical and General Engineering. The curriculum includes a sequence of firstand second year engineering courses, matched closely with the development of students’mathematical sophistication and analytical capabilities and integrated with course work in thesciences. Students develop a conceptual understanding of engineering basics in this series ofcourses which stress practical applications of these principles.The
Conference Session
Social Dialogue on Diversity and Inclusion
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tara C. Langus, University of Nevada, Reno; Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering students’ identity devel- opment. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty
Conference Session
ERM Potpourri
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anthony Gregerson, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Sean Franey, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
AC 2012-3264: OPTIONAL FINAL EXAMS AS AN ASSESSMENT TOOLIN ENGINEERING CURRICULAAnthony Gregerson, University of Wisconsin, Madison Anthony Gregerson is a Ph.D. student in electrical and computer engineering at the University of Wiscon- sin, where he recently won the 2012 Exceptional Service Award for teaching assistants. He is a member of the UW’s Teaching Academy and the Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning. He has eight years’ experience teaching as a tutor, Teaching Assistant, and instructor and occasionally writes about testing and assessment for PlusError.com. When not teaching, he designs real-time processing systems for CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.Sean Franey, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Conference Session
Student Success II: Self-Regulatory, Metacognitive, and Professional Skills
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Justine Chasmar, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Industrial EngineeringAbstractThis research paper is a pilot of a larger, mixed methods study that aims to capture theexperience of sophomore engineering students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) strategy use andthe connections with the student’s motivation with respect to the future. The overarching goal ofthe project is to understand the motivations and attitudes of undergraduate students inengineering, which is vital to answering the call for increasing the number of engineeringgraduates. Our project aim is to study engineering students’ future time perspective (FTP) andhow their FTP affects their use of SRL strategies. The quantitative portion of this study describesa cluster analysis of data from a motivation survey that characterizes students
Conference Session
Student Engagement, Socioemotional Needs, and Social Support During Pandemic
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Qin Liu, University of Toronto; Juliette Sweeney, University of Toronto; Greg Evans, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Juliette Sweeney is a doctoral student in the Engineering Education Collaboration program at the Univer- sity of Toronto. Her research interests focus on diversity in graduate engineering programs with a focus on gender. She is also interested in graduate employment outcomes and the impact of online learning environments on student socialization.Dr. Greg Evans, University of Toronto GREG EVANS PhD, P.Eng, FCEA, FAAAS is the Director of the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP), Director of the Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education, a 3M national Teaching Fellow, and a member of the University of Toronto President’s Teach- ing Academy. He has been learning
Conference Session
SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 2
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Jocuns, University of Washington; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Lari Garrison, University of Washington; Daniel Amos, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
bedoing design work, but he had become resolved to the fact that this is a less likely possibility forhim in the image he has of his future engineering workplace.In other students we noticed a more gradual development of this understanding of the differences Page 13.1113.8between drafting and designing. For instance, with Steve this shift develops from research, todesign, then to the actual practicality of what he anticipates his workplace to look like. In hisfreshman year interview Steve emphasized the research aspect of his anticipated engineeringworkplace. Well, the mechanical engineering class that I took would lead me to believe that
Conference Session
Student Approaches to Problem Solving
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jessica E. S. Swenson, University at Buffalo; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Colorado Boulder; Mary Rola, University at Buffalo; Hoda Koushyar
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
elementary school engineering teachers.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Colorado Boulder Aaron W. Johnson is an Instructor in Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Col- orado Boulder. He teaches courses in structures and vehicle design, and his research focuses on how mathematical models are taught in undergraduate engineering science courses and how these models are used in analysis and design. Before CU he was a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michi- gan and the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014 and a bachelor’s degree in aerospace
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 5: Assessment
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bahar Memarian, University of Toronto; Susan McCahan, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
framework for the design ofassessment activities and the integration of assessment in courses. Assessment for learningsupports the adoption of evaluation and feedback practices that improve student learning goingforward, and assessment that is, in and of itself, a learning activity [10]. As one aspect of this“feed forward” approach [11], assessment for learning aims to not only produce a grade as aproduct of a summative evaluation, but also support improved performance in the future.Assessment becomes not just an add-on to the course design, but a central component of thedesign. This is aligned with a backward design method and Bigg’s constructive alignmentframework [12], [13].Conventionally, assessment is seen as a product of performance or
Conference Session
STEM Pipeline: Pre-College to Post-Baccalaureate
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chris Smaill, University of Auckland; Elizabeth Godfrey, University of Auckland; Gerard Rowe, University of Auckland
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
others are Mathematical Modelling, Engineering Mechanics,Engineering Design, Biology and Chemistry for Engineers, Engineering Computation andSoftware Development, and Materials Science. Selection and study in a specific engineeringdiscipline is not undertaken until all first-year courses are completed.MethodologyAn action-research methodology seemed appropriate for an iterative, reflective process thatwould allow for inquiry and discussion as components of the “research”. Commonly thosewho apply an action-research approach are practitioners who wish to improve understandingof their own practice. Although the naming and number of the steps involved can vary,action research always involves a series of cycles, sometimes envisioned as a spiral 7
Conference Session
Postgraduate Pathways and Experiences
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Elif Miskioğlu , Bucknell University; Kaela M. Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
and epidemiology, providing crucial exposure to the broader context of engineering problems and their subsequent solutions. These diverse experiences and a growing passion for improving engineering edu- cation prompted Dr. Miskio˘glu to change her career path and become a scholar of engineering education. As an educator, she is committed to challenging her students to uncover new perspectives and dig deeper into the context of the societal problems engineering is intended to solve. As a scholar, she seeks to not only contribute original theoretical research to the field, but work to bridge the theory-to-practice gap in engineering education by serving as an ambassador for empirically driven, and often novel
Conference Session
Medley of Undergraduate Programming and Pedagogies
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University; Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University; Michele Miller, Campbell University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Use of Personas in Rating Scholarship ApplicationsIntroductionThis evidence-based practice paper introduces a method for creating subjective, holistic rubricsbased on the human-centered design concept of personas. It can be difficult to align assessmentmetrics with subjective artifacts, especially when the goal of the artifact itself is subjective. Thefaculty team who collaborated on an NSF S-STEM project faced
Conference Session
Innovative Classroom Techniques
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Todd Johnson, Washington State University; Reid Miller, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
will require adoption of proven educational practices2. Major investments bythe National Science Foundation, US Department of Education, and other agencies have beendirected at understanding the issues and identifying solutions to student learning. For many,based on the research, students learn best when they set goals for their study, engage in activestudy, add meaning to what they are learning, explain their understanding to others, and self-monitor their success in achieving goals3-6.Accepting the challenge to address and understand retention issues of engineering students, theCollaborative Learner-constructed Engineering-concept Articulation and Representation(CLEAR) project has as its goal to develop a model for instructional
Conference Session
Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Butt is a doctoral student at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. He is currently working as a research assistant on the CourseMIRROR project funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). He is interested in designing educational tools and exploring their impact on enhancing students’ learning experiences. Before Purdue University, Ahmed has worked as a lecturer for two years at the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Additionally, he has been associated with the software industry in various capacities, from developer to consultant. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Perceived Motivational Constructs and Engineering Students' Academic
Conference Session
Undergraduate Students' Professional Skills and Reflection
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Gloria Washington, Howard University; Marlon Mejias, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Marlon Mejias; Legand L. Burge III, Howard University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
clear an d calm to teachcoding concepts, and utilize code-switching techniques that allow them to communicatemore effectively with younger, more slang-using audiences. Practices described in thisresearch can be implemented in two-part capstone courses, independent study courses, orelective courses that require undergrads demonstrate hard skills as well as soft skills.Figure 1: Social and emotional learning skills fostered in undergraduate students in thiscamp learning experience.The primary research question this paper explores is how does acting as near-peer mentorsand leading a tech innovation and entrepreneurship camp for high schoolers foster socialand emotional learning skills in undergraduate computing students? Qualitative analysis
Conference Session
Alternatives to Traditional Assessment
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kaela M. Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Richard T. Mangum, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
different types of engineering courses. Rather than evolving fromlearning theory or research, current grading practices have primarily arisen from canonicalpractices created three centuries ago, originally created to rank students against each other. Suchranking or competition derived practices are out of alignment with modern outcomes-basedengineering assessment practices. Specifications grading, an alternative, is a framework forassessment grounded in learning theory as well as student agency. The cornerstone ofspecifications grading is treating each assignment as a pass/fail marker of mastery using clearlydefined and transparent criteria. With limited examples in engineering, this paper provides aclear introduction to specifications grading for
Conference Session
Approaches to Curriculum and Policy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University; Rebecca Segal, Virginia Commonwealth University ; Alen Docef, Virginia Commonwealth University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Commonwealth University Dr. Rebecca Segal is an Associate Professor where she pursues research in the area of mathematical bi- ology and is the Graduate Program Director in the Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics at Virginia Commonwealth University. Dr. Rebecca Segal received her A.B. in Mathematics from Bryn Mawr College. She went on to earn her Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from North Carolina State Univer- sity. She completed a research post-doc at CIIT Centers for Health Research in Research Triangle Park, NC. She then was a Teaching Fellow at University of Bristol, England. Since 2006, Dr. Segal has been a faculty member in the Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics at Virginia Commonwealth
Conference Session
Cognitive and Motivational Issues in Student Performance I
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dawn Williams, Howard University; Lorraine Fleming, Howard University; Marcus Jones, Howard University; Ashley Griffin, Howard University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
is a graduate research assistant for the Center for Advancement of Engineering Education. His research interest include the academic achievement of African American males and the factors that influence attrition of engineering students.Ashley Griffin, Howard University ASHLEY GRIFFIN is a Developmental Psychology doctoral candidate at Howard University. Ashley is a former graduate research assistant for the Center for Advancement of Engineering Education. Her research interest include culturally relevant teaching practices and their impact on engagement, motivation, and performance surrounding African American students
Conference Session
Predicting Student Success
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shanon Marie Reckinger, Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
). They concluded that the use of theseassessments in practice is likely a waste of resources, though solely based on the “meshing,” oralignment of teaching with learning style preference, hypothesis at the center of their review.However, a reason these learning style models are popular among faculty is they provide aheuristic basis for varying teaching methods, such as in-class activities, assignments, andassessments. No research has been conducted to demonstrate increased student performance as aresult of application of the Felder and Soloman (n.d.) learning styles model to teaching, but othermodels have demonstrated evidence of improved performance (Kolb 1984, Brokaw and Merz2000). One study in particular examined the effect of designing
Conference Session
Student Perceptions of Self-efficacy, Success, and Identity
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Hindolo Michael Kamanda, University of Georgia; Davis George Anderson Wilson, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; James L. Huff, Harding University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy
Conference Session
Engineering Identity 2
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John C. Chen, California Polytechnic State University; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Karen J McGaughey, Cal Poly State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 Best Paper Award for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Karen J McGaughey, Cal Poly State University Associate Professor Department of Statistics California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA Page 23.521.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Engineering Students’ Development as Lifelong LearnersAbstractIt is widely accepted that one goal of
Conference Session
Teaching and Learning Strategies I
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Uzma Shaikh, Purdue University; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Camilo Vieira, Purdue University; R Edwin García, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
implementation. The problem synthesis phase involves buildingthe solution approach and the problem implementation phase involves the actual implementationof the solution. Simulations and computational models are implemented in the problem synthesisphase and using these simulations and models, the problem solution is implemented in theproblem implementation phase.In this study, we investigate the impact of coupling the integrated model of problem solving withthe use of modeling and simulation for learning the concepts of kinetics of materials in graduateengineering students. The theoretical framework guided our learning and research design asfollows. Students first conducted a preliminary literature review on a given topic, then they wereasked to
Conference Session
Open-Ended Problems and Student Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karen M. Bursic, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
freshman engineering program. Dr. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas of Engineering and Project Management and Engineering Education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania.Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the
Conference Session
Understanding Our Students II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Viktoria Zelenak, University of New Haven; Michael J. Hollis, U.S. Air Force Academy
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, course drops, persistence, and graduation rates. Programs tohelp with stress and time management including support services geared toward adult studentssuch as their own orientations, academic and financial aid advisors, peer advisors, and supportstaff and faculty who understand their needs without loss of academic rigor,10 campus day care,families invited to campus events, etc.Additional research supports the hypothesis that the balance adult students face between work,school, family, and other commitments is an additional cause of stress for adult students, but thedifficulty of the coursework was also a factor. A research project in 2009 that surveyed 72 adultgraduate students at Texas State asked students an open-ended question: “_______ are
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 8: Survey and Instrument Development
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dina Verdin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #26186Recognizing Engineering Students’ Funds of Knowledge: Creating and Vali-dating Survey MeasuresMs. Dina Verd´ın, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education and M.S. student in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit
Conference Session
ERM Potpourri
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Turns, University of Washington; Jessica Yellin, University of Washington; Yi-Min Huang, University of Washington; Kathleen Gygi, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
evaluation.Kathleen Gygi, University of Washington Kathleen Gygi is a doctoral student in Technical Communication at the University of Washington. Her research interests include the nature of competence in professional practice and the pedagogy of teaching. Page 11.1446.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 What’s so important about peer review of teaching portfolio components? An exploratory analysis of peer review episodesAbstract: Understanding and promoting effective teaching are central concerns of theengineering education community. In this paper, we report on research to investigate