motivation affects student learning. She is also involved in projects that utilize Tablet PCs to enhance and assess learn- ing, and incorporating engineering into secondary science and math classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. Beshoy Morkos Beshoy Morkos is a newly appointed assistant professor in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology. Dr. Morkos was a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Engineer- ing & Science Education at Clemson University performing NSF funded research on engineering student motivation and its effects on persistence and
(50%), insufficient evidence (0%),or no attempt (0%); where the level of achievement of a LO was based on the number ofapplicable pieces of evidence sufficiently demonstrated in student work (see Table 1). Suchrubrics were used to assess student work on 12 problem sets, three midterm exams, and fiveproject milestones. Grading of problem sets and project milestones was completedpredominantly through the course learning management system, Blackboard LearnTM. Studentscould access their overall grade through Blackboard’s gradebook and their individual LOassessments and written feedback by drilling into the rubrics associated with assignments onBlackboard. Grading of exams was done both on students’ written exam papers which werereturned to
Science and Engineering project investigating persistence of women in engineering undergraduate programs. Dr. Lord’s industrial experience includes AT&T Bell Laboratories, General Motors Laboratories, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, and SPAWAR Systems Center.Michelle Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle Madsen Camacho received her Ph.D. in Social Sciences (an interdisciplinary concentration in Social/Cultural Anthropology and Sociology) from UC Irvine in 2000. She was a Fulbright Scholar to Bolivia and was a Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellow at Cornell University. She held two postdoctoral positions at UCSD, a Researcher-in-Residence at the Center for US.-Mexican
AC 2009-1855: APPLICATION OF MULTIMEDIA THEORY TO POWERPOINTSLIDES CREATED BY ENGINEERING EDUCATORSJoanna Garner, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Joanna K Garner is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Penn State University, Berks College. Her research interests focus on the application of cognitive psychological principles to the improvement of student learning outcomes.Allen Gaudelli, Pennsylvania State University Allen Gaudelli is working on his B.S. in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. This paper's project he performed as an undergraduate researcher in the Leonhard Center at Penn State. At present, he is working in a co-op position at
processes of the project. She has been faculty in science and mathematics education quantitative and qualitative research design courses at the doctoral level. She has been involved in the development of innovative mathematics curricular activities and formative assessment in mathematics problem solving. Page 14.347.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Comparison of Student Perceptions of Virtual and Physical LaboratoriesKey words: metacognition, experimental design, virtual laboratoryAbstractThis paper presents an analysis of student survey responses after completion of three differentlaboratories, two
, North Carolina State University Heather entered the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the fall of 2014, after com- pleting her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. She has participated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confi- dence, their influence upon womens’ performance in school and the workplace, and their presence in the media and consequences for viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Blanca Miller, University of Nevada, Reno Blanca Miller is a Computer Science & Engineering Graduate Student at the University of
engineering applications. No Talks about how Talks about how Talks more about the Talks about engineering Hands down, Evidence engineering cannot engineering helps potential for engineering to as a crucial element engineering is theProfessional Ability help those who are generally just by the help solve social/ towards finding solutions central source of in need projects that we do. environmental problems that to social problems. May solutions for social Uses examples of roads face society. This is
extended to 75 minutes. The longerduration allowed for in-class activities and projects to be part of the class time. Moodle, an online delivery system, similar to Blackboard, developed through the University ofMinnesota system, was used as the primary delivery method for online content in the course.Electronic learning components of the class were delivered via Moodle through the use oflearning modules. The learning modules provided the fundamental information needed by thestudents to be ready to tackle the homework problems in class. The Moodle site was also used toindicate which problems would be discussed during class time and due by the beginning of thenext time the group met. Class time was always started with a 5-10 minute recap of the
learning and personaldevelopment7. Students get motivated when their basic psychological needs for engaged learningare fulfilled8,9 Over the past three decades, researchers have identified many factors thatinfluence student engagement in classrooms including attributions10, self-efficacy11, perceivedability12, motivation13,14, learning strategy15 and goal orientations16,17. In order to obtain a clearerpicture on some of these influencing factors, a project titled National Survey for StudentEngagement (NSSE)18 has been conducted and they identified five important benchmarks forstudent engagement. These benchmarks are: level of academic challenge, enriching educationalexperiences, student-faculty interaction, active learning and a supportive campus
literature for designing a complete cognitivevalidity evaluation of an instrument, particularly for instruments that measure self-report items.We aim to describe a particular use of VRMs (specifically, think-aloud sessions) in this paper asan example of its potential utility for other researchers in engineering education by presenting anapplication of this model to our specific engineering education research project (details of whichare given later in this paper). It is a primary goal of the current study to construct a model thatengineering education researchers (and other relevant fields) can use to establish a case for thecognitive validity of their survey instruments, giving confidence that participants will have theintended interpretations of
manner. Furthermore, students not only enjoy flexibility in their early curriculabut also enjoy through their later semesters where specialization courses dominate thecurriculum. The aim of this research is to provide a new metric for describing the flexibility ofengineering majors and further the discussion into how student progression through a major willrequire significant, future work.Introduction and BackgroundThe work of the MIDFIELD group has been widely disseminated and can be found on theMIDFIELD website.[1] Previously, the project has focused extensively on important engineeringeducation issues such as: the persistence of students in engineering disciplines; the success ofwomen in engineering using quantitative and qualitative
assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program and Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group, whose projects are described at the group’s website, http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new models
. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Use of Personas in Rating Scholarship ApplicationsIntroductionThis evidence-based practice paper introduces a method for creating subjective, holistic rubricsbased on the human-centered design concept of personas. It can be difficult to align assessmentmetrics with subjective artifacts, especially when the goal of the artifact itself is subjective. Thefaculty team who collaborated on an NSF S-STEM project faced
understand issues of diversity and inclusion in engineering. Specifically, she investigates how language influences who engages in the technical fields. She was recently awarded the Stanford DARE fellowship. Globally, she is part of the Galapagos research-practice partnership that seeks to improve the teaching of science for underserved communities through education for sustainability. Before coming to Stanford, she was a bilingual educator at Plano ISD. In Plano, she served in the Gifted and Talented Advisory Committee and the Elementary Curriculum Design team. Prior to starting her career in education, Greses was a project manager for engineering programs funded by the European nonprofits in the Caribbean. She holds a
Paper ID #23334Adaptive Expertise: The Development of a Measurement InstrumentDr. Janna H. Ferguson, Northeastern University Dr. Ferguson designs assessments and analyzes data related to student learning and its relevance to stu- dent success. Focusing on how experiential learning and co-curricular education works in conjunction with traditional academic environments, Dr. Ferguson works to develop, plan, implement, and evaluate meaningful assessments across multiple learning environments and provides support for projects related to institutional assessment.Jennifer Lehmann, Northeastern UniversityDr. Yevgeniya V
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How PBL Graduates Experience Self-Directed Learning: A Phenomenographic StudyAbstractThis research paper describes the study of the impact of a project-based learning (PBL)curriculum on the learners’ development of self-directed learning abilities. Themotivation for this study is that self-directed learning (SDL) ability is positioned as oneof the essential outcomes of engineering education. This can be seen in the followingquote from the International Engineering Alliance1 “The fundamental purpose ofengineering education is to build a knowledge base and attributes to enable the graduateto continue learning and to proceed to formative development
moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Future Time Perspective and Self-Regulated Learning: Multiple Case Studies in
animal models 24. Curriculum efficacy studies of theEngineering Is Elementary program also look for students to make progress in science contentknowledge 25. Earlier work featured in-depth case studies of scientific sense-making in designcontexts, such as Roth’s investigation of fourth and fifth graders’ reasoning about mechanicaladvantage as they created lifting machines and Penner et al’s study of reasoning about force andmotion in an elementary school biomechanics design project 26, 27.At the college level, engineering education researchers have argued for instructors to pay closeattention to students’ conceptual knowledge in areas that are fundamental, yet surprisinglychallenging for college student reasoning, such as relationships between
basedon solid data, has itself been the study of recent research. Borrego, Froyd and Hall (2010)10found that even high levels of awareness of innovative engineering education practices did nottranslate into high levels of adoption. Henderson, Beach and Finkelstein (2011)11, in ananalytical review of literature based on 191 conceptual and empirical journal articles publishedbetween 1995 and 2008, concluded that simply disseminating “best practice curricularmaterials…to other faculty does not work.” (Henderson et al., 2011, p. 971) Like Seymour(2001)12 they found weakness in the (unproven) theory that Seymour suggested as ascribed to bymany STEM reform projects and funding agencies, that “good ideas supported by convincingevidence of efficacy, will
practice engineering technical andprofessional skills while engaged in competitive, design/build projects. Increasingly, SELECTare fore-fronted as the hallmark of engineering programs and are commonly featured in materialsshared with prospective students and donors. Teams, especially successful ones, featureprominently in alumni newsletters, recruiting brochures, outreach and recruiting tours, andpromotion of college activities. For example, when a SELECT member interviewed for thisproject was asked, “(D)o you believe your department, the College of Engineering and theuniversity value SELECT,” the student responded "Oh yeah, yeah. For sure, it makes ’em lookgood. The college always likes to throw out statistics, like, ‘Oh, we're number this or
cofounder and director of Lehigh University’s Masters of Engineering in Technical Entrepreneurship (www.lehigh.edu/innovate/). He joined the Lehigh faculty in 1979 as an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering, was promoted to associate professor in 1983, and to full professor in 1990. He founded and directed of the Computer-Aided Design Labs in the Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Department from 1980 to 2001. From 1996 to the present, he has directed the University’s Integrated Product Development (IPD) capstone program (www.lehigh.edu/ipd). The IPD and TE program bring together students from all three undergraduate colleges to work in multidisciplinary teams on industry-sponsored product development projects
Paper ID #7256Multisource feedback for STEM students improves academic performanceDr. Jesse Pappas, James Madison University Jesse Pappas studied self-insight, intentional self-development, and the role of emotion in self-perception at the University of Virginia, where he received a Ph.D. in social psychology. His dissertation project involved adapting established professional development tools to facilitate the personal and academic suc- cess of college students and others. As a research fellow in the School of Engineering at James Madison University, Jesse currently leads efforts to equip future scientists and
AC 2007-2438: IMPACT OF A GK-12 PROGRAM ON THE DEVELOPMENT OFUNIVERSITY STUDENTS ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL SKILLSJamie Medoff, University of Maryland-Baltimore County Mrs. Jamie Gurganus is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at UMBC. As an undergraduate student, she was involved in the UMBC TEPP program. Currently, Jamie serves as the Associate Director for Project Lead the Way and develops curriculum for K-12 engineering education.Anne Spence, University of Maryland-Baltimore County ANNE M. SPENCE is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at UMBC and holds a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering. During her ten years as an engineering educator, she has developed curricula
of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of
LinkedIn accounts, for instance) and through their participation in variousresearch activities, we also observe student growth in establishing their professional STEMidentity.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM program [1] provides scholarships to highachieving financially needy students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. TheCity Tech’s S-STEM project “Advancing Student Futures in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics” supports students in five associates and baccalaureate majors (Applied Math,Computer Science, Biomedical Informatics, Chemical Technology, and Applied Chemistry).This work-in-progress project provides comprehensive support in multifaceted ways: (1)financial support through
society (Alpha Lambda Delta / Phi Eta Sigma) and the mathematics honorary soci- ety (Kappa Mu Epsilon). His research interests involve first year engineering course analysis, authentic projects and assessments, and K-12 engineering.Dr. Kenneth J Reid, Virginia Tech Kenneth Reid is the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and an Associate Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is active in engineering within K-12, serving on the TSA Boards of Directors and over 10 years on the IEEE-USA STEM Literacy Committee. He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award in 2013 for designing the nation’s first BS degree in Engineering Education. He was named NETI Faculty Fellow for 2013
project is to characterize and better understand thebeliefs that undergraduate students hold about their own intelligence. The research team utilizedthe work of Carol Dweck as a theoretical framework. Dweck’s framework posited two mindsets:fixed and growth. Fixed mindset individuals believe that their intelligence is unchanging, whilepeople with a growth mindset believe that effort can grow and develop greater intelligence.Prior researchers have shown that individuals with a growth mindset respond to challenges withhigher levels of persistence, are more interested in improving upon past failures, and value effortmore than those of a fixed mindset.Guided by Mindset as a theoretical framework, the research team drafted an interview protocol.This
used to troubleshoot the fictitious Arduino blink exercise while he actively modeled his troubleshooting procedure to the unique problem students approached him with. Most of these instructional interventions had durations of under ten minutes and frequently occurred after students attempted to solve the problem on their own for some period of time. These interactions occurred throughout the entirety of the prototyping process with no obvious phase of the project where these episodes were most frequent. With that said, these episodes most often revolved around electronics and programming faults. In our observations, Holmes put in considerable effort to be prepared to help students with the flaws they would likely encounter within
State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. His teaching responsibilities are in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing
Journal, and the ACM SIGCSE and ITiCSE and Koli Calling International Computer Science Education confer- ences. Pears is currently Steering Committee Chairman of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, and has served as Programme Chair for several other international conferences.Dr. Judy Sheard, Monash University Judy Sheard is an Associate Professor in the faculty of information technology, Monash University. She has had leadership roles both nationally and internationally in the computing education research com- munity. Sheard’s main research interests are in student learning behavior and in exploring the web as a new educational medium. She has extensive experience in computing education related projects includ