and comfort levels withthe material were more apparent. For example, on question 3, the two strongest students Page 11.325.5immediately recognized this as a conservation of energy problem. Both of these studentsdeveloped their own equations, using dimensional analysis to organize the given information.Both students displayed a solid understanding of specific heat capacity and heat transfer. The next tier of students began the problem by organizing the given into a table ordiagram. These students could also identify this as an energy balance question. With minimalprompting or clues (e.g., q = mC∆T), these students could develop a
support during the research process. Additionally,authors would like to thank University of Michigan - Flint institutional review board, faculty and staff fororganizing necessary field trips and to various locations related to current study and equipment support. References[1] Savoji, A. P. (2013). Motivational strategies and academic achievements in traditional and virtual university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences; 84 (2013), 1015-1020[2] Mazumder, Q. H. and Ahmed, K. (2014). “A Comparative Study of Motivation and Learning Strategies Between Public and Private University Students of Bangladesh” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Estadístico sobre la educación de Puerto Rico 2016-2017 (Databook): Tabla 9. Tasas de graduación (IPEDS Graduation Rate) en las instituciones de educación superior en Puerto Rico (año académico 2016-17)” [Online] Available: CEPR webpage, http://www2.pr.gov/agencias/cepr/inicio/estadisticas_e_investigacion/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed Mar. 21, 2018][17] Q. Jin, S. Purzer, and P.K. Imbrie, “Measuring first year engineering students' knowledge and interest in materials science and engineering”, In Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012[18] P.O. Garriott, L.Y. Flores, and M.P. Martens, “Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first
or science teaching experience. We examinedwhether there were differences based on teaching experience by performing one-wayANOVA. Levene’s test was performed to ensure homogeneity of variance, and q-q plot wereexamined to ensure normality. We also computed effect size w2 for significant factors. IfANOVA showed significant differences, we performed Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test tocompare between groups. We did not explore differences between groups of different gendersor grade levels because the sample was rather homogeneous in terms of these attributes.FindingsResults of the entire surveyOverall, the summer academy participants thought DET was important (M=3.47, SD=0.35)(please note that 4 was the highest possible score, and 1 was the lowest
ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3406386), 2010.[4] M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering education research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.[5] Q. Liu, "A snapshot methodological review of journal articles in engineering education research," in Proceedings of the annual Canadian Engineering Education Association conference, Ottawa: ON, 2019, June 8-12.[6] Advance CTE, "The state of career technical education: Improving data quality and effectiveness," Silver Spring, Maryland: Advance CTE, 2019, Available: https://careertech.org/resource/state-cte-improving-data-quality-effectiveness.[7] National
. Page 26.1552.1210. Oyserman, D.; Destin, M.; Novin, S. Self Identity 2014, 1–16.11. Fugate, M.; Kinicki, A. J.; Ashforth, B. E. J. Vocat. Behav. 2004, 65, 14–38.12. Ibarra, H. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44, 764–791.13. Ibarra, H. Identity transitions: possible selves, liminality and the dynamics of career change; 2005.14. Kerpelman, J. L.; Pittman, J. F. J. Adolesc. 2001, 24, 491–512.15. Godwin, A.; Potvin, G. Int. J. Eng. Educ. (In Press. 2015.16. Pizzolato, J. E. Cultur. Divers. Ethnic Minor. Psychol. 2006, 12, 57–69.17. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects; Katehi, L.; Pearson, G.; Feder, M. A., Eds.; The National Academies Press
online social platforms for education is not a new conceptfor students. In fact, it is not uncommon for a new cohort of University of Waterlooundergraduate students to actively maintain a closed online discussion group (e.g., Facebook) tocommunicate class news, course-related Q&A, and other discussion. Instructors are rarelyincluded in these existing conversations. Students who use these online groups to ask course-related questions enjoy the benefits of peer-to-peer learning and convenience of obtaining quickanswers without having to leave their study area, but at the possible cost of accuracy andcompleteness of response. This presents an opportunity to create a formal discussion forum thatcan be actively moderated by the instruction team
: Yeah but then… S1: Think about the physical system and what’s going to be happening and how the heat transfer is going to change…as the temperature inside the pipe increases to our target… Q out is going to increase because your temperature gradient is getting larger. Right? S2: I think it’ll go…I think it’ll actually go the opposite way, it’ll come down because there will be less of a temperature gradient.Figure 1: Examples of self-construction and collaborative engagement in team dialogueAnalyzing the remaining lines of dialogue in Figure 1, S1 must defend his hypothesis to histeammates who are questioning its validity. The dialogue is laden with engineering worldreasoning, leading to substantive exchange
,” Journal. Mass Commun. Q., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 728–749, Dec. 2016.[21] A. Lorde, “and Sex : Women Redefining Difference *,” Sister Outs., no. April, pp. 114–123, 1984.[22] K.-Y. Taylor, How We Get Free: Black Feminism and the Combahee River Collective. 2017.[23] B. Moradi, M. C. Parent, A. S. Weis, S. Ouch, and K. L. Broad, “Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 151–169, Jun. 2020.[24] B. Love, We Want to Do More Than Survive by Bettina L. Love. Penguin Random House, 2019.[25] B. Moradi and P. R. Grzanka, “Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism,” J. Couns
; Huggard, M. (2005). Computer Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Computer Experience: An investigation throughout a Computer Science degree (pp. S2H–3–S2H–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.161224621. Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3).22. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.2002923. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4 edition). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.24
. Terry, Eds. Psychology Press, 2001.[6] J. E. Stets and P. J. Burke, “A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity,” in Handbook of Self and Identity, First Edit., M. Leary and J. Tangney, Eds. Guilford Press, 2003.[7] M. A. Hogg, D. J. Terry, and K. M. White, “A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity,” Source Soc. Psychol. Q. Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 255–269, 1995.[8] J. E. Stets and P. J. Burke, “Identity theory and social identity Theory,” Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 224–237, 2000.[9] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “Marginalized Identities of Sense-Makers: Reframing Engineering Student Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no
to decode. Story Develop a chapter (100-200 words) individually and independently in week 1 and Telling work as a team in week 2 to resolve all conflicts or inconsistencies. Exploring Explore sensory stimuli at a particular site (sounds, sights, smell, etc.) and document observations. Simile Poses “simile” descriptions and participate in team-to-team Q&As to solicit guesses and descriptions relevant to a particular object. Machine Devise ways to test a black-box mysterious machine without causing harm to Testing humans while attempting to reveal the functionalities of the machine. Calendar Build a calendar for a planet with
hypothetical three-category Likert-style item. Subjects of low abilityare more likely to endorse the “Low” category (dark blue, e.g., 0.84 probability at θ = -2.0).Middle-ability subjects are relatively evenly split between the three options, while high-abilitysubjects display a pattern similar to that encountered for dichotomous items. At each θ value, thepredicted values sum to 1. In fact, a dichotomous response is a simplification, with only tworesponse categories (correct symbolized as P, and incorrect symbolized Q, where P + Q = 1). 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Probability of response
path taken.” This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: Process #1 State B Pressure Process #2 State A Volume [In these questions, W represents the work done by the system during a process; Q represents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal to that for Process #2? Please explain your answer.FIGURE 1. Two of the questions posed to students in both
Prediction Active Copying solution 12 1% Individual thinking 70 8% Listening and taking notes 88 11% Other Active 18 2% Student answer Q 131 16% Student Ask Q 69 8% Test/ Quiz 28 3% Searching for information Passive Listening 274 33% Students
Coll Univ. 2013.5. Brownell JE, Swaner LE. High-Impact Practices: Applying the Learning Outcomes Literature to the Development of Successful Campus Programs. PEER Rev. 2009.6. Kuh GD. High-Impact Educational Practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Assoc Am Coll Univ. 2008.7. Wenzel T. Definition of Undergraduate Research. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 1997;17.8. Laursen S, Hunter A, Seymour E, Thiry H, Melton G. What is Known About the Student Outcomes of Undergraduate Research? In: Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.9. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A
student will post the URL link in to the course home-page (Wibliography)and talk to the topic for 5 minutes followed by a brief Q&A session. The activity has a certaingrade allocation associated with it for class participation. Each student will identify the source andevent (or news), location, how it is tied to the current course and its importance. The student willalso discuss quantification as applicable to the subject matter being taught. Students are alsoexpected to interpret the news or event as they see it and give their opinion (positive or negative).As noted, this is an exercise in critical thinking and data synthesis (students can discuss otherrelated events). The instructor publishes a schedule for all students. The News of the
DONE!!!! U=Q+W Q=0 THEREFORE WE HAVE NO FLOW WORK. Flow work is done the same amount of particles esscap (sic) as are inputed (sic) rlaying (sic) that There is less internal energy if the pressure C there is an increase in velocity which is removed decreases from the temperature of T1 and thus to T2 is less than that of T1Table 5 shows similar data for Group 2. However, the impact of
High School,” The High School Journal, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 92–106, 2013, doi: 10.1353/hsj.2013.0026.[12] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, p. 05017008, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[13] R. M. Groves, F. J. F. Jr, M. P. Couper, J. M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau, Survey Methodology, 2nd edition. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2009.[14] D. C. Braun, C. Gormally, and M. D. Clark, “The Deaf Mentoring Survey: A Community Cultural Wealth Framework for Measuring Mentoring Effectiveness with Underrepresented Students,” LSE, vol. 16, no. 1, p. ar10
application/technology technology (Microsoft, Cisco, etc) Does not provide solutions to situation involving multiple technologies or products Product bias by vendorOnline Forums Discussion and Q&A Provide solutions to Trustworthiness of information is forums (StackExchange, common problems questionable depending on forum etc) Provide answers to very used
: a tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5(1), 11-24.[29] Proust-Lima, C., Philipps, V., & Liquet, B. (2015). Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package lcmm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.00890.[30] Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). A model for Longitudinal Data. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data, 19-29.[31] Shireman, E., Steinley, D., & Brusco, M. J. (2017). Examining the effect of initialization strategies on the performance of Gaussian mixture modeling. Behavior research methods, 49(1), 282-293.[32] Wang, M. C., Deng, Q., Bi, X., Ye, H., & Yang, W. (2017). Performance of the entropy as an index of
academicallymature individuals with work experiences outside of college. This information would be valuablefor identifying the precise needs of SCS undergraduate students and targets for intervention andprogrammatic efforts to facilitate their academic and career goals and support their well-being. Specifically, we examined the following research questions:Q.1 How do SCS undergraduate students differ from traditional undergraduate students andgraduate students in terms of needs based on their levels of school and personal demands andresources?Q.2 How do SCS undergraduate students differ from traditional undergraduate students andgraduate students in their levels of student outcomes?MethodProcedure In April of 2019, a link to a 57-question
definitely think that I could have made my presentation moreinteractive and engaging. I think for next time, I will try to incorporate several different activitiesinto the lesson instead of just one at the end.” Similarly, “I think I could have had more specificinstructions” or “I could also improve by providing relatable examples so that the audience canbetter understand the topic” indicated that students recognized that they needed to go more in-depth or explain their key concepts better (18%).Many made mention that discussion and Q&A sessions were successful as assessments (17%), “Ifeel that I had a well thought out topic that connected well back to content of this class. Thepresentation that I prepared was engaging and easy to follow, with
the basis of likelihood, the final desired number of visuallysignificant scenes is determined dynamically via a user setting. The user has the ability to set thegranularity, which at one extreme selects only the most significant changes, and at the otherextreme shows all significant changes, including the least significant ones. Page 12.985.8Figures 5-7: Camera shots when presentation slides are not present: (top left) Prototypedemonstration, (top right) Q&A from students, (bottom left) Q&A from audience member.Key frames are an invaluable visual tool for an alternative to viewing the entire video or usingthe positioning peg to skim a
” boundary condition) to find v(r). Sketch v(r) in the figure. c) Find the volume flow rate Q by integrating v(r) over the cross section of the tube. By which factor is Q changed if the diameter of the tube is increased by i) a factor of 1.5 and ii) a factor of 2, without changing the pressure gradient p/L?ReferencesArney, D. C., W. P. Fox, K. B. Mohrmann, J. D. Myers, and R. A. West. 1995. Coremathematics at the United States Military Academy: Leading into the 21st century. Problems,Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 5(4), 343–367.Carr, S.H. 2003. Engineering First at Northwestern University: Where are we in 2003?Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, June
deepening? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.19 Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.20 Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation, (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.21 Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. (2005). Evaluation theory, models, & applications, (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.22 Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.23 Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the
63.4 11.0 25.71: Q: Question from survey (see Appendix A)2: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Strongly Agree”3: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Agree”4: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Neutral”5: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Disagree”6: Total number of students that provided feedback of “Strongly Disagree”7: % (+): Positive feedback expressed as a percentage (rounded up) of the total number of students that responded to the survey as either “Strongly Agree” or “Agree”8: % (-): Negative feedback expressed as a percentage (rounded up) of the total number of students that responded to the survey as either “Strongly Disagree” or “Disagree”9
, “Predicting Undergraduate Student Retention in STEM Majors Based on Career Development Factors,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 88–93, 2017.[3] J. G. Cromley, T. Perez, and A. Kaplan, “Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2015.[4] R. W. Lent, A. M. Lopez, F. G. Lopez, and H. Bin Sheu, “Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2008.[5] A. Carpi, D. M. Ronan, H. M. Falconer, H. H. Boyd, and N. H. Lents, “Development and Implementation of Targeted
) Classroom Response and Page 11.24.14 Communication Systems: Research Review and Theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Association, San Diego, CA, April 2004.5. Jenkins, Maura & Goo, Edward K. (2005) Concept-Based Instruction and Personal Responses Systems (PRS) as an Assessment Method for Introductory Materials Science and Engineering. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition, 2005. American Society for Engineering Education.6. Kennedy, G. E. & Cutts, Q. I. ( 2005) The association between students' use of an