of novice teachers’ epistemological framing ofengineering learning and teaching. The inclusion of engineering design at all grade levels in theNext Generation Science Standards calls for efforts to create learning opportunities for teachersto learn to teach engineering. In our research on the role of engineering in elementary teacherpreparation, we ask, what learning goals do new elementary teachers take up when asked to doengineering design themselves, and what learning goals do they establish when setting upengineering design tasks for students?We conducted an interpretive comparative case study with two purposefully selected cases,chosen to unpack contrasting epistemological framing of engineering. Ana and Ben participatedin the same
the Development of Metacognition in Engineering Students in a Problem-Based Learning Program with a Think-Aloud ProtocolThis evidence-based practice paper focuses on how an engineering education program thatpromotes self-regulated learning impacts students’ problem-solving skills. Iron RangeEngineering (IRE) is an innovative, problem-based-learning (PBL) engineering program inVirginia, Minnesota. Throughout the curriculum of this program, students learn about and applymetacognitive skills necessary for self-regulating their learning. For the past several years, wehave been conducting research funded by the National Science Foundation1 to (1) identify themetacognitive skills inherent in self-regulated
deviation from consistency is an indication of a serious problem in the coursestructure and probably methods of delivery that should be dealt with at the department level.The paper will discuss the process of the successful writing of measurable learning objectives.We will introduce statistical analysis of results from selected course assessments.We will demonstrate that this assessment process could lead to a continuous improvementprocess if it is properly integrated in the plan of improvement.The paper will also discuss the mapping of course learning objectives to the program learningobjectives and university goals.2. Teaching by Measurable ObjectivesA common belief that the student’s grades in different tests and assignments could be used
: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and Its Global Influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 165-184.6. Sageev, P. & Romanowski, C. (2001). A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in the Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 4, 685-693.7. Pappas, E.C., Kampe, S.L., Hendricks, R.W., & Kander, R.G. (2004) An Assessment Analysis Methodology and Its Application to an Advanced Engineering Communications Program. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 3, 233-246.8. Lamancus, J.S., Jorgensen, J.E. & Zayas-Castro, J.L. (1997) The Learning Factory- A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum. Journal
administrative policies, faculty interactions, curriculum andpedagogy, and peer relationships. Other factors included elements of the study environment,quality of effort on the part of both faculty and student, and integration of the student into theculture of the institution. The student outcomes are explained by Astin to encompass thoseaspects of student development that the university purposefully attempts to influence, thoughdefining the outputs of interest is “clearly the sine qua non of meaningful research on collegeimpact” (p. 224). Astin1 also explained the relationships between these three factors. The collegeenvironment was clearly affected by the kinds of students who enroll (shown in relationship A).The principal concern relating to
Sciences, 2nd ed., R. K. Sawyer, Ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[28] D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 302– 314, Oct. 2012.[29] P. Blikstein, Z. Kabayadondo, A. Martin, and D. Fields, “An Assessment Instrument of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs: Assessment of Technological Literacies in Makerspaces and FabLabs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 149–175, Jan. 2017.[30] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage, 2009.[31] L. J. Martinez, P. A. Sullivan, and E. Pines, “Integration of Engineering Capstone within a
than those thatshould be measured. Further, the indicators are generally examined for the university as a wholerather than for university divisions, departments or programs. Implicit also is that placement inthe rankings is indicative of quality. This paper provides an overview of the methodologies usedfor the more popular rankings and summarizes their strengths and weaknesses. It examines thecritiques of rankings and league tables to provide appropriate context. The paper then examinesthe issue of how a university (or a college or program) could be assessed in terms of the qualityof its engineering and technology programs. It proposes a set of indicators that could be used toprovide relative measures of quality, not so much for individual
, no. 1, pp. 52–61, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.11120/ened.2011.06010052.[19] C. M. Leahy, R. F. Peterson, I. G. Wilson, J. W. Newbury, A. L. Tonkin, and D. Turnbull, “Distress Levels and Self-Reported Treatment Rates for Medicine, Law, Psychology and Mechanical Engineering Tertiary Students: Cross-Sectional Study,” Aust N Z J Psychiatry, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 608–615, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.3109/00048671003649052.[20] University of Michigan - Counseling and Psychological Services, “Healthy Minds Study,” 2012. https://caps.umich.edu/article/healthy-minds-study (accessed Aug. 14, 2020).[21] H. Tajfel and J. Turner, “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict,” in Intergroup relations: Essential readings, New York
AC 2007-1277: GEEKS ARE CHIC: CULTURAL IDENTITY AND ENGINEERINGSTUDENTS’ PATHWAYS TO THE PROFESSIONHeidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines Heidi G. Loshbaugh, Ph.D., is an Assistant Research Professor in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Colorado School of Mines. She is also the Associate Director for CSM's Center for Engineering Education. Within the CAEE, Dr. Loshbaugh has been responsible for developing and maintaining the CSM cohort of students, and collaborating on development of protocols and/or instruments in ethnography, the survey, and structured interviews. She has conducted ethnographic interviews, directly observed students, and collaborated in the
Paper ID #33768COVID-19 Effects on Higher Education: A Case StudyDr. Boshra Karimi, Northern Kentucky University Dr. Boshra Karimi is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management at Northern Kentucky Univer- sity. She received the Ph.D. degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering (Construction Management) from Oklahoma State University, the MSc degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from Sharif University of Technology, and the BSc degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of Tehran. She has over 10 years of experience in teaching and research. Prior to joining NKU as an Assistant Professor, she
effectiveness of the method to teach chemistry at their locallevel and with the assistance of two consultants, a pure linguistic teacher and a teacherspecialized in linguistics didactics. This team was not integrated within a specific institute ofresearch. The idea of presenting the results of this study at an International Conference wasborn after a subsequent research where the team was trying to find the best venue to presentthe results. This research (Landucci 2005)12 was conducted between 2004 and 2005 and Page 12.1349.3showed that the majority of text books were following the traditional method.The genesisThis work has its genesis in the following
Paper ID #9343From the mouths of students: two illustrations of narrative analysis to under-stand engineering education’s ruling relations as gendered and racedDr. Alice L Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education with affiliations with the Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies Program and Division of Environmental and Ecological En- gineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering (with distinction) from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s
for their intellectualdevelopment as engineers and incurs a lapse in interpersonal networking.Charlie directly referred to engineering and physics faculty as negatively influencing their studentexperience more than the other faculty they interacted with at their institution. These interactionsinfluenced Charlie’s development as an engineer, as they felt unable to create interpersonalrelationships with some of their engineering professors. Marra and colleagues [2] emphasized theimportance of classroom climate, the difficulty level of STEM curriculum, and teaching andadvising for student retention and success. Students’ inability to build connections with theirfaculty resemble classroom environments that are classified as “chilly” based on its
2006-1442: THE QUALITY OF SOLUTIONS TO OPEN-ENDED PROBLEMSOLVING ACTIVITIES AND ITS RELATION TO FIRST-YEAR STUDENT TEAMEFFECTIVENESSTamara Moore, Purdue University Tamara Moore is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received both her B.S. in Mathematics/Mathematics Education and M.S. in Mathematics Education from Purdue University in 1996 and 2001, respectively. Before pursuing her doctorate, Tamara taught high school mathematics for seven years. Her research interests include curriculum development, the learning of complex problem-solving, teamwork, integration of engineering into the K-12 classroom, and operations research.Heidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University
and Diversity Impacts across Three Engineering Research Centers," in Frontiers in Education Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 2019.[5] D. M. Pai, R. G. Liles, C. Lambeth, P. N. Kumta,, H. S. Borovetz, S. K. Pixley and J. Sankar, "Bootstrapping a new graduate curriculum through an Engineering Research Center," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, B.C. Canada, 2011.[6] P. Hirsch, D. Kelso, B. Shwom, J. Troy and J. Wal, "Redefining Communication Education for Engineers: How the NSF/VaNTH ERC is Experimenting with a New Approach," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2011.[7] T. Dahlberg, T. Barnes, A. Rorrer and E. Powell, "Improving retention and graduate recruitment through immersive
College. Her research interest revolves around software estimation, software design and curriculum design of software engineering course(s).Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Muhsin Menekse is an assistant professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research investigates how learning activities affect students’ conceptual understanding of engineering and science concepts. His second research focus is on verbal interactions that can enhance productive discussions in collaborative learning settings. And his third research focus is on metacognition and its
Paper ID #10492The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/FacultyInteraction and Students’ Self-EfficacyDr. Micah Stickel, University of Toronto Dr. Micah Stickel (ECE) is Chair, First Year, in the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering. He is also a Senior Lecturer in The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Dr. Stickel first came to the Faculty when he started as an undergraduate in 1993. Since that time, he has completed his BASc (1997), MASc (1999), and a PhD (2006) — all with a focus on electromagnetics and the development of novel devices for high
that the training sessions were an effective supplemental methodfor teaching the Learning Objectives knowledge. LO training is recommended to continue to beused and expanded if possible to more, if not all, IPRO teams.Hypothesis about overlapping content have been suggested by several sources and therefore it isbelieved that differentiated test scores will be found. Unfortunately, no evidence exists as shownin Tables 6 or 7, so far, that any major or curriculum covers the full LO content of an IPROcourse. Significant gains in a semester are demonstrated in acquisition of project managementknowledge regardless of year or major at least in this first semester of testing but these gains aredue to a poor test instrument BOS Fall 2005 not actual
paper point to the need for fundamental changes in engineeringeducation. The data reveal the importance of understanding human behavior: many of theaspects of engineering practice have evolved to control the incidence of human errors anddifferences in interpretation. Just as students currently gain a rigorous framework of ideas tohelp them think about technical issues and problems, they also need rigorous intellectualtreatment of human behavior. Engineers are human and rely on other people to achieve theirresults: this is fundamental to engineering practice. Relocating the human element to thecentre of engineering practice from its present position at the periphery is an essential pre-requisite to integrate studies of engineering practice in
economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextDue to factors such as globalization, climate change, and even issues of social justice, engineersmust learn to include and address considerations beyond the traditional engineering purview ofthe technical and economic. Ethics and the social/societal impacts of engineering, for example,rarely find much space (let alone integration) in a curriculum packed with technical topics [5].There are many possible ways to expand