research needs withinengineering education. We provide a comprehensive definition of complex systems educational research(Hilpert & Marchand, under review; Jacobson et al., 2016) and an overview of methods specific to theapproach (Hollenstein, 2013; Koopsman & Stavalomsis, 2016; Strogatz, 1994). After this, we delineate aresearch-based framework that can be used to develop and conduct complex systems research andevaluation. We identify two areas within the field of engineering education where complex systemsresearch can be useful: 1) educational research focused on student interaction and cognition and 2)assessment and evaluation of collaboratives such as grant funded projects and communication/publication networks. We discuss existing
participate in the NSF Project Based Service Learning Summit. He received the 2008 President’s Service Learning Award for innovations in the use of service learning at Cal Poly. In 2004 he was named a Templeton Research Fellow by the Center for Academic Integrity. Dr. Harding received both the 1999 Apprentice Faculty Grant and 2000 New Faculty Fellow Award for his contributions to engineering education.Dr. Patrick J. Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patrick Cunningham is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. During the 2013-14 academic year he spent a sabbatical in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Cunningham’s educational
the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Destigmatizing Confusion – A Path Towards Professional PracticeIntroductionThis research paper investigates a student team’s approach to a task designed to elicit conceptsand practices used in professional engineering
methodsand changes in engineering teaching practices. Froyd, Wankat, and Smith noted some of thesechanges in the teaching methods over the 100 years of engineering education. These shiftsinclude an emphasis on engineering science and analytical techniques, focus on outcomes-basededucation, emphasis on engineering design, applying education, learning, and social-behavioralsciences research, and integration of information, computational, and communicationstechnology in education [8]. To achieve these shifts, studies in engineering education haveemphasized using various strategies to improve students’ academic performance. Thesestrategies include the use of innovative teaching practices such as problem-based learning,project-based approaches, peer and
, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Presentacion Rivera-Reyes is currently a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He formerly held a position of teaching assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. He also held a position as Professor of Telecommunication Engineering at Technological University of Honduras teaching courses of Transmission System to senior students. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Na- tional Autonomous University of Honduras. He has experience in the telecommunication industry where he worked as a Project Manager developing solutions of high-speed transmission
dataset for this paper comes from the MOOCKnowledge project data collection,which provides an opportunity to work with real-world data from hundreds of people. K-Means and SOM algorithms are performed with a subset of participants' features as inputdata. The clustering evaluation, meanwhile, is achieved with a selection of indices, an intra-cluster measure and an overall quality criterion for K-Means, and two measures related totopological ordering for SOM.The comparison of internal structure of both clustering (set of profiles) shows that there aresimilarities between them on the one hand and some pinpointed differences that can not beevaluated in advance without the opinion of an expert familiarized with the specifications ofthe MOOC on the
but not solarge as to invalidate the tools. Steps should be considered to educate students about potentialbias.IntroductionTeamwork is an integral part of Engineering and Engineering Education.1 Well-designed groupand team projects can help students gain valuable teaming skills, and accrediting bodies requirethese skills of engineering graduates.2,3 But teamwork is not without its problems. Social loafingand “I better do it myself, if I want an A” syndrome are part of many peoples experiences withgroup and teamwork.4 A well-designed peer evaluation process can improve the studentexperience and lead to more powerful learning outcomes.Peer evaluation can be used to foster a better team experience and to equitably recognizeindividual student’s
unexplored3,4,5. This paper addresses this literature gap and aims to broaden theconceptualization of engineering identity by studying the development of engineering identity ofLatina/o undergraduates from their perspective and experiences. The forecasted growth of Latinas/os in the United States has encouraged a range ofinstitutions to assess how this shift in population will affect various programs of study especiallythose in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) where Latinas/os arecurrently underrepresented. In engineering, the number of Latina/o students enrolling hasincreased since the 1990s and it is projected to continue to increase, though not at the same rateas the Latina/o population growth. Engineering is one
Hunsu is currently an assistant professor of engineering education at the University of Georgia. He is affiliated with the Engineering Education Transformational Institute and the school electrical and computer engineering at the university. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in electronic and computer engi- neering from the Lagos State University in Nigeria, a Masters in Project management from the University of Sunderland, and a PhD in Educational Psychology from Washington State University. His research in- terests include learning and cognition, students’ engagement, and the assessment of learning and students engagements, in engineering classrooms. His expertise also include the development and validation of
Paper ID #23055Understanding the Investment of Underrepresented Minorities in DoctoralEngineering ProgramsMs. Mayra S. Artiles , Virginia Tech Mayra S. Artiles is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University with a focus on nanotechnology. Before her joining the Ph.D. pro- gram, she worked at Ford Motor Company as an Electrified Vehicles Thermal Engineer for four years. As a doctoral student, Mayra has collaborated in research projects on diversity in
Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incorporat- ing engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. Geoff Potvin, Florida International UniversityDr. Adam
influenced by aspects of the socialcontext through processes of socialization, it is seen as essentially a psychological phenomenonand an individual possession. In contrast, we draw on anthropological and other socioculturalapproaches that see identity not as a relatively stable possession of an individual, but as anongoing project of construction by a given individual together with the others with whom shecomes into contact. Thus, who an individual is—that is, her identity—depends upon how sheactively identifies herself and is actively identified by others within the various social fields inwhich she acts: friendships, a families, universities, professions, etc. In this view, identity is“double-sided,” 8 meaning that identity is both something
instruction primarily focuses onverbal and printed words, rote memorization, and is instruction driven 38. Students who aretaught traditionally are told what they are expected to know and concepts are presenteddeductively 10,16, where the instructor conducts lessons by introducing and explaining concepts tostudents, and then expecting students to complete tasks to practice the concepts. Moderninterpretations of student-centered learning include project-based learning, case-based learning,discovery learning, and just-in-time teaching with 3 instructional approaches of active learning,cooperative learning, and problem-based learning 30.This quantitative study was designed to explore variables affecting student academic success,with the hope of
found that graduate student mentors who work closely withstudents on their projects served as “coping models” in developing undergraduates’ self-efficacyfor research and graduate school. Specifically, we reported that the REU program served as a“taste” of graduate school, and gave participants access to graduate students and professors whoserved as both role models and sources of information about academic and career options.Several factors contributed to their reported increased in self-efficacy for graduate school andresearch careers: their accomplishments in the laboratory, new knowledge about graduate schooland potential career options, and vicarious learning3 that took place over the summer via theirgraduate student mentors. In particular
typicallyunderrepresented in engineering has not increased significantly in the last decade. Former NAEPresident Bill Wulf noted that “...for the United States to remain competitive in a globaltechnological society, the country as a whole must take serious steps to ensure that we have adiverse, well trained, multicultural workforce.”1Even during weaker economic times, high demand for U.S. engineers continues; and, the numberof U.S. engineering jobs are projected to increase in all engineering diciplines during the nextdecade. Most engineering disciplines are projected to grow faster than most other labor sectors.4The number of undergraduate engineering degrees awarded in the U.S. fell dramatically from77,572 in 1985 to a low of 59,214 in 2001, but has been on the
freshman engineering program. Dr. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas of Engineering and Project Management and Engineering Education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania.Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the
Bernard Van Wie has been teaching for 30 years, first as a graduate student at the University of Oklahoma, and then as a professor at Washington State University. Over the past 15 years, he has devoted himself to developing novel teaching approaches that include components of cooperative/collaborative, hands-on, active, and problem/project-based learning (CHAPL) environments.Dr. Gary Robert Brown, Portland State UniversityDr. Olusola O. Adesope, Washington State University, Pullman Olusola O. Adesope is an Assistant Professor of educational psychology at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent
AC 2010-806: TOWARDS A MODEL OF TEACHING EXPERTISE IN CAPSTONEDESIGN: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A PRELIMINARY SURVEYINSTRUMENTJames Pembridge, Virginia TechMarie Paretti, Virginia Tech Page 15.1269.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Towards a Model of Teaching Expertise in Capstone Design: Development and Validation of a Preliminary Survey InstrumentAbstractCapstone design courses seek to create a transitional environment between school and work byengaging students in collaborative, open-ended projects. These environments present a challengeto capstone faculty because the pedagogies used in such courses may differ significantly fromthose
study of K-12 engineering-oriented studentcompetitions, Wankat (2007) concluded that students with supportive parents had higherperformance at the competition, and parent involvement was effective in focusing students and Page 24.968.3increasing enthusiasm for the project.23 Retrospective studies have also revealed that parents area significant motivator, especially for low socio-economic students to enter into engineering andthat parents’ influence on children depended on the parents’ motivational beliefs in helping thechild succeed in school.24 In summary, research indicates that parental involvement andexpectations are important for
I’m doing research all day. Which, I’m sure would be true if I went into the academic setting, but um, but I may end up working for some sort of firm, um, if I got say a biochemical engineering degree. I could go and work for a company that makes say replacement knees or things like that. (Steve, SPRI, Year 1)Steve’s sophomore year interview focused upon a dominant image of engineering that we havenoticed previously in both Erica’s and Colin’s excerpts above, being a design engineer. As an engineer? Hmm, I imagine it depends on what, like, phase of the project I’m in. Like if I’m in the initial design phase, coming up with lots of random ideas, you know, my brain to meet whatever fantasy the client
important to note that the study was designed with a consideration for thevocabulary, context and pedagogical differences between K-12 and higher education, whichmeant, at times, a modification of the language around STSE, although an effort was made topreserve meaning and intention.The methodology used in this project – an online survey - was selected and designed to explorethe goals and practices of a large group of diverse engineering instructors. Although the 6currents supported a deductive approach, a naturalistic quality was emphasized throughdescriptive, open-ended questions. The online survey included: 1) demographic questions; 2
exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences, and during Fall 2017 he taught at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor of mechanical engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford
of IntersectionalityKristen R. Moore, University at BuffaloWalter Hargrove, University at BuffaloNathan R. Johnson, University of South FloridaFernando Sánchez, University of St. ThomasAbstractUsing a citation network analysis, this project analyzes the 209 instances of the term“intersectionality” in the ASEE PEER repository to locate the central authors and texts thatinform the field’s use of the term. In this citational analysis, we suggest that the limited citationof Black women should be interrogated and redressed as a form of inequity. Framing this projectwithin the politics of citation and the current campaign to #CiteBlackWomen, we work toexplore how the term “intersectional” has been embraced, whose theories have been adopted,ignored
be reduced solely to the question of how much development, butrather the more challenging question of how much of what kind of development could beoccurring.Impetus for developing the assessment instrumentThis paper describes the process by which we developed an assessment instrument to measurestudents’ interpretive understanding of engineering design concepts as nascent indication ofdeveloping expertise in the middle school engineering education context. We had multipleinterrelated goals for this project. In part, we realized the need to create a new alternativeassessment as one of several means by which we might evaluate student learning outcomesrelated to a narratively-based engineering curriculum aligned to the Next Generation
usual process of research we followed, all the six steps [Aisha].From the interview data it was found that there was no set process for a research study to getapproval from the institution. The participants explained that anyone interested in conducting anEER related activity could just start by themselves without any prior approval. However, once thefaculty decided to start an EER project, they followed steps that are typically taken in conductingresearch. The first step in conducting EER was problem identification followed by formulatingresearch questions. The faculty said that research questions helped them dig in deeper and tookthem in the right direction in the literature. They decided on the methodology and framework usingthe research
University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Angela Harris, Stanford University Angela is currently a Fellow with the Thinking Matters program at Stanford University. Angela received her PhD in Stanford’s Environmental Engineering and Science Program (Spring 2015). Angela completed her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology prior to coming to Stanford for her M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Angela conducts research related to water, sanitation, and child health in developing countries. Angela has extensive experience in developing survey questionnaires
implications foracademic practices. As such, this paper is a “welcome mat” or introduction for those interested inlearning more about APS. Components of the paper address questions researchers designing newstudies may have about the organizational and technical infrastructure that supported this project,or about the quantitative and qualitative research methods, tools, and protocols used. Othercomponents of the paper address questions that researchers and engineering faculty andadministrators might have regarding how to explore the findings and insights that are emergingfrom this extensive longitudinal and cross-sectional study of students’ pathways throughengineering. Research findings to date are summarized in a companion paper entitled Findingsfrom
own transformation. This wouldseem to make the necessity for successful assessment and CQI greater in education than anyother activity since the potential sources of failure are greater in education compared to theseother activities.Initial Planning Steps and Constraints on the ModelIn a typical engineering project, the initial steps include such items as a problem or visionstatement (what are we trying to accomplish), business case (why are we trying to develop thisprocess or product) and the specification of at least some of the product or process requirements(how do we know we have solved the problem adequately). In waterfall models, there is anattempt to specify the majority of requirements in advance of the design process whereasadaptive
promise for addressing these deficiencies in traditional STEMeducation is Communication Across the Curriculum (CXC), the integration of oral, visual, andelectronic communication in all disciplines. CXC was initially developed in the 1970s and hasseen some success in a variety of fields. Many CXC initiatives have been criticized, however, forbeing overly compartmentalized, focusing too much on discipline-specific skills training andhaving missed opportunities to encourage broad-minded thinking. CXC, traditionally applied,has not been viewed by the National Communication Association (NCA) as a substitute for basicinstruction provided by departments of communication [10].This project aimed to return to Deanna Dannels’ and Housley Gaffney’s [11] call
. Impact of engineering on society and the environment 10. Ethics and equity 11. Economics and project management 12. Lifelong learningAs with other accreditation boards, such as ABET, it is the engineering program seeking accreditationthat must devise the outcomes-based teaching and assessment measures to facilitate students’ learningin these areas1. To some extent, thus far in Canada, due to the pressures of accreditation, approaches tothis problem could be generalized as efforts to teach and assess the CEAB graduate attributes byindividually and equitably attending to each attribute on the list, despite acknowledgment by theWashington Accord that whilst all attributes are important, they should not necessarily be appointedequal weight2