2001-126). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001126.pdf24 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.25 van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Abany, NY: State University of New York Press.26 Säljö, R. (1997). Talk as data and practice – A critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 173-190.27 Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA
university is helpful to enhance research ability? Page 15.523.14 14 How many credits in chemistry courses are reasonable in university?Appendix 2 Pilot Study Main StudyItems Average Q. D. Average Q. D.1-1 Knowing Chemistry 4.25 0.5 4.41 0.51-2 Measurement and unit 4.468 0.5 4.53 0.52-1 Atomic theory and structure 4.375 0.5 4.09 0.52-2 Chemical formula and nomenclature 4.468 0.5 4.37 0.52-3 Chemical Equations
. • Schedule synchronous class times to open a few minutes before and stay open a few minutes after class time and use the time to have conversations with students.Figure 4. Summary of recommendationsReferences[1] K. A. Douglas, A. C. Johnston, J. Martin, and T. Short, “Instructor Decisions andStudents’ Perceived Support in Engineering Project-Based Courses During the COVID-19Pandemic.”[2] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. Jossey-Bass, 2016.[3] X. Huang and E.-L. Hsiao, “Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2012.[4] C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear
, 2020.[23] B. N. Hara and R. Kling, “Student distress in web-based distance education,” Educ. Q., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 68–69, 2001.[24] S. Shafiq, S. N. Nipa, S. Sultana, M. R. U. Rahman, and M. M. Rahman, “Exploring the triggering factors for mental stress of university students amid COVID-19 in Bangladesh: A perception-based study,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 120, no. August 2020, p. 105789, 2021.[25] L. T. Hoyt, A. K. Cohen, B. Dull, E. Maker Castro, and N. Yazdani, “‘Constant Stress Has Become the New Normal’: Stress and Anxiety Inequalities Among U.S. College Students in the Time of COVID-19,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 270–276, 2021.[26] G. J. Hwang, S. Y. Wang, and C. L. Lai
/s40594-019-0185-0[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, 2002.
metric from the “Topical Content Post-Tests”will then be used to test the learning effectiveness by performing another two-way ANOVA between thepost-test survey results and the topical post-test results. The learning engagement will be measured based Table 1: RIMMS 2015 Questions Plus Two Rewrites (RIMMS++) RIMMS ARCS Prin- Original RIMMS Ques- RIMMS++ Question Q ciples tion [22] R7 Confidence - As I worked with these huser As I worked with this industry standard Learning re- instructionsi, I was confident tool or practice, I was confident that I quirements that I could learn how to work could learn how to
knowledge. discussion. Teaching Use pictures Ask students Emphasize Emphasize Project Strategies and visuals; to produce tiered compare and presentations in SLA- speak slowly, simple questions and contrast for by students aBLe use simple, programs in use “think, different to enhance shorter words addition to pair, share” to concepts. learning to draw multiple- process the Allow through connection choice new concepts. students to Q&A. between SLA questions
factors. We will examine the multi-dimensionality of the academic resilience construct by testing the three-factor model against afour or five factor model. Future studies will explore diversity of participants, examine genderdifferences among different samples and explore other demographics. Lastly, we intend to usethe validated instrument as a tool to examine causal relationships between academic resilience,students’ school engagement, and other motivational factors that influence academicachievement, especially for students who are most vulnerable to high academic stress.References[1] G. Windle, K. M. Bennett, J. J. H. Noyes, and q. o. l. outcomes, "A methodological review of resilience measurement scales," vol. 9, no. 1, p. 8, 2011
learned at various stages of the project h) Applying strategies that seek to strengthen your interdisciplinary collaboration i) Developing strategies that contribute to your professional growth (e.g., diversifying for broader learning, relationship building, etc.)Q. 9 Please select all the programs you are associated with at your institution from the choices below. __Engineering __Education __Learning Sciences __Psychology __Engineering Education __Other ______Q. 10 For how many years have you been teaching in higher education? ______Q. 11 For how many years have you been involved with interdisciplinary engineering education research? ______Q. 12 Please select the job or title that best
. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[21] N. Fouad, R. Singh, M. Fitzpatrick, and J. Liu, “Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering,” 2012.[22] L. M. Frehill, “Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering,” Sociol. Q., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 225–249, 1997.[23] National Science Board, “Chapter 3. Science and Engineering Labor Force,” in Science and Engineering Indicators, 2016, pp. 1–60.[24] A. Godwin and G. Potvin, “Chemical engineering students: A distinct group among engineers,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 145–153, 2013.[25] M. Schar, P. Bracken, K. J. Chew
, "Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms," Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153-174, 2010.[13] R. F. Korte, "How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers," Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 285-306, 2009.[14] A. Q. Gates, S. Roach, E. Villa, K. Kephart, C. Della-Piana and G. Della-Piana, The Affinity Research Group: Creating And Maintaining Effective Research Teams, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2009.[15] N. K. Martin and K. Meyer, "Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Student Retention Rates at A Hispanic Serving Institution: Building Collaborative Relationships for the Common
-achieving student whodominates the project, a student who doesn’t pull his share of the load, a shy student who doesn’tspeak up, and a student who takes on a task without finishing it. The sketch also alludes todeeper issues relative to male-female gender dynamics, poor communication and follow-through,and frustration about unsatisfactory group dynamics.After Off-Course ends, the facilitator discusses the performance with the audience using a varietyof interactive learning strategies: pair sharing, large group discussion, and Q&A between thesketch characters and the audience. That is, the characters from the sketch remain on the stageand the students in the audience interact directly with them (as they remain in character) byasking questions
-based learning on metacognitive strategies during an engineering design task. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 1-18.17. Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. State University of New York at Buffalo [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm.18. Mazumder, Q. H. (2010). Metacognition approaches to enhance student learning in mechanical engineering classroom. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).19. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self- regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues
better spatialvisualization skills, and eventually succeed in their engineering education and future careers. References 1. J. Boaler, “Ability and Mathematics: the mindset revolution that is reshaping education,” Forum, vol. 55, no. 1, p. 143, 2013. 2. J. L. Burnette, M. V. Russell, C. L. Hoyt, K. Orvidas, and L. Widman, “An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 428–445, 2017. 3. Q. Cutts, E. Cutts, S. Draper, P. Odonnell, and P. Saffrey, “Manipulating mindset to positively influence introductory programming performance,” Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on
George Saridakis. (2008). “The Role of Higher Education Skills and Support in Graduate Self-Employment.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (6): 653–72.Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217-229.Huang-Saad, A., Bodnar, C., & Carberry, A. (2020). Examining Current Practice in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890828Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global
success,” Educate, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2007.[16] J. Otero, J. M. Campanario, and K. D. Hopkins, “The Relationship between Academic Achievement and Metacognitive Comprehension Monitoring Ability of Spanish Secondary School Students,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 419–430, Jun. 1992.[17] P. R. Pintrich, “The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 231–236, 2002.[18] O. Lawanto, “Students’ metacognition during an engineering design project,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115–134, 2010.[19] O. Lawanto and S. Johnson, “Student’s cognitive self-appraisal, self-management, and the level of difficulty of an engineering design project
: Diversifying the pipeline through the development of social capital,” in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 2007.[14] S. R. Harper, “Niggers no more: a critical race counternarrative on Black male student achievement at predominantly White colleges and universities,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 697–712, 2009.[15] Q. S. Hughes, R. L. Shehab, and S. E. Walden, “‘Success is different to different people’: A qualitative study of how African American engineering students define success,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[16] T. Fletcher, M. Ross, D. Tolbert, J. Holly, M. Cardella, A. Godwin, and J. Deboer, “Ignored
). “An overview of computational thinking,” International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3 (1) 1-11.[3] V. Shute, C. Sun, & J. Asbell-Clarke (2017). “Demystifying computational thinking’” Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158.[4] M. Berland & U. Wilensky (2015). “Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking,” Journal of Science Education and Technology 24(5), 628-647.[5] M. Bers, L. Flannery, E. Kazakoff, & A. Sullivan, (2014). “Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum,” Computers & Education 72, 145–157.[6] B. Zhone, Q. Wang, J. Chen, & Y. Li (2016). “An exploration of
progression in built environment and engineering programs: Case of Central Queensland University,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000341.[16] D. Ifenthaler and C. Widanapathirana, “Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: Two case studies using support vector machines,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 19, pp. 221–240, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4.[17] A. M. Bessent and E. W. Bessent, “Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 57–75, 1980, doi: 10.1177/0013161X8001600207.[18] C. Shah and G. Burke, “An undergraduate student flow
European space for higher education: an explanation, 2000.4. Turning Project, “Turning Educational Structures in Europe”, Online: http://www.tuning.unideusto.org/tuningeu/ [Jan 6, 2009], 2004.5. Training Agency, Enterprise in Higher Education: key features of Enterprise in Higher Education Proposals. Sheffield: Training Agency, 1990.6. Yorke, M. Employability in higher education: what it is – what it is not. York: The Higher Education Academy 2006.7. Nguyen, D. Q., “ The Essential Skills and Attributes of an Engineer: A Comparative Study of Academics, Industry Personnel and Engineering Students,” Global journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1998 pp. 65-75.8. Lang, J., Cruse, S., Francis, M., and
. 23% 10I enjoy discussing course ideas online. 26% 11I receive credit (or a bonus) for participating in discussion. 5% 2Table 4. Mediating factors that inhibit participation.Q2 Which of the following factors influence your decision NOT TO USE (TO IGNORE) thediscussion board? (I.e., which of these factors dissuade you from participating. Statements mayrefer to posting questions or replies.)Question Response Item % Responding N RespondingReading other students' Q&A postings is enough. 30% 13I do well in class and have no questions. 5% 2I
Mining Society, 2018.[22] A. Fortino, Q. Zhong, W. C. Huang, and R. Lowrance, “Application of text data mining to stem curriculum selection and development,” in 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 2019, p. 354––361.[23] S. Lunn, J. Zhu, and M. Ross, “Utilizing web scraping and natural language processing to better inform pedagogical practice,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, p. 1––9.[24] B. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, P. K. Lund, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 9, p. 699–705, 2011.[25] X. Su, “Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity,” J
thecommunity, (k) my enjoyment or satisfaction with teaching, (l) my ability to address ABEToutcomes in my teaching, (m), my day-to-day workload, (n) my access to resources and people,(o) the existence of partnerships between my College or program and other organizations in thecommunity, (p), the use of community issues in the class or program by other faculty in theCollege or community organization, (q) my role as a resource for colleagues in my College orprogram, (r) my connections with other engineers who share my interests and ideals, (s) mysense that I am confident and capable as an educator, and (t) my sense of pride and satisfactionwith the UML engineering program. This survey required reporting on a Likert scale of 1-9,with 1 being “strongly
). IEEE.McCord, R., & Matusovich, H. M. (2013). Developing an Instrument to Measure Motivation, Learning Strategies and Conceptual Change. In 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.Morelock, J., Matusovich, H., Cunningham, P., & Hermundstad, A. L. (2016). Working the Problems: Creating a Behaviorist Culture. Poster presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.Newstetter, Wendy C., and Marilla D. Svinicki. "Learning theories for engineering education practice." Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (2014): 29-46.Patton, M. Q., & Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research
. “Reconciling Graduate Attribute Assessment with Existing Outcome-Based Assessment.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference (CEEA), 6 pp., 8–11 June. Canmore, AB: OJS/PKP. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/issue/view/54331. Kishawy, H. A., T. Sidhu, R. Pop-Iliev, M. A. Rosen, D. Zhang and Q. H. Mahmoud. 2014. “Meeting the Outcome-Based CEAB Accreditation Criteria: Engineering Programs at UOIT.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference (CEEA), 7 pp., June 8-11. Canmore, AB: OJS/PKP. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/issue/view/54332. Lye, L. 2014. “Development and Use of Simulation Apps and Physical Toys for Teaching Experimental Design