The project was completed as part of a course. Two teams of four people each worked through semester.Product Realization Capstone Working in multidisciplinary design teams from engineering Project and business, students take a product from concept to business plan. In doing this, they address issues of market analysis, design, manufacturing design, and production planning. Two teams of five people worked on the project for a semester.Two student teams per project were taped. The tapes were then experimentally observed withtwo sets of raters observing
introductory engineering courses as multidisciplinary because they include studentsfrom all engineering majors.Similarly, study participants often described capstone courses in this manner. For example, aHarvey Mudd College faculty member’s description of a “Clinic” project suggested that he usesmultidisciplinarity as we defined it, referring to teams of students from within engineering: And clinic is where students have this, usually multidisciplinary problem that they are trying to deal with. So they draw from, I mean today you saw the mechanical engineering, structurally how do we make this not fall off our plane, and electrically, how do we make it communicate to the down station or base station. So I think that is it, they have to use
questions about the strengths and weaknesses of the undergraduate research experience, and (d) general questions about the team, demographics, etc.More details about NESLOS, including a list of some of the outcomes, are included in a previousASEE publication, in which NESLOS was employed to assess students’ learning outcomesduring capstone design projects 7. During this previous effort, both students and faculty wereadministered NESLOS and results revealed a strong correlation (75%) between students’ self- Page 13.231.4ratings and faculty ratings of their students’ learning. This finding revealed that NESLOS isvalid as a self-assessment
Undergraduate Studies and Professor of Instruction in Mechan- ical Engineering at the Temple University College of Engineering. He received his Bachelor of Textile Engineering from Georgia Tech and his Sc.D. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He was responsible for re-imagining and leading the college-wide capstone senior design course Currently he is the College -wide Coordinator of ABET ac- creditation. Prior to joining Temple University in 2014 he was Dean of the School of Engineering and Textiles at Philadelphia University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WIP: Rethinking How We Teach in Engineering
Scientist with the Legislative Office of Research Liaison of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. He has been Principal Investigator of a number of bioengineering research projects involving implantable transmitters and sensors and their use in physiologic measurements. He was the Principal Investigator of the Drexel E4 educational reform project, the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and is currently PI of an NSF funded GK-12 project. He is member of the NAE and a fellow of the ASEE, the IEEE, and the AIMBE. He is the recipient of a number of other awards and honors including the Bernard M. Gordon Prize of the National Academy of Engineering
-based teaching and learning. Clearly, implementing new processes ofassessment of outcomes for ABET is having a significant effect on our programs. We have beenfortunate to have other influences, as well, including good counsel from external advisory boardsand the resources from an endowed center for engineering education, both of which have beeneffective in fostering change.Over the last 15 years, these diverse drivers for change have nurtured nearly 50 major projectsfor which substantial funding was available. These 50 initiatives, however, do not begin torepresent the totality of the effort because many individual faculty and small groups of facultycarried out projects to improve what they are doing in their own classes without the benefit
, positive reinforcement, and additional help on project tasks,which may be construed as transformational in nature. When compared to more tangible rewardofferings in a professional setting such as promotions, bonuses, and additional vacation time, thefact that contingent reward behaviors load quite strongly with the MLQ’s transformationalbehaviors is not surprising. This conceptual understanding of the leadership phenomenon,corroborated by early works in the theory indicate that this scale may be measuring leadershipbehaviors consistent with the experiences of student mechanical engineers in a capstone setting.Next, the passive-avoidant/laissez-faire scale developed departs from the current construct of theMLQ Form 5X but is consistent with
used in allcore course in the non-traditional degree plan.Some flexibility is also provided in the traditional program to allow students to customize theirdegree based on their interests. In doing so, nine semester credit hours are available as electives.However, these electives must come from a predetermined list. Project-based learning is alsoimplemented later in the upper-level course of the degree plan in capstone style courses.Recognition – To build a sense of relatedness and recognition as an engineer for students, thenon-traditional department intentionally seeks to create a sense of community within thedepartment and help students see a connection between their engineering education and theworld around them. Projects and course work
to social responsibility, but theydon’t examine how faculty or departments believe that they are influencing such views. At the17 institutions surveyed, it would be beneficial for departments to see where their students saidthey were influenced and compare that to where they thought they were affecting student views.Departments could assess if the first-year or capstone projects were influencing the ethicaldevelopment that they expect. Possible single time interventions on ethical or professionalresponsibility are not enough to provide lasting impressions on students such that they wouldhighlight that course years later. This could be an impetus to change such approaches to ethicseducation. More broadly, this work provides a useful approach
those students who did not remember the class well would be less likely to participate inthe study.Future work directions could minimize selection bias and expand scope. To reduce selectionbias, all students could be surveyed at the end of the class (not 2-3 years later). While aninterview during the term would introduce its own problems (i.e., students could be influencedby feeling like the interview could affect their grades), adding questions to the anonymous end-of-course evaluation could be a viable mechanism to get responses from everyone in the class.Expanding the scope of the work beyond exploring why learning improved in the class,following students to their capstone projects to investigate their problem formulation behaviorswould also
information sources do students rely on most when developing user requirements and engineering specifications? Why do students choose particular information or information sources during front-end design?ParticipantsThe study tracked six design teams as they developed user requirements and engineeringspecifications for their senior capstone design projects. Each design team had four students. Fourteams consisted exclusively of mechanical engineering students and two teams each had onebiomedical engineering student in addition to the mechanical engineering students. All studentswere enrolled in the same capstone design course. The design teams focused on the design ofglobal health technologies for low-income settings (i.e., diagnostic
them in a full range of professional skills, mostnotably communication, ethics, teamwork, and lifelong learning. Attention to contemporaryissues receives limited attention in some of the courses. To date, however, none of the courseshave rigorous, codified assessment schemas in place to consistently document student skills; allare thus appropriate venues for testing the assessment methodology under development.Integrated CoursesThe second implementation model involves integrating the professional skills into technicalcourses; this model is currently in place in the capstone design courses in both MSE and ESM.Both capstone design programs are full-year courses that address not only engineering design,but the larger project management issues
communicators, and have the skills towork globally and in multidisciplinary teams. For evaluation purposes, the Universityperiodically sends out surveys in which engineering alumni are asked about how well preparedthey perceive themselves to be for their post-graduation employment. Using the results from the2010 administration of this survey, this study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) Whatare alumni’s perceptions of their preparedness in these areas: ethics, innovation, communication,project management, global and international work, and multidisciplinary teamwork? (2) Canclusters be identified from the survey results? (3) What undergraduate engineering experienceshelped prepare them for these skills, and in what ways do they believe the
engineering learning outcomes. Senior mechanical engineering students participating in asenior capstone project were shown to ascribe high value to the learning outcomes of theexperience. Personal and professional skill gains were ranked higher than their technicaloutcomes with female students having statistically higher scores than their male classmates.Engineering co-op students (mostly rising seniors) revealed that a co-op experience was alsohighly valued overall with females rating the five most highly ranked outcomes (all professional Page 22.454.3skills) significantly higher than their male classmates.While these two contexts are not service
Engineering has worked for years to continuouslyimprove its approach to professional formation, relying heavily on input from constituentsranging from alumni and corporate partners to faculty and current students. The most influentialstakeholder group has been the department’s Industrial Advisory Board (IAB), and for the pastdecade the IAB has driven a number of initiatives designed to teach and build capacities forprofessional skills, often called “soft skills.” As shown in Table 2, the IAB’s recommendationshave been delivered in silos, mostly via the senior design capstone experience. ECE 202 CircuitTheory Applications – which now includes a project design component in the sophomore year –has served as the vital lower-level course for introducing
Establish/develop study groups / offer courses with focus on analytical skills to 1) Get more faculty & industry support for senior capstone help students put together their basic course; 2) (**) Raise expectations for the quality of knowledge with requirements of theGroup 7 projects to industry standard. Group 16 problem.Group 8 Problem-oriented course earlier in the curriculum Group 17 no answer Identify a couple of courses that will Should implement this idea across the curriculum
been active in the ASEE since 2001, currently serving as the Program Chair for the Commu- nity Engagement in Engineering Education constituent committee. Swan’s current research interests in engineering education concern project-based learning and service-based pedagogy.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She has incorporated service-learning projects into the senior capstone design course for environmental engineering since 2001. Her engineering education research interests include sustainable engineering, ethics, and retention of female
, and type of reflection: how reflection is being operationalized. As aresult of our findings, it is evident that there has been a significant and recognizable upwardtrend in the explicit attention to reflection across the body of the ASEE conference publications.Understanding the trends of reflection across literature can help us further analyze its prevalenceand importance in the engineering education community.IntroductionIn engineering education, there has been an increase in pedagogical approaches that positionstudents at the center of the teaching practice, like problem-based learning, project-basedcourses, and capstone design courses.1,2,3 Such pedagogical approaches often engender reflectionby engaging students in reflection activities
University of California at Berkeley.Robert A. Linsenmeier, Northwestern UniversityJennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. Dr. Cole’s primary teaching is in capstone design, and her research interest are in engineering design education. Page 22.688.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Exploring Senior Engineering Students’ Conceptions of ModelingAbstractModeling is a pervasive feature of engineering that
analytic rubric and having to provide freeformcomments upon a student artifact. The evaluation criteria are limited, through use of a rubric, tothose considered key for reviewing the assignment, but feedback can be easily provided in thosecases where student performance within a particular criterion is either above or belowexpectations. Projects of sufficiently long duration, such as term projects or capstones, are theassignments that would be the “best fit” for applying single point rubrics, as there would besufficient time for students to utilize the formative feedback to improve their project or theirperformance.In summary, the authors believe that there is considerable potential in adopting single pointrubrics for formative assessment purposes
collaborations. Coming to understand (scholarship of merit) and promotingthe efficacy of project-based learning and design thinking (scholarship of impact)22 are theexpected results of this project. Page 24.902.9References1. Todd, RH, SP Magleby, CD Sorensen, BR Swan & DK Anthony (1995). A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 165- 174.2. Newstetter, Wendy C, Eastman, Charles E, McCracken & W Michael (2001). Bringing Design Knowing and Learning Together. In Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education.3. Lande M and Leifer L (2009). Work In Progress
the curriculums of Connections and Identity but these curricula may not be explicitly taught. Capstone projects are used to assess how students integrate all of these curriculums.With such an analysis, it is easy to articulate why the traditional program has failed to serve at-risk populations such as women: By concentrating the Core and Practice up front, this program Page 11.1316.6may discourage or misrepresent the discipline for those, particularly women, who need somesense of Connection to society and Identity to the field.5Recent innovative efforts in engineering education can be understood using the PCM language: By
systems.Individual class sessions include hands-on design and building activities to support theengineering design or engineering science content. Students also have a number of substantialdesign project challenge experiences over the course of the semester. The senior cohort ofstudents is in an optional senior elective that augments their engineering design experiences(foundational product development through capstone design) with introduction of a human-centered design approach to get at latent and expressed needs for problems where people are atthe center of the problem and solution space. Similarly a problem-based learning approach istaken and students have many in-class hands-on activities to support different aspects of humancentered design (like
Education. He served as 2004 chair of the ASEE ChE Division, has served as an ABET program evaluator and on the AIChE/ABET Education & Accreditation Committee. He has also served as Assessment Coordinator in WPI’s Interdis- ciplinary and Global Studies Division and as Director of WPI’s Washington DC Project Center. He was secretary/treasurer of the new Education Division of AIChE. In 2009 he was awarded the rank of Fellow in the ASEE, and in 2013 was awarded the rank of Fellow in AIChE.Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts
to engage with. Improving undergraduateengineering education requires a better understanding of the ways in which studentsexperience ill-structured problems in the form of engineering design. With specialattention to the experiences of first-year engineering students, prior exploratory workidentified two critical thresholds that distinguished students’ ways of experiencing designas less or more comprehensive: accepting ambiguity and recognizing the value ofmultiple perspectives.The goal of current (work-in-progress) research is to develop and pilot a self-reportinstrument to assess students’ relation to these two thresholds at the completion of an ill-structured design project within the context of undergraduate engineering education
Figure 4: The resulting theatre box and section through the theatre.User Stories as a Programming and Design tool for Architecture 5In the following year, the capstone studio project was a combination food pantry and homelessyouth shelter for a provider in a nearby urban center. This project presented the prospect of userstories from several perspectives—that of the food pantry clients, the organization’s skeletalstaff, homeless teens, and the volunteers that do much of the work of unloading, sortingpackaging and stocking the pantry shelves.All students were required to volunteer at the food pantry to experience the volunteers’perspective. This also gave them a chance to
for teaching these skills now engages the engineeringfaculty in a collaborative environment with resources drawn from within the College ofEngineering.We have used a variety of approaches to assess the success of our initiative, including studentevaluations, faculty survey, and an external advisory council. Our initial observations, drawnover a three-year period in Senior Capstone Courses, are that students’ understanding of thetechnical content has increased in the communication-intensive courses. It seems that students’efforts to communicate technical aspects of their designs, have required better understanding ofthese aspects, especially when the students are challenged during their oral presentations.Feedback from design review panels and
types of methods, and different methods are needed to understand the complexitiesof the research environment. The qualitative data, acquired from students’ weekly journalentries, provided data to further enhance an existing National Engineering Students’ LearningOutcomes Survey (NESLOS), developed by the lead author and utilized in prior efforts 12, 13. Thestrength of the mixed-methods approach used herein is that such qualitative and quantitativetools can be used across project-based learning experiences (undergraduate research, industryinternships, capstone design, service learning, etc.), across engineering disciplines andengineering programs. Key findings are likely to be transferable across other engineering REUprograms as well as other
course and the students that are working within the boundaries of thecourse [4]. Therefore, work is being done to design assessment that allows for student freedomwith strategies like project-based learning and learning portfolios [5]. These forms of assessmentderive from work on open-ended learning environments and self-regulated learning. Open-endedlearning is a pedagogical approach that harnesses students’ intrinsic motivation to learn [6], andself-regulated learning is when students make goals and evaluate their learning in order topractice metacognition [7]. Many researchers have found benefits when implementing moreopportunities for student-directed learning both in higher education [8–11] and the K-12system [12]. Giving students ownership
. Page 15.1030.8Figure 5. Model Representation Component Key.Results and DiscussionModel Representations have been generated for the Virtual Laboratory projects of students of thesenior capstone laboratory course at Oregon State University in Fall 2008. The class consisted of55 students majoring in chemical engineering, 19 majoring in bioengineering and 6 majoring inenvironmental engineering, who worked in 27 teams of 2-3 students on either the Virtual CVDLaboratory (41 students) or the Virtual Bioreactor Laboratory (39 students).Instructional ContextOver the course of the 10 week term students complete three laboratories, each requiring aboutthree weeks. The first and third laboratories are physical laboratories (a heat exchanger and