classroom3, orthis pedagogical approach can be combined with more traditional in-class lectures in numerousvarieties of a hybrid approach. As aptly stated by Lage et al.1, in the flipped classroom eventsthat would typically occur during class time are moved to take place outside of class and viceversa. In order to accommodate the increased class time for student-centered activities in aflipped classroom the traditional in-class lecture component is minimized or removedaltogether. Students then receive lecture material typically through computer-based videos andinstructional activities to be completed prior to attending class. A review of the literature revealsthat instructors are utilizing the flipped classroom in a variety of undergraduate
atthe University of Washington12,13).Due to their ability to measure procedural knowledge, researchers studying engineering designknowledge rely heavily on ethnography and VPA. Design educators, however, would not gainenough value from performing such studies on students in their classes to warrant the intenseamount of time required; educators need more efficient means to assess learning. Hence, thepurpose of this study is to evaluate two streamlined approaches – each taking no more than 10minutes of class time (for the whole class) and 1 minute of coding per response – with respect totheir effectiveness in measuring procedural knowledge. While each approach aims to assessprocedural knowledge, they both do so by asking students to declare their
has on technology readiness, the complexities of globalchallenges, and benefits that come with multiple skillsets and knowledge domains. With the overall traditional student population dropping, retaining college students isbecoming more urgent. A response to these challenges has included tactics such as increasedfinancial aid and fiscal support. However, a sustainable effort is warranted. The higher educationenvironment must encourage a sense of connectedness and community by recognizing students’diversity of thought and opinion, and merit. To retain students to degree completion at higher rates, the prior observations by Tinto5are recommended for improving student persistence: 1. A commitment to success must include monetary
with the posttest) actually show learning gains and not only retention as afunction of the retention interval.1 IntroductionThe purpose of instruction in engineering is to help prepare students for subsequent courses andfuture jobs. It might be an obvious statement, that the knowledge gained in engineering coursesis meant to be retained, but is it really? While there is a large body of research that focuses onteaching effectiveness by measuring how much knowledge was gained during instruction, thequestion of how much of this knowledge is actually retained in the years following completion ofthe course is less frequently addressed, although it is equally important.In this paper, we investigate the long-term retention of conceptual
better meet the needs of students and society. One means forimproving education is through interventions aimed at changing educators’ teaching practices, as well astheir larger organizations, namely the structures and routines that affect students’ experiences inclassroom. These interventions include a range of designs, including comprehensive initiatives andaccountability policies[1] meant to foster change to teaching practices, related organizational structuresand routines, or both. These include disciplinary and institutional accreditation policies, federal and statelaws, initiatives between and across campuses supported and coordinated by various funders andstakeholders, conceptual tools like those promoting educator inquiry on teaching
advisement, when carried out effectively, can help students to discover and build theirprofessional identity, to perceive their college environment as one that is caring and welcoming,and to feel better connected to the University [1, 2]. Ultimately, good academic advisementimproves student’s chances of persisting in college [3, 4]. Here, at the College of Engineering,Computer Science, and Technology (ECST) at California State University, Los Angeles, theGolden Eagle Flight Plan (GEFP) has been developed to encourage a holistic, developmentaladvisement approach. The GEFP was one of the interventions in a new First-Year Experience atECST (FYrE@ECST) program, which was piloted this 2015-16 academic year. The GEFP hasundergone preliminary testing with
learning are key engineering accreditation requirements, and fundamentalelements of undergraduate education, but “are often considered to be among the most difficultoutcomes to define, teach and assess” 1. There has been significant interest in measuringfundamental transferable intellectual skills (TIS) like critical thinking, communication,problem solving, and lifelong learning 2–7. Past work has found average performance gains inbroad TIS like critical thinking and written communication, for example, with effect sizesaround d=0.5 standard deviations (SD) over a four year program3,6,7, with some findingdifferences between majors3 and others finding no strong evidence for this6.TIS are found in some form in the Washington Accord 8, the Essential
to a prescribed and emergentapproach (Table 1). For prescribed outcomes, the change agent knows upon initiating achange process what kind of behavior or mental states in individuals or groups areexpected and sought, driven by the assumption that the change agent has the keyknowledge needed to define the outcomes. For emergent outcomes, the end state, interms of behaviors or mental states, is determined as part of the change process, with theassumption that those involved in the change have important information needed todefine the outcomes7. When the individual is the focus of the change, the changestrategy seeks to directly impact their beliefs and behaviors, assuming that they act of
expressed are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science FoundationReferences[1] Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of motivation science. New York, NY: Guilford Press.[2] Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait- like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 835-847.[3] Mowrer, O. H. (1939). A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent. Psychological Review, 46(6), 553-565.[4] Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International
be reflected in the different types of resourcesprevalent within these “worlds.” The research described in this paper aims to deepen insight ofengineering concept representation, description, and usage in academia and practice (i.e. theworkplace).Two specific issues guided the use of roundabout design as the medium for analyzing conceptuse, representation, and description: 1) roundabouts are specific transportation design facilities emerging in use and design within the United States, and 2) the design of roundabouts served as the larger context for an ongoing case study exploring concept use, representation, and interpretation in engineering activity and interactions.The application of roundabouts as a
the 21st century has been built squarely oninformation, communications, and computational technology (ICCT). In this WIP, we explorehow ICCT impacts the way that engineering is learned with the goal of establishing a researchagenda for propagating the effective use of ICCT in engineering education. We seek to informaction and generate conversation amongst administrators, instructors, researchers, and students.We can approach this goal from two broad perspectives. First, ICCT has fundamentally changedengineering practice by supporting discovery, collaboration, and innovation processes.1 Intandem, learning technologies promise to provide an unprecedented opportunity to improveinstruction, provide adaptive learning, and foster increased access
Assessment and Measurement. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Construct Validation of the Engineering Students’ Motivational Beliefs Scale: Findings and Future Directions Previous research has shown that engagement in a task is directly linked to a person’smotivational beliefs[1]. Motivational theories have been incorporated into domains likepsychology and education for decades in order to
fromanthropology become useful in elucidating complex concepts such as culture models and socialcapital. Cultural models are internalized cognitive schemas that individuals within a cultureshare to varying degrees and draw upon to form and organize their beliefs, meanings, andpractices.1 Social capital is refers to the social connections of students and the resourcesavailable through those connections. To examine these concepts, it is important to understandtheir meaning as interpreted by individuals who are members of a particular culture. Freelisting, an anthropological structured technique, allows researchers to quickly and systematicallycollect data about a population’s shared cultural knowledge in a specified cultural model
methodologies almost always involve students discussing questions and solving problemsin class, with much of the work in and out of class being done by students working in smallgroups22. Experimentation with some of these methods has demonstrated that students achievebetter conceptual comprehension and problem-solving capacity learning with them23 13.Although pedagogical innovation in STEM education can lead to improved teaching andlearning, the adoption of innovations is a potentially long-lasting process, posing challenges toinstitutions regarding curriculum development, technology adoption and cultural change24 1 25 26.Several barriers exist to the use and adoption of novel teaching methodologies based on RBIS27 128 . These include student
developed to isolate concepts and typically include commonmisconceptions as possible incorrect answers. Situated cognition theory suggests that knowledgeis an interaction between the individual and the context and that isolated concepts may be oflimited value in solving engineering design problems. We began to test this proposition byadministering the statics concept inventory to practicing civil engineers.Purpose: The purpose of this research is to gather data on practicing civil engineers’performance on the statics concept inventory.Methods: The statics concept inventory, implemented as an online survey, collected responsesfrom practicing engineers with a range of experience from 1 year to 45 years as an engineer.Results: There were 25
, or difficult; or appeal to the emotions instead ofcognitive learning of their students4. Ultimately, constructive resistance may help students toengage more deeply if managed appropriately by the instructor.Research Questions Acknowledging the need for a deeper understanding of student resistance to activelearning, this study was guided by two research questions:1. To what extent do nontraditional undergraduates resist required participation in anasynchronous, online support forum in first year calculus? [QUAN]2. What are the attitudes and rationales of nontraditional undergraduates who resist participationin the online forum? [QUAL]Frameworks Theoretical framework. The theoretical framework for this study is
NTID faculty he worked for AT&T Bell Laboratories as an electrical engineer, a physical designer, and a computer programmer for 20 years.Dr. Aaron Weir Kelstone, RIT/NTID EDUCATION Ed.D in Education, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 2013 M.A. in English Literature Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 2001 B.A. in English Literature Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1994 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Senior Lecturer, 2010 & Program Director of Performing Arts, NTID ,2011 RECENT PUBLICATIONS American Deaf Prose: 1980-2010: Gallaudet Deaf Literature Series, Vol. 1, ”Homecoming,” Gallaudet UP, April, 2012 Wordgathering: A Journal of Disability Poetry, ”Ruminations of a Cyborg
theory), and in that it borrows concepts from disciplines, making it dependent onknowledge that is transportable. However, not all knowledge is transportable and borrowing isnot always successful.10Data Point 1: The 2006 Engineering Education Research AgendaAs mentioned above, a group of leaders in the engineering education community developed aresearch agenda for the field in 2006. Engineering epistemologies was one of five research areasprioritized. Engineering epistemologies was defined as “research on what constitutes engineeringthinking and knowledge within social contexts now and into the future.”11 Within that area, fourspecific lines of inquiry were further identified: 1) What knowledge, skills, processes, values, and attitudes
and has presented over 30 scientific and technical papers at various professional conferences worldwide.Dr. Aaron Weir Kelstone EDUCATION Ed.D in Education, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 2013 M.A. in English Literature Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 2001 B.A. in English Literature Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1994 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Senior Lecturer, 2010 & Program Director of Performing Arts, NTID ,2011 RECENT PUBLICATIONS American Deaf Prose: 1980-2010: Gallaudet Deaf Literature Series, Vol. 1, ”Homecoming,” Gallaudet UP, April, 2012 Wordgathering: A Journal of Disability Poetry, ”Ruminations of a Cyborg,” (WWW.wordgathering.com) March, 2010 Vi- gnettes
. Page 26.1731.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 What’s Muddy vs. What’s Surprising? Comparing Student Reflections about ClassIntroductionClassroom assessment techniques that ask students to reflect on material covered in classare believed to help improve learning by allowing the student to actively participate in thelearning process while evaluating their understanding of course content.1 Promotingstudents to be more reflective about their learning experiences allows them to developrobust learning strategies and metacognitive skills that are characteristic of expertise.2Students’ written reflections can also provide instructors with formative informationabout
close links to problem-solvinge.g., 1, 2-4. While significant work on metacognitionhas been done in other learning domains, few researchers have focused on engineering orprovided strategies that engineering educators can use to help students develop metacognitiveskills focused on problem-solving practices central to engineering work. To help address thisgap, we draw on work in both writing-to-learn and reflective practice to explore students’ currentlevels of metacognitive awareness, and to identify fruitful interventions for further investigation.MetacognitionBroadly, metacognition is the ability to understand and be aware of one’s own thinkingprocesses. Metacognitive approaches to learning encourage students to examine their ownthinking
’ attitudes toward personal and professionalsocial responsibility, operationalizing the Professional Social Responsibility Development Model(PSRDM) 3. In this context, social responsibility is seen as feelings of desire or obligation tohelp others who are in need through one’s professional abilities, with particular emphasis onunderserved and marginalized groups. The framework consists of eight dimensions, summarizedin Table 1. The survey instrument, EPRA, consists of 50 Likert-items on a 7-point metric (from‘Strongly Disagree’ to ‘Strongly Agree’) that are intended to assess these eight dimensions. Thenumber of items attributed to each dimension are also shown in Table 1. In addition to theLikert-items, the tool also includes several open-ended
gains [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Yet, outside of time-consuming observation protocols [8, 9],little systematic work has been done in characterizing classroom activities, due in part to a lackof proper instrumentation [10]. Additionally, students can engage in activities in very differentways than instructors intend [1, 2], so it is important to account for the student perspective. Thispaper reports current progress towards an effort to develop and rigorously assess a student surveyinstrument aimed at this purpose in post-secondary STEM classrooms: the Student Class Activityand Engagement Instrument (SCAEI).The SCAEI is based on Chi’s Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) framework[1, 2] . The ICAP framework differentiates
disparatematerial across disciplines into a cohesive and fully interdisciplinary sequence, we are just nowin a position to redefine our learning outcomes for the HERE Program. Our most recent list oflearning outcomes (Figure 1) is informed by the learning outcomes of the ACPA (AmericanCollege Personnel Association) (Figure 2) and by the revised established learning objectives ofthe courses we teach.Our revised list puts ethics, actions and values and emotions in the top three positions. Engaged Page 26.1696.4learning is a primary goal of any critical pedagogy, especially in education for sustainability, andespecially in a living-learning community
, values, andbeliefs regarding global citizenship that are likely to be reliable across diverse populations ofundergraduates and be particularly relevant to engineering students.BackgroundPsychographics consist of beliefs, values, attitudes, motives, needs, desires, and otherpsychological factors that make up an individual’s lifestyle.1 Of these influences, values arecurrently thought to be the most accurate in predicting future behavior.2 Values are core beliefsthat guide actions and behaviors, and are studied to understand enduring characteristics ofindividuals.3,4,5Social values in particular are often applied in predicting sustainability behavior and actionsincluding recycling6, energy conservation7, and sustainability literacy.8,9 The UN
/failures and creative performance metrics. Our results show that while the correlationbetween number of attempts (i.e., failure rate) and creative performance was statisticallysignificant, the relationship was weak. In addition to these and other quantitative results, thisresearch has value for engineering educators as a case study in the evolution, scaling, andtransfer of face-to-face experiential learning tasks to global online learning environments.1. IntroductionThe relationship between creativity and failure appears to be a complex one, with scholarsdebating the positive and negative effects of failure on the quality and the quantity of creativeoutcomes6, 7, 12, 13. Within this context, the concept of Intelligent Fast Failure (IFF
. Page 26.764.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Faculty change in engineering education:A case study of teaching faculty about blended and online learning Page 26.764.2AbstractThis paper reports results from a case study of teaching development in engineering education atKTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, in answer to the research question“what impact, if any, does participation in a blended course about teaching in blended face-to-face and online formats have on faculty views about teaching in engineering education?” Earlyresults indicate that 1) faculty can assess the value of online and blended
town in California. The college of engineering is fairly large (almost 6000 students, 95%undergraduates), has selective admissions (44,000 applicants for 4600 spots in 2014), and hashigh job placement of graduate. This grading method has been used in 11 different courses withover 700 students (see Table 1). Theses courses are mostly delivered using a flipped classroomwhere the lectures are available on video before class, and class time is used for activities andgroup work to deepen understanding. The learning management system (Moodle - Polylearn) isused extensively to support the students with resources for their independent learning. Inaddition, during the Fall of 2015, one course was taught at California State University, LosAngeles (Cal
Evidence supports the reliability and initial validity of the 14-item decision-makinginstrument. Three reliable latent constructs are present which support effective decision making:Processing Information, Understanding Decisions, and Processing Alternatives (Cronbach’s α:.90, .84, and .88). A first-order factor structure produced a good fitting model, χ2 = 272.412, p .699) suggesting that it was appropriate to proceed with further analysis.Using EFA the model was refined by removing problematic items such as items withoutsignificant loadings or items that loaded on the incorrect factor. Initially factors were retainedfollowing Kaiser’s criterion to keep only factors with eigenvalues of greater than 1; however theresulting pattern matrix was
environments.MethodInstrument A rubric-based approach for assessing energy literacy was first developed by Langfitt,Haselbach, & Hougham15 based on the DOE’s7 framework for energy education. The structure ofthe rubric was borrowed from a rubric used to assess senior design projects in a civil andenvironmental engineering program, and then refined based on work conducted in the area ofscientific understanding and writing24. Subsequent examinations17 and refinements16 of the rubricled to the rubric under examination in the present study. The rubric adopted an analytic style19,with scores assigned to each of six energy literacy dimensions—1) Issue, 2) Solution, 3) Impacts,4) Stakeholders, 5) Technical Concepts, and 6) Outside Information. Appendix A displays