often designed and used by electrical and mechanical engineering students. Likewise,the analyses of the data can be confusing and difficult to perform. Regardless of students’apprehension, instrumentation use grows because these tools can be used to validate importantdesign assumptions and monitor performance as the design is built. This is especially true insituations when unknown design parameters must be verified and workers safety may becompromised, such as a large earthwork and shoring projects. The experience CE students gainin instrumentation is non-existent or scant in many undergraduate and graduate programsthroughout the U.S. The holistic approach to this course includes; instrumentation selection, datacollection, data analyses, data
organizations and individuals engage in technological innovation.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design thinking, making and design innovation project courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and mak- ing processes to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in
AC 2007-1694: INTRODUCTION OF VIDEO JOURNALS AND ARCHIVES IN THECLASSROOMAlexander Haubold, Columbia UniversityJohn R. Kender, Columbia University Page 12.985.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Introduction of Video Journals and Archives in the ClassroomAbstractWe report on two innovative approaches of using video recordings in project-based coursestargeted at journaling student and team performance and project progression. The first approachis strictly managed by instructors and staff, and involves periodical recording of studentpresentations, which are made available to students for self and peer evaluation. The secondapproach is loosely managed
AC 2009-2312: ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL: IMPACT OF VARIEDFRESHMAN DESIGN EXPERIENCES ON ENGINEERING SELF EFFICACYBarbara Masi, MIT Dr. Barbara Masi is the Director of Education in the MIT School of Engineering. Page 14.933.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 One size does not fit all: Impact of varied freshman design experiences on engineering self-efficacyAbstractThis paper presents results of a two year pilot program in freshman design. Theprogram’s goal was to create a variety of project-based learning, or PBL, freshmanexperiences in design and complex problem solving as a means of energizing
in academia he worked as Assistant, Associate, Full Professor, and Departmental Head at Kazan Aviation Institute, and Visiting Full Professor at Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical Engineering De- partment at University of Tennessee, Knoxville. In 2007 he joined CCSU School of Engineering and Technology as an Associate Professor. He taught about 30 undergraduate and graduate courses; was sci- entific advisor of multiple Ph.D. and Dr. of Science Dissertations. Area of research and teaching interests - Propulsion, Aerothermodynamics, Combustion and Heat Transfer. Instrumentation. Performed research projects for Russian and French Aerospace Agencies, NASA, DOE, DOD, and Automotive Company SAAB. Author of 3
Associate Director for Research and Operations of the Interprofessional (IPRO) program. He was brought in specifically to focus on IPRO courses, and has led over 50 IPRO project teams in the past four years. He has an undergraduate degree in liberal arts and mechnical engineering, and graduate degrees in Business and Industrial Engineering. For over 20 years he led consulting businesses specializing in financial and information process design and improvement, professional training/education for industry, market research and professional publications. He has been instrumental in implementing many of the assessment processes and interventions now used by the IPRO program. He also
christel.heylen@mirw.kuleuven.be 2 Jos Vander Sloten, Faculty of Engineering, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, K.U.Leuven, Belgium Technical communication and technical writing are important skills for the daily work- life of every engineer. In the first year engineering program at KU Leuven, a technical writing program is implemented within the project based course ‘Problem Solving and Engineering Design’. The program consists of subsequent cycles of instructions, learning by doing and reflection on received feedback. In addition a peer review assignment, together with an interactive lecture using clicking devices, are incorporated within the assignments of the
these areas at graduation.However, the variability of these projects presents significant challenges for common rubricdevelopment and by implication, our ability to retrieve reliable data on student performance inthese categories/attributes. This variability also brings unique challenges to the development of asingle rubric that is 1) flexible enough to apply to a variety of engineering thesis projects, 2)reflective of the learning objectives of the thesis course, and also 3) appropriate for use ingathering reliable data about students’ graduate attributes.This paper describes the development of the rubric, and the inherent challenges in designing avalid and reliable tool that provides flexibility to a diverse group of projects and supervisors
Paper ID #25651Work in Progress: The Professional Development Track: A Cooperative Ex-periential Learning Approach to Academic Success for Underserved Engi-neering StudentsDr. Alejandro Gutierrez, University of California, Merced Dr Guti´errez is a teaching professor at UC Merced, where he runs the Capstone Design Program in the School of Engineering. This program is the culminating experience for all students in mechanical engineering, civil & environmental engineering, bioengineering, and materials science. All projects in the UC Merced Capstone Design Program are initiated by industry partners, and the main goal of the
, data compression, wavelets, computer vision, remote sensing, and computing educa- tion. Her projects are currently funded by NSF, United States Department of Agriculture, and Department of Education.Dr. Wei Zhan P.E., Texas A&M University Dr. Wei Zhan is an Associate Professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Texas A&M University. Dr. Zhan earned his D.Sc. in Systems Science from Washington University in St. Louis in 1991. From 1991 to 1995, he worked at University of California, San Diego and Wayne State University. From 1995 to 2006, he worked in the automotive industry as a system engineer. In 2006 he joined the Electronics Engineering Technology faculty at Texas A&M. His research activities
. Three engineering-education collaborators were interviewed in dyads tounderstand conceptualizations of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking in relation totheir joint research project(s). All three dyads provided specific examples of different ways ofthinking from their shared research efforts. Preliminary findings suggest that a ‘ways of thinking’framework could provide a useful guideline for engineering and education faculty planning tocollaborate for interdisciplinary research as well as the overall EER community.OverviewThe world today faces complex problems ranging from climate change to health issues.Numerous calls by prominent organizations have been made in light of these global,sociotechnical problems to transform
successfulstudent leaving this course will develop a working Android, iOS, or Web-based App.” Studentslearned ten key programming skills including Variables, Data Types, Console I/O, Functions,Debugging, Operators, Conditional Code, Flow Control, Loops, Objects. In addition, studentsemployed integrated development environments for their final projects. Students were given achoice between these three platforms based on interest and resource availability (for example,developing for iOS requires access to an Apple computer).The third learning objective focused on developing the soft skills required to flourish asengineers: “A successful student leaving this course will create a personal learning network.”Students learned to work effectively in teams
Paper ID #34567Development and Implementation of Professional Communication Activitiesfor Undergraduate Engineering Curricula Based upon Industry ExpectationsDr. Jacob Allen Cress P.E., University of Dayton Dr. Jacob Cress is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology. Prior to joining the faculty at UD, Dr. Cress worked for two years at Stress Engineering Ser- vices Inc. in Mason, Ohio. There he specialized in mechanical test development and project management largely in the railroad and hunting equipment sectors. For five years prior to that, Dr. Cress worked at GE
strategies. Inter-rater reliability for the code book wasexamined. Codes focused on the type of course (engineering course, humanities course, seniordesign, first-year), the topic of the course (e.g. sustainability, energy, religion, ethics), andteaching pedagogy (e.g. service-learning, case-studies, project-based).It is concerning that 42% of the engineering students indicated that no courses in theirundergraduate studies influenced their views of social responsibility. Of the seniors whocompleted the survey, 37% indicated that no courses had influenced these views. Of those whowere influenced, the most common courses were engineering courses (44%) and humanitiescourses (44%). Doing design work (11%), projects (9%) and service learning (8%) were
, Page 13.1038.3operated, and managed a highly successful REU Program in Nanotechnology for over ten years.This program began under the National Nanotechnology Users Network (NNUN) whichconsisted of five of the current NNIN sites: Cornell University, Howard University,Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, and University of California Santa Barbara.In 2004, with the awarding of the NNIN, the REU program grew to include seven additionalsites: Georgia Institute of Technology, Harvard University, University of Michigan, Universityof Minnesota, University of New Mexico, University of Texas (Austin), and University ofWashington. The objectives of the NNIN REU program are: • Provide advanced nanotechnology research project experience
explores student in-code comments as a self-explanation strategy for a given worked-example. The context of the study is a materials science and engineering programming coursethat involves in-class programming activities, as well as five computational projects ondisciplinary problems. The guiding research questions are: What are the characteristics of student self-explanations of programming worked examples involving a disciplinary context? How are student’s self-explanation characteristics related to their performance in a computational project involving a disciplinary context?Background Literature Computer programming is a complex skill to learn6. When novice programmers startlearning to code, they need to
were funded as curriculumdevelopment projects in 1998 (e.g., Enhanced Engineering Education Experience DUE-8854555and Integrated First Year Engineering Curriculum DUE-8953553), with the first of the eight fullfledged engineering coalitions funded in 1999 as multi-institutional experiments in innovation inengineering education. By 1991, an award was made to Richard Felder of North Carolina StateUniversity for a longitudinal study of the effects of innovative teaching (DUE-9150407) and in1993 prestigious NSF Young Investigator awards were given to engineers Cynthia Atman of theUniversity of Washington (DRL-9358516) and Martin Ramirez of Johns Hopkins University(DRL-9358518). Atman’s research examined how first-year engineering students
and cultureat the institutional level are currently being tested. The Science Education Initiative, facilitatedby Carl Wieman, at the University of Colorado Boulder and the University of British Columbia13and efforts in the University System of Maryland14 are concrete examples of efforts to change Page 25.1126.2institutions. At their core, these projects emphasize evidence-based teaching and studentengagement through active- and inquiry-based approaches. While these model initiatives addressmany disciplines within STEM education, engineering education leaders have similar aspirationsfor achieving excellence in undergraduate education. The
curriculum over the past decade. Most of these courses have a number of objectives relating to the development of traditional technical skills, including familiarization with design and shop tools, incorporation of physics into design decisions, and methods for analysis and testing. These courses, which are a form of experiential learning,, can have a number of additional broader objectives as well. These broader objectives can include fostering creativity, persistence in overcoming obstacles, making all students welcome regardless of their prior experience in design, and understanding how to work on a team and manage a project. While assessment of traditional technical and analytical skills is straight-forward to assess in exams and report
identity of the fourteen participants, demographic information was notdisclosed to the researchers. The participants worked in teams of up to three members and wereinformed by the instructor to form their own teams. The instructor also gave the students theoption of working solo for the project. All of the teams worked on a course project whichconstituted solving a complex computational problem using modeling and simulations. Eachteam had to come up with a team name. The team and their member pseudonyms are listed inTable 1. Table 1 also describes the problem solving tasks undertaken by the team. Three teams(Kinetics, Star Wars 8 and Super Battery) contained three members each. One team (Ramvik)consisted of two members. Three students (Lone Ranger
Virtual LaboratoryIntroductionModeling has been identified as a critical element of engineering practice. Theories regardingmodeling by STEM professionals in practice contend that models are initially constructed fromprior knowledge and newly gathered information and that they are refined in an iterative cycle ofcreation, use, evaluation, and revision.1,2,3 However, authentic modeling practices are difficult toreplicate in the school environment.In order to develop these iterative modeling skills in students we have designed the Virtual CVDLaboratory Project. It has been specifically designed to provide students an authentic,industrially-situated task which they can solve using the fundamental knowledge and skills
appreciate the need for all that math and science, when theirinterest is to do engineering. Students who survive to the senior year (nationally, about half theinitial freshman class) are then asked to synthesize all that they have learned in a design project,which requires teamwork, project management and communication skills, as well as the abilityto see the world from a broader perspective. Note that they have spent the previous three yearslearning to focus on details of ever-increasingly narrow topics, with an strong emphasis onindividual achievement. It is no surprise that many students have difficulty adapting to the morerealistic nature of work in the senior design course.The Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven
concerned if steps can be taken to reduce thelag time.Several obstacles exist that can lead to uncertainty and a longer transition into industry. First,students can no longer determine the type of problem they are facing or which equations applysimply by recognition of the section of the text they are studying. While in school, material isbroadly segmented into courses that are refined into chapters and topics. The proper problemapproach is easily recognized and their success verified by the answers in the back of the book.When initially given a project the young practicing engineer may feel insecure and unsure of theapproach that should be taken. They feel lost without the safety net of the course leading theway. Try as they may they will not find
-servicesecondary math and science teachers. This latter course is part of a series of courses, offeredthrough the NSF-sponsored MSP (Math and Science Partnership): Project Pathways,1 designedto help integrate mathematics and science, and can be taken as partial fulfillment of a Master’sdegree in Science/Math Education. An attitude survey, based on the well-documented PFEAS(Pittsburgh Freshmen Engineering Attitude Survey),2 was taken by both sets of learners. Bothgroups completed the survey at the beginning and end of the Fall 2006 semester. Initial datashows a statistically significant difference between the two groups in attitudes about engineering.The greatest difference in the two groups’ attitudes at the beginning and end of the semester wasin the
between progress on class related activities that the student reported in thesurvey and the project grade that the student ultimately received. There was no correlationbetween the survey and exam grades. The second study was an experiment using two sections ofone class of lower division Computer Science students. The experimental group reported timespent on projects and lecture preparation in periodically administered surveys and the controlgroup did not. The study showed that the experimental group achieved significantly higherperformance on all project grades and on the exam grade during one time period compared to thecontrol group. We discuss the use of our results in Computer Science and Engineering and theneed for replication and
Paper ID #28821Development and Insights from the Measure of Framing AgencyDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological Engineer- ing Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revo- lutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education
research project investigating the development and measurement of general learning outcomes. Natalie comes from an Australian Senior-Secondary/ Post-Secondary teaching background, with experience at the State-wide level in curriculum development, large-scale assessment, and evaluation and assessment of outcomes based education.Dr. James A. Kaupp, Queen’s University Assessment and Quality Assurance Coordinator (Msc ’06, PhD ’12) at Queen’s University, Kingston, On- tario, Canada in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science. Educational research interests include engineering education development, cultural change in higher education, higher-order thinking develop- ment and assessment, outcomes-based data-informed
Education. He served as 2004 chair of the ASEE ChE Division, has served as an ABET program evaluator and on the AIChE/ABET Education & Accreditation Committee. He has also served as Assessment Coordinator in WPI’s Interdis- ciplinary and Global Studies Division and as Director of WPI’s Washington DC Project Center. He was secretary/treasurer of the new Education Division of AIChE. In 2009 he was awarded the rank of Fellow in the ASEE, and in 2013 was awarded the rank of Fellow in AIChE.Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts
Edith Gummer is the Director of the Classroom-Focused Research and Evaluation Program for the Center for Classroom Teaching and Learning at the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. She coordinated the structure of the research design and the data collection and analysis processes of the project. She has been faculty in science and mathematics education quantitative and qualitative research design courses at the doctoral level. She has been involved in the development of innovative mathematics curricular activities and formative assessment in mathematics problem solving.Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State
practical aspects of battery fabrication. Theprocedures of the study were embedded in the practical component of the course. As part of a finalproject, students modeled and analyzed a graded porous electrode to be used as part of a rechargeablebattery system. The individually-submitted course assignments served as the raw data used to examinestudents’ modeling and simulation practices.Data CollectionFor part of the final course project, students were asked to design a rechargeable battery system able tooperate under specific conditions in several different applications. For example, one team designed abattery to power an electric lawn mower for at least 30 minutes of operation. Another team designed abattery able to support 4 x 24 h of charge in a