revised sections, and have onefaculty member teach the other sections. All the instructors used common exams and homeworkassignments. The course instructors had been using a pre-assessment at the start of the course fora few years, so we have several years’ worth of baseline data. The final exam used similar itemsto previous semesters for comparison on key ideas. Students were randomly assigned to sectionsto avoid bias in any of the groups. Students were required to also enroll in chemistry laboratoryclasses. The laboratory sections were not yet revised during this study period. Student scores arebeing examined in all sections and across the laboratory sections.The symbolic lens was a significant area of concern for the reform of this course
kind of laboratory work,” while Rebecca Brentspoke about her involvement with engineering teaching workshops: “I think [my contribution] is pretty much out there in the workshop work. … I think I work with people really well one-on-one. I think I have developed a lot of the materials that we use and brought in a lot of ideas. So I’m more of a behind the scenes person than an out there in front person.”Similarly, Michael Pavelich commented: “I hope [my contribution] is to have documented the importance of these learning taxonomies and to take them seriously and understand them fully, and then models of how to implement that kind of thinking in the classroom, and then finally ways of measurement that make sense or that really speak to
departments?ContextThis study is a preliminary analysis of the teaching and learning expectations and practiceswithin three engineering units involved in an institution-based change initiative. The changeinitiative leadership has set out to accomplish several goals within and across the seven STEMunits. The first goal of the change initiative is to promote evidence-based instructional practicesin large-enrollment STEM undergraduate courses. The specific practices promoted by the changeinitiative leadership are interactive engagement with frequent formative feedback in lecturesettings, and Cooperative Learning in laboratory settings.1,10 Second, the change initiativeleadership promotes these practices through the development of Communities of Practice
Paper ID #14585Impact of Curriculum Transformation Committee Experience on Faculty Per-spectives of their Teaching and its Influence on Student LearningDr. Debra A. Fowler, Texas A&M University Dr. Debra Fowler serves the Associate Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A&M University. Following 16 years working in industry she completed a Ph.D. is in Interdisciplinary Engi- neering with a specific focus on engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives and growth through curriculum design and redesign, interdisciplinary teaching and
Paper ID #15935An International Study of the Teaching and Learning of Communication:Investigating Changes in Self-Efficacy in Four Undergraduate EngineeringProgramsDr. Lori Breslow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lori Breslow is the founding director emeritus of the Teaching & Learning Laboratory (TLL) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. An internationally recognized expert in teaching and learning in higher education, she conducts research on the development, diffusion, and assessment of educational innovation, particularly in science and engineering.Dr. Christina Kay White, Massachusetts Institute of
University of Minnesota Duluth faculty, he spent four years at the Natural Resources Research Institute as a Research Fellow in the Center for Water and the Environment engaged in computational toxicology research. His current research interests include inquiry-based laboratory activities and the flipped classroom.Dr. Joshua W. Hamilton, University of Minnesota DuluthProf. Elizabeth M. Hill, University of Minnesota Duluth Dr. Hill is focused on active learning teaching methods and research for engineering education. After receiving her Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Dr. Hill spent several years working on polymer processing research and advanced materials manufacturing. She has an extensive background in
Paper ID #16477Implementing a Challenge-Inspired Undergraduate ExperienceDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Lecturer in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance experimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and mentoring and guiding student teams through the senior design capstone course and a translational
Paper ID #15038The Impact of Project-based Learning on Engagement as a Function of Stu-dent DemographicsMs. Alyssa Bellingham, Drexel University Alyssa Bellingham is currently an electrical engineering Ph.D candidate at Drexel University. She re- cieved her B.S/M.S degrees in electrical engineering from Drexel University in 2012 and has a degree in materials engineering from Politecnico di Milano. As a National Science Foundation Stem GK-12 Pro- gram fellow, she has been teaching a robotics course at the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia.Mr. John Kamal, Science Leadership Academy John teaches young people
5 of 5 Literacy in Materials Science Undergraduate Students” #11347 11. Manufacturing Materials M735 Teaching the Latest 1 • “Improving Student Lab Report Writing Performances in Materials and & Processes Manufacturing 4 of 4 Manufacturing Laboratory Courses by Implementing a Rhetorical Processes & Materials Approach to Writing” #14083 Concepts 12. Multidisciplinary W241 Multidisciplinary 1 • “Strategies to Integrate Writing in Problem-Solving Courses: Promoting Engineering
: 2009.9 Fila, N. D. & Wertz, R. E. H. Towards Evaluating the Content, Assessment, and Pedagogy in Instructional Laboratories. (2013).10 Smith, K. In Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research- based innovative practice, IEEE: 2011; pp T3E-1.11 Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J. & Pöllänen, S. Making learning whole: an instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education 8, 51-86 (2013).12 Hipkins, R.; Cowie, B.; Boyd, S.; Keown, P.; McGee, C., Curriculum implementation exploratory studies 2. Final report 2011.13 Cunningham, J. W. & Wall, L. K. Teaching good readers to comprehend better. Journal of
Paper ID #16380Vertical Integration of the Liberal Arts in Engineering EducationDr. Bingbing Li, California State University - Northridge Dr. Bingbing Li is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Manufacturing Systems Engineering & Management at California State University Northridge. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in Manufacturing Systems Engineering. His research includes additive manufacturing (laser additive manufacturing, 3D bioprinting, FDM & SLA for plastics), sustainable design and manufacturing, and sustainability analysis of nanotechnologies.Dr. Robert G. Ryan, California State
is focused on enhancing educational access for deaf and hard of hearing students in mainstreamed classrooms. He worked in industry for over five years before returning to academia and disability law policy. Towards that end, he completed a J.D. and LL.M. in disability law, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Computer Science.Mr. Gary W. Behm, Rochester Institute of Technology Gary W. Behm, Assistant Professor of Engineering Studies Department, and Director of NTID Center on Access Technology Innovation Laboratory, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology. Gary has been teaching and directing the Center on Access Technology Innovation Laboratory at NTID for five years. He is a deaf
University. His research interests include the development of novel pedagogical methods to teach core engineering courses and leveraging technology to enhance learning experiences. Nick holds a BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering and has eight years of engineering experience. He also has four years of experience as an adjunct instructor at the community-college and research-university level.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology
Interest Council IV. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Research Asso- ciate Professor of Education, and Founding Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research areas include student resistance to active learn- ing, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and institutional change. She is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, an Associate Editor of
faculty member at the University of Calgary in the Mechanical and Manufacturing department of the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary. She teaches graphical, written and oral communication in their first Engineering Design and Communication course taught to all incoming engineering students. She co-founded and designs ZQ, an online journal to provide a platform to showcase the nexus of science and design using case studies, news, and articles. As an instructor, she was one of the recipients of The Allan Blizzard Award, a Canadian national teaching award for collaborative projects that improve student learning in 2004. In 2005, she was one of the recipients of the American Society of Mechanical
Paper ID #16950Network Analysis of Interactions between Students and an Instructor duringDesign MeetingsDr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses through developing communities of practice. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Dr. Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan
Paper ID #16180Investigating Physics and Engineering Students’ Understanding of AC Bias-ing NetworksMr. Kevin Lewis Van De Bogart, University of Maine Kevin Van De Bogart is a Ph.D. candidate in the department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Maine. He received his B.S. in Physics from the University of Idaho. He is a member of the UMaine Physics Education Research Laboratory. His research interests are student understanding of analog elec- tronics, student troubleshooting in the laboratory, and students’ use of metacognition.Prof. MacKenzie R. Stetzer, University of Maine MacKenzie R. Stetzer is an Assistant
, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Presentacion Rivera-Reyes is currently a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He formerly held a position of teaching assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. He also held a position as Professor of Telecommunication Engineering at Technological University of Honduras teaching courses of Transmission System to senior students. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Na- tional Autonomous University of Honduras. He has experience in the telecommunication industry where he worked as a Project Manager developing solutions of high-speed transmission
Award from the College of Engineering in 2014, Halliburton Excellent Young Professor in 2014, and the OSU Regents Research Award in 2014.Ms. Beverly DeVore-Wedding, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Bev DeVore-Wedding is a doctoral student in the College of Education and Human Sciences at the Uni- versity of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). In her second year, DeVore-Wedding works with Nebraska Indian Community Colleges (NICC) teaching chemistry, bringing community topics into the classroom for chem- istry content and laboratory connections, and coordinating the NSF grant between UNL NICC. DeVore- Wedding previously taught high school math and science for 28 years in northwestern Colorado in a rural setting. Research interests
Analysis and Optimization: An Exploratory Study (Evidence-based Practice)Background and MotivationThere is a long-standing interest and focus in educational research on electricity-related concepts, due totwo essential reasons: (a) electricity is one of the central areas of science, technology, and engineeringcurricula at all levels of education, and (b) its concepts are particularly difficult to teach and learn becausethey are abstract and complex 1. Therefore, both educators and students face several challengesthroughout the learning process 2. Students often develop their own conceptions of electricity, which maybe in conflict with the formal science perspectives 3. When these students’ interpretations of
in the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post-doc at University of Pennsylvania in the area of Haptics and Virtual Reality. His research interests are in the areas of unmanned vehicles particularly flapping flight, mechatronics, robotics, MEMS, virtual reality and haptics, and teaching with technology. He has ongoing research in flapping flight, Frisbee flight dynamics, lift in porous material and brain injury He is an active member of ASEE and ASME and reviewer for several ASME, IEEE and ASEE, FIE conferences and journals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Fluids Friday! A Method for Improving Student Attentiveness
.: ‘A Hands-On Approach to Teaching Product Development’ World Transactions on Engineering &Technology Education vol. 5, no.3, (2006) pp 397-400.4. Ssemakula, M.E; Liao, G.; Ellis, R.D; Kim, K-Y; Aguwa, C.; and Sawilowsky, S.: ‘Manufacturing Integrated Learning Laboratory (MILL): A Framework for Determination of Core Learning Outcomes in Engineering Curricula’ Int. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, no. 2 (2011) pp. 323 – 332.5. Basken, P.: “Why Engineering Schools Are Slow To Change.” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 22, 2009. http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Engineering-Schools-Are/1470.6. Curricula 2015: Moving Forward. SME, Manufacturing Education Web Forum Series: http://www.sme.org
the ASME at the University of San Diego and the President of the Pacific Division of the AAAS. He received the Outstanding Engineering Educator Award from the San Diego County Engineering Council in 2008, the Faculty of the Year Award from the Zeta Omega Chapter of Beta Theta Pi Fraternity in 2013, the Outstanding Undergraduate Research Mentor Award from the University of San Diego in 2014, the Preceptor Award of the University of San Diego in 2015, and Best Paper Awards from the Division of Experimentation and Laboratory Oriented Studies of the American Society for Engineering Education in 2008 and 2014.Dr. Ernest M. Kim, University of San Diego Ernie Kim received his BSEE from the University of Hawaii at Manoa
, S. Crosby, B. Flugman, S. Issac, H. Everson, and D. B. Clay, "Using formative assessment and metacognition to improve student achievement," Journal of Developmental Education, vol. 37, p. 2, 2013.7 J. Emig, "Writing as a Mode of Learning," College Composition and Communication, vol. 28, pp. 122-128, May 1977.8 J. M. Ackerman, "Reading, Writing, and Knowing: The Role of Disciplinary Knowledge in Comprehension and Composing," Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 25, pp. 133-178, May 1991.9 J. L. Auerbach, C. M. Bourgeois, and T. R. Collins, "Do Students Benefit? Writing-to- Learn in a Digital Design Laboratory Course," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 1, pp. T1F-20
Paper ID #14997Applying ”The New Age of Innovations Principles” to Software EngineeringEducationDr. Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Guruji Education Foudation Dr Pradeep Waychal is a founder trustee and the chair of Guruji Education Foundation that provides holistic support to the education of underprivileged students and operates on funding from friends. The foundation has recently extended its work in diverse areas such research in engineering education, youth employability and teaching computer science to adolescents. Earlier, Dr Waychal has worked at Patni Computer Systems for 20 years in various positions including the head
Science Teaching 2015 Outstanding Doctoral Research Award.Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brenda M. Capobianco is Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She holds a B.S. in biology from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, M.S. in science education from Connecticut Central State University, and Ed.D. from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She teaches elementary science methods and graduate courses in teacher action research and gender and culture in science education. Her research interests include girls’ participation in science and engineering; teacher’s engagement in action research; and
teacher (7-12) and taught in public schools and museums from 2003-2013.Dr. Marci S. DeCaro, University of Louisville Marci DeCaro is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Louisville. Her research focuses on the role of cognitive factors such as working memory in learning and performance situations. She studies these topics with adults and children in laboratory and educational contexts.Dr. Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville Jeffrey L. Hieb is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Univer- sity of Louisville. He graduated from Furman University in 1992 with degrees in Computer Science and Philosophy
disadvantage of this approach is that it does not facilitate early remediation ofperformance failures because necessary outcomes information related to deficient teaching andlearning mechanisms is measured only for mastery level courses. A holistic approach forcontinuous quality improvement in academic learning would require a systematic measurement ofperformance indicators in all three domains and their corresponding categories of learning levelsfor all course levels in a given program’s curriculum.In this research, we present an innovative methodology for engineering program evaluationutilizing significant customization implemented in a web-based software, EvalTools® 6. Uniquecurricular assessments implementing scientific constructive alignment are
, to enter today’s workforce” (italics added).4 This is a situation that is hardly unique toengineering and concerns about gaps and mismatches between university education andprofessional practice are common in many fields including K-12 teaching, medicine, and law.Because of perspectives like this from ‘industry representatives,’ we were hopeful that we wouldfind willing research partners in industry who saw the value of this research for, if not directlyclosing the gaps between university education and professional practice, at least getting a clearer,empirically grounded understanding of these gaps. We and our research collaborators at anotheruniversity went into this study with combined decades of ethnographic fieldwork experience inother
Paper ID #16079Understanding Student Experiences in a Blended-Learning MOOC: A Phe-nomenographic StudyMs. S. Zahra Atiq, Purdue University, West Lafayette S. Zahra Atiq is a PhD student at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. Her research interests include: computer science education specifically on teaching computer programming to undergraduates and how to improve their learning experiences. She is also interested in understanding student behaviors and performance in online learning environments specifically MOOCs.Ms. Casey Lynn Haney, Purdue University, West Lafayette Casey Haney is