-Regulated Learning While Learning Electric Circuit Concepts with Enhanced Guided Notes AbstractMeasuring self-regulated learning (SRL) skills of engineering college students while usingenhanced guided notes (EGN) promotes a better understanding of how students deal with note-taking activities. This study focused on students’ task interpretation, cognitive strategies, andSRL processes including planning, monitoring, and regulating strategies while using EGN in anelectric circuits course. The main objectives of this study were to (1) understand how students’SRL skills changed after using EGN; and (2) evaluate how students’ conceptual understandingon electric circuits improved after using
. Finally, to supplement the SRLI where we thought we had insufficient questions for ourcontext, several questions were added from the Learning Strategies section of the MotivatedStrategies of Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) 19. The MSLQ was designed specifically for use incollege classroom settings. Page 23.392.6 The final Learning Strategies section for the Phase 1 Survey contains 31 questionscovering 11 constructs. The constructs for the learning strategies portion of the Phase 1 Surveywere developed using the original categorizations (scales) suggested during the development andvalidation of the SRLI 33 including Planning, Keeping Records
science. Katarina had no siblings in her family who had completed college. Duringhigh school she took three AP science courses and had a GPA of 3.9. Katarina’s roommate, aPhD science student, was the person who encouraged her to participate in an undergraduateresearch experience. She decided to apply because she thought it would be a great opportunity tofigure out what it would be like to have a career in bioengineering. She also hoped that theprogram would help her make more definitive academic and career plans. Katarina had completed one year of community college before the start of theundergraduate research program. She planned on earning her associates degree and thentransferring to a 4-year university. Bachelor degrees she was
economic difficulties have led state governments to pressfor a lowered rate of increase in funding for state-supported universities. Private donors whohave often generously supported colleges and universities are also feeling financial strain as theycontemplate their plans for charitable donations9. On the other side, Dunbar et al.10 and Logue11found students are under increasing pressure to complete their degrees, find gainful employmentin a very tough economic climate, and begin repaying student loans that are approaching acrushing level of burden. Both sides have a vested interest in increasing the efficiency andeffectiveness of undergraduate engineering education.Bell12 discussed the similarities that universities have to a manufacturing
Recognition: Student will be able to: Recall or locate data in the text for quizzes Create ideas for the idea pitch and new venture analysis Acquire customer/market data Analyze customer/market data Prepare a customer/market analysis Acquire competition data Analyze competitor data Prepare a competitor analysis Acquire data for a product design and/or production plan/team plan/organization plan Prepare a product design and/or production plan/team plan/organization plan Construct a scenario based financial analysis Integrate the four feasibility analysis components into a final report2. Presentation Skills: Student will be able to: Develop a two minute
M.S. in Counseling with an emphasis in Student Development in Higher Education from California State University, Long Beach. For the past nine years at both two and four- year institutions, he has served students interested in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). As the Assistant Director of Advising for the Engineering Student Success Center at San Jos´e State University, he supports students with personal, academic and professional growth.Ms. Eva Schiorring Eva Schiorring is Senior Researcher for the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges. Since joining the RP Group in 2000, she has served as project director for ten major projects, including a statewide, multi-year
Paper ID #5886Consistent Course Assessment ModelDr. Sabah Razouk Abro, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Sabah Abro is an internationally educated professor and program Director at Lawrence Technological University. He graduated with a Bachelor degree from the University of Baghdad, pursued a post gradu- ate diploma in planning from the United Nations institute in the middle east, Went to Wales in the United kingdom to get his Master’s degree and then to Belgium for his Ph.D. He has also international work experience; he served as Faculty at Al Mustansiria University in Baghdad, a regional consultant at the
classroom configured for seated instruction and equipped with six dedicated Linuxworkstations. The authors' research equipment supplemented the instructional equipment toprovide an isolated local area network, enterprise infrastructure, and additional workstations. InJune 2012, the administration made a decision to re-purpose the instructional space into a thirty-seat generic classroom with back-to-back course booking. No other instructional space wasavailable, and all equipment used for Linux instruction was moved to storage.Reduced instructional funding hit another blow in late July 2012. Original plans for the re-purposed classroom called for thirty workstations with the option of dual booting operatingsystems. Unfortunately, funding constraints
the additional practice. Therefore, we suggestinstructors using these homework assignments should make them a required part of the regularcoursework.SchedulingAutomated analysis and the generation of reports within a few hours allows faculty to have dataabout their students’ learning immediately available to them. Generally the online homeworkassignments were due around midnight, analysis began at 9am and reports were ready for facultybefore the end of the work day for use in class the next day. The faculty reported that theyneeded more time than the overnight period to digest the contents of the report and modify theirlesson plan. Often this was because faculty had prepared their instructional material days orweeks in advance.We can address
Service Ribbon, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. Work Experience: Utah State University, Jan. 2010 to present, instructor for ETE 1020 energy, power, transportation systems control technology exploration of the concepts and processes relating to the control and automation (both hard and programmable) of technical systems in the areas of energy and power, transportation, and agricultural and related biotech- nologies. California University of PA, Jan. 2008 to May 2009, Teaching Assistant. Assisted the professor in class preparation, lesson plans, and distribution of materials Also gain teaching experience by lecturing the class
, coordinating efforts among K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) outreach programs, and working closely with university enrollment management and data management professionals at the Friday Institute at NC State University. She works closely with both large and small NC State outreach groups offering K-12 outreach to teachers and students. She also assists with planning, implementing, managing, and reporting of project activities which include survey development, coordination of data collection, interfacing with data managers, coordination of meetings and workshops for outreach providers to gather feedback, identify best practices, and disseminate findings
in three different American states. These wereIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), and University of Illinois –Chicago.One group of participants all agreed to attempt PEL, and some had begun implementation ofPEL in their courses. The team conducted interviews focused on instructional planning andreflections on PEL as a pedagogical strategy. In addition, these instructors were recruited toparticipate in a series of professional development activities and focus group discussionsoccurring at various points throughout the ongoing project. The participants in interviews andfocus group discussion did not include instructors who declined to attempt PEL.All individual participants in this group were contacted initially by a
associated software packages in engineering educationresearch. LDA extracted Software in Education, CAE Process Design, University Computersand Integrated Technology Tools , while LSA extracted Integrated Design Technologies,Computer CAD Design, Industrial Software, Computer Programming and Control, ComputerEngineering. Engineering training was also part of the engineering education research area.LDA extracted Teaching Engineering Courses and LSA extracted Teaching Engineering andEngineering Programs. Emphasis on the systems concept was noted in this period. LDAextracted Systems Research and Industrial Systems while LSA extracted System Planning. Onefield that seems to have come into play is the Management Science field, a topic that wasextracted by
acompromise on every design choice to accommodate every new suggestion. However, this doesmean that developers should be confident about their core idea(s) –for example, a theoreticalframework or target audience- and be open to modifying details that are not related to the team’score idea(s) to ensure that the resource meets the needs of the users. Lastly, the highlighted awards illuminate one key idea as it relates to sustainability: beginplanning for long-term sustainability early. Although coming up with a plan for long-termsustainability is one of the developers’ biggest struggles, many are overcoming these challengesand generating plans that promote success. Some of these plans include commercialization.Others involve seeking support from
prompt in the form of a series of questions that direct the participants toidentify problems, consider stakeholder perspectives, and outline a plan to learn more about theproblems. An example scenario and discussion prompt is found in Appendix A.Student performance with respect to the set of ABET professional skills is determined by scoringthe discussion using the analytical Engineering Professional Skills (EPS) rubric. The EPS rubricis segmented into five dimensions defined by the ABET Engineering Criterion 3, StudentOutcomes (3f, 3g, 3h, 3i, and 3j). The five dimensions of the rubric are then further divided intothe specific areas for scoring shown in Table 1. The complete rubric is located in Appendix B.Currently, the research team is scoring
was formed from the following sets of questions: Page 23.521.4 Goal setting: Questions 1, 6, 7, 9, 14 Applying appropriate knowledge and skills: Questions 5, 10, 12 Engaging in self-direction and self-reflection: Questions 8, 13 Locating information: Question 11 Adapting learning strategies to different conditions: Questions 2, 3, 4Circle your answers to these questions using these guidelines for 1 to 5. 1-Strongly agree 2-Agree 3-Neutral 4-Disagree 5-Strongly Disagree1. I prefer to have others plan my learning 1 2
for Engineering Education, 2013 Examining Reflections of Current Engineering Students on Educational OutreachThis study was conducted to explore the experiences of engineering students that helped themlearn about engineering. The hope is that understanding which experiences made the most impactmay improve the planning of student outreach activities. 974 students in the first-year of theirengineering program were asked to describe the experiences and interactions that had the mostinfluence on them when contemplating an engineering career. Results indicate that knowledgeabout what engineering is and outreach experience, and therefore the reasons that students gointo engineering, vary greatly. Future directions
standards in an implicit way [6].Providing PPDs during problem solving process enables a direct comparison andencourages students to focus on generating a general plan or sequence of principleapplications that can be followed in order to solve the problem. Compare-and-contraststrategy highlights similarities and differences between two diagrams. Successfulapplications of this strategy include training students in writing [22] and reading [23]. It canhelp students cognitively perform the act of classification, distinguish between types ofideas, and facilitate the formation and attainment of conceptual and metacognitiveknowledge [24]. It can also support students making connections by “identifying andlearning key concepts and networks of information
Hatian American Nathan Male African American University of Pittsburgh 22 Sammie Male Black or African American University of Alaska-Fairbanks 25 Tristin Female Diné Columbia University 21 Tyson Male Black Howard University 20 Vera Female University of Texas-Austin Xuan Female Vietnamese (mixed race) DeVry University 35RecruitmentI have progressed through multiple methods of recruitment since the start of this project. Theoriginal plan had been to
-year engineering experience at the University. Itanswers the following research questions: (1) How do students define engineering? (2) Why arestudents planning to major in engineering? (3) What are some of the positive experiences instudents’ first year of engineering? and (4) What are students’ perceptions of the followingengineer of 2020 skills and attributes: communication, creativity, global and multidisciplinaryteamwork, and ethics?Data for this study was collected using surveys and interviews. A total of 665 first-yearengineering students completed a survey in the fall 2011 semester. Forty first-year engineeringstudents who completed the survey participated in one one-hour semi-structured interview in thespring 2012 semester. The results
motivation in different curricula27, student learning habits28, student confidence inperforming a task29career plans and values placed on a task30, and student perceptions about theireducation.22 Page 23.1284.3 Within the motivation theories, our study specifically situated in expectancy-value theory 16-18(EVT) for two reasons. First, EVT was developed in part to explain academic programenrollments and ultimately career choice.31 Second, EVT contains both ability constructs (suchexpectancy of success) and importance constructs (such as interest). These types of constructsexist in other motivation theories, though some theories
theBig Five personality indicator. Psychologists define the "Big Five" personality traits as broadfactors or dimensions of personality, discovered through empirical studies. 16 These factors are Page 23.875.4often defined as follows:17 Extraversion (sometimes called Surgency). This broad dimension encompasses specific traits such as being talkative, energetic, and assertive. Agreeableness. This dimension includes traits like sympathetic, kind, and affectionate. Conscientiousness. People high in this trait tend to be organized, thorough, and planning oriented. Neuroticism (sometimes reversed and called Emotional
Page 23.874.12 Desire to maintain involvement with a community 2317 18 that is not related to my universityLike Table 5, Table 6 conveys findings for survey items that are not directly linked to the ULOs,but items in Table 6 are directly linked to professional advancement, which is perhaps anunarticulated desired outcome of all undergraduate programs. Responses indicated that while justover 20% of respondents believed their project work provided them with professionallybeneficial connections, it provided approximately twice as many (38%) with knowledge orexperience that helped them change their minds about future plans—something of particularvalue when considering the importance of career satisfaction. Even more
-section disparity was a common concern raised by the studentsthroughout the semester, since several faculty members are required to handle the highenrollment. A course coordinator was tasked to organize and oversee the multiple sections, butinconsistencies in pace and depth of the material presentation were inevitable and common.Some instructors chose to introduce some form of active learning problems during lecture wherethe students worked on their own or in informal groups on an example problem, while otherslectured the entire period and worked example problems directly. Increased exposure to exampleproblems was another common student request considered in the course revision. Course RevisionThe plan to improve the course involved arranging
-division coursework. That said, the author envisions a future research plan where the MSE instrument gets usedas an “awareness tool” for considering how we might choose to structure teaching in a manner ofthis sort. Being that the author is focused on the development of cognitive learning instruments(psychometrics) in the field of engineering education, the latter is deemed “detail work” thatsubsequent teaching researchers will hopefully find useful.Bibliography[1] Bandura A. (1981). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Co.[2] Bandura A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4: 359-373
(Question 4). A separate study is planned for freshman to be executedduring the fall 2013 semester. Students were asked about their parents’ educational achievementlevel and results are shown in Figure 2 (Question 5). 40% Percentage of Participatats 30% 20% 10% 0% My mother and father At least one of my One of my parents is a Both of my parents are have never attended parents attended college graduate. college graduates. college. college, but
about the purpose of supplemental material given? Questions · Did the participants clarify what questions they were supposed to answer? · Did the participants have a plan of action to answer the questions that they identified? Points of View · Did the participants ask whether there were other relevant viewpoints that should be considered? · Did the participants ask about the viewpoints expressed in
classified them as an engineer or non-engineer, the participants weregiven the opportunity to self-identify as an engineer or non-engineer at the end of the interviewprocess. Page 23.240.12Interview Process Interviews were conducted at locations that were convenient to each participant. Allinterviews were audio recorded for the purpose of review by the researcher. Field notes were alsorecorded during each interview. For the purpose of this study, interviews were not transcribeddue to the limited time in which this study was conducted. In future research, I will conduct moreinterviews with participants and plan to transcribe and code