ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 74 in total

← Previous
1
2
3
Next →

Early-career Plans in Engineering: Insights from the Theory of Planned Behavior

Conference Session: Career Decisions and Faculty Development
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan; Katie A. Shoemaker, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #23384Early-career Plans in Engineering: Insights from the Theory of Planned Be-haviorTrevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan Trevion Henderson is a doctoral student in the Center for Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. He recently earned his master’s degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University while serving as a graduate research associate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise. Trevion also hold’s a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science and Engineer- ing from The Ohio State University, where he served as a research assistant in

Relevance Score: 3.3085203

Understanding the Socializer Influence on Engineering Students’ Career Planning

Conference Session: Career Decisions and Faculty Development
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #21635Understanding the Socializer Influence on Engineering Students’ Career Plan-ningRohini Abhyankar, Arizona State University Rohini Abhyankar is a second year graduate student at Arizona State University’s Engineering Education Systems and Design doctoral program. Rohini has a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University and Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in Physics from University of Delhi, India. Rohini has over ten years each of industry and teaching experience.Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a part-time faculty Research Scientist for Virginia Tech and owner

Relevance Score: 2.8073726

Examining a Novel Theory-to-practice Effort in Engineering Education through Multiple Theoretical Lenses of Systems and Change

Conference Session: Institutional Change
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stephen Secules, University of Georgia; James John Bale Jr., University of Georgia ; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

college of engineering.When organizing a departmental or programmatic effort, logistical decisions can dominate andobscure the underlying organizing theory for the effort. Consistent with NSF’s calls for a greaterunderstanding of theories of change, we connect the explicit and implicit organizing philosophiesunderpinning the innovative approach to enacted institutional plans and approaches. We draw onHenderson’s theoretical models of Institutional Change in higher education to clarify the chosenapproach to transformation. We also draw on a complex systems perspective as a guidingphilosophy to conceptualize change in the interconnected human, institutional, and socialstructures of our engineering college, and on boundary spanning to address the

Relevance Score: 0.020678986

WIP: Teaching Engineering Students How the Brain Works to Encourage Positive Learning Dispositions and Behaviors

Conference Session: Works in Progress I
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Dong San Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

week’stopics. Students maintained Strategy Documents to plan and evaluate weekly academic goals(e.g., splitting up weekly problem sets into daily quotas). In lieu of a final exam, students wroteFinal Papers in the form of a letter to their high school self (or to a friend in high school). Theseletters included what students wished they had known before coming to college and whatstudents wanted to share from the “Engineering the Mind” course.Data analysisWe used multiple methods to analyze the data because we wanted to capture various nuances ofthe course. For quantitative methods, we calculated the average score of the items for each scalefor each student. For example, the mindset scale had eight items, each with a score ranging fromone to six (Likert

Relevance Score: 0.015413206

Rewards of an Engineering Prerequisite Assignment

Conference Session: Practice I: Academic Success
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Cynthia Jane Wilson Orndoff Esq., Florida Southwestern State College; Elizabeth W. Schott, Florida Southwestern State College
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #21415Rewards of an Engineering Prerequisite AssignmentDr. Cynthia Jane Wilson Orndoff Esq., Florida Southwestern State College Dr. Cynthia Orndoff received a J.D in 2014 from Ave Maria Law School and a B.S. in 1984, an M.S. in 1997 and a Ph.D. in 2001, all in Civil Engineering from University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Prior to Florida SouthWestern College, she was an Associate Professor at Florida Gulf Coast University and an Assistant Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Missouri, Columbia. She has taught courses in infrastructure management, planning, transportation and

Relevance Score: 0.014622251

Personal Epistemology: The Impact of Project-based Learning

Conference Session: Cognitive Engagement
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rongrong Liu; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

realized the distinctionsbetween theory and practice. Therefore, they demonstrated an awareness to connect theory topractice. For example, they would set extra time aside just in case for unexpected problems infeasibility tests, taking into account the gap between theory and practice. What’s more, theexperience of project-based learning can help students know more about the process of research.Based on these experiences, some students started to make plans for their future. Students reflecton the meaning of their major and the emphasis of their research orientation. Some students wonderabout whether they are going to receive further education or not. The thoughts about future plansreflected that students started to undertake major responsibilities

Relevance Score: 0.013871885

Using a Paper-Based Supply Chain Game to Enhance Student Learning with Enterprise Software

Conference Session: Active Learning Methods in Action
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Scott Abney, East Carolina University; Mark Angolia, East Carolina University; Leslie Pagliari, East Carolina University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

conducts consulting projects and professional development seminars for local industry on topics including forecasting, inven- tory control, production planning, project management, transportation logistics, procurement, and supply chain management.Dr. Leslie Pagliari, East Carolina University Dr. Leslie Pagliari serves as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Technology and Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Systems. Her research interests center on STEM initiatives, leadership, global supply chain issues, and new technologies in the distribu- tion and logistics sector. She was one of three professors in the United States recognized in an Inbound Logistics Article

Relevance Score: 0.013785991

Work in Progress: Ways of Thinking of Interdisciplinary Collaborators

Conference Session: Institutional Change
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

. Three engineering-education collaborators were interviewed in dyads tounderstand conceptualizations of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking in relation totheir joint research project(s). All three dyads provided specific examples of different ways ofthinking from their shared research efforts. Preliminary findings suggest that a ‘ways of thinking’framework could provide a useful guideline for engineering and education faculty planning tocollaborate for interdisciplinary research as well as the overall EER community.OverviewThe world today faces complex problems ranging from climate change to health issues.Numerous calls by prominent organizations have been made in light of these global,sociotechnical problems to transform

Relevance Score: 0.013785991

Engineering Identity Development of Hispanic Students

Conference Session: Motivation, Identity, and Belongingness
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Nathan Hyungsok Choe, University of Texas, Austin; Maya Denton, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

field and prior engineering identity studies. In particular, we seek tounderstand which factors may influence Hispanic students’ engineering identity development.We begin by answering the following research questions: 1. How do the engineering identity, extracurricular experiences, post-graduation career plans, and familial influence of Hispanic students attending a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) differ from those of Hispanic students attending a Predominantly White Institution (PWI)? 2. How do the same measures differ for Hispanic students attending a PWI from those of non-Hispanic white students at that PWI? 3. How do the same measures differ for Hispanic students attending an HSI from those of non-Hispanic

Relevance Score: 0.013078539

Engineering Undergraduates’ Task Interpretation during Problem-Solving in Thermodynamics

Conference Session: Problem Solving, Adaptive Expertise, and Social Engagement
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Jacek Uziak, University of Botswana; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

, personalconceptualizations and prior learning experiences related to the problem [11]–[13]. Taskinterpretation is broadly defined as students’ judgment about the required cognitive processes toanswer a problem [14]. Studies reported that people who can self-regulate appropriately (i.e.,engage in coherent planning, enacting, and monitoring activities) based on a correct andcomplete interpretation tend to be more successful in academia [15], [16], problem-solving [17]–[19], and engineering design [4], [20], [21].Task Interpretation in Self-Regulated Learning Task interpretation refers to one’s understanding of a problem, including knowledge ofthe required cognitive process to solve it [14]. Students’ interpretation of tasks is considered asan important work

Relevance Score: 0.012330565

To Map or to Model: Evaluating Dynamism in Organically Evolving Faculty Development

Conference Session: Career Decisions and Faculty Development
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

intends to enact change [22].Evaluators use logic models to examine implementation fidelity, when logic models have beendeveloped as part of a program plan [23]. In addition, logic models can be used as a framework,to focus data collection on the specified program activities and expected outcomes, to determineappropriate methods for data collection, and to organize and interpret data in terms of aframework [22]. When no logic model exists, evaluators may develop a logic model to describethe program visually. Logic models can be a useful tool for communicating the nature of aprogram to stakeholders. The use of logic models has been found to contribute to clarity in goals,alignment of activities with goals, communication about the program, and

Relevance Score: 0.012233853

Bridging the Gap Between Academia and Industry in Approaches for Solving Ill-Structured Problems: Problem Formulation and Protocol Development

Conference Session: Problem Solving, Adaptive Expertise, and Social Engagement
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Secil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University; Kristen Sara Cetin P.E., Iowa State University; Renee Fleming; Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University; Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Bora Cetin, Iowa State University; Paige Taylor
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

information gathering. Pertaining to thisgap between academia and industry, research is needed to explore characteristics of the problemsolving approaches of students and professionals to better understand what factors may influencethese approaches, and to gain insight into how to better teach undergraduate students how tosolve ill-structured problems. In order to extend the analysis of problem solving approaches to alarger group of participants, this study examines faculty members as well as students andpracticing engineers. It is hypothesized that these three groups of participants will differ bothquantitatively and qualitatively in their problem-solving processes.III. Methodology In this study, we plan to conduct a comparative analysis of

Relevance Score: 0.012062742

Data Visualization for Time-Resolved Real-Time Engineering Writing Processes

Conference Session: Research Methods
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine; Zixuan (Victoria) Zhao, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

the main tenets of this theory is that writershold multiple processes at the same time, for example, composing text while also anticipating theaudience or the venue to which a manuscript will be submitted. Thedevelopment of this theory and model has extendedover time, to which aspects of technology have beenassumed into the model: Composing and revising ona computer is much different cognitively thancomposing and revising by pen-and-paper. Some ofthe facets of cognitive writing theory are visible—thatis, they are easily tracked through visible outcomesmanifested through writing (e.g., composition orrevision), while some of the categories in the initialmodel might be invisible (such as planning orconsidering needs of the audience.) In using

Relevance Score: 0.011326347

Work in Progress: Got Intuition? Exploring Student Intuition in Response to Technology-aided Problem Solving

Conference Session: System 1 in Engineering Education and Research
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University; Kaela M Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

mission, would you approve it? Why or why not? 2. If you were planning this trajectory, would you be worried about the lifetime of the spacecraft? Why or why not? What if the trajectory had the same altitude around Earth? 3. If the goal of the fly-by was to fly in-between Saturn’s rings, would you have the spacecraft perform this fly-by? Why or why not?The questions were evaluated on two dimensions: “correct answer” (yes/no recommendation)and “correct reasoning.” The “correct answer” was marked as no answer, correct, or incorrect. Ifthe student provided the correct “correct answer”, the “correct reasoning” was evaluated ascorrect or incorrect. The three questions spanned the semester and increased in difficulty intandem to the

Relevance Score: 0.010898783

A Multi-Epistemological Mapping of Knowing, Learning, and Analytics in Materials Science and Engineering

Conference Session: Cognitive Engagement
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Petr Johanes, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

linkages between knowing, learning, and analytics, andthat knowing is not an objectively defined or agreed-upon term [14].Since the main thrust of this paper is about designing navigating and planning instructional andassessment activities, the knowledge-learning-instruction (KLI) framework [12] developed out ofthe knowledge tracing literature [13] serves as a productive starting point. The KLI frameworkdifferentiates between observable events (instructional events and assessment events) andunobservable events (learning events). Therefore, moves by an instructor (instructional events)aimed at producing learning (learning events) set up moments during which the learnerdemonstrates knowing (assessment events). The learning that occurs as a result of

Relevance Score: 0.010789244

Development and Evaluation of an Evidence-based Instrumentation Course in Civil Engineering

Conference Session: Curricular Transformation
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming; Janel Seeley
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

; a review ofTable 1. Schedule for class and laboratory. Week Class Lecture/Lab Section 1 1 1 Syllabus, Review of Mechanics 2 2 Circuits / Ohms law 3 Data acquisition / Signals and sampling 3 4 Planning a Monitoring program / Uncertainty / Accuracy 5 Strain Sensors / Vibrating wire gages 4 6 Foil Gages, theory and installation Section 2 7 Foil Gages, selection and voltage 5 8 Fiber optics / Load cells 9 Piezometers / Linear deformation

Relevance Score: 0.010789244

Dissemination of Active Learning Tools for Software V&V Education and Their Pedagogical Assessment

Conference Session: Active Learning Methods in Action
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Priya A. Manohar, Robert Morris University; Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Peter Y. Wu, Robert Morris University; Mary A. Hansen, Robert Morris University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

Provost for Research and Gradu- ate Studies. A Professor of Software Engineering, Dr. Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Software Security, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in Learning Objectives based Education Material Design and Development. Dr. Acharya is a co-author of ”Discrete Mathematics Applications for Information Systems Professionals” and ”Case Studies in Software Verification & Val- idation”. He is a member of Nepal Engineering Association and is

Relevance Score: 0.010339493

Student Preferences in Mentoring Practices and Program Features in an S-STEM Scholarship/Mentoring Program

Conference Session: Mentoring Practices and Project Teams
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Suzette R. Burckhard, South Dakota State University; Joanita M. Kant, South Dakota State University; Francis Arpan; Ross Peder Abraham, South Dakota State University; Gregory J. Michna, South Dakota State University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

% Caucasian 96% 100% African American 4% 0% Male 62% 79% Female 38% 21% GPA range 3.0-4.0 2.6-4.0 GPA mean 3.6 3.6 Recipients included all levels of undergraduate STEM majors, mostly engineering,with the majority including sophomores, juniors, and seniors, with only 15 percent freshmen(1 to 30 credits) (Table 2). Sixteen per cent of participants planned to attend graduate schoolin the first-year survey (with another 27 per cent indicating graduate school or employment).Thirty

Relevance Score: 0.010339493

Design Thinking in Engineering Course Design

Conference Session: Design Thinking and Creativity
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University; Kelly Guerin, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

betaking the course. In general, since this knowledge did not come from specific users, insightsapplied to the entire group of students, or the potential variation in the group. Their focus wasinsights in two areas: student preparedness for learning and factors that could affect interest andmotivation. The team sought a general understanding such that they could plan content andactivities that were appropriate and engaging for the entire class.This technique may have stemmed from deep knowledge of prior students that has grown into acomposite image over time, and the assumption that future students will fit into this composite.For example, the instructor’s insights came from having taught the same class several times inthe past. However, since

Relevance Score: 0.009748167

How Engineering Educators Use Heuristics When Redesigning an Undergraduate Embedded Systems Course

Conference Session: Curricular Transformation
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University; Steven Joseph Abramsky, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

. Meetingslasted 1–2 hours and featured discussion of the course to be redesigned, negotiation of coursecontent, planning assessments and pedagogy, and collaborative decision-making and artifactbuilding. While not every team member participated in each meeting, at least three teammembers participated in all meetings. We focused on meetings during the month preceding andthe month and a half after the beginning of the semester due the heavier focus on planning anddesign of the course (later meetings tended to discuss logistics of implementation and feedbackon planned activities). In total, we analyzed 15 meeting transcripts from 17.6 hours of audio, plusdetailed notes from an additional 6 meetings that were not audio-recorded. Interviews,reflections, design

Relevance Score: 0.009438623

Uncovering K-12 Youth Engineering Design Thinking through Artifact Elicitation Interviews

Conference Session: Design Thinking and Creativity
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Suzanne Eyerman, Fairhaven Research and Evaluation; Sarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder; Emily McLeod; Tania Tauer, Techbridge Girls
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

“First you draw out your plans, then you collect your supplies, then you build his body, then you code it on this. You can keep going around again if you have enough time, so you could maybe attach an arm here and make it move like this.” Mina (pseudonym), Middle School studentThese excerpts were captured in video-recorded interviews of elementary and middle schoolstudents who participated in girls’ engineering afterschool programs in Seattle and Washington,DC. Researchers used artifact elicitation interviews to assess girls’ understanding of the cyclicalnature of the engineering design process. In the first interview excerpt, Samara offered a succinctexplanation. She explained the engineering design process as a cycle, saying

Relevance Score: 0.009343759

Cluster Analysis Methods and Future Time Perspective Groups of Second-Year Engineering Students in a Major-Required Course

Conference Session: Motivation, Attitudes, and Beliefs
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Justine Chasmar, Goucher College; Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

linked to goal-setting, self-regulation,and success in engineering programs [2], [6], [10]–[13]. In this paper, domain-general(Connectedness, Value), domain-specific (Perceptions of the Future, Present on Future, Futureon Present), and context-specific constructs (Perceived Instrumentality) were considered. Ingeneral, Value, often termed valence, is the “anticipated subjective value”[14] (p. 567) of futuregoals for a person; thus students may place a higher value or hold one goal in higher regard thananother goal. The second domain-general FTP construct, Connectedness, is “general feeling ofconnectedness to and planfulness about the future” [15] (p. 116). Perceived Instrumentality (PI)[15]–[17] is a context-specific variation of connectedness

Relevance Score: 0.009247923

Work in Progress: Undergraduate Socialization in Engineering: The Role of Institutional Tactics and Proactive Behaviors

Conference Session: Institutional Change
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

design teams and professional engineering societies, has been shown topromote engineering identity development, graduate school intentions, and plans to pursueengineering careers after graduation.In this work we posit that it is not simply differences in SES that separate highly involved,successful students in engineering from their less involved, less successful counterparts. Insteadwe postulate that such differences inform students’ socialization into engineering and, as a result,their patterns of co-curricular participation. Weidman defines socialization as “the process bywhich individuals acquire the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that make them more or lesseffective members of their society” [5]. In this study, we hypothesize that an

Relevance Score: 0.009247923

Exploring Making-based Pedagogy in Undergraduate Mezzanine-level Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Maker Communities and Authentic Problem Solving
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, Arizona State University; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

design appropriate simple robotic systems to accomplish a task in a manner that is effective and safe. 3. Students can distinguish between open-loop and feedback control for velocity and position of a single joint and can implement feedback for single-joint position control. 4. Students are able to select appropriate sensors, and make use of digital and analog sensors (including visible-light cameras) to obtain and utilize information in a robotic system.The course is structured in a way that a seemingly impossible final deliverable, a functioningrobot, is broken down into a planned and sequenced set of minor deliverables that eventuallyculminate in the final creation. There is little in the way of independent

Relevance Score: 0.008719026

Examining the Replication – or Mutation – Processes of Implementing a National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education at a New Site

Conference Session: Curricular Transformation
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kevin O'Connor, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder; Derek T. Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kenneth M. Anderson, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

spring2017, continuing through summer planning months and through the first course offering duringthe fall 2017 semester. This analysis is timely as the events have recently occurred and thedetails of each negotiation and adaptation are not yet obscured by the broad brush strokes ofinstitutional record.The bulk of data shared in this paper include auto-ethnographic observations and recollectionsbased on the lived experiences of the course instructor and coordinator, the assessment director,and supporting administrators and researchers (Ellis, Adams, & Bochner, 2011). Institutionalartifacts constitute a secondary source of data; they include presentation slides, emails and otherwritten communications, curricular flowcharts and other digital files

Relevance Score: 0.008616244

A Systematic Literature Review on Improving Success of Women Engineering Students in the United States

Conference Session: Practice I: Academic Success
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods

?” Student Immigration into and within Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(2): p. 191-205.24. Trenor, J.M., et al., The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students' educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of engineering education, 2008. 97(4): p. 449-465.25. Brainard, S.G. and L. Carlin, A six‐year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 87(4): p. 369-375.26. Bell, A.E., et al., Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(4): p. 307-312.27. Foor, C.E., S.E. Walden, and D.A. Trytten, “I wish that