Polytech- nic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu UniversityDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for sev ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 [Work in Progress] Intelligence is Overrated: The Influence of Noncognitive and Affective Factors on Student PerformanceAbstractWhen
, “Exploring Agency in Capstone Design Problem Framing,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 96, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.69.[4] X. Du, A. Lundberg, M. Ayari, K. K. Naji, and A. Hawari, “Examining engineering students’ perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-based learning using Q methodology,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 111–136, 2022.[5] M. Wilson-fetrow, V. Svihla, S. Wettstein, J. Brown, and E. Chi, “Consequential Agency in Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses,” in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[6] R. A. Engle and F. R. Conant, “Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive
R. Haapala is an Associate Professor in the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University, where he directs the Industrial Sustainability Laboratory and OSU Industrial Assessment Center.Dr. Christopher A. Sanchez, Oregon State University Dr. Sanchez is a cognitive psychologist with explicit interests in STEM education; specifically in the areas of engineering and design. He is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering Psychology at Oregon State University where he heads the Applied Cognitive Theory, Usability and Learning (ACTUAL) Lab- oratory. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Do I need to know this?: A comparison of
://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.[12] D. H. Uttal et al., “The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 352–402, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0028446.[13] C. A. Supalo, “Teaching chemistry and other sciences to blind and low-vision students through hands-on learning experiences in high school science laboratories,” 2010. Accessed: Feb. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhDT.......375S[14] T. Green, D. Kane, G. M. Timko, N. Shaheen, and W. Goodridge, “Spatial Language Used by Blind and Low-Vision High School Students During a Virtual Engineering Program,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference, Jun. 2022.[15] D. E. Kane, T. Green, N. L
chemistry and other sciences to blind and low-vision students through hands-on learning experiences in high school science laboratories,” 2010. Accessed: Feb. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhDT.......375S.[11] K. Fiehler, J. Reuschel, and F. Rösler, “Early non-visual experience influences proprioceptive-spatial discrimination acuity in adulthood,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 897–906, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.023.[12] S. E. Lopez, W. Goodridge, I. Gougler, D. E. Kane, and N. Shaheen, “Preliminary Validation of a Spatial Ability Instrument for the Blind and Low Vision,” in AERA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Apr. 2020.[13] W. H. Goodridge, N. L
Oklahoma State University. Right now, Mohammad is working in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV) as a Lecturer 2. He started this position in the fall of 2022, right after he got his Ph.D.Dr. R Ryan Dupont, Utah State University Dr. Dupont has more than 35 years of experience teaching and conducting applied and basic research in environmental engineering at the Utah Water Research Laboratory at Utah State University. His main research areas have addressed soil and groundwater bioDr. David K. Stevens, Utah State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessing Engineering Students' Behavioral Engagement and
effectiveness, and global competencies He helped establish the scholarly foundation for engineering education as an academic discipline through lead authorship of the landmark 2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Dis- cipline of Engineering Education.” He has a passion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Inno- vation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the
"mathematization of space" in relation to making graphs. Fenner andO'Neill [10] had similar results from a project aimed at improving engineering students' abilitiesto analyze, interpret and communicate data. Their study found that engineering students in alinear circuits laboratory collected experimental data correctly but frequently failed to synthesizeand summarize the findings. Hadley and Oyetunji [11] found that engineering students maypossess the mathematical procedural knowledge associated with numeracy but are notnecessarily able to employ these skills in specific engineering contexts. While this researchexplores the QL of engineering students, no current instruments are specifically designed tomeasure the QL of engineering students.This work-in
blended project based learning (sbpbl) model implementation in operating system course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(5): 202–211, 2020.[19] Divya Kundra and Ashish Sureka. An experience report on teaching compiler design concepts using case-based and project-based learning approaches. In 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pages 216–219. IEEE, 2016.[20] Marc Dahmen, Luis Quezada, Miguel Alfaro, Guillermo Fuertes, Claudio Aballay, and Manuel Vargas. Teaching artificial intelligence using project based learning. Technical report, EasyChair, 2020.[21] D Anitha, C Jeyamala, and D Kavitha. Assessing and enhancing creativity in a laboratory course with
. (2017). Democratizing digital learning: Theorizing the fully online learning community model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-16.[3] Boston, W. E., & Ice, P. (2011). Assessing retention in online learning: An administrative perspective. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2).[4] Cochran, G. L., Boveda, M., & Prescod-Weinstein, C. (2020). Intersectionality in STEM Education Research. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 257-266). Routledge.[5] de la Torre, L., Heradio, R., Jara, C. A., Sanchez, J., Dormido, S., Torres, F., & Candelas, F. A. (2013). Providing collaborative support to virtual and remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on
Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoJohn Galisky, University of California, Santa BarbaraDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for sev ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Instructors’ Framing of their Instructional PracticeIntroductionThis WIP study stems from a larger project focused on the propagation of educationaltechnology in diverse instructional settings
modeling: applications using mplus. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012.[22] C. Payne and K. J. Crippen, “A structural model of student experiences in a career‐ forward chemistry laboratory curriculum,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1002/tea.21860.
(DE-NA0004115) , MSIPP-I AM EMPOWERED funded by the Department of Energy (DE-NA0004004), NSF-RISEfunded by the National Science Foundation (1646897), CREST Center funded by the National Science Foundation (1735968),RETREAT: Retaining Engineers through Research Entrepreneurship and Advanced Materials Training funded by the NationalScience Foundation (1950500), DREAM: Diversity in Research and Engineering of Advanced Materials Training. Funded by AirForce Research Laboratory (FA8651-18-1-0003) and Catalyst Project: A Two-Semester Driven Conceptualization Training ofManufacturing Intelligence in Materials Engineering (MIME) - A Froshmore FUTURES Program (2011853).References[1] M. L. Espino, S. L. Rodriguez, and B. D. Le, "A Systematic
Paper ID #41273Exploring Engineering Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Creativity in Academicand Research EnvironmentsAutumn R. Deitrick, Pennsylvania State University Autumn Deitrick is a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State). She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying creativity in graduate-level engineering education. She earned her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Penn State and her S.M. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Paper ID #41180Exploring the Evolution of Engineering Doctoral Students’ Academic andCareer Goals in the First Year of Graduate SchoolGabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University Gaby Sallai is currently a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering department at Penn State. She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying the experiences of engineering graduate students. She received her Bachelor’s degree from Franklin & Marshall College in Physics and Women & Gender Studies.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine
. R. Castaldo, W. Xu, P. Melillo, L. Pecchia, L. Santamaria, and C. James, “Detection of mental stress due to oral academic examination via ultra-short-term HRV analysis,” presented at the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016.18. J. Abiade and L. Moliski, “Work-in progress: identity and transitions laboratory: Utilizing acceptance and commitment therapy framework to support engineering student success,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.19. Y. Yasdin, A. Abduh, M. I. Musa, and B. Rauf, “Impact of cyberbullying on the development of student soft skills in engineering education,” Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, vol. 11
research methods such as (ethnographic observations, interviews, analysis ofartifacts and sometimes protocol analysis), these methods are always used to iteratively constructthe emerging design, which itself simultaneously constitutes and elicits the research results...” (p.164).In our research project, we sought to understand how best to design initiatives with a particularfocus on understanding what sites should be focused on (classrooms? Laboratories? Officehours? Gathering spaces?) and what populations to engage (TAs? Faculty? Staff? Otherstudents?). These narrow design parameters were used to elicit narratives and stories about bothpositive and negative experiences, or as the researchers put it to the participants, places whereand people who
Paper ID #37594IMPACT OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE ON IMPROVING LEARN-ING PERFORMANCE OFSTUDENTSDr. Atefe Makhmalbaf, The University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Atefe Makhmalbaf is an assistant professor at the UTA School of Architecture. She worked for Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a research engineer and joined UTA after receiving a Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in Building Science. Dr. Makhmalbaf leads a Building Performance Analytics group at UTA. She develops decision support systems to enhance sustainable built environment. Since joining UTA, she has developed and taught several
and Associate Head for Undergraduate Programs in the Department of Aerospace En- gineering. He holds an affiliate appointment in the Coordinated Science Laboratory, where he leads a re- search group that works on a diverse set of projects in robotics and education (http://bretl.csl.illinois.edu/). He has received every award for undergraduate teaching that is granted by his department, college, and campus. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Second-Chance Testing as A Means of Reducing Students’ Test Anxiety and Improving OutcomesAbstractThis full research paper explores how second-chance testing can be used as a strategy formitigating students’ test
phenomenological study [10] was to describe the lived experiences ofinternational engineering graduate students who had to switch to a new research group tocomplete their studies in the US. In this study, the lived experiences of the graduate students wasdefined as the meaning students attributed to their experiences and the description of theirphysical, emotional, and psychological states as they navigated the new research laboratory andadapted to its work ethics and cultural and social norms.Positionality Researchers undertaking phenomenological studies must identify and articulate theirpositionalities [11]. Declaring our positionalities will help us set aside our experiences and focuson the research topic and process [12],[13]. The first author
seems to bring the vague notion around whatis an inclusive culture down to concepts that resonate with individuals and reinforce the norms forhow we want everyone to be treated in order to maximize our satisfaction with the workplace andcollegiality with our work colleagues, all of which helps to improve productivity and creativity inlarge teams [15, 17].For example, when talking to some of our Centers’ summer research participants, we showed thepictorial representation to help communicate our expectations for how they would treat others,and how they should be treated. We made it clear to Center graduate mentors, too, and had themthink about how they could make their laboratory and research groups be more inclusive.Moreover, when talking to our
Paper ID #41205Developing Research Identity: Experiences and Influences Leading to UndergraduateStudents’ Growth as ResearchersSamantha Splendido, Pennsylvania State University Sam Splendido is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is currently a graduate research assistant under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She earned her B.S. in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical
in curriculum & instruction from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on promoting teamwork in complex engineering problem solving through collaborative task design. She currently co-leads the integration of human-centered design principles within select courses across the Grainger College of Engineering.Mr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice
. 3, pp. 37-45, 2008.[9] Q. H. Mazumder and M. R. Karim, "Comparative Analysis of Learning Styles of Students of USA and Bangladesh," 119th ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 25-328, June 2012.[10] Y. Deng and I. H. Yeter, "Exploring engineering students' perspectives on hands-on, remote, and virtual laboratories use: An engagement level exploration.," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, 2024.[11] F. Zurita Ortega, A. Martinez Martinez, R. Chacon Cuberos and J. L. Ubago Jiménez, "Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Motivation and Strategies of Learning Questionnaire—Short Form (MSLQ-SF) in Spanish higher education students.," Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 132, 2019.[12] Department of
enrollment course. Research should expand Hartman’s experiences withmore scholarship to understand how these influence faculty assessment decisions, such as usingtests, which our findings will begin to address. Another form of course context is the type of courses that influence the faculty’s coursedecisions. In engineering curricula, courses are typically in the form of introductory courses,fundamental engineering courses, laboratory courses, and capstone courses (Lord & Chen, 2015;Sheppard et al., 2009). Stark (2000) has argued that instructors of introductory courses tend toshape their goals of the course based on nature of the disciplines, and subsequently their courseplanning. In engineering education, however, studies on the types
Paper ID #36921A Qualitative Methods Primer: A Resource to Assist Engineering EducationScholars in Mentoring Traditionally Trained Engineering Faculty toEducational ResearchDr. Matthew Bahnson, Pennsylvania State University Matthew Bahnson a postdoctoral research scholar in engineering education with the Engineering Cogni- tive Research Laboratory with Dr. Catherin Berdanier at Pennsylvania State University. He completed his Ph.D. in the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in at North Carolina State University. His previous training includes a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Northern Iowa and an M.A. in
of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1-2): 182–197, 2015.[14] Bronwyn Bevan. Research and practice: One way, two way, no way, or new way? Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(2):133–141, 2017.[15] Cynthia E Coburn and William R Penuel. Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1):48–54, 2016.[16] Carrie Scholz, Jason LaTurner, and Elizabeth Barkowski. Tool for assessing the health of research-practice partnerships. rel 2021-057. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest, 2021.[17] Rebecca Zarch and Stacey Sexton. Research practice brief: The health assessment tool, 2019.[18] Monica M. McGill, Amanda Menier, Stacey Sexton, Rebecca Zarch, Alan
. J. Jirout, “Investigating the relation between curiosity and creativity.” Journal of Creativity, 33(1), 2023.[13] D. Lopatto, “Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings,” Cell Biol. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 270–277, 2004.[14] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005.[15] T.B. Kashdan, et al., "Understanding psychological flexibility: A multimethod exploration of pursuing valued goals despite the presence of distress." Psychological Assessment 32.9: 829, 2020.[16] T. Porter and K. Schumann. "Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view." Self and
representations and physical materials; the second is activities & interactions, whichemphasizes engineering usually benefits from project-based and collaboratively team-organized work; andthe last dimension named participation & identity, which indicates that engineers often have a strong senseof engineering identity in communities of practice [18]. Community of practice is an important part insituated learning theory, which refers to the informal learning organizations or learning contexts composedof learners with similar professional experience and shared enthusiasms, like students leagues, engineeringclubs, professional laboratories, competition teams, etc. [19]. The current research is a part of a largerproject concentrating on the effect of