Paper ID #41273Exploring Engineering Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Creativity in Academicand Research EnvironmentsAutumn R. Deitrick, Pennsylvania State University Autumn Deitrick is a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State). She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying creativity in graduate-level engineering education. She earned her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Penn State and her S.M. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Paper ID #42209REU Program Evaluation: A Valuable Tool for Studying UndergraduateSocialization in EngineeringDr. Caitlin D. Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin D. Wylie is an associate professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Mr. Kent A. Wayland, University of Virginia Kent earned his PhD in Anthropology at the University of Virginia and is now an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Society, School of Engineering and Applied Science, at the University of VirginiaMr. Andy Wang, University of Virginia Andy Wang is an
Student Development, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 925-942, 2016, doi: 10.1353/csd.2016.0091.[9] D. Verdin, A. Godwin, and B. Capobianco, “Systematic Review of the Funds of Knowledge Framework in STEM Education,” Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25999.[10] D. Cole and A. Espinoza, “Examining the Academic Success of Latino Students in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Majors,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 285-300, 2008, doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0018.[11] R. Revelo, J. Mejia and I. Villanueva, “Who are we? Beyond Monolithic Perspectives of Latinxs in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 124th
earned an M.S. degree in industrial engineering from Sharif University of Technology, and a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Tabriz University. Her research interests focus on mental health and wellness in engineering, retention of engi- neering students from underrepresented groups, engineering student interactions with peers and faculty, and system thinking and system analysis. Dr. Gholizadeh has also work experience as an educational data analyst and strategic planning project manager.Mrs. Shanta A. Jerideau, University of South Carolina Shanta Jerideau is a doctoral candidate in the counseling education and supervision program at the Uni- versity of South Carolina (USC). Shanta obtained her B.A. degree in
students provided anarrative of significant hurdles that may hinder success.Realizing the importance of undergraduate research for enriching the undergraduate learningexperience, UVU encourages undergraduate research through various grants. This includes the(i) Undergraduate Research Scholarly and Creative Activities (URSCA), (ii) D. Clark and PamTurner Endowment for Engaged Learning in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering andMath) Research Fellowships (TEELS), (iii) College of Science Scholarly Activities Committee(SAC), and the Grants for Engaged Learning (GEL). A common denominator of all thesefundings is the requirement for the students to be paired with a faculty mentor/advisor. To furtheraddress the challenge of time shortage, UVU allows
societal changes such as in-person universitiestemporarily teaching classes over online platforms [1] and businesses permanently adoptingmore technology and work-from-home models [2]. This work investigates the effects ofCOVID-19-related educational and work environment changes on the development of expertise,decision-making, and intuition in early-career engineering practitioners (fewer than six years ofpost-baccalaureate experience).Expertise is a status held by those who have a large accumulation of knowledge that is leveragedfor quick decision-making, making connections between concepts, and quickly referencingrelevant information [3]. Becoming an expert is thus a combination of collecting knowledge andgaining the ability to use it through
Cooper for their collaborationin developing Contents Under Pressure.References[1] M. A. H. Amani, “Quality Control and Safety During Construction,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 108–113, 2017.[2] D. D. Akinleye, L. A. McNutt, V. Lazariu, and C. C. McLaughlin, “Correlation between hospital finances and quality and safety of patient care,” PLoS ONE, vol. 14, no. 8. Public Library of Science, Aug. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219124.[3] W. E. Encinosa and B. M. Didem, “Hospital finances and patient safety outcomes,” The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 60–72, 2005.[4] P. R. Amyotte et al., “Why
within the industry.Literature ReviewProfessional competencies are essential for the success of engineers, influencing careerpersistence, employability, and early career experiences. Professional skills, as emphasized bythe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) board [7], highlight thatteamwork on multi-disciplinary teams, comprehension of ethical responsibility, and effectivecommunication are some of the key professional skills that the engineering curriculum shouldintegrate. In other words, the engineering curriculum should meet the goals of cultivating holisticskills that are beyond the foundational technical knowledge.In the context of successful engineering practice, a list of 38 competencies has been identified
(WIL)?,” November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cewilcanada.ca/CEWIL/CEWIL/About-Us/Work-Integrated- Learning.aspx?hkey=ed772be2-00d0-46cd-a5b8-873000a18b41. [Accessed 21 January 2024].[3] Q. Liu, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann and E. Moore, “Examining Workplace Affordance and Student Engagement in Engineering Co-op and Internship Literature,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 116-129, 2020.[4] R. Adams, D. Evangelou, L. English, A. D. De Figueiredo, N. Mousoulides, A. L. Pawley, C. Schiefellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J. M. Trenor and D. W. Wilson, “Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 48-88, 2013
approaches.,” 1982, pp. 315–339.[49] M. Matters, C. B. Zoltowski, P. M. Buzzanell, and A. O. Brightman, “WIP: Exploring an engineering faculty’s intention toward inclusive teaching,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2020, June 22, 2020 - June 26, 2020, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2020- June. Virtual, Online: American Society for Engineering Education, 2020, p. Abet; Engineering Unleashed; et al.; Gradescope; IEEE Xplore; Keysight Technologies.[50] H. Baytiyeh and M. K. Naja, “Attitudes toward pursuing doctoral studies in engineering,” in 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
, andthe application of knowledge and skills to problems that are representative of those faced bypracticing engineers” (p. 124) [8]. As such, learning effectiveness is first and foremostunderstood as relating to certain outcomes.However, measures of learning effectiveness go well beyond learning outcomes. Other measurescan be attitudes such as motivation [9, 10], satisfaction [9, 11], and initiative [7]. Some studiesmeasured learning effectiveness based on resources, teaching activities, and services provided[12], or instruction, curriculum management, and technological media [2]. As these measuresbetter reflect aspects of teaching practices, they may better represent teaching effectiveness thanlearning effectiveness. Notably, learning
to draw on paper the relationshipbetween engineering ethics and DEI. We chose to have participants draw after having oneinterviewer practice the protocol with another. At the time, we were considering askingparticipants to use modelling software (e.g., Miro) that was familiar to them. Based on this pilotinterview experience, physically drawing on paper felt more appropriate than virtual modelling.We rationalized that drawing would eliminate time devoted to learning a new technology andthat drawing activities employ different parts of the brain than verbal responses would. After thedrawing activity, participants responded to a DEI case on organizational retention ofunderrepresented employees, which we adapted from “Dirty Diversity” [30
Paper ID #38728Work in Progress: Using Machine Learning to Map Student Narratives ofUnderstanding and Promoting Linguistic JusticeHarpreet Auby, Tufts University Harpreet is a graduate student in Chemical Engineering and STEM Education. He works with Dr. Milo Koretsky and helps study the role of learning assistants in the classroom as well as machine learning applications within educational research and evaluation. He is also involved in projects studying the uptake of the Concept Warehouse. His research interests include chemical engineering education, learning sciences, and social justice.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Tufts
. Wiebe, “Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving,” Memory & Cognition, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 238–246, May 1987.[6] D. H. Jonassen, “Toward a design theory of problem solving,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 63–85, 2000.[7] S. E. Dreyfus, “Five-stage model of adult skill acquisition,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 177–181, 2004.[8] M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M. J. Farr, The nature of expertise, 1st ed. 1988.[9] E. E. Miskioglu et al., "Situating Intuition in Engineering Practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 418-444, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20521.[10] K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J
in the Department of Engineering Education and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Science, Technology & Society and the Center for Human-Computer Interaction at Virginia Tech. Dr. Zhu is also serving as Associate Editor for Science and Engineering Ethics, Associate Editor for Studies in Engineering Education, Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include engineering ethics, global and inter- national engineering education, the ethics of human-robot interaction and artificial intelligence, and more recently Asian American students
University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the professional formation of engineers and the development of a diverse engineering workforce.Dr. Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge is a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. He holds dual B.S. degrees in Industrial Technology Education and also in Civil and Environmental Engineering. His M.S. and Ph.D. are in ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 1A Kickstart to Smart Living in Undergraduate Engineering: Proposing Goals
change students’ ways of thinking about engineeringand engineering work must move away from the theoretical realm and into the practical realm inengineering education. Thus, our future work will begin to develop interventions that positionstudents to enact the epistemic values they profess in the specific context of design projects. References[1] Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63 – 85.[2] Jonassen, D. H. (2014). Chapter 6: Engineers as problem solvers. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 103 – 118). Cambridge
Paper ID #41797Appraising the Impact of Dialogical Pedagogy and Curriculum Co-Design: AConversation Between the Humanities and EngineeringDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is the Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, Technology and the Anthropocene, and Art of Thinking along with communication courses for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral
Paper ID #39227Work in Progress: Developing Methods from Feminist StandpointPerspectives to Analyze a Panel Discussion and Promote Enduring ImpactDr. Renee M. Desing, Oregon State University Dr. Renee Desing is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University in the School of Civil and Construc- tion Engineering. Her research interests include diversity, equity, inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and
approach and avoidance achievement motivation.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 628–644, 1999, doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.4.628.[37] S. Purzer, T. J. Moore, and E. Dringenberg, “Engineering cognition: A process of knowledge acquisition and application,” in Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, and D. R. Baker, Eds. Springer, 2018, pp. 167–190.[38] R. Ferrari, “Writing narrative style literature reviews,” Med. Writ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 230– 235, 2015, doi: 10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329.[39] J. A. Byrne, “Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews,” Res. Integr. Peer Rev., vol
Between Executive Functioning and Intelligence," The Journal of CreativeBehavior, vol. 55, (3), pp. 857-874, 2021. Available:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jocb.493. DOI: 10.1002/jocb.493.[7] C. M. Syharat, A. Hain and A. E. Zaghi, "Diversifying the engineering pipeline through earlyengagement of neurodiverse learners," in 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,2020, .[8] L. Clouder et al, "Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis," High Educ, vol.80, (4), pp. 757-778, 2020. . DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6.[9] N. W. Moon et al, Accommodating Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Findings from Research and Practice for MiddleGrades through University
around 14 years of teaching experience in undergraduate engineering and technology education. His research interest is to explore, understand, and enhance ways to promote self-directed, self-regulated life-long learning among the undergraduate engineering student population. Various pieces of his research efforts are intended to converge into an inclusive instructional design for undergraduate engineering students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 1 Institutional Role in the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Undergraduate Engineering Students: Student
Paper ID #41956Defining Measurement Constructs for Assessing Learning in MakerspacesMr. Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University Leonardo Pollettini Marcos is a 3rd-year PhD student at Purdue University’s engineering education program. He completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Materials Engineering at the Federal University of Sao Carlos, Brazil. His research interests are in assessment instruments and engineering accreditation processes.Dr. Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is a Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute
the K-12 setting, withSTEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math) initiatives continuing to proliferatein schools nationally and internationally [1], [2], [3]. The integration of the arts and engineeringin the higher education context has been more limited. However, in recent years, universities havestarted to explore how the arts could be integrated into engineering through various initiatives [4],[5]. Some other examples include co-curricular events (i.e., the Annual Art/Engineering ProjectShowcase at the University of Florida), endowed institutes (i.e., the Krenicki Arts and EngineeringInstitute at the University of Connecticut), and interdisciplinary degree programs (i.e., theIntercollege Degree in Colleges of Engineering and
support to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. Prior to her current position, she was the Program Coordinator/Coordinator of Administrative Services at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and prior to that the Program Assistant at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at the college. Mais holds a Bachelor’s degree in Finance, Master’s degree in Hospitality Management, and is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering and Computing Education program at FIU. Her research interests are in graduate and postdoctoral education with a focus on mentorship and transitions as well as faculty development and the use of technology in engineering and computing education.Mr
Paper ID #44000Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Racing Games in EngineeringEducation: A Systematic Literature ReviewAn Nguyen, University of Oklahoma An Nguyen is a student in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He is pursuing a double degree in Computer Science and Math and is hoping to graduate with both Fall ’25. Afterwards, An is hoping to pursue a one-year Master’s program in Computer Science to further expand his knowledge in the technological field. Passionate about Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), An’s academic and research interests are focused
Paper ID #44078Engineering Learning among Black and Latinx/e/a/o Students: ConsideringLanguage and Culture to Reengineer Learning EnvironmentsDr. Greses Perez, Tufts University Greses P´ rez is the McDonnell Family Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in the Civil and e Environmental Engineering Department at Tufts University with secondary appointments in Mechanical Engineering and Education. She received her Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design with a focus on Engineering Education from Stanford University. As an Afro-Latina engineer and learning scientist, she has dedicated her career
intersection of artificial intelligence, robotics, control systems and applications of AI in education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Traditional Engineering Assessments Challenged by ChatGPT: An Evaluation of its Performance on a Fundamental Competencies ExamIntroduction The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly in naturallanguage processing, has brought forth transformative changes across various areas, includingengineering education [1]. One of the most prominent manifestations of these advancementsis ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM) developed by OpenAI, which has demonstratedremarkable capabilities in text
Instruction, DELTA program, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where his research centers on collaborative learning in engineering education and other STEM disciplines. He obtained his B.S. in Technology and Engineering Education in 2019 and his M.S. in STEM Education and Leadership in 2021, both from Illinois State University. Additionally, he holds a professional educator license for secondary education in Technology and Engineering Education in Illinois.Mr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of
of the Engineering Education Faculty. She is also the Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering. She is a member of the Center for Population and Aging, the Center for Remote Health Technologies & Systems as well as the Institute for Data Science. Hammond is a PI for over 14 million in funded research, from NSF, DARPA, Google, Microsoft, and others. Hammond holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science and FTO (Finance Technology Option) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and four degrees from Columbia University: an M.S in Anthropology, an M.S. in Computer Science, a B.A. in Mathematics, and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics and Physics. Hammond