transform existing undergraduate engineering education byaddressing the important issue of transfer between theory and practice. The research plan isguided by the research questions listed in Table 1. The focus of the present paper is thedevelopment of an instrument that can be used to help answer the first research question. Table 1. Research Questions for Overarching FHWA Project No. Research Question Do students who experience the Anchored classroom interventions demonstrate an ability to transfer fundamental engineering knowledge to applied bridge design? a. If so, how many Anchored courses must a student have taken to demonstrate a significant positive 1. correlation with their success in
. His current research interests are focused in educational innovation and educational technologies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impact of the flipped classroom methodology on the development of argumentative skills and academic performance of engineering studentsAbstractAt the Tecnologico de Monterrey, we face two great challenges: working under a new student-centered educational model, which focuses on the development of skills and competencies; andon the other hand, the return to face-to-face learning after preventive isolation to which we weresubjected due to the Covid-19 contingency. In the classrooms we observed problems in theteaching-learning process such as lack of
Paper ID #38926Work in Progress: Using Participatory Design and Qualitative ResearchStrategies in the Development of a New Faculty Mentoring Program forUndergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Constanza Miranda, Johns Hopkins UniversityMrs. Rachel McClam, Johns Hopkins University Rachel McClam is a doctoral student at Johns Hopkins School of Education. Her primary research inter- ests involve questions about how to support educators to make and sustain growth in their practice across the span of their career. In particular, she is interested in ways to better support educator development toward equitable outcomes for historically
impact context, and we can use 16 items to measureit. Although the development of instruments in this paper is a pilot study, it has some important implicationsfor future research. First, the instrument can be used to evaluate the authenticity level for engineeringlearning in communities of practice. Besides, many new engineering initiatives such as PBL andExperiential learning have focused on the creation of authentic learning contexts. So future research canuse the instrument to make a further understanding of the authenticity in different kinds of engineeringlearning situations. Additionally, previous research have demonstrated the importance of authentic learningin some design-based learning environments like engineering education [30], but
University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessment of a Survey Instrument for Measuring Affective PathwaysAbstractThis research paper analyzes the emotions that students experience while completing ill-definedcomplex problems called Open-Ended Modeling Problems in their engineering courses. Studentsare asked to make their own modeling decisions, rather than being given those assumptions, as isthe case in most textbook problems. There are many approaches they can take, and having tomake decisions and assumptions that impact the
. Mayled et al., “Coaching and feedback in a faculty professional development program that integrates the entrepreneurial mindset and pedagogical best practices into capstone design courses,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--32513.[6] S. Zappe, K. Hochstedt, E. Kisenwether, and A. Shartrand, “Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach entrepreneurship to engineering students,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2013.[7] F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry,” Educational Researcher, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2–14, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.3102
STEM education for future researchers. He is currently participating in an NSF-funded grant (#1923452) to spearhead research into middle school students’ digital literacies and assessment. Recently, Dr. Hsu has received a seed grant at UML to investigate how undergradu- ate engineering students’ digital inequalities and self-directed learning characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy) affect their learning outcomes in a virtual laboratory environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Hsu’s research interests include advanced quantitative design and analysis and their applications in STEM education, large-scale assessment data (e.g., PISA), and engineering students’ perception of faculty en- couragement and
subjects, and effectivelycommunicating results to academic, industry, policy, and other audiences.This paper reports on a research project, supported by an NSF EAGER award, that exploresinnovative ethnographic research methods for studying engineering practice. Here we primarilyfocus on the experiences of three students who were directly involved in our data collectionefforts. One undergraduate student engaged with one field site (a utility company, “UtilityCo”)through job shadowing and informal interviewing, while two graduate students collected data asparticipant observers at a second site (a small software start-up, “SoftCo”). In this paper, ourprimary research objective is to examine how these three students experienced their roles
, they also set the trajectory for what will be discoveredthrough the research enterprise. The tension of practicality alongside knowledge generation ispalpable in engineering research work, as engineering scientists often balance and blendpostpositivist and naturalistic approaches. Due to the applied nature of engineering research,engineering research work often takes a pragmatic approach, employing whatever epistemic andmethodological modes seem to best answer the question presented [54].Engineering Research FundingFunding availability and source hold a salient position in all threads of research work, and it is nodifferent for engineering. Research always comes at a cost to someone—Leydens and Lucenaraised the key question of who does
academic pursuits, he also serves as a Graduate Research Assistant at OU. His research interests encompass diverse areas such as Traffic Incident Analysis & Prevention, Traffic Flow Theory, Autonomous Connected Electric, Shared (ACES) vehicles, Big Data Analytics, Network Science, Natural Hazards, Machine Learning, and System Optimization.Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Okla- homa. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in
engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Detecting Dimensions of Significant Learning in Syllabi using a Course Change TypologyAbstractThis research paper addresses the need for an instrument to detect the changes in the use ofresearch-based approaches over time. Change occurs within three
evaluating efforts across ERCs and the predictive validity of these outcomes on preparing thefuture engineering workforce. The next steps of this project will consist in the launch of ouronline platform which will host the MERCII Survey as well as other instruments designed byTEEC.References[1] D. Roessner, L. Manrique, and J. Park, “Economic impact of engineering research centers:preliminary results of a pilot study,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 35, no. 5, pp.475–493, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9163-x[2] National Science Foundation, "Engineering Research Centers," National Science Foundation,[Online]. Available: https://nsf.gov/eng/eec/erc.jsp. [Accessed 24 January 2023].[3] J. Biancolo, "Best Practices Manual," Aug. 16
, especiallyfor students with disabilities.Recommended Pedagogical Practice: Teachers Should Be Considerate, Patient, andCreativeSome informants designed lesson plans with Frozen and Angry Bird themes. Researchers need torecognize that integrating STEM and robotics content in teachers’ curricula may not be as simpleand intuitive as it appears and will require conscious and consistent efforts on their side, whichshould be very much appreciated. At first sight, such connections may seem naive and furtherreify the gendered nature of STEM. But it is a critical first step for our informants to think aboutrobotic integration in their classroom and make the robotic experience relevant for their students.We understand that how our informants experience and
Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colom- bia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process En- gineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. In addition to teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for more than 10 years, Juan has over 6 years of experience as a practicing engineer, working mostly on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants.Dr. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech Michelle Soledad, Ph.D. is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research and service interests include teaching and learning experiences in fun- damental engineering courses, faculty development and support initiatives
impact and are impacted by graduate students’ mental healthand well-being, we can push for programmatic change and inform the development of methodsto train GPDs to implement evidence-based healing practices to support engineering graduatestudents.Methodology In this WIP, a scoping literature review was conducted using an adapted version ofArksey and O’Malley’s [23] five-stage approach of knowledge synthesis to identify researchgaps in the existing literature regarding the definition of GPD roles, responsibilities, andapproaches taken to promote healing using trauma-informed frameworks of care. Scopingreviews enable researchers to broadly map complex topics where many alternative study designsmay be appropriate [23]. In brief, the five
in whiteness and maleness [63], [64]. Whenwork exclusively considers engineering broadly, programmatic and curricular practices may bedeveloped that also support this narrow interpretation of interest and identity. Almost allparticipants mention an interest outside of engineering, fewer described this interest with adegree of commitment, and even fewer actually integrated this interest by pursuing it throughclasses, a minor, or a double major. A key reason for not doing so was the limitations of time intheir program and the fear it would impact their graduation time or cost them too much money.However, many participants had a math minor despite the lack of connection between it and theirinterests or goals. The ease of adding this minor
. in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Math- ematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (’17). Atop his education, Justin is a previous National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 American Society for En- gineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Best Diversity Paper for his work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic improvement rather than an additional barrier.Ms. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan
, Physics and Engineering, and Computer Science from Lansing Community College. Her research interests include the impacts of culture on students and their sense of belonging, graduate educa- tion, and the faculty experience. This work is motivated by her experience and training in student affairs and her enthusiasm for student development and inclusive environments. She is hoping to continue her work and research in an engineering education Ph.D. program in the coming cycle.Dr. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika A. Mosyjowski (she/her/hers) is the Research and Faculty Engagement Manager in the Center for Socially Engaged Design at the University of Michigan. She has a B.A. in Psychology and Sociology from
conversation shifts about the content). By determining whether the codebook istransferable in the same context, we can provide evidence for its robustness and application inengineering educational contexts. Figure 1 shows an overview of the research process includingthe summer study. Figure 1. Overview of the research design.4.1. Research Context – TikTokTikTok is a popular, video-based social media platform where users create short video clips thatdescribe or show their experiences as a form of expression and has unique community interaction[60], [61]. TikTok, gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic [60] and continues to beone of the top apps on both the Apple App Store and Google Play (as of February 2023
. She is currently working with Dr. Marissa Tsugawa on Neurodiversity Research and Education. She believes that neurodiversity can help her better understand her younger brother’s condition (Asphyxiation) and respond to his basic needs because his mind works differently from everybody else’s due to which he unable to express his feelings and pain.kiana kheiriDr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University focusing on neurodiversity and identity and motivation. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering Education focusing on motivation and identity for engineering graduate students.Hamid Karimi, Utah State University I completed my Ph.D. in Computer
. Internalconsistencies for each of the six subscales, measured by Cronbach’s α, ranged from 0.751 to0.878; average discrimination indices ranged from 0.509 to 0.688. The development of thisquestionnaire affords researchers the opportunity to more deeply explore students’ attitudestoward and perceptions of engineering, as well as the relationship among these two phenomena.Introduction and BackgroundA diverse pool of engineering graduates who can apply sociotechnical thinking – consideringboth technical and non-technical factors (social, economic, cultural, political, etc.) [1, 2] – isneeded to solve complex, interdisciplinary problems that have a significant impact on society atboth local and global levels (e.g., climate change, access to clean water, etc.) [3-5
of the Department of Civil Engineering. As a faculty, she has developed a number of novel courses to improve student learning, and to share her expertise on aspects of ambient air quality management. Her research focuses on engineering pedagogy and air quality management to address environmental safety and justice issues. In this capacity, she is a fierce advocate for local communities and communities abroad. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Systematic Implementation of Four Versions of a Course-Based Intervention to Reduce Attrition Among Civil Engineering Students: Overall Study Design and Implementation of First VersionINTRODUCTIONNationally and
the gaps between engineering education and practice,” in The Science and Engineering Workforce Project, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018, pp. 129-163.[16] R. Korte and S. LeBlanc, (2021). “Studying the Formation of Engineers: A Case Study of a Higher Education Learning Ecology,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2021, Long Beach, California USA.[17] U. Bronfenbrenner, The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.[18] U. Bronfenbrenner and P. A. Morris, “The Ecology of Developmental Processes” in Handbook of Child Psychology (5th ed.) Volume 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development, R
Paper ID #38286Validity evidence for measures of statistical reasoning and statisticalself-efficacy with engineering studentsDr. Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology Todd is a lecturer in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests are engineering students beliefs about knowledge and education and how those beliefs interact with the engineeringDavid S. Ancalle, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kennesaw State University David S. Ancalle is a Lecturer in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Kennesaw
Paper ID #37800Developing and Evaluating a Virtual Training Process for Energy AuditEducationBehlul Kula, Michigan State University Behlul Kula is currently a Ph.D. student and graduate research assistant in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department at Michigan State University (MSU). Also, he is a team member of the MSU Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) as an energy & sustainability analyst. He completed his Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering from Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Turkey in 2015. He then worked in Qatar as a site civil engineer at Dogus Construction company for nearly one year. After
education research. Her research interests include faculty change, 3D spatial visualization, gender inclusive teamwork, and study- ing authentic engineering practice. Dr. Panther has experience conducting workshops at engineering education conferences both nationally and internationally, has been a guest editor for a special issue of European Journal of Engineering Education on inclusive learning environments, and serves on the Aus- tralasian Journal of Engineering Education advisory committee.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell
held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineer- ing and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP
strong impact on the learning experience and should receive training toensure consistency and that learning objectives are met.1 IntroductionIn the past five years, nearly half of undergraduate mechanical and manufacturing engineeringstudents enrolled in a mandatory third-year materials science course at the University of Calgaryconsistently report on their end-of-course surveys that their laboratories are not linked to theirin-class learning or to their careers following graduation. There have also been calls from thelocal engineering industry, the local government [1], and University of Calgary administration [2]for more industry-relevant learning to be included in post-secondary curricula. Previous work bythe ASEE has established that the
other scenarios related to STEM or engineering education settings (Hertz,2022).Social Relations Model and Estimation The SRM represents a class of models investigating dyadic relationships within a groupof research subjects. While typically, dyadic relationships are defined as two-person interactionsand ratings for human-subject studies, the SRM can be used for other studies where the researchsubjects are animals or organizations, etc. The SRM has wide applications in psychology,economics, education, and other social sciences; and has been reviewed as a canonical way toinvestigate interpersonal relationships data stemming from a round-robin design (e.g., Kenny &La Voie, 1984; Kwan et al., 2008; Lüdtke et al., 2013; Martin, 2013
to connect researchto practice and impact engineering students. This approach involved creating scenarios andprobing questions from the composite narratives for sharing the research findings in academicand industrial educational settings. Lastly, we discuss the benefits and limitations of thismethodology, highlighting the research findings brought into focus using this methodology andcomparing and contrasting these results with those that emerged using an inductive-deductivethematic analysis approach to the data also taken in this research project.Key Words: Composite narratives, Methodology, Participant confidentiality, Research to practiceapproachesIntroductionComposite narratives are a way to combine aspects of multiple interviews into a