Paper ID #37580Relationship between Motivation and Effective Communication inEngineering Capstone Projects Design ClinicsMrs. Nourhan E. Elatky, Rowan University Nourhan El-Atky is a Graduate Assistant in Experimental Engineering Education at Rowan University. She received her BS from The Arab Academy Of Science And Technology in 2018 in Egypt. She is working on her Ph.D. in Engineering Education and MS in Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University.Dr. Juan M. Cruz, Rowan University Juan M. Cruz is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. He has a B.S. in Electronic
Paper ID #48377Exploring Student Engagement and Project Outcomes in Capstone Design:Insights from a Grounded Theory StudyElliott Clement, Oregon State University Elliott Clement is a doctoral student at Oregon State University. His current research is using grounded theory to understand identity and motivation within the context of capstone design courses. He is also part of a research team investigating context-specific affordances and barriers faculty face when adopting evidence-based instructional practices in their engineering courses.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate
specific, its aid in instructional and course design. The METM program curriculum offers courses that focus on Project Management,Strategic Planning and Management, Financial Resource Management, etc., that are included inthe Engineering Management Body of Knowledge (EMBOK)[3]. At the conclusion of theMETM program, students must research, design, and showcase a real-world project that requirescomprehensive application of the knowledge they have learned throughout the program, in orderto bring significant impact to the stakeholders of their chosen organizations. The Capstone course spans over two semesters, Fall (Capstone I) and Spring (CapstoneII); it was first offered in 2019, and in 2023, the fifth student cohort started their
and parallel ideas. tasks. Curriculum objectives related Select an engineering project to the Washington Accord; outcome (PO) in the corresponding standard for the e.g. environment and learning outcome (CO) requiredEvaluation based on sustainability, abstract thinking by professional coursesthe matrix of and originality in analysis to Construct the CO-PO matrixcompetency criteria Isa et al.[24
be for our students asfuture engineers.Professional preparation of engineers, as with the law, and medicine, necessitates the applicationof knowledge through an applied rehearsal in authentic learning situations. The clinic of law ormedicine is sometimes practiced as a capstone educational experience in fields of engineering.Having engineering students work together on a project is becoming a prominent pedagogicalapproach in upper-level engineering undergraduate courses and graduate courses. This directlysupports the professional practice and professional formation for many fields of engineering andaddresses many ABET student learning outcomes.A multiple case-study approach was used to apply and illustrate a “product”-based learningframework
Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26629. doi: 10.18260/p.26629.[2] H. Chaibate, A. Hadek, S. Ajana, S. Bakkali, and K. Faraj, “A Comparative Study of the Engineering Soft Skills Required by Moroccan Job Market,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 142, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p142.[3] M. S. Rao, “Enhancing employability in engineering and management students through soft skills,” Ind. Commer. Train., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 42–48, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1108/ICT-04-2013-0023.[4] J. Dawson and S. Kuchnicki, “Experiences Of Using Formula Sae As A Capstone Design Project,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Louisville, Kentucky: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2010, p. 15.555.1
team diversity,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2016, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757523.[25] C. Altmann, “The Benefits of a Course for 2nd and 3rd Year Students in Design Competition Teams,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022, p. 8.[26] J. Dawson and S. Kuchnicki, “Experiences Of Using Formula Sae As A Capstone Design Project,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Louisville, Kentucky: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2010, p. 15.555.1-15.555.22. doi: 10.18260/1-2--15685.[27] L. M. Vaughn and M. Lohmueller, “Calling All Stakeholders: Group-Level Assessment (GLA)—A Qualitative and Participatory Method for Large
specifications. Amongthese requirements, the engineering education curriculum must include a total duration of 3,200to 3,600 instructional hours, of which at least 500 must be dedicated to professional internships.Although there is significant variability in completion of these programs nationwide [7],engineering training must culminate in a capstone project, a thesis, or passing a comprehensiveexamination, which may be part of credit requirements or plan-specific milestones.According to guidelines established by the Chilean National Accreditation Commission (CNA)[8], engineering programs must ensure that their students acquire the necessary competenciesto apply a distinctive set of scientific, mathematical, and technological knowledge dimensions.To
peer feedback comments? 2. What are the components of quality peer feedback, and how effective are existing rubrics in measuring the quality of peer feedback comments?II. Background A. Role of Feedback in PBL Courses Project-based learning (PBL) courses are a common pedagogical approach used to teach engineering design [13], especially in senior capstone and first-year cornerstones. The team- and project-focused nature of PBL courses helps students develop essential professional skills such as communication [14], conflict management [15], and collaboration with diverse team members [16]. Another unique aspect of the PBL format is the team dynamics in every project group. Each team forms a culture and workflow unique
Paper ID #40272Undergraduate Student Experience with Research Facilitated by ProjectManagement and Self-regulated Learning ProcessesMs. Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College Lon- don and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research focuses
University of Nigeria, Nigeria and the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Currently, His research focus is in the field of Computing and Engineering Education where he is involved with investigating team-based computational projects using qualitative, quantitative, and artificial intelligence-based tools. He is also involved with developing and redesigning a Team-Based transdisciplinary graduate course under the Purdue University EMBRIO Innovation Hub Grant project, where He has contributed by applying computational fluid dynamics methods in the development of partial differential equation (PDE) models to implement cell cytokinesis. His ongoing Ph.D. research broadly investigates teamwork interactions and
Paper ID #37433Detecting Dimensions of Significant Learning in Syllabi Using a CourseChange TypologyDorian Bobbett, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dorian is a 4th-year chemical engineering undergraduate student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She has been involved in Engineering Education Research for 2 years under the supervision of Dr. Grace Panther and Dr. Heidi Diefes-Dux on projects related to faculty development, adaptability, and educa- tional research methods. She will be pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan beginning in the Fall of 2023.Grace Panther, University
completeunderstanding of faculty pedagogical choices. Ultimately, this research will evaluate teaming andcollaborative practices in the classroom to support faculty efforts in preparing students to navigatecomplex engineering practices in the future. 6References[1] M. F. Ercan and R. Khan, “Teamwork as a fundamental skill for engineering graduates,” in 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Dec. 2017, pp. 24–28. doi: 10.1109/TALE.2017.8252298.[2] G. A. Mosher, “Enhancing Team-Based Senior Capstone Projects: Opportunities and Challenges,” 2014 ASEE North Midwest Sect. Conf., vol. 2014, no. 1
(including capstone projects) did you have participated in? o 0 - 5 projects o 6 - 10 projects o 11 - 15 projects o More than 15 projects 5. Based on your previous experience in course group projects, overall, how satisfied are you with your group members' participation? o Very Unsatisfied o Unsatisfied o Neutral o Satisfied o Very Satisfied 6. Based on your previous experience, tell us why [sometimes] it is difficult to ensure appropriate contribution from all team members.Teamwork Related QuestionsThis part of the survey utilizes the Team-Q survey to assess team participation. Somemodifications are made to fit the questionnaire to the context of data
objectives and students’ interests. • Equip students with resources such as templates for designing interview questions and interview guide. • Encourage or require students to write reflective summaries or reports based on the dialogue(s). Where are professional dialogues applicable? Professional dialogues are particularly applicable in upper-level engineering courses that emphasize design, systems thinking, or interdisciplinary approaches. They are most impactful in project-based learning contexts such as capstone courses or collaborative design challenge, where understanding user needs, industry standards, and technological constraints is essential. Additionally, this strategy can support career exploration and professional
. However, as a pilot, the sample limited generalizability; thecurrent study addresses this limitation. We used a national cohort that included multipleengineering disciplines (biomedical, mechanical, chemical, electrical, computer, aerospace),types of formal design projects (e.g., first-year, design-spine, senior capstone) and institutiontypes, including private religious; Hispanic-serving; public land-grant; and research flagshipinstitutions (N=449). We report sample characteristics and used confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) to provide validity evidence, reporting the chi-square and standardized root mean squareresidual as estimates of fit. We report Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of internal consistency.We found that overall, the CFA aligned with
are problem- and project-based learning [7]. Capstones and cornerstone courses areusually taught following a project-based learning approach where students work in teams solvingreal-world problems [7] in a face-to-face setting [8].Collective empathy (empathy with team members) is key to effective teams [9]. It promotescreativity, team members' understanding, a constructive working environment, and diminishingconflict [9].Several studies have found different results regarding face-to-face and online teamwork. Forexample, Goñi et al. [10] found insignificant differences regarding personal goals, regulationstrategies, and team challenges. Nevertheless, online students revealed that they discussed less inteams than face-to-face students. However
Quality Based on Team that could be useful for training Chinese engineers Spirit Training. Research in Higher working in the global context Engineering Education, (6), 103-108. Duan Guijiang, & Xu Shixin. (2012). Reported experience of an instructional team in the Improving students' teamwork ability by program Manufacturing Management Information reforming a capstone design course. Systems in reforming a mandatory capstone design course Research in Higher Engineering by integrating various team training tools and modules and Education, (1), 132-137. teamwork assessments Wan Baikun, Li Qing, Yang Chunmei, & Reported a course reform project in a biomedical
IKC Value rubric was used to code thestudent reflections. The results of the study demonstrated that living in the learning communityand studying the concepts of intercultural competence while interacting with students of diversebackgrounds allowed the students to develop interculturally. Also, engaging students in guidedreflection helped them to reflect on the intercultural skills that they developed through constantinteraction with peers that requires efficient communication among the team members. Similarly,in another study by Swartz et al. [13], students were challenged to collaborate internationally withstudents from three different countries during a 6-week project to increase their interculturalcompetency. The results of the study
Paper ID #43651Teaching Effective Communication for TeamworkDr. Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University Joanna Tsenn is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her B.S. from the University of Texas at Austin and her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. She coordinates the mechanical engineering senior capstone design program and teaches senior design lectures and studios. Her research interests include engineering education with an emphasis on capstone design and teamwork.Jonathan Weaver-Rosen, Texas A&M University
am delivering this We’re really glad you’re here. news that, “We’re gonna have to find you a Just hold tight. Here’s some new job. We don’t know what it’s gonna be. training, we have to figure out Um, sorry, your product is going way.” where we’re going.” (Manager 2)The role is related to her capstone the option of just being 100% focused on his The manager talks about a late- career Ph.D. hire project, so she feels she has PhD [work] was no longer an option, it’s that is focused on a technical niche that they relevant experience to an exciting part because I’m excited, I’m are very passionate about. I
examined the workplace transitionexperiences of undergraduate queer engineering students and revealed a notable gap in the literatureconcerning transition experiences of these students. To address this gap, we have developed a new researchagenda that specifically investigates the school-to-work transition (STW) of undergraduate engineeringstudents. The aim of this project is to analyze and map the existing literature on this topic through a scopingreview (ScLR). A scoping review is a type of literature review designed to systematically explore and map thebreadth of available evidence on a specific topic (Samnani et al., 2017). It identifies key concepts, researchgaps, and the variety of study designs within a field (Grant & Booth, 2009). For
thiswork and how these informed the design of the survey, including the reasoning behind usingself-efficacy measures. We will also present our early analysis of the validity of this tool and itsutility in measuring HCED learning. Findings from this paper cover data collected at thebeginning of the Fall 2023 semester. Future work will include pre/post comparison andlongitudinal analysis. Design is a central part of engineering and continues to play an important role inengineering undergraduate education [1]–[3]. Design projects have been positioned in thefreshman and senior years as cornerstone and capstone projects [1], [4]–[7]. Beyond thesedesign-focused courses, many engineering courses employ a project-based learning approach,often
instead of getting discouraged 2. Social modeling – seeing peers succeed at challenging tasks contributes to one’s beliefs that they will also be successful 3. Social persuasion – people can be persuaded to believe in their own abilities 4. Physical and emotional states – self-efficacy beliefs are affected by emotions like anxiety, as well as physical strength and stamina, and one’s ability to regulate emotionsThe first three mechanisms - mastery experiences, social modeling, and social persuasion - areall common elements of project-based learning. For example, cornerstone (i.e., a project whichappears early in a curriculum to serve as a foundational experience for students), capstone, andother long duration
offers a valuable framework for investigating various behaviors, it is importantto acknowledge its limitations in capturing the potential influence of power dynamics and otherconfounding elements. For example, power imbalances within a capstone engineering teamcould shape individuals’ behaviors in ways that extend beyond their personal beliefs, which maynot be fully captured by the RAA’s focus on individual beliefs and intentions. Similarly,contextual factors may influence behaviors in ways that are not adequately represented by theRAA. In the capstone engineering example, project complexity or time pressures could be suchfactors. To address these concerns, researchers could incorporate qualitative methods andcontextual factor measures, such as
graduate attribute definitionsoften miss crucial aspects of what this looks like for engineering practice. The authorsrecommend team- and project-based educational activities to foster lifelong learning orientations.It will be important to attend to alumni reflections on these types of learning activities and anyconnections to their lifelong learning orientations.Ford et al. [28] investigated the effects of capstone design project experiences on lifelonglearning during workplace transitions. They examined alumni from four institutions, focusing ontheir initial three months at work. Challenges often related to self-directed learning, which wasless emphasized in undergrad programs, as well as interpersonal interactions with colleaguesfrom different
at Iron RangeEngineering participate in a one-semester certification program called the Bell Academy wherethey gain training in the areas of technical learning, design, and professionalism. In addition tocompleting their technical coursework, they also complete a team design project with industryclients and participate in workshops to develop as engineering professionals. For their next foursemesters after the Bell Academy, they work full-time in engineering internships and co-opsaround the globe while continuing their technical courses remotely.During their senior year, students write six chapters, which result in a senior capstone paper.These papers have been used to assess student learning, as well as to measure ABETperformance indicators
grid clinics Implementing Smart Grid clinics Senior/Junior capstone design and hands-on experiences in projects. senior and junior projects Smart grid The effect smart grid is having Its effect on climate change environmental effect on the environment Smart grid future What are the aspects that the More social power/connections/ industry smart grid industry is willing to legacy system upgrade/ improve in the future modernizing gridsFinancial process of The financial process/cash flow Budget, financial support,smart grid project for a smart grid project
“I push my own point of view.” Problem solving “I examine ideas from both sides to find a mutually optimal solution.” Avoiding “I try to avoid a confrontation with the other.”MethodsA conflict management workshop was designed and facilitated for three different project-basedlearning courses involving year-long design projects: a first-year foundations of engineeringcourse, an interdisciplinary design course for first through fourth-year students from multiplemajors, and a senior interdisciplinary engineering capstone course. The workshop utilizedMentimeter (Menti) to promote engagement and support data collection. Menti is an instructionaltechnology that enables instructors to collect responses to specific prompts from
progress explores the relationship between time-on-task and self-organization skills in undergraduate engineering students. It uses an adapted version of atimesheet that was first proposed by Häggman, Honda, and Yang [4] and was later used to tracktime-on-task in geographically distributed teams engineering design in an ABET-accreditedinstitution [5]. As a pilot, we are conducting an instrumental case study [6] using a yearlongmultidisciplinary design course that fulfills the ABET design credit requirement of a capstone forevery engineering sub-discipline (ECE, BME, ChemBE, MechE, etc.). We customized thetimesheet to match those in this undergraduate course and produced a Qualtrics survey sostudents could report hours spent on design activities