discrete signal {x[1]…x[8]} and an impulse response{h[1] …h[4]}, the students are shown that the output sequence {y[1]…y[11]} can be realizedusing the systolic array shown in Figure 1. Page 14.807.5Figure 1. Systolic array for 1D discrete time convolution.We spend approximately two weeks on this topic.Laboratory assignmentsA significant feature of the new course is the tight integration of the lecture with the laboratory.The course meets for one hour and 15 minutes twice a week, once in the classroom for thelecture and then in the laboratory for programming assignments. We have developed a series oflaboratory exercises that serve to reinforce the
Singapore in 2003 and Ph.D. from Cleveland State University in 2009, all in electrical engineering. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Gannon University. Page 15.1092.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 STEM-based Projects to Integrate the Undergraduate ECE Program with the K-12 STEM CurriculumIntroductionThis paper discusses how electrical and computer engineering (ECE) projects withscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) components will integratethe undergraduate degree programs in ECE with the K-12 STEM-based
helpful for the effort of theConnecticut Nanotechnology Curriculum Committee.1. IntroductionNowadays, the technology advancement has the trend of making things smaller andsmaller. Taking VLSI technology as an example, the feature size of a CMOS transistor isshrunk to deep submicron or nanometer domain. A state-of-the-art Intel CPU chip maycontain millions or even billions of transistors. As the VLSI technology continue tobecome smaller and smaller, people are also considering shrinking the size of mechanicalcomponents (mirrors, gears, pumps, etc.) to microns and integrating them with VLSIcircuits into a system. MEMS and nanotechnology are exactly the enabling technologiesfor this dream. MEMS mainly deal with things in the scale of 1µm~1000µm
challenging strategy computer games, have become a big part of our everyday routine.Other, less obvious, applications, such as automatic target recognition, earthquake prediction,gene expression discovery, intelligent credit fraud protection and affectionate computing, tomention just a few, are examples of cutting-edge applications of ML in various technological,scientific and financial domains.This paper describes the outcomes of a prototype project titled “PROJECT EMD-MLR:Educational Materials Development through the Integration of Machine Learning Research intoSenior Design Projects“, whose intellectual focus is ML. The project is an on-going, multi-institute effort that started in May 2004. The project partners are two major universities
from within the Matlab / Simulinkenvironment, and then to implement these designs directly on a hardware platform coupled to theKinect system. Students develop their designs using interconnected Simulink blocks andsubsystems, and the ‘build’ process automatically cross-compiles and downloads the model tothe target for execution. External mode capability can be used to monitor the target hardware asit executes in real time, enabling the user to tune model parameters and log data while theirapplication is running. An example showing how the Kinect can be integrated into a higher levelsystem design is shown as an example.1. IntroductionAdvances in low-cost, high-capability computing and sensing devices offer new opportunities forteaching
Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL 33431 rothz@fau.edu , Zhuang@fau.edu , ungvich@fau.edu , zilouchi@fau.eduACKNOWLEDGMENTThe work was partially supported by NSF Grant No. 1033815. The authors wish to thank ourengineering students who were involved in the design projects reported here.AbstractThis paper shares the experiences from an undergraduate curriculum refinement involvingintegration of design contents in the entire four-year Electrical Engineering program. Theimplementation of the refinement can be described by four mottos: start early, be persistent, openmore fronts, and cap with a peak. The integration of design at certain years, such as the freshmenyear or in capstone senior level projects
Electrical Engineering CurriculumAbstractThis paper presents findings from an impact study of a lower division student experience withinan undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum. This experience, culminating in the secondyear of the curriculum, is integrated across multiple first and second year courses and includeselements commonly found in senior-level capstone project courses. An introductoryprogramming course utilizing an embedded platform is the first course in the sequence. Thefinal course in the sequence requires students to design, build, and test an autonomous mobilerobot. Through a series of milestones, students systematically complete both the hardware andembedded software tasks required for the project. The final milestone
essential to decidewhich projects would benefit the most from an integrated graduate student and which projectswould benefit sufficiently from a graduate mentor relationship.Due to the similarity between their implementations, the benefits of integration and mentoring atfirst appear to be almost identical. In both cases, the undergraduate student gains technical andnon-technical information from a graduate student who has previously completed a similar seniordesign curriculum. The graduate student benefits from working with a design team andperforming research through the undergraduate students that would not have been accomplishedotherwise. These benefits are the exact same for integration and mentoring when approachedfrom a theoretical standpoint
UniversityDr. Annmarie Ward c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Hands-On Knowledge on Cybersecurity with a Self-Learning KitAbstractThere is an exponential growth in the number of cyber-attack incidents resulting in significantfinancial loss and national security concerns. Secure cyberspace has been designated as one ofthe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges in engineering. Broadly, thesecurity threats are targeted on software programs, operating system and network with theintention to launch confidentiality, integrity and availability violations. Existing undergraduateand graduate-level cybersecurity education curriculum rely primarily on didactic teachingmethods with little focus
(VIP) Program is an engineering educationprogram that operates in a research and development context. Undergraduate students that joinVIP teams earn academic credit for their participation in design efforts that assist faculty andgraduate students with research and development issues in their areas of technical expertise. Theteams are: multidisciplinary – drawing students from across engineering; vertically-integrated –maintaining a mix of sophomores through PhD students each semester; and long-term – eachundergraduate student may participate in a project for up to seven semesters and each graduatestudent may participate for the duration of their graduate career. The continuity, technical depth,and disciplinary breadth of these teams enable
of social, political and / or organizationalcontexts in the engineering discipline. These aspects are an integral part of the problems in theelectrical engineering units of study. By taking on and playing the persona of a role, learnerswere led to reflect on the material from the perspective of personal experience and identity. Thisdeep reflection was enhanced by being able to act out possibilities in a safe and collaborativeenvironment. In addition, learners were absorbed in situations and contexts that highlight thelearning outcomes and objectives of the engineering units of study.The project was carried out over two semesters in 2006 and was evaluated by student feedbackquestionnaires to determine whether the role playing platform had
specific classes at themore advanced level devoted to nanotechnology. For example Pai et al. discuss the introductionof two graduate-level classes that cover the growth and characterization of emergingnanomaterials.4 Uddin and Chowdhury describe a comprehensive plan for integrating a set ofcourses into the undergraduate engineering curriculum.5This paper advocates an approach that integrates nanoelectronics material into an existingintegrated circuits design course. This is a viable approach for several reasons. First, it is anattractive approach for a smaller-sized institution that may not have the resources forimplementing a full set of separate nanoelectronics courses. Second, it is often not easy to makewholesale changes in the curriculum to
focus in the first year of the curriculum reform has been on restructuring andredefining the core curriculum, responding to assessment results, implementing several newassessment tools, and planning and executing two pedagogical workshops. In this paper, wedescribe the process by which we have modified the core curriculum and the results of theredesign. [This work was supported by NSF grant EEC- 0431812].Initial assessment activities associated with our legacy curriculum indicated several areas thatneeded to be strengthened. First, students rarely felt they understood the coherent, overarchingframework that integrates basic principles. Second, there was an unbalanced coverage offundamental areas of ECE. Finally, the laboratory and design
Page 25.486.2through the Electrical Engineering or Computer Engineering programs. Incorporation of globallearning into our curriculum gives us an opportunity to better prepare our students for careers astruly global engineers 3;6 .Three key results of this integration of global learning elements into the ECE curriculum are thefollowing: 1. Several elements of global learning were already present in our ECE curriculum, but were not formalized or assessed. The most common were: (a) Discussion of historical background of course topic; (b) Sustainability, in the form of efficient design or use of resources (for example, mini- mized logic, efficient code or spectrum usage). 2. Global learning
AC 2011-271: INTEGRATION OF NANO SCALE ELECTRONIC DEVICESINTO UNDERGRADUATE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULAHasina Huq, The University of Texas-Pan American Dr. Hasina F. Huq is an assistant professor at the University of Texas-Pan American, TX, U.S.A. Her research interests include electronics device characterization, VLSI system design, and wide bandgap (WBG) semiconductor. She received her M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, in 2002 and Ph.D in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, in 2006. Dr. Huq has more than twenty papers published in peer reviewed international/national conferences and
Conceptualization (Thinking)Figure 1: Kolb elements of learning and learning styles with overlaid learning activities and 4MAT learning cycle (arrows); adapted from3.Vision for Curriculum EnhancementBased on ideas generated by the Kolb/4MAT system, and funded by an NSF curriculum plan-ning grant8, we have redesigned our systems area curriculum. Overall, we have identified 38credit hours of courses that will be affected: a two semester sequence in circuit theory, a two se-mester sequence in electronic circuit analysis and design; a linear systems theory course, theircompanion non-integrated laboratories, senior technical electives and their companion non-integrated laboratories, and the senior seminar/senior design courses. The old core and its
of the ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor in the Office of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award
. Learning in one area supports learning in another.”The study also calls the labs a missed opportunity and states that3: “…[The labs] can be more effectively used in the curriculum to support integration and synthesis of knowledge, development of persistence, skills in formulating and solving problems, and skills of collaboration. Design projects offer opportunities to approximate professional practice, with its concerns for social implications; integrate and synthesize knowledge; and develop skills of persistence, creativity, and teamwork.” Our work is motivated by the study. Instead of treating the labs as the adjuncts that followthe learning of the theories and presenting them in a limited “component context,” we use
learning in another.”It is also suggested that labs can be an effective tool 2: “…[The labs] can be more effectively used in the curriculum to support integration and synthesis of knowledge, development of persistence, skills in formulating and solving problems, and skills of collaboration. Design projects offer opportunities to approximate professional practice, with its concerns for social implications; integrate and synthesize knowledge; and develop skills of persistence, creativity, and teamwork.”Our work is motivated by the observation and recommendation. Instead of treating the labs asthe adjuncts that follow the learning of the theories and presenting them in a limited “componentcontext,” we use them as a cohesive
Architecture and Design including: Register Transfer Level, Block Level and Component Level • Physical planning and design • Performance modeling and analysis • System Integration • System Verification and ValidationThe type of coursework is determined depending on whether the student is required to have aconceptual understanding and/or a practicing knowledge of the subject material. The optimalbalance across virtual and physical prototyping is determined by the desired competencies.Based on the goal of encouraging systematic engineering competencies, we analyzed the listabove and generated an importance scorecard that is summarized in the table below. Coursework Prototyping Model
students at Rochester Institute of Technology and broughtthem very well up to speed which resulted in successful research (publications in top-tierelectrical and computer engineering IEEE Transactions journals for the case study of side-channel analysis attacks and reliability).We have had the following goals in such integration: (a) Exposing the challenges of deeply-embedded system security education; (b) Hardware and software secure system co-design teaching and research integration (in previous work, theory and practice are combined for such purpose: A co-design course applying symmetric key ciphers has been presented6, a helicopter-like robot motion control has been implemented7, and co-design as an emerging discipline in
changes to the department curriculum and course structures,departmental interactions and community-building efforts, departmental mentoring efforts,student recruitment, department recruiting efforts, and departmental partnerships withcommunity colleges.Due to the overlapping nature of the individual program goals and the department’s efforts tocreate broad change, adhering to the Program Evaluation Standards of utility, feasibility,propriety, and accuracy (Yarbrough et al., 2011) necessitated taking a comprehensive evaluationapproach. This approach would enable an understanding of not just individual programs, but alsoallow us to gain an understanding of the ways in which the department was, and was not,changing as a whole.Researchers have noted
AC 2011-1540: INTEGRATING A NONTRADITIONAL HANDS-ON LEARN-ING COMPONENT INTO ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS COURSESFOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTSKathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech Kathleen Meehan is an Associate Professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at Virginia Tech. Prior to joining Virginia Tech, she worked at the University of Denver and West Virginia University as well as having worked 12 years in industry. Her research interests include optoelectronic materials and devices and high heat load packaging in addition to Electrical Engineering pedagogy.David Fritz, VA Tech
from data collected at the mastery levelwill generate sets of action items which feedback to the program for improvement. Even withdata collected only at the mastery level, for instance at a large university, the amount of datacollected will still be an issue for a timely evaluation. Figure 3 shows a commonly used processof how the GR assessment model is implemented [9, 15]. Figure 2: Sample curriculum outcomes-mapping matrix Figure 3: The GR assessment processSince there are vast amounts of data collected even for the mastery level courses, a sample ofdata, 10% for example, are actually being assessed by an independent multi-rater team. Theindependent raters are in general selected to be
Education in Software Defined Radio Design Engineering Abstract— Software Defined Radio (SDR), an interdisciplinary emerging technology,presents new challenges for communications engineers and engineering educators. In SDR,signal modulation and information coding are defined in the system's software, nothardware. The authors have incorporated SDR design into their respective curricula bothto support the growing demand for SDR engineering and to teach widely applicablesystems engineering concepts. SDR-oriented curricular changes include new courses,laboratories, and software design tools. Software radio design is taught as aninterdisciplinary systems engineering undertaking, emphasizing the importance of
to be prevalentfor the EE curriculum?Unfortunately, the reverse, the ME for EEs course in the EE curriculum, is not endemic andinfusing mechanics into such EE courses as electromechnical systems, control theory andelectrical power and energy conversion remains challenging. Although some EE programs haverecognized this curricular deficit and have engaged their ME department colleagues to provide aservice course, such a course has been only sporadically provided and often not required. Asurvey of peer institutions, using the predicate that the single ME for EEs course be acomprehensive upper division offering, has found that only 18 of 94 (19%) EE programs haveeither an elective (14) or requisite (4) course.Although the ME for EEs course is
Department of Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Fort WayneAbstract In this paper, the work-in-progress project which seeks the adaptation andimplementation of one undergraduate education’s most promising and readily adoptableinstructional technique in recent years - Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT), in an electrical andcomputer engineering course — Digital Systems Design is presented. JiTT involves web-basedwarm-up assignments which students are required to complete and submit before class. Students’responses to these assignments are then reviewed by the instructor who makes appropriateadjustments in the teaching based on student’s understanding and concerns. The warm-upassignments, combined with classroom teaching, will lead
ofaffairs further is the requirement for our undergraduates to still attain a level of proficiency incore electrical engineering concepts such as circuit analysis, signal processing, E&M fields, andembedded computing. Furthermore, it is important that the students understand the relationshipsbetween these topics and to view them as an entire spectrum, and not as individual courses to bedispensed with at the end of a semester.To address these concerns, we have undergone a major curriculum update in Electrical andComputer Engineering at the University of Virginia. We have moved all of our undergraduatecore material to a studio format of instruction and directed our efforts to breadth-first instruction.Traditional courses in "Circuits
Engineering (ECE), andMechanical Engineering (ME) take a 2-credit hour clinic during the fall and spring semesters.At this level, the emphasis is on learning the process of engineering through measurements onexemplar engineering systems, and reverse engineering of typical appliances or processes toillustrate key engineering concepts [2]. Students are managed as a class with the composition ofeach class a mixture of all four disciplines. During the sophomore year, students take 4-credithour clinics. In the fall, the general education Composition course is integrated with a designproject. This emphasizes the importance of technical writing as an integral part of theengineering process. In the spring, the general education Public Speaking course is
curriculum that can be used to practice deepconceptual learning and the higher stages of Bloom’s Taxonomy, therefore improving theirretention, application, and creative problem solving. A narrative arc is defined here as a student’sability to form a cohesive net of concepts, reasonings, and relationships that can be explainedwithout using formulae as a crutch. While being able to apply and understand mathematicalformulae is an invaluable tool for students, too often courses rely solely on the evaluation of themathematical formulae related to concepts instead of emphasizing the conceptual definitions andrelationships. This imbalance results in students being weak in the areas of explaining why andhow things happen using words and unable to formulate