involves an industry-sponsored event where the entire student cohort participates in a robot competition.For a number of years, anecdotal evidence has suggested that the course sequence has significantpositive impacts on student experience throughout the curriculum. It has been postulated thatthis experience results in significant knowledge gain, reinforces their decision to pursue a careerin electrical engineering, and builds camaraderie amongst the student cohort. A study wasconducted to better understand these potential impacts. Part 1 of the study analyzed grades in theproject course sequence and compared them to another course sequence that also occurs in thefirst and second year of the curriculum. Part 2 was a survey in which students and
components are used to augment the courses in order to enhance students’mastery of the subject matter and its applications. Usually, the capstone design course at thesenior level allows students to synthesize what they learned and exercise their creative ability.The main goal is to facilitate an environment for students to walk through the entire designprocess from the formulation of ideas, through implementation, test and validation. There aremany reasons that might contribute to the difficulty faced by the students in their ability tosynthesize and be creative. Two specific contributing reasons that we identified and attemptedto address are (1) insufficient critical thinking exercises and (2) lack of self-motivated activitiesunlike the cook-book
example, a set of three PIs are defined for each SO, theevaluation effort will be at least three times more time consuming.To further improve the assessment model used, the traditional rubric-based assessment model isaugmented by classifying courses in the curriculum to three levels: introductory, reinforced, andmastery. It is customary for the traditional rubric-based assessment model to include only thecourses in the mastery level for the program outcomes assessment. The drawbacks of lookingonly at courses at the mastery level are: (1) lack of information needed at the lower level toidentify the root cause of the deficiency when the symptom occurs at the higher level courses; (2)lack of the mechanism to compute a clear indicator such as the
recreate the WIMP51 processor, using the BDF platform, via anexperiential learning project. Note that the group did not have any prior knowledge onmicroprocessor design techniques. They also had not yet taken the Digital Systems Designcourse.Design Methodology The WIMP51 design was based on the available block diagram and instruction set7,shown below in Figures 1 and 2. Some additional state machine information, including the threemain states, in an instruction cycle, was also available7. In order to complete the design, in theallotted time, minor changes in the internal organization (missing ‘PSEN’ as seen in Figure 1)and the instruction set (Figure 3) had to be made. Each Upper-level block was broken down, intosub-systems, to determine
lab(s), depending on the complexity of the project.Course ProjectsThe biggest challenge faced when developing the course is mapping the course contents toteaching modules and finding adequate projects to deliver and assess the students’ knowledge ineach topic. This section describes the projects used in the class and the topics they covered. Page 26.91.4 I. Image EnhancementIn this project, students are given the grayscale image shown in Figure 1. Seeing that the imageis too dark for any effective vision processing, the students’ assignment is enhancing the image.During their search for a solution, students are exposed to the concept
-long senior design project. Theobjective of the design was to safely launch a small projectile at a muzzle velocity of 350 meters/secondfrom an approximately 1-meter long barrel using capacitor-based energy storage limited to a maximumof 450 VDC. The projectile needed to be fired into a catch to facilitate demonstrations inside a laboratoryenvironment. The project was also constrained by a $5,000 operating budget and access to parts availablein the laboratory. The three electrical engineering students and one systems engineering studentself-selected the project and decided how to divide tasks, structured and managed a schedule, plannedbudget use, and leveraged in-house machine shop capabilities. The paper describes how the cadetsdecomposed the
of online solution manuals, ever more intelligent search engines,and repositories containing solutions from previous course offerings, the utility of traditionalhomework as a form of summative or formative assessment is increasingly unclear 1 . Traditionalhomework models reward correct answers, incentivizing students to consult online sources foranswers; studies have shown that 90% of students consult (questionably obtained) online solutionmanuals when completing homework 2,3 . While there are means to counteract this somewhat (e.g.,creating new problems or variations each course offering), it would seem that with the rampantuse of solution manuals by students, traditional graded homework assignments are an unreliableindicator of student
follows: 1. Reduce or eliminate homework plagiarism: this is achievable since the final homework grades are not going to assess how well the student attempted the homework but will assess how well they graded it and reflected on their mistakes. This will totally flip the homework from being an assessment tool to an active learning tool. 2. Improve the effectiveness of the homework within the learning process: this is achievable since homework is honestly attempted. In addition, the process of grading the homework requires a good grasp of the solution, which is only possible through outside-the- classroom learning. 3. Develop the student self-reflection skill: this is achievable since students will learn how to
instructionalexpectations and students’ learning outcomes. 1, 2 To address this issue, engineering educatorsand educational researchers have been working together seeking innovative approaches thatengage students in meaningful learning. 3-10 “Flipping classrooms” is one of the emerginginstructional approaches that attempt to replace traditional lectures in an effort to engage studentsin active learning. Educational research shows that when students passively receive contentknowledge from instructors in large lecture halls, meaningful learning seldom happens. On thecontrary, rote learning is the result of such traditional teachings. Learning in classroomsdominated by instructors’ lectures often leads to knowledge retention in the short term, but failsto prepare
/ Page 26.1036.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Inverting Instruction in a Semiconductor Devices Course: A Case Study of a Flipped Electrical Engineering ClassroomAbstract: In this paper, we report our experiences in implementing a flipped classroom modelin a semiconductor devices course. The paper presents the course design, pedagogical methods,and results from the most recent offering of the course (Fall 2014). The course design andimplementation provide simple solutions to effectively transform and offer a flipped engineeringcourse. Furthermore, to emphasize the need for strategic approaches to implement aflipped/blended learning environment, we include (1) a teaching
questions at the beginning of the lecture sessions or lab recitation sessions for a given course. To allow student to get a chance to see a clear picture of essential concept and content relevant to the topic as questions through “thought bubbles” are posed at the start of each lecture/lab session and revisiting them at the end of each lecture/lab session. To help students to be motivated around key concepts and use that knowledge to connect the dots. To use thought bubbles to link other supplementary questions related to main question/concept. To enhance the teaching and learning process for better outcomes.To achieve these objectives, instructor follows an approach as shown in Figure 1 where theinstructor
. Various factors impact thischoice; Students’ career interests at the time of application, their perception of the discipline andresulting career opportunities, analytical complexity of the required core courses, and the impactof their contributions on society, among many others 1. ECE programs lose a good number ofstudents to other disciplines and programs due to its supposed ‘highly theoretical’ nature, and acommon misconception that ECE is exclusively about electricity and electric circuits. Manyundecided students are torn between their love for building gadgets, and their need to acquirehighly in-demand skills such as programming and creating applications. The same holds true forECE students in their sophomore or early junior years who may
demoed their products. Students were accountable not onlyfor their products as subsystems of Mariner, but also for the proper operation of Mariner as asystem of systems. The evaluation was made by both faculty advisors and mentors from SNCSand focused on the extent to which (1) design specifications have met, and (2) students havemastered relevant program outcomes. The result was a marketable experience that instilled instudents the sense of responsibility and self-confidence. The main contributions of this paper areinformed integration of engineering practice into curriculum, meaningful and practical designexperience, effective evaluation and assessment of students and their work.IntroductionSaudi, as in the case of any fast developing country
and Computer Engineering Education PracticesAbstractThis research paper describes results from an international survey of electrical and computer(ECE) educators and stakeholders about the current state and future directions of ECEeducation. Technological, economic, and social pressures are reshaping higher education, butthere is little consensus about the future. IEEE created a Curricula and Pedagogy Committee(CPC) and charged it with forecasting the future of ECE education and to makerecommendations regarding roles that IEEE will play in preparing for and crafting that future.To gather more information from members of the engineering education community, thecommittee conducted a global survey. Surveys were deployed in 2014 to those who (1
-Study report. The annual reports also provide evidence thatimprovements to our EE program were based on assessment andevaluation of SOs as well as other inputs.At the heart of our assessment program lies course-embeddedassessment. The choice of courses for course-embeddedassessment is guided by two principles: (1) each Student Outcomeis assessed with student work in a benchmark course, and (2) onlyrequired courses, not elective courses, in the curriculum areselected as benchmark courses.Assessment of a benchmark course is conducted with the followingin mind: (1) assessment of student work measures the extent towhich SOs are being attained, (2) it is not necessary to use all ofthe student work to assess an outcome, and (3) outcomesassessment is
, stimulate their curiosity, and engage them in hands-on activities that are notlimited to the laboratory 1. This paper proposes the integration of an activity-based learning approach in the EEcurriculum with the use of Analog Discovery Boards (ADB) by Digilent Inc. This enhancementallows students to build, analyze and visualize circuits using the USB-powered AnalogDiscovery platform, a personal computer, and a basic analog parts kit. This opens the door for avariety of learning activities that include in-class experimentation, take-home exercises, groupactivity sessions, and design-and-learn projects among many others. Our work aims to create anenvironment for a student that is conducive to innovation and creative thinking; while providingan
basic to more advanced circuit concepts. This lack of formal prior knowledge hasthe potential to prevent students from being able to assimilate new material they come in contactwith when instructed about electric circuit concepts. Other impeding factors reported have beenthe influence of students’ prior misconceptions, the abstract nature of the content, inadequateinstructional strategies to provoke conceptual conflict and inadequate preparation of studentsfrom pre-requisite courses. However, a gap that still exists is the direct interaction between: (1)students’ prior knowledge, (2) the types of learning activities and (3) the design of the learningenvironment fueled by the decisions made by professors on how to teach circuit concepts.This
additional experiments for conducting and analyzing the RL and theRLC circuits and all three revised experiments are now a permanent part of the Circuits ILaboratory. (Appendix A: Figure 1).Another example of the introduction of the ADB included the support for Ohms’ law moduleswhich were developed as an introductory lesson for students. Because most students understandohm’s law, these modules allowed students to focus on understanding how to use the ADB.Students are able to quickly build the circuit as they were forced to familiarize themselves withboard connections and computer interface. Once the students are comfortable with the boards, theyare able to move on to modules that reinforce the concepts covered in class. By the third module,students
, power systems, communications, computer hardware and software,signal and image processing, control systems, optics and lasers, and electromagnetics, amongothers — some are more commonly chosen by students than others.1 Electromagnetics is often perceived by students as being too highly mathematical,conceptual, and theoretical in nature.2 With a reputation of being difficult and demanding,electromagnetics has become one of the least popular undergraduate specializations withinelectrical engineering programs.3 Introductory classes in electromagnetics focus on the study ofMaxwell’s equations, the fundamental equations governing electromagnetism.1 The broader fieldof electromagnetics also encompasses antenna theory, radar systems, and the
parameters. Excluding the limit of movement of each joint, therelationship between the joint angles and the position and orientation of the end-effector isdictated only by the D-H parameters and any two arms with the same parameters will have thesame relationship. That is why those and the joint limits are the only parameters the tool needs tospecify the arm. This results in the user being able to simulate any arm in the text book andfurthermore being able to enter the arm in just a few minutes. In Figure 1 the specifications forthe three DOF arm with two revolute joints and one prismatic joint (R2P) is shown entered intothe arm creation pane. The rendered arm in shown in Figure 2a.Figure 1: The control panel to create the robotic arm.IV
of asynchronous pipelineddigital circuit structures that are called self-timed [1]. The dynamic energy dissipation isreduced in this realization, relative to synchronous implementations, because circuit timing andcontrol is event driven and all clocks are generated locally. The performance of these circuitscan exceed synchronous realization because it is based on the average intrinsic timing of thecircuit instead of its worst case timing that is used to set the clock frequency in synchronoussystems. The circuit design process used to determine the device sizing in self-timed circuits istypically the same as that used for synchronous realizations [2, 3, 4]. The input distribution isnot considered in this process. A novel self-timed circuit
complexproblems normally onerous to the apprentice electrical engineer. More advanced concepts suchas switched capacitors circuits and broadband amplifiers are also covered. Finally, the entirety ofthis material is compiled for dissemination on a web page for the community at large.1. IntroductionWhen one compares today’s students to those of earlier generations, the differences are striking.Yet the way most faculties teach electric circuits is essentially unchanged since the middle of thelast century [1]. Electric circuits courses are mostly taught through “analysis”. Too often, thefocus lies on writing and solving sets of simultaneous equations based on Kirchhoff’s voltageand current laws (KVL and KCL). In practice, this leads to a circuit methodology
a Fellow of the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and a licensed professional engineer in Texas and Alabama. Carroll has co-authored two textbooks, a tutorial book, and numerous papers and technical reports. He has received an American Society for Engineering Education Outstanding Young Faculty Award, two National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technology Innovation Awards, and three IEEE Computer Society Service Awards. He is an IEEE Computer Society Golden Core Member and a recipient of the IEEE Third Millennium Medal. Carroll served as Dean of the College of Engineering at UTA from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2011. During his service as dean, the College of
has GNSS revolutionized modern technology, it has begun to be used effectively for abroad range of educational purposes. Kindergarten through 12th grade (K12) educationalprograms based on GNSS have been developed to teach fundamental science and engineeringconcepts, the principles of engineering design, and the impact of modern technology on society[1]. The teaching of geography is particularly enhanced by consideration of GNSS andconsiderable efforts are being made to incorporate Geographic Information System (GIS) andGNSS concepts into K12 educational technology [2]. Also for K12, there are approaches intechnology education assessment theory that use the so-called GPS-analogy to ‘locate’ studentsand move them forward on their learning
, Manufacturing Engi-neering or Mechatronics Engineering program, students most likely only take one Microcontrol-lers (or Microprocessors) course. Then, teaching non-ECE students from the architecture of amicrocontroller to broad applications in both low-level and high-level programming languagescan be very challenging. In this paper, we present a unique approach that has been applied in theMicrocontrollers course in the past few years. We have limited the content for the exercises in alow-level language, i.e. assembly language, in (1) understanding how the machine code works,(2) comprehending the flow of control for a high-level language in a real-time system, e.g. thetime delay is generated by multiple loops, the assembly language is used to
studentorganizations. I. BackgroundIn 2008 a corrective action plan was implemented at the University of Oklahoma (OU) to reversedrastic declines in ECE undergraduate enrollment.1, 2 The ECE enrollment numbers in fall 2008were 246, but by fall 2014 they soared to 440. The research that went into the plan revealed thata freshman engineering course is a critical place to start. The American College TestingProgram performed a detailed study comparing different retention practices at 228 differentaccredited 4-year public colleges. The retention practice reported to have the highest impact wasa “for credit” freshman seminar/university course with 46 out of the 228 colleges listing it as oneof the three practices that has had the greatest impact on student
participatinginstitutions (including a Historically Black College), the developed SDR based signal detectionand RF parameter estimation platform will be integrated in undergraduate curricula of all threeinstitutions. 1. IntroductionWe are living in a world of wireless communication and networking. More than 90% of the USpopulation use wireless services such as cell phones and WiFi every day [1][2]. Consequently,communication and networking has increasingly become an important part of modern electricalengineering and computer science/engineering curricula [3]. In our previous National ScienceFoundation (NSF) funded Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) project“Evolvable wireless laboratory design and implementation for enhancing undergraduate
study, the workshop content was designed to assist participants in accomplishing theABET student Outcome E of the DCS course17,18 which is expressed as: Implement a digitalcontroller using a digital computer and software. According to the OBE framework13, thecontent of each workshop was designed in four stages: (1) Desired Outcomes, (2) CurricularPriorities, and (3) Learning Objectives. The first two stages, provided a baseline to determine theexpected student outcomes and define student’s Learning Objectives that must be accomplished.Desired Outcomes: Outcomes were established Following Streveler’s OBE methodology13. Theinstructor identified the main requirements for the workshops according to the laboratoryexperiments characteristics and the
been accumulated. RF energy receivers are currently available in the market. An example is thePowercast Power harvester [1], that delivers renewable energy by converting radio wavesto DC power. This RF power harvester could be added to a circuit with a 50Ω antenna inorder to power a low power circuit. The device will always need to have a source for RFenergy to harvest from which could be a Wi-Fi router, a cellphone tower placed in theproximity of the RF energy harvester, or simply a place with high RF traffic. The main idea of this project is to create an environmental wireless sensor network(WSN), which is powered by an RF energy receiver. While the use of renewable energy,such as solar power, for powering wireless sensor
complex touch sensing devices (i.e., touch keys, touch slider andtouchscreen). The Atmel SAM 4S-EK2 board is chosen as the main development boardemployed for practicing the touch devices programming. Multiple capstone projects have beendeveloped, for example adaptive touch-based servo motor control, and calculator and games onthe touchscreen. Our primary experiences indicate that the project-based learning approach withthe utilization of the selected microcontroller board and software package is efficient andpractical for teaching advanced touch sensing techniques. Students have shown the great interestand the capability in adopting touch devices into their senior design projects to improve humanmachine interface.1. IntroductionModern touch