methods that they found usefulas well as changes they would like to see to benefit those taking this course with the project intothe future. Using this feedback and project results, the ECEG 210 course will continue to evolveand improve. This paper is structured as follows: Section I outlines the organization of theproject and the details of the scaffolding provided for each project-lab milestone. Section IIaddresses the benefits of the project experience to ABET student outcomes. Section III highlightsand summarizes some of the final projects produced by the ECE teams. Section IV summarizesthe project evaluation, student feedback, and plans for possible future course iterations.I. Project Organization Prior to embarking on the final PV
in the list correspond to hierarchically lower categories and provide a foundation to build upon to reach and achieve higher categories. In addition, the taxonomy has a dimension exploring four types of knowledge: factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive. This taxonomy can greatly aid educators in clearly defining course goals to achieve desired learning outcomes, and it also helps align the expectations of students and educators for the learning experience in a course. Thus, Bloom’s taxonomy can also inform the assessment techniques that educators might use to evaluate whether students have truly grasped the planned learning goals. In fact, Bloom’s taxonomy has been applied in an ECE education context. Meda and
0.8692 -1.284 0.2106 Significance codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Multiple R-squared: 0.7079, Adjusted R-squared: 0.6855 F-statistic: 31.51 on 2 and 26 DF, p-value: 1.126e-07Results for Exam 2 are shown in Table 2 and Figure 4 and indicate that CATE usage was notsignificant. As seen in Table 2, the coefficient for CATE is negative. This would be a terribleresult, but for the lack of significance for the variable! After experimentation and reflection, aworking hypothesis has emerged; CATE coverage of the topics associated with Exam 2 needsimprovement! Exam 2 covers AC analysis and transients. Plans are to expand practice withcomplex arithmetic and solving differential
hardware systems, ECE education issignificantly inaccessible to learners who are blind or have low vision (BLV). Thus, it isimperative that we assess and evaluate any accounts of blind ECE learners to critically redesignECE pedagogy to meet their preferences and needs and prioritize their inclusion. TheChallenging and Rewarding Experiences (CARE) methodology is a recent framework thatpromotes an in-depth assessment of student-centric perspectives on ECE course offerings, withthe intention of informing instructors of necessary change to be introduced to the courseofferings to improve students’ experiences and align their expectations with the planned courseobjectives. In this paper, we apply the CARE methodology to conduct a comprehensive
will graduate in 2024, said “this experience helped hersolidify her post-graduation plans” [5].Participating faculty appreciated both the immediate impact on their programs and futureprospects. “‘With this program, we are serious about building long-lasting multifacetedrelationships that give electrical engineering faculty at minority-serving institutions bothrecognition and support for their critical efforts to inspire, train and educate – year after year –diverse cohorts of electrical engineering undergraduates who are prepared to go on to electricalengineering graduate programs, if they choose,’ said Truong Nguyen, the electrical and computerengineering professor at the UCSD Jacobs School of Engineering who runs the program” [5
class sizes.This paper reported students’ level of observed earnestness, and analyses of earnestnesscorrelation with various factors. Further investigation is planned into causality of thesecorrelations, and into additional factors that may correlate with earnestness, including: studentstruggle (as measured by time spent and number of attempts required for correct completion) onassessment questions for which students do not have access to the correct answer; variations inlevel of difficulty of questions within a set (for the evaluation in this paper, the level of difficultyfor a question set was defined based on the hardest question in the set); the length of timerequired to perform the participation activities; the percentage of exercises
students' perceptions of their experiences with customPCBAs, rather than directly measuring their learning outcomes. We acknowledge this as alimitation. However, we believe that custom PCBAs indirectly enhance student learning. Byeliminating the time-consuming breadboarding process, students can spend more time engagingwith the material and applying what they've learned. This efficient use of class time allows for adeeper exploration of topics and more in-class activities. Additionally, by reducing the need fortroubleshooting common issues associated with breadboarding, students can concentrate more onthe core learning objectives. In future studies, we plan to directly measure the impact of customPCBAs on student learning to provide a more
students understandthe topic and how these courses influenced them to taking another course in the same field orto conduct research in this field. Notably, it has shown that junior project course sparksenthusiasm regarding this field in most students for them to voluntarily advance to conductadvanced research in following semesters or plan their career path in this field. This verifiesthe importance of and the effectiveness of hands-on experiments for nurturing potentialworkforce for VLSI fields. The recent development of technology shows enlarged scale ofcircuits and systems. In turn, both industry and academia are relying on design tools for designand for predicting behaviors of the systems. Whether for academia or industry, however, hands-on
astonishment that they could get such great agreement betweenthe physical thing they built and measured, and the ideal circuit they simulated. Thisdemonstrated how powerful simple models and analysis were to describe real world circuits.Creating the labsThe take-home hands-on labs were designed during the summer before the class began. Thisinvolved planning the labs to be consistent with the curriculum, creating the BOM, acquiring theinventory for up to 138 kits, assembling the kits, distributing the kits, writing the lab manual, andrecording the videos.We decided to record videos for the first five labs and hold off on the last five labs to getfeedback from students. Even so, getting ready for the first day involved about 200 hours ofpreparation time
upon each other leading up to the desired outcome. Once those major points areorganized the student is asked to provide the 1-3 supporting elements for each major pointpaying special attention to the values of the audience and/or decision-maker. This outlinestructure is an invaluable tool for all written communications. One note is that the student alwaysmust be cognizant of the time that is available which determines how many points canrealistically be discussed. A 30-minute PowerPoint presentation has much more flexibility than a5-minute verbal update.Presentation & written composition planning: Throughout the class, students are encouraged tothink about how to create a compelling storyline to convey a technical topic. The basic
program began.This overall increase (from 50% to 72%) in the comparison group is likely due to programmaticchanges that are synergistic with this program’s goals, including redesigning the first- andsecond-year seminars and adding mid-semester intervention for first- and second-year students.The retention rates in Figure 1 also project preliminary graduation results. Although both cohortsare not yet expected to have graduated, the majority of students (12 out of 18) are on track to doso within the next year or shortly thereafter, which conforms to a 4- to 5-year time to graduation.In fact, three students have graduated early (within 3.5 years), which already gives a resultinggraduation rate of 33% for the first cohort. A fourth student also plans
, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 6. An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions. 7. An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.Table 1 illustrates the relationship between the program’s educational objectives and studentoutcomes. As presented next, each student outcome is mapped to multiple education objectives. Table 1. Relation between PEOs and SOs. PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4 SO 1 x x SO 2 x x
course instructors surmised that perhaps the collaborative nature of thegroupwork helped students tackle more advanced concepts better than in the traditional labsetting. As can be seen from the study findings, students also see the benefit of working togetherand the open-ended laboratory setting can enable them to get into the pluralistic mindset in theirproblem-solving approaches. The caveat is that careful instructional planning for the lab works iscrucial for the successful implementation of the open-ended laboratory including frequentmonitoring of the student group works by course instructors and early interventions of lab groupsif things do not work well as planned. Student perceptions regarding the laboratory settings, however, were
principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. This is demonstrated both inhomework assignments and in the laboratory. On homework assignments, students must use theirnew knowledge to identify the method to solve the question at hand. In the laboratory, studentsmust understand the necessary approach to build the system described.Outcome 5 is an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives. While the teams are not large, students do work in pairs on each laboratoryassignment. This creates an opportunity for group dynamics to evolve, with some students takinga natural lead and each group member collaborating in
. Objective and MotivationIn 2018, the National Science and Technology Council Committee on STEM Education releasedAmerica’s strategic plan to lay out a vision for future STEM education with three goals: buildingstrong foundations for STEM literacy, increasing DEI in STEM, and preparing the STEMworkforce for the future [1]. Specifically, the second goal, increasing DEI in STEM, is key toachieving the other two goals. Following the guidance of this strategic plan, colleges, anduniversities have implemented various practices, including recruiting a more diverse faculty andstudent body for better diversity and inclusion on campus, improving outreach and recruitment toa diverse array of students, providing support services for students, and creating an
found to decrease sharply as questiondifficulty level increased. Which begs the question, with awareness of the researchdemonstrating retrieval through answering questions to result in greater retention compared toreading, how can content developers influence greater student earnestness when practicing moredifficult questions?Students’ institution was the factor with the second highest correlation observed to studentearnestness. Institutions' Carnegie classification seems to be related to this, as institutions with anOther classification (not R1 or R2) have a statistically significant higher mean earnestness thanthe R1 and R2 institutions. Further investigation is planned into what other characteristics maycontribute to the causation of
some cases, a single essay is all the evidence an institution canaccess to plan DEI interventions and improve academic programming. Our recommendation foraddressing the STEM pipeline leak is to create a system to track students that fall out of formalSTEM pipelines. The system can assist the student to return to the pipeline if the student desires.The system will support the student to secure employment in the engineering discipline.References[1] L. L. Crumpton-Young, S. Etemadi, G. E. Little, and T. D. Carter, “Supportive practices used with underrepre- sented minority graduate students,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.25979. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org
by saying something like, “Whoa! That’s a tough question!” or“Hey, I’m supposed to know this,” or whatever suits the type of relationship you have with your students.Wild Card SticksIf the Wild Card is drawn, then the last student who was called upon gets to choose any student (i.e., not the instructor) inthe class to field the question. The last student called upon can answer the question if they wish but students usuallychoose someone else.AbsencesIf a student’s stick is drawn but they are absent, his or her stick goes into the Absent container. The exception is for a pre -planned or approved absence in which case the stick goes back into the Pool. When the activity commences during thenext class period, the first draws are from the Absent
- Adj Server - Noun Autonomous - Adj Optical - Adj Concrete - Noun Intelligence - Noun Analog - Noun Biomechanics - Noun Pollution - Noun Window - Noun Order - Noun5. LimitationsWhile in this work we only used four different departments, we plan to expand our analysis toother departments from other colleges, where we might find even more prominent differences instudent enrollment based on gender. The outcomes of this study will inform and guide futureresearch that is needed within departments.Our filtering might have disproportionally affected the courses remaining in the BMEdepartments, which in general have fewer enrolled students. There are less courses in thatdepartment that
and the course sequence. Typical andcommon constraints also exist in both universities which can be applicable to other universities.The authors interviewed and listened to other faculty to reconfirm that time is one of the mostimportant constraints in their teaching. In this interview, instructors not only in Electromagneticsbut also in other courses usually experience a lack of time to cover all the planned topics.Specially, the U.S. Air Force has a specialized curriculum to achieve both academic and militarystandards in its education, and the total in-class and out-of-class time seems limited compared toother universities. Therefore, careful and effective class design is highly important to considerthis time constraint. For both
a way that meets performancerequirements. In these capstones, the second year and beyond were asked to include last year'sdesign in their literature search.Each team has weekly meetings with their capstone advisor, a faculty member. When capstoneprojects are sponsored by industry, student teams typically meet with their project sponsormonthly or even sometimes quarterly. In the case of these environmental sensor projects, theproject sponsor was another faculty member, and so sponsor meetings were also nominallyweekly and combined with the advisor meeting. The advisor provides general guidance aboutdesign, schedule, backup plans, team cohesion, task assignment fairness, and so on, and theindustry sponsor provides goal clarification, approves
objectives.This orientation highlights how each individual has varying levels of abilities to manageactions required for goal attainment. Action-oriented individuals are more adept at deployingcognitive control processes to sustain the effort needed for goal progression. For instance, anaction-oriented individual can properly establish academic objectives, plan methods forachieving these goals, and implement these methods effectively to achieve said objectives.Conversely, state-oriented individuals may identify similar academic objectives and formulatesimilar plans but face challenges in sustaining the necessary cognitive control to turn theseplans into completed achievements. There are three common ways in which the cognitivecontrol of state-oriented
, including improvements in public health, environmental quality, and resource sustainability, even if they involve higher upfront costs or regulatory hurdles. Medical Device Design: Engineers involved in designing medical devices, such as pacemakers or prosthetic limbs, must weigh considerations of safety, effectiveness, and accessibility for patients. Utilitarianism would prioritize devices that provide the most significant improvements in quality of life and healthcare outcomes for the greatest number of people, even if they require additional research and development costs or regulatory approvals. Transportation Infrastructure: Planning and designing transportation systems, including roads
did not find value in the extent of review. The challengeof balancing the learning needs of two different cohorts is a common theme arising ininterdisciplinary engineering education [2]. Two major adjustments are planned for the secondoffering to address this imbalance. The first adjustment is to include a more extensive review oftopics from computing, particularly the use of computational models. The second adjustment isto shift much of the prerequisite review to offline learning modules that students can completeindependently. This will allow students to work through prerequisite material at their own pace,possibly spending less time on topics with which they are already familiar. This format willmaintain sufficient lecture time to cover
towards students not in the specialization. It seems manystudents were keen for hands-on engineering design experience and often concurrently enrolledin other clinic subjects.Assessment for the subject is in line with the PBL pedagogy employed with most majorassessment closely tied to the design project. The first major project milestone is submission of aproject plan that breaks down anticipated tasks, determines a provisional timeline for workcompletion, and outlines team protocols and procedures. A mid-project design review isconducted as an oral presentation and enables instructors to give important formative feedbackon a team’s technical approach and engineering analysis. The main assessment instrument for theproject is a written report
been buildingrelationships with advising staff and curriculum committees across the university, ensuring thiscourse would meet engineering/science elective requirements for various undergraduateprograms.To understand how students are impacted by the final design project, we defined and measured anumber of constructs, including self-efficacy, maker identity, and engineering identity. Self-efficacy refers to the strength of an individual’s belief in their capabilities to complete tasks andachieve a planned outcome (Bandura, 1997). We quantified students’ self-efficacy in two areas: 1) self-efficacy for tinkering with circuits (Tinkering SE), and 2) self-efficacy for designing new electronic systems (Design SE).Higher self-efficacy
and solutions and analyze 2.81 88 0.00* options using an “if-then” Academia 4.47 0.69 rationale. perspective Industry Students plan steps, 3.84 1.41 perspective procedures, or approaches for 3.31 88 0.00* addressing tasks. Academia 4.60 0.58 perspective3 We have used the following scale: 1. Not Important 2. Somewhat Important 3. Important
complex.Our survey also aimed to understand how participants played the simulator and rated the majorcomponents of the simulator, namely the visuals, controls, and instructions. 80% of the learnersutilized the simulator alternating between sitting and standing positions, while the remaining 20%preferred a standing position. This observation is important to consider when planning for utilizingthe simulator in the classroom with a larger number of students. More space is needed to play in astanding position and the environment needs to be free of furniture to not cause any accidentswhile the learners are immersed in the simulator. The learners rated all the simulator features assatisfactory or better which contribute to the immersiveness of the
%, Pell enrollment ~50% of the total enrollment. Based on a total enrollment of about 1500 students per class. * African American average GPA gap is significantly higher than URM, typically 0.3-0.85, and enrollment is about 5% of the total. A 0.4 gap in GPA separates ‘B+’ and ‘A-’ grades, for example. Data provided by the California State University Student Success Dashboard [30]To overcome the GPA gap and the DFW disparities, we plan to redesign six critical-path, largeenrollment courses ENGR1 Introduction to Engineering, ENGR17 Introductory Circuit Analysis,EEE117 Network Analysis, EEE108 Electronics I, EEE161 Applied Electromagnetics, andEEE180 Signals & Systems, based on active
. The state funding agency asked student participantsto discuss their research experiences in video submissions. Students received a regular stipend in-line with their academic classification. The students all had a positive experience with the project. Figure 5: Preliminary prototype Key Performance Indicator Dashboard.They appreciated the benefit of mentorship from an industry professional. However, logisticalmatters such as student summer housing and transportation to the manufacturing site required ad-ditional personnel and effort. Student participants expressed frustration regarding these logisticalissues.Project managementContingency plans are key to a successful industry-academia partnership. The logistics of