Power-On Indicator LEDs3. Function generator We used Analog Discovery 2 (AD2) [9] units as our function generator to supply power to our boards. The “Supplies Mode” is set to the positive supply voltage of 5V and then AD2’s Positive Supply Channel jumpers are connected to the bus strip of the test-board. The AD2 units were readily available to students in our program, as these units were ordered and used in the pre-requisite course Electric Circuits Lab. These units are loaned to students and are returned to school upon completion of the course. In the absence of AD2 units, and in cases where the cost is prohibitive, interested individuals can use 9V batteries together with an inexpensive voltage regulator to create a 5V
: https://tll.mit.edu/sense-of-belonging-matters/.[28] M. Gopalan and S. T. Brady, “College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A National Perspective,” Educational Researcher, vol.49, no. 2, pp. 134–137, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19897622.[29] M. C. Murphy, M. Gopalan, E. R. Carter, K. T. U. Emerson, B. L. Bottoms, G. M. Walton, “A customized belonging intervention improves retention of socially disadvantaged students at a broad-access university,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 29, July 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba4677.[30] M. Gopalan and S. T. Brady, “College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A National Perspective,” Educational Researcher, vol
, Canada, 26-29 June 2011.4. W.T. Riddell, E. Constans, J. Courtney, K. Dahm, R. Harvey, P.M. Jansson, M. Simone, P. von Lockette, B. Wolff, “LessonsLearned from Teaching Project Based Learning Communication and Design Courses,” 2007 ASEE Middle Atlantic SectionFall 2007 Conference, Philadelphia, PA, November 3, 2007.5. P.M. Jansson and R. Elwell, “Design of Photovoltaic Systems for Municipal and School Buildings in Ocean City, NewJersey,” ASEE 2007 Annual Conference Proceedings, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007.6. S. Hazel and P.M. Jansson, "Photovoltaic System Feasibility Assessments: Engineering Clinics Transforming RenewableMarkets," ASEE 2006 Annual Conference Proceedings, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006.7. P.M. Jansson, S. A. Mandayam and J.L
productive route for instructors to explore in their efforts to improvetheir teaching.References [1] Jonathan Wai, David Lubinski, and Camilla P. Benbow. Spatial ability for stem domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4):817–835, 2009. [2] Yukiko Maeda and So Yoon Yoon. A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (psvt: R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1):69–94, 2013. [3] S. Brownlow, T.K. McPheron, and C.N. Acks. Science background and spatial abilities in men and women. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12:371–380
. Additionally, studentsare presented with a wealth of opportunities in the form of the range of roles an individual cantake and the variation in compensation levels. Students are also exposed to a barrage ofinformation about ideal timings for an engineer to switch jobs to remain productive, relevant, andcompensated fairly. Thus, by developing self-directed and accessible career reflection skills andtools, we hope to enable our students to not only apply their technical skills and competenciesbut also to demonstrate agility and embrace change to pursue the career(s) they desire.References1. B. K. Jesiek and L.H. Jamieson, “The Expansive (dis) Integration of Electrical Engineering Education,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 4561-4573, 2017.2. E. Lindsay, R
; Exposition, 2013, pp. 23–171. [4] Steven Bell and Mark Horowitz, “Rethinking non-major circuits pedagogy for improved motivation,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [5] Pengyue Guo, Nadira Saab, Lysanne S Post, and Wilfried Admiraal, “A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures,” International journal of educational research, vol. 102, pp. 101586, 2020. [6] Zhiqiang Liu and Dieter J Schonwetter, “Teaching creativity in engineering,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 801–808, 2004. [7] “Atsam4s8b,” https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/atsam4s8b, Accessed: 2025-01-13. [8] “Omnivision takes lead in mobile cameras with new 2-megapixel
Challenges for Engineering: Imperatives, Prospects, and Priorities: Summary of a Forum," National Academy of Engineering, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2016.[3] "TUEE Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Phase IV: Views of Faculty and Professional Societies," ASEE, Arlington, VA, 2017.[4] D. Grasso and M. B. Burkins, "Beyond Technology: The Holistic Advantage," in Holistic Engineering Education, New York, NY, Springer, 2010, pp. 1-10.[5] S. Abraham, M. Vurkaç, A. Miguel, D. M. Takach, E. Ferré, S. Singh and H. Louie, "Work in Progress: Reimagining the ECE Curriculum: Bridging Technical," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, 2024.[6] "Oh My Git!," [Online]. Available: Available: https
inducing stress.In ECE 330 and ECE 333, students were exposed to both Mentimeter and Kahoot!. 69.2% and62.7% of students in these courses found Kahoot!’s competitive aspects were beneficial forlearning (Q13). In addition, most the students reported low or no stress in Q14 (57.7% and75.0%, respectively). The combination of competitive and interactive elements from both toolsmay have mitigated stress while supporting effective learning engagement.The Pearson correlation analysis between Q13 and Q14 revealed a weak positive correlation(r = 0.046, p = 0.657). This indicated that the perceived benefits of competition and reportedstress levels were not strongly related. While students may recognize the learning advantages ofcompetition, these benefits
• Should you use =, is, or == to calculate the answer? • This predicate is only meant to be used in situations where you know the first two pa- rameters. Do not call it with variables as either of the first two parameters in the call. • You will likely need to write more than one rule named add. • You may need to test the type of one of the parameters to know whether to use a rule with + or a rule with string concat. • Do not worry about calls to add like add(3, 3.14) or add(3, “hi”) for this assignment. Autograder test cases test case fail response(s) add(3, 4, 7) Doh! Your results were: results. add(3.2, 4.6, 7.8) Doh! Your results were: results
, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Russia, and later at the Department of Semiconductor Physics, University of Ulm, Germany. Currently, he is Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Virginia Commonwealth Univer- sity. His research interests encompass growth, characterization and device applications of semiconductor, nanophotonic, and plasmonic materials. He is a member of the American Physical Society, the Materials Research Society, and IEEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 New Course Development for Internet of ThingsAbstractIoT is a fast growing technology sector that is estimated to be valued at 100’s of billions
://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-make-a-vehicle-autonomous-16edf164c30f[2] P. Narkhede, S. Poddar, R. Walambe, G. Ghinea, and K. Kotecha, “Cascaded Complementary Filter Architecture for Sensor Fusion in Attitude Estimation,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 1937, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21061937.[3] M. Nazarahari and H. Rouhani, “Full-State Robust Extended Kalman Filter for Orientation Tracking During Long-Duration Dynamic Tasks Using Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Units,” Jun. 28, 2021.[4] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352811149_A_Full- State_Robust_Extended_Kalman_Filter_for_Orientation_Tracking_During_Long- Duration_Dynamic_Tasks_Using_Magnetic_and_Inertial_Measurement_Units[5] “Adaptive Cruise Control with Sensor Fusion.” MATLAB
online studentsand connect them with campus services available online. For long-term planning, course redesignor a new online course offering would be necessary if online learning will continue to play asignificant part in undergraduate education.References[1] P. Panindre and R. S. Thorsen, “Assessment of learning effectiveness in online and face-to-face learning environment for engineering education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[2] M. Ssemakula, “Learning effectiveness in online vs. traditional courses,” in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005, pp. 10–877.[3] M. Kozak, “In person versus synchronous remote delivery of mechanics lectures,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010, pp. 15–707.[4] J
. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, Volume 11, No. 2, June 2007.[7] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education – anOverview of Implementation and Feasibility,” 14th International Multi-Conference forEngineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
also working to integrate specificfeatures such as titles, summaries, and keywords. These fields will hopefully allow us to developsoftware to automatically build a SCHOLAR tutorial index with the option of exporting theentire repository as a website.The SCHOLAR lessons and examples will continue to be refined and shared as a git repositoryfor any interested instructors. As the SCHOLAR type of lessons are adopted, it will be possibleto share the resources across institutions building a robust framework and resource for learning.References[1] “Git.” Accessed: Aug. 22, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://git-scm.com/[2] S. Downes, “Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources,” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects
members from the ECE department. This expansion aims to increase the number ofparticipants as well as to understand faculty’s perspectives, ultimately contributing to thedevelopment of comprehensive guidelines for mentoring meetings. These guidelines will beparticularly beneficial for new faculty members who are leading these sessions for the first time,enhancing the overall effectiveness of the mentoring process.References[1] M. S. Jaradat and M. B. Mustafa, “Academic advising and maintaining major: Is there a relation?” Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 151, 2017.[2] A. M. Lucietto, E. Dell, E. M. Cooney, L. A. Russell, and E. Schott, “Engineering technology undergraduate students: A survey of demographics and mentoring,” 2019.[3] J. K
[1] P. C. Brown, H. L. Roediger III and M. A. McDaniel, Make It Stick, The Science of Successful Learning, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.[2] B. Oakley, B. Rogowsky, and T. J. Sejnowski, Uncommon Sense Teaching: Practical Insights in Brain Science to Help Students Learn, United Kingdom: Penguin Publishing Group, 2021.[3] I. H. L. Roediger and J. D. Karpicke, "The Power of Testing Memory," Perspectives on Psychological Science, pp. 181-201, Sep 2006.[4] Y. Weinstein, C. R. Madan and M. A. Sumeracki, "Teaching the Science of Learning," 24 January 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y.[5] B. Hurst, R. R. Wallace and S. B. Nixon, "The
Physical System Model for IEEE 14-busPower System Security," 2018 13th International Conference on Malicious and UnwantedSoftware (MALWARE), Nantucket, MA, USA, 2018, pp. 95-102, doi:10.1109/MALWARE.2018.8659367.[3] Cisco, “How do OT and IT Differ?”, [Online]. Available:https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/internet-of-things/what-is-ot-vs-it.html[4] A. Ribeiro, “OT security skills gap is a major challenge for industrial, manufacturingorganizations”, Industrial Cyber. [Online]. Available: https://industrialcyber.co/news/ot-security-skills-gap-is-a-major-challenge-for-industrial-manufacturing-organizations/[5] S. Steiner, A. Jillepalli, and D. C. De Leon. “A survey of cloud
National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 12: 6476–83.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117.5. D. Fisher, N. Frey, 2013, “Gradual Release of Responsibility Instructional Framework” (pp. 1–8).https://doi.org/10.1598/essentials.8037.6. Deslauriers, Louis, Logan S. McCarty, Kelly Miller, Kristina Callaghan, and Greg Kestin, 2019. “Measuring Actual Learningversus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom.” Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences 116, no. 39: 19251–57. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.7. Oakley, Barbara A., Darrin M. Hanna, Zenon Kuzmyn, and Richard M. Felder, 2007. “Best Practices Involving Teamwork inthe Classroom: Results From a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents.” IEEE
- 25.5. Sarik, J. & Kymissis, I. 2010. Lab kits using the Arduino prototyping platform. Paper presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Arlington, VA, October 27-30.6. Kramer, K. & M. Anderson. 2011. A PIC18 robot-centered microcontroller systems laboratory. Paper presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD, October 12 - 15.7. Hass, K., and J. Su. 2012. Modernizing the Microcontroller Laboratory with Low-Cost and Open-Source Tools. In Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June 10 -13.8. Hsiung, S., F. Jiao, L. Xu, and M. Issapour. 2018. “Collaborated Efforts in TI ARM M4/32Bits Microcontroller Curricula Developments and Assessments.” In
. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.995865. [2] M. Saigot, “Unveiling Technorelief: Enhancing Neurodiverse Collaboration with Media Capabilities,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00949, 2023. [3] A. S. George, “Preparing students for an AI-driven world: Rethinking curriculum and pedagogy in the age of artificial intelligence,” Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 112–136, 2023. [4] A. Evmenova, “Preparing teachers to use universal design for learning to support diverse learners,” Journal of Online Learning Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 147–171, 2018. [5] M. L. Payano, “Teachers Perceptions on Technology as a Tool to Support Neurodiverse Students,” Ph.D. thesis, Fordham University, 2024
American Society for Engineering Education conference and exposition, 2015.[4] Evans, A., Davies, T., Wilks, S. “Is your laboratory a turn-off?”, International Journal of Electrical EngineeringEducation, Vol. 39 Issue 3, July 2002, pp. 284-291.[5] Jenkins, B., Field, C.T. “Practical circuit design in an elementary circuit theory lab”, Proceedings of the 2000ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, Missouri, June 2000.[6] LeBlanc, H., Al-Olimat, K., Hassan, F., Alsbou, N.,” Combining Technical and Entrepreneurial Skills in an ElectricCircuits Course through Project-Based Learning”, Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.6
beneficial. During Autumn 2023, in addition to knowledgetransfer, AGOH evolved into a social space where students could relax, connect with peers, seekcareer guidance, expand their professional networks, and stay engaged with the teaching team.This was particularly significant since many of these students belonged to engineeringdepartments other than that of the teaching team. Many of these connections persist even a yearafter the course has been offered.Beyond weekly instructor AGOH, EE 215’s main components include weekly TA-led labsections and office hours, regular homework, two midterm exams, and a comprehensive finalexam. By examining how AGOH affect students in our local context, we hope to inspireeducators to consider experimenting with and
Student Organization Chapter with Student Success. 2017.[4] B. F. French, J. C. Immekus, and W. C. Oakes, "An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students' Success and Persistence," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 419-425, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00869.x.[5] S. Hu and G. D. Kuh, "Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics," Research in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 555-575, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40197272.[6] X. Wang, M. Dai, and R. Mathis, "The influences of student- and school-level factors on engineering undergraduate student
strong preference for mandatory meetings scheduled atmoderate intervals rather than more frequent or optional sessions. Importantly, no significantdifferences in student satisfaction were observed based on their preferred meeting frequency.Future research will continue to explore these dynamics to further improve mentoringpractices.References[1] M. S. Jaradat and M. B. Mustafa, “Academic advising and maintaining major: Is there a relation?” Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 151, 2017.[2] A. M. Lucietto, E. Dell, E. M. Cooney, L. A. Russell, and E. Schott, “Engineering technology undergraduate students: A survey of demographics and mentoring,” 2019.[3] J. K. Banerjee, “Mentoring undergraduate students in engineering,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual
-reported score in the end-of-year feedback form about how much they learned has improvedcompared to the previous semester without quizzes. This improvement is a crucial objective ofthe quizzes and provides evidence of their effectiveness.References[1] M. Cred´e, S. G. Roch, and U. M. Kieszczynka, “Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 272–295, 2010.[2] J. K. Durfee, W. R. Loendorf, D. C. Richter, T. L. Geyer, and D. M. Munson, “A formal research study on correlating student attendance to student success,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25–50.[3] P. Purcell
in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta- analysis." BMJ open 9.9 (2019): e028280. 6. Khawam, Ashley M., Toni DiDona, and Brenda S. Hernández. "Effectiveness of teamwork in the workplace." International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 32.3 (2017): 267- 286. 7. Kørnøv, L., Johannsen, H.H.W. and Moesby E., Experiences with integrating individuality in Project- Oriented and Problem-Based Learning POPBL. Inter. J. of Engng. Educ., 23, 5, 947-953 (2007). 8. Kommula, Venkata P., Jacek Uziak, and M. Tunde Oladiran. "Peer and self-assessment in engineering students' group work." World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 8.1 (2010): 56-60. 9. Goodwin
. 10.18260/1-2--4578 2. K. Reeves, B. Blank, V. Hernandez-Gantes, and M. Dickerson, “Using constructivist teaching strategies in probability and statistics,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2010, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16660 3. D. Tougaw, “Integration of active learning exercises into a course on probability and statistics,” in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2005, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--15579 4. N. S. Vidic, R. M. Clark, and E. G. Claypool, “Flipped classroom approach: probability and statistics course for engineers,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2015, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.241195. R. Al-Hammoud, “Molding the interactive
and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Shanghai, China, 2016.[14] E. Cooney, S. Deal, A. McNeely, and H. Chaubey, “Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Research Project to Create Musical Effect Box,” in 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, 2019 CIEC, New Orleans, LA, February 2019.[15] E. Bezzam, A. Hoffet, and P. Prandoni, "Teaching Practical DSP with Off-the-shelf Hardware and Free Software, "2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK, 2019, pp. 7660-7664.[16] Y. Lin and T.D. Morton, “A Microcontroller-based DSP Laboratory Curriculum Paper,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 2017.[17] K.D. Coonley and J. Miles
refine their preparation,enhance their competitiveness, and improve overall program effectiveness.References[1] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, "A systematic review of studies on educational robotics," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J- PEER), vol. 9, no. 2, p. 2, 2019.[2] F. R. Sullivan, "Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding," Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 373-394, 2008.[3] M. U. Bers, L. Flannery, E. R. Kazakoff, and A. Sullivan, "Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an
Instruments, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 221–226, 1953.[12] “Chatgpt,” https://chat.openai.com/, Accessed: 2024-01-22.[13] Chung Kwan Lo, “What is the impact of chatgpt on education? a rapid review of the literature,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 410, 2023.[14] Lars Bengtsson, “Take-home exams in higher education: A systematic review,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 267, 2019.[15] Gina J Mariano, Debra E Allwardt, Paul R Raptis, and Kristine Stilwell, “Reintroducing the oral exam: Finding out what your students really know in the age of chatgpt.,” Currents in Teaching & Learning, vol. 16, no. 1, 2024.[16] Lorenzo Moreno-Ruiz, D Castellanos-Nieves, B Popescu Braileanu, EJ Gonz´alez-Gonz´alez, JL S´anchez-De La Rosa