were applied to in-person classrooms.Trends in the Types of Intervention Categories and Sub-CategoriesThe trend for "Learning Strategy Interventions" was consistently the most utilized method ofintervention from 2014 to 2019. However, after this period, due to the increase in "TechnologyEnhanced Learning" interventions, the trend for "PBRBIS" began to rise. Additionally, followingthe COVID-19 pandemic and the resumption of in-person classes, LSI interventions once againbegan to show an upward trend. Also, over the past 10 years, the majority of interventionspublished in the ASEE conference proceedings focused on improving and changing the learningstrategies of students in circuits rather than improving the motivation of students to learn
/25979.[2] A. Huynh and N. T. Buswell, “How was your internship: Stories about the engineering internship experience from five female engineering students,” in 2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting. California State University, Los Angeles , California: ASEE Conferences, April 2019, https://peer.asee.org/31829.[3] D. Weagle, D. B. Ortendahl, and M. A. P.E., “Universities and industries: A proactive partnership shaping the future of work,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33486. Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, June 2019, https://peer.asee.org/33486.[4] J. P. Martin, S. D. Garrett, S. G. Adams, and J. Hamilton, “A qualitative look at african american students: Perceptions of developing engineer of
IDE thatruns on multiple operating systems. The touch screen enabled an intuitive user interface, whichmade working with the board much more convenient.References[1] J.O. Attia, L.D. Hobson, P.H. Obiomon, and M. Tembely, “Engaging Electrical and Computer Engineering Freshman Students with an Electrical Engineering Practicum,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017.[2] K.R. Hite, L.J. Slimak, D. Korakakis, and T.C. Ahern, “An Online Approach to the Analog Electronics Laboratory,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. June 2019.[3] M.E. Radu, C. Cole, M.A. Dabacan, J. Harris, and S.M. Sexton, “The Impact of Providing Unlimited Access to Programmable Boards in
used with underrep- resented minority graduate students,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/p.25979. New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, June 2016, https://peer.asee.org/25979. [8] A. Huynh and N. T. Buswell, “How was your internship: Stories about the engineering internship experience from five female engineering students,” in 2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting. California State University, Los Angeles , California: ASEE Conferences, April 2019, https://peer.asee.org/31829. [9] D. Weagle, D. B. Ortendahl, and M. A. P.E., “Universities and industries: A proactive partnership shaping the future of work,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33486. Tampa
outcome. The score sequence represents score ranges. Less than 60=1, 60-64= 2, 65-69=3, 70-74=4, 75-79=5, 80-84=6, 85-89=7, 90-94=8 and 95-100=9.Figure 3 shows the class performance for Assessment 1 which was performed after one month ofclass. For the better comparison, normalized values are presented in this and the followingfigures. The results show that Falls 2019 and 2021 carry almost similar outcomes. However,Winter 2022 outperforms the other two. The reason could be resources as well as the adaptationto online materials for the assessment.Figure 4 shows the student’s grade distribution for the classes in 2019 and 2021 Fall. The formerclass did not receive any video solutions for homework. However, the later one received somevideo
received the Dean’s Achievement Award to recognize his contribution to the Texas A&M-Qatar campus in 2021. He also received the Texas A&M University-STAR Award in 2013 and 2016.Dr. Muhammad S. Zilany, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Muhammad Zilany earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, in 2007. He held academic positions at the University of Malaya and the University of Hail before joining the Electrical and Computer Engineering Program at Texas A&M University at Qatar in 2019. His research focuses on signal processing in the auditory system employing a comprehensive approach that integrates computational modeling, physiological recordings
, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 544-552, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TE.2022.3147099.[2] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, "Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students' engineering role identities and future-time perspectives," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362-383, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20324.[3] W. J. S. B. E. Hughes, E. Annand, R. Beigel, M. B. Kwapisz, and B. Tallman, "Do I think I’m an engineer? Understanding the impact of engineering identity on retention," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 15, 2019, 2019.[4] M. S. Somia Alfatih, M. S. Leong, and L. M. Hee, "Definition of Engineering Asset
workshop,” in ASEE Conference and Exhibition, 2024, under review.[18] Mentimeter, “Interactive presentation software-Mentimeter.” https://www.mentimeter.com/, 2024. [Online; accessed 1-January-2024].[19] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzelski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social responsibility in a circuits course,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33354, (Tampa, Florida), ASEE Conferences, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/33354.[20] H. Greene, “An effective academic construct for international humanitarian projects in engineering education,” in ASEE North-Central Section Conference, 2013.[21] R. Bandyopadhyay, “Volunteer tourism and “the white man’s burden”: globalization of suffering, white savior complex
in-person instructions, thanks to the declined infection rate afterthe development of different vaccines, online and hybrid class meetings are still an option forconducting a class, especially for those students who might contract COVID during the semester.In this work, we study the students’ performance in a linear control course across three differentcohorts: pre, during, and after the pandemic. Statistical analysis of students’ exam scores is usedto infer whether the online experience significantly affected the students learning or not. We usedata from the course offering in fall 2019, fall 2020, and fall 2021, where the taught modules andfinal exams were kept the same. In addition, while the homework assignments were not identical,they
.[7] "Listen to me: Community college students tell us what helps them persist.," CCCSE, 2022.[8] H. Hartman, S. Lezotte, R. A. Dusseau, T. R. Forin and S. Farrell, "Transfer Students in Undergraduate Engineering," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Online, 2020.[9] B. T. Berhane, S. Hayes, D. M. Koonce, C. J. Salley, S. Fries-Britt and D. J. Pines, "On Transfer Student Success: Exploring the Academic Trajectories of Black Transfer Engineering Students from Community Colleges," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[10] M. R. Anderson-Rowland, "Transfer Students: Lessons Learned over 10 Years," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[11] J. S. Curtis, B. F
, “Adapting Scrum Project Management to ECE Courses,”presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Oct.10, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32395[6] R. B. Bass, B. Pejcinovic, and J. Grant, “Applying Scrum project management in ECE curriculum,” in2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2016, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757568.[7] S. Reynolds, A. Caldwell, T. Procko, and O. Ochoa, “Scrum in the Classroom: An ImplementationGuide,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2023, pp. 01–08. doi:10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343213.[8] M. W. Ohland et al., “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Developmentof a Behaviorally Anchored
Control and Automation. Dr. Luo is an IEEE senior member, INFORMS, and ASEE member. Dr. Luo is active nationally and internationally in his research field. He was the Program Co-Chair in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (IEEE-ICIA’2018). He was the Plenary Session Co-Chair in the 2021 and 2019 International Conference on Swarm Intelligence, and he was the Invited Session Co-Chair in the 2017 International Conference on Swarm Intelligence. He was the General Co-Chair of the 1st IEEE International Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Smart Technologies (IEEE-CIST 2015), and Journal Special Issues Chair, IEEE 2016 International Conference on Smart Technologies (IEEE-SmarTech
; Mumcu, G. (2019, June), 3D Visualization-assistedElectromagnetic Theory Teaching Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--31940[16] Pettiford, C. I. (2017, June), Enhancing visualization of magnetic fields inElectromagnetic Fields Course Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2—28283[17] Voltmer, D., & Tierney, W., & Garner, B. (2001, June), Visual Electro Magnetics(Vem): A Visualization Tool To Enhance Learning In UndergraduateElectromagnetics Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.10.18260/1-2—9998[18] Xu, Y., & Meehan, K., & Martin, C. V., & Overby, A. B., & Wei, X. (2011,June
. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, Volume 11, No. 2, June 2007.[7] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education – anOverview of Implementation and Feasibility,” 14th International Multi-Conference forEngineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
students use rules andstructured processes to come to the one “right” solution. While in many cases, this strategy isuseful and necessary, real life is complex, dynamic, and imprecise enough that it is unrealistic tothink that problems have only one solution. Therefore, students need to learn how to use truecreative thinking. Realizing this contemporary demand, the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) 2018-2019 criteria1 shifted the emphasis of engineering curriculum byidentifying creative problem-solving skill as a vital component for improving the future ofengineering and engineering education. Particularly, ABET 2000 Criteria1 requires visualization,cognitive model, communication, teamwork and creative problem solving.In
Instructor and the Tenured Faculty”, International Journal on E-Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5-22. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2008.[2] M. Goryll, T.J. Thornton, C. Wang, S.M. Phillips, D. and Allee, “Online Undergraduate Laboratories in Electrical Engineering”, 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp 1-4, 2019.[3] Y. Astatke, C.J. Scott, K.A. Connor, J.O. Ladeji-Osias, “Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Laboratory Courses”, ASEE Conference, 2012[4] M. Perales, L. Pedraza, and P. Moreno-Ger, “Work-In-Progress: Improving Online Higher Education with Virtual and Remote Labs”, 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1136-1139, 2019.[5
] T. Estrada and S. Atwood, “Factors that Affect Student Frustration Level in Introductory Laboratory Experiences,” en, in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceed- ings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, pp. 25.629.1–25.629.7. DOI: 10. 18260/1-2--21386. [8] E. Burkholder, A. M. Price, M. Flynn, and C. E. Wieman, “Assessing problem-solving in sci- ence and engineering programs,” in 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceed- ings, Provo, UT: American Association of Physics Teachers, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1119/ perc.2019.pr.Burkholder. [9] S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, B. Hanks, L. Murphy, B. Simon, and C. Zander, “Debugging From the Student Perspective,” en, IEEE Transactions on
questions,and revising the questions if needed. Instructional videos of the content and examples in the firsthalf of the semester will be added, starting from more difficult ones. Scaffolding pedagogicalteaching support can be added to help students acquire the knowledge as needed. For example,additional resources can be included in the learning management system and released on aconditional basis if a student answered some quiz questions incorrectly or if a student’sperformance on some assignments falls below a threshold.References 1. N. Gautam, “Teaching courses on probability and statistics for engineers: classical topics in the modern technological era,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, Texas
., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 125–136, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.515012.[5] D. Kang et al., “Providing an Oral Examination as an Authentic Assessment in a Large Section, Undergraduate Diversity Class,” Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 13, no. 2, May 2019, doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130210.[6] M. A. Nelson, “Oral Assessments: Improving Retention, Grades, and Understanding,” PRIMUS, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47–61, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/10511970902869176.[7] Y. Zhao, “Impact of Oral Exams on a Thermodynamics Course Performance,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference, Mar. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/impact-of-oral-exams-on-a-thermodynamics-course-performance[8] I
microcontrollers (Bilkstein, 2018; Halverson &Sheridan, 2014; Irie et al., 2019; Martin, 2015). Engagement with the culture is associated with a“maker mindset” that is coupled with a strong sense of identity (Dougherty, 2016). The presentstudy investigates how non-major students change in their confidence and sense of identityrelated to making after completing a cornerstone engineering design project.We have created a semester-long (14-week duration) course about circuits, incorporating hands-on experiences that purposefully serve the educational needs and desires of students acrossdisciplines at Carnegie Mellon University. The goal of this “non-major” course is to trainstudents in basic electrical principles through soldering, building circuits on a
course description changes for their courses. This research addssignificantly to the literature as there is very little research on the impact of course descriptionson students’ course selection process.1. IntroductionEfforts to broaden the participation of women and people of color within engineering andcomputing education have made incremental improvements in the U.S. but, overall, continue tohave challenges. The under-representation of women and ethno-racial minorities in STEM fieldsis nothing new [1]. Based on a 2021 report, the share of women in computer occupationsdeclined from 30% in 2000 to 25% in 2016 and has remained stable until 2019 [2]. Womencontinue to be vastly underrepresented in the ranks of engineers and architects (15% in 2019
San Marcos. He earned his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Shiraz University in Iran, and his M.S.E. and Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville. As an active participant in IEEE and ASEE, his research has received funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Office of Naval Research (ONR), and various industry partners.Prof. Jairo Giraldo, University of Utah Dr. Jairo Giraldo received a B.Sc. degree in Electronic Engineering from the National University of Colombia in 2010 and an M.Sc. and Ph.D. degree from the University of the Andes, Colombia in 2012 and 2015, respectively. Dr. Giraldo is currently a Research Assistant Professor at the Department of
sessions.References[1] M. F. Aburdene and R. J. Kozick, “A project-oriented course in probability and statistics for undergraduateelectrical engineering students,” in Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education 1997 Conference, pp.598 – 603[2] D. Tougaw, “Integration of active learning exercises into a course on probability and statistics,” in Proc. ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, June, 2005.[3] R. A. Budiman, “Using card games for conditional probability, explaining Gamma vs. Poisson Distributions, andWeighing Central Limit Theory,” in Proc. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June,2016.[4] J. A. Reising, “Lab experiments in probability,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR,June, 2005.[5] Q
online studentsand connect them with campus services available online. For long-term planning, course redesignor a new online course offering would be necessary if online learning will continue to play asignificant part in undergraduate education.References[1] P. Panindre and R. S. Thorsen, “Assessment of learning effectiveness in online and face-to-face learning environment for engineering education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[2] M. Ssemakula, “Learning effectiveness in online vs. traditional courses,” in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005, pp. 10–877.[3] M. Kozak, “In person versus synchronous remote delivery of mechanics lectures,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010, pp. 15–707.[4] J
Development: leadership, teamwork, communication, career planning • Transition Support: transfer portal, academic advisors, peer networking, supplemental resources, community engagement • Active Engagement: ambassadors, peer mentors, student organization liaisonTuition and stipend support can be up to $10,000 each, depending on student circumstances.Most of the various types of student support involve direct student engagement so students areboth receiving and providing support.The IEC is a nonprofit organization founded in 2019 to enable its core Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) programs at Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) to work togethercollectively to address opportunities and problems that they find difficult or
participating in studies on technologies for disability, overlookingtheir much-needed insight, and treating them as unequal engineering partners in the design andresearch processes [2]. Another literature survey focused on ASEE publications noted that therewas a significant lack of research focusing on disability as an identity and on the experiences ofstudents with disabilities in engineering education [3].Several works have explored the stigma, social exclusion, systemic marginalization, devaluation,and feelings of “otherness” experienced by students with disabilities in engineering education[4], [5]. These consequences were attributed to a variety of reasons, including the lack of rolemodels with disabilities, educators’ misconceptions about the
. J. Eng. Educ. 111, 2 (April 2022), 357–375. [2] Jill Davishahl and Sura Alqudah. 2020. Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in introductory-level pre-engineering classes. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings (Virtual On line). ASEE Conferences. [3] E.L. Deci, H. Eghrari, B.C. Patrick, and D. Leone. 1994. Facilitating internalization: The self determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality 62 (1994), 119–142. [4] E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan. 2012. Self-determination theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology, P.A.M. van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, and E.T. Higgins (Eds.). Sage Publications Ltd., 416–436. [5] C.S. Dweck. 2006. Mindset: The new psychology of success
participation in engineering. Dr. Abraham is a member of the IEEE and ASEE, and she serves in leadership roles within both organizations. She also serves on the board of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC). Dr. Abraham received the B.E. degree in Telecommunication Engineering from Visveswaraiah Technological University (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA in 2012.Dr. Mehmet Vurkac, Seattle University Mehmet Vurkac is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University.Dr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Dr. Miguel is Professor and Department Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University. Dr. Miguel