learning that peer-to-peer review encourages (Jones & Wheadon, 2015).The majority of research around ACJ has been centered in Europe (Hartell & Skogh, 2015;Kimbell, 2012a, 2012b; Seery, Canty, & Phelan, 2012) with recent efforts in the United States(Bartholomew, Reeve et al., 2017; Strimel, et al., 2017) and Australia (Heldsinger & Humphry,2010). While ACJ has been utilized in K-12 classrooms the majority of ACJ-use has taken placewith higher education, awarding bodies, and industry (M. Wingfield, personal communication,November 15, 2016). Collaborative efforts to use ACJ in international settings have recentlybeen undertaken with future efforts planned for international assessment research.Tools for ACJCurrently there are limited
planning, coordinating and organizing ability In order to receive accreditation from the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET), an engineering or engineering technology program “must havedocumented student outcomes that prepare graduates to attain the program educational objectives[3].” Highlighted below are several outcomes provided by ABET [3] for accrediting engineeringtechnology programs. Interestingly, and not surprisingly, these student outcomes are similar tothe attributes specified as desirable by employers. an ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities an ability to select and apply a
graphics communication: Irwin, 1995.[5] X. Danos, "Curriculum Planning for the Development of Graphicacy," Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, vol. 18, 2013.[6] E. Fry, "Graphical literacy," Journal of Reading, pp. 383-389, 1981.[7] G. P. Adanez and A. D. Velasco, "Predicting academic success of engineering students in technical drawing from visualization test scores," Journal of Geometry and Graphics, vol. 6, pp. 99-109, 2002.[8] C. L. Miller and G. R. Bertoline, "Spatial Visualization Research and Theories: Their Importance in the Development of an Engineering and Technical Design Graphics Curriculum Model," Engineering Design Graphics Journal, vol. 55, pp. 5-14, 1991.[9
) 1 page report to summarize your step-by-step approach to the problem and brief explanation of your design. (Anything that requires further explanation) Page 23.394.19 N101101 85° Angular Position Sensor and Specifications Appendix 8Student designs of sensor attachment project Page 23.394.20 Appendix 9 Box Jig ProjectAnalyze the part drawing and production plan to determine all relevant information necessary todesign a channel or box jig to drill the specified five holes on the
students at summer orientation. The maximum enrollment ofstudents for each class section was 36. Attendance was required and was a component in thegrading scheme. The grade earned by students was either Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory.During Autumn 2012, there were four sections of ENGR 1180 offered. The students sat four to atable where a computer was available to each student at the table. The workbook utilized wasDeveloping Spatial Thinking Workbook by Sheryl Sorby and software by Anne FrancesWysocki.8 A Tactile Modeling Set (linking cubes shown in Figure 1) were provided to studentsto build the objects based on a given coded plans (Figure 2) detailed in the workbook. Thesecolorful linking cubes were available during class and for students to take
. Incontrast, ‘Enquiry’ was implemented at Michigan Tech as a means of developing spatialvisualization skills and to help students understand conventional methods of representingobjects.The collaboration across two international universities proved very beneficial in terms ofmodifying and improving the apparatus used in the activity but it also provided a means ofcritiquing and refining the courses in which they were implemented. The recommendationsfrom ‘Phase 2’ indicate that careful consideration should be given to the timing andapplication of ‘Enquiry’ within modules of study. This planning should take learningoutcomes and students’ prerequisite knowledge into account. For example, it may bebeneficial to facilitate experiential learning of various
feature relations; correct feature terminations; correct feature duplication;correct part design intent; and part accommodates planned and unforeseen design modificationwithout feature failure. They further define the components of CAD expertise to include thegeneral categories of the part modeling task, procedural 3D CAD knowledge, strategic 3D CADknowledge, declarative 3D CAD knowledge, graphical and visualization capability, modelingdeconstruction capability, and metacognitive processes 19.Evaluating CAD ModelsStudies involving the evaluation of CAD models have been quite diverse. In a study of thecorrelation between parametric modeling ability and performance on the Mental Cutting Test,Steinhauer used the general categories of approach
an important aspect in the development ofmodeling strategies.Barnes et al.24 suggests that many of the exercises presented to students are in the form of“elegant solutions” which present essentially one single obvious modeling approach. Fortunately,even very simple parts such as those presented in standard graphics texts can be modeled usingdifferent strategies. In planning a part model, the designer must decompose or “featurize” thepart to be created in the solid modeling system. Two common strategies for modeling simpleparts involve decomposition into features based on either additive or subtractive approaches.30Metrics for Evaluating Solid Model Part ComplexityIt is important to choose parts for CAD instruction that present increasing
-week training program would grant them full creditfor the spatial skills component of the course, regardless of their final test score. For this reason,our incentive plan may need to be revised for future iterations to better motivate participants toput forth their best effort on the final test. Table 2. Descriptive statistics for initial, midterm, and final test scores Initial Midterm Final Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Direct training 14.4 3.57 17.0 3.26 18.9 4.54 Indirect training 17.7 4.04 19.0 1.00
planning, monitoring, and evaluation of thinking Formative assessment for Promote both knowledge more learning opportunities and regulation of cognition. Post-activity reflection Students perception on Collect diagnostic clues to intervention meet Individual needs A B Figure 1: (A) Process-oriented activities for improved student engagement and performance and (B) Process-oriented intervention for creative and critical thinkingThere is a lack of knowledge of
andacts as visual map to reinforce the connection of the course topics to one another. The Ganttchart also is an introduction to how to manage a project by planning tasks that need to becompleted in serial and what tasks can be done in parallel to have a distributed workload over thetime period while finishing the project on time.Tasks #1 and #2 are done as individual technical reports. Students do not necessarily come tothe course knowing any of the students in the class. Thus, the first two weeks is a time for thestudents to begin to meet others during the two-hour lab sessions and to force each student to beinvolved in all aspects of writing a technical memo report. Any weaknesses in technical reportwriting and formatting in MS Word are to be
, the conclusions arevery upbeat, so that the plans are to continue with GEOPAK © as implemented. The authoremphasizes the point that the exposure was a significant and worthwhile accomplishment, even ifproficiency was not achieved.Instructor and QualificationsImplementation of GEOPAK © into ENGR 301 required, of course, an instructor, software, andcomputer lab. The software could be purchased through an education subscription agreementfrom Bentley Systems, Inc.. Adequate computer laboratory facilities existed. Hiring a qualifiedinstructor proved prohibitively expensive. This might not have been the case for a largerengineering program, or one with more financial resources. But for the UT Martin program thisconstituted an obstacle. It was
environment. The Spatial Visualization Trainer (SVT) App was developed initially forthe iPad tablet with plans to expand to other platforms in the future. The App allows students toperform sketching exercises on a touchscreen. When a sketch is completed, a grading algorithmautomatically grades the sketch and provides immediate feedback. The goal is to create a moreengaging and more cost-effective spatial visualization training method.The SVT App could ultimately be used in the classroom, independent learning, or a hybridenvironment. While independent learning may provide the students with the maximum amountof flexibility and the lowest instructional costs, recent attempts with on-line learning havereported a low level of student engagement resulting
resources16. Wanget al17 develops a VA system to help bridge managers analyze bridges and plan maintenances.Wong et al18 created a visualization system called GreenGrid to examine power systeminformation through semantic encoding, multilevel graph visualization, and force-directedlayout. Jigsaw19 and CZsaw20 enable users to make sense of a large collection of text. They offera collection of visualizations to detect the connection among alternatives. With document view,scatter-plot view, history view, and dependency graph, these visualizations can help usersexamine the connection between entities and support analytical strategies. Such VA systemshave been widely adopted in many domains. But it is still rare to see the application of VA onPLM.Possible
educators and administrators in placingstudents in the appropriate course per their skill level by accurately identifying the lower, themiddle, and the higher performing students. The inventory may also be used as a pre and post-assessment for the middle and lower performing students to demonstrate their learning gains.The results of the inventory may also be used to develop new and refine existing lesson plans toaddress the identified student misconceptions.Theoretical FrameworkStudent misconceptions are common throughout the engineering curriculum. Engineering Page 22.759.3faculty members repeatedly encounter students while able to correctly solve
) Figure 10 ‐ Lesson 1 Quiz ResultsAll groups were given the same quiz and homework assignments. The experimental groups wereasked to complete Lesson 1 as outlined above. The control groups were not required to completeLesson 1. The new CBI curriculum is working. There is a 10.6% improvement in homeworkgrades and a 14.9% improvement in quiz grades from the Spring 2010 semester to the Fall 2010semester. This is due to the introduction of the CBI material as well as the new EG website. Thecontrol groups benefited in the form of better planned lessons but did not benefit from the CBIlessons. During the two CBI semesters, there is a 1.61% difference in quiz grades betweenexperimental and control groups. The results suggest that the CBI groups were
but also in cost anddelivery time. SolidWorks Sustainability accounts for both the distance and mode oftransportation used to deliver the product throughout its supply chain: air, truck, rail, and ship.In addition to distance and type of transportation, consideration of the quality of the fuel usedmakes this model detail oriented. The fuel that is used during transportation differs with fuelsource and refining technology, and has different acidification potential from the exhaustemission16.In comparing different environmental impacts to each other that reflects a comparable scale ofeffects SolidWorks Sustainability has formulated a sequential computation plan. As a first step,the software gathers specific environmental impacts of each
Paper ID #11432Enhancing a Blended Learning Approach to CAD Instruction Using LeanManufacturing PrinciplesDr. Derek M Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Dr. Yip-Hoi received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1997. His dissertation research focused on developing Computer-Aided Process Planning methods and software tools to support automation of machining on Mill/Turn machining centers. In 2003 he joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. His appointment included a position as junior chair of the NSERC
, theystrongly manifest their appreciation of the freedom of thought that open-ended designproblems provide. Thus the successful completion of a series of challenging projects hasserved as mastery experiences for the students, which is a primary building block of self-efficacy 44.Due to the single data point collected in this work-in-progress, it is not possible yet toascertain specific reasons for the ineffectiveness of the interventions in this form towardsdeveloping SV skills, however the insights gained during this first iteration will be usedto refine the implementation, and continue the assessment with the help of a controlgroup. Specific planned actions include: • Increasing the number and reducing the scope of geometric design exercises
, because we learned from students who have been on co-op and done SolidWorksdrawings for companies before. Their experience shone through and made everything wedid feel relevant and important. Especially the work with drawings and designing formanufacturability.”These comments are important in the sense they will help drive future upper-classmembers of ASME to continue the service to their fellow students providing themadditional access and training to a valuable engineering tool. In addition to and possiblemore importantly, they are providing first-hand knowledge of what to expect on their firstco-op.In the future, the undergraduate teaching assistants plan to refine and modify the modulesbases on the comments received from the assessment. Issues