Conference Session

CAD Assessments, Trends and Applications

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Srikanth B Pidugu, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Mamdouh M. Bakr, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Swaminadham Midturi, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; George P Tebbetts, University of Arkansas, Little Rock

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

assess specific student outcome(s).We selected a first yearcomputer graphics course to satisfy criterion (f) of the associate of science (AS) degree. Per toETAC of ABET, student outcome (f) requires that the program must demonstrate students’ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non-technicalenvironments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature.Structure of Computer Graphics Course The first year computer graphics course at UALR is a traditional engineering drawingscourse and the course incorporates the use of modern tools such as AutoCAD. This course is forthree semester credit hours with 30 contact lecture hours and 45 laboratory contact hours in asemester. The

Conference Session

Learning styles affect on students in graphic and design courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Christopher D Grant, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Authentic Integration of Mathematics andTechnology in Inquiry-Based Science Instruction,” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and ScienceTeaching, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2001, p. 99.[3] Schlenker, R., and K. Schlenker, “Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Sociology in an Inquiry-Based Studyof Changing Population Density,” Science Activities, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2000, p. 16.[4] Buch, N., and T. Wolff, “Classroom Teaching through Inquiry,” Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation and Practice, Vol. 126, No. 3, 2000, p. 105.[5] Biernacki, J.J. and C.D. Wilson, “Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Advanced Materials: A Team-OrientedInquiry-Based Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, 2001, p. 637.[6] Stahovich, T.F., and H. Bal, “An

Conference Session

Learning styles affect on students in graphic and design courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech; Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Row sumsP=0.347At-risk 14 28 42Not at-risk 38 52 90Column sums 52 80 132ConclusionsBased on this study, conclusions and recommendations can be formulated pertaining topedagogy specific to engineering design graphics. First, kinesthetic learner preference from theVARK instrument is the overall preferred preference for learning and can be directly related tothe overall learning of materials in this type of laboratory and lecture based engineering graphicscourse. Multimodal is next, or second in preference as a preferred method of learning fromstudents in this

Conference Session

Visualization tools, modeling abilities and grading models

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly K. Ault Ph.D., Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Alister Fraser, Parametric Technology Corp.

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Technology and Design Education,Volume 17, Number 1 (2007), 23-35.10 Menary, G. and T. Robinson (2011). Novel approaches for teaching and assessing CAD. International Conferenceon Engineering Education, Belfast, N. Ireland, 21-26 August 2011.11 Rynne, A., and W. Gaughran (2012). Cognitive Modeling Strategies for Optimum Design Intent in ParametricModeling. Computers in Education Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 55-68. Page 23.31.912 Branoff, T.J. (2004). Constraint-Based Modeling in the Engineering Graphics Curriculum: Laboratory Activitiesand Evaluation Strategies. Proc. Midyear Conf. Eng. Design Graphics Division of the Am. Soc. for Eng

Conference Session

Visualization tools and uses in graphics

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathy Schmidt Jackson, The Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence; Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Science, 75, 451-456.13. Ma, J. & Nickerson, J.V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated and remote Laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), Article No. 7, 1-24.14. Sarasin, L. C. (1999). Learning style perspectives: Impact in the classroom. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.15. Leopold, C., Gorska, R., &. Sorby, S. (2001). International experiences in developing the spatial visualization abilities of engineering students. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 5(1), 81– 91.16. McLaren, S.V. (2008). Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age. International Journal of Technology and Design, 18(2), 167-188.17. Philpot, T.A., Hubing

Conference Session

Visualization tools and uses in graphics

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melchor Garcia Dominguez, Universidad de Las palmas de Gran Canaria; Jorge Martin-Gutierrez, Universidad de La Laguna; Cristina Roca, University of Las Plamas de Gran Canaria

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

didn’t undertake anykind of training.MethodologyThe training was performed in the Graphic Design laboratory. The aim was to obtain data aboutthe improvement of spatial ability in the groups using the three methodologies and to find outfrom the feedback of students their motivation and satisfaction.The study was performed at the beginning of the 2011/12 academic year, so when they undertookthis task these students had not attended any kind of Engineering Graphics classes previously.The spatial abilities of engineering students were measured before and after training using boththe Mental Rotation Test (MRT) and the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT-5:SR). Besides, uponcompletion of training, the students completed two surveys about their

Conference Session

CAD Assessments, Trends and Applications

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Chirag Patel; David Joseph Tortoriello; Justin Baldacci, ASME Northeastern chapter; Jeffrey Speroni

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics