Conference Session

Advancing Research on Engineering Leaders’ Confidence, Careers, and Styles

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, University of Toronto; Milan Maljkovic; Emily L. Moore, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

four engineering-intensive organizations, asking them to identify 3-4 senior engineers with a range of career pathswho had graduated prior to 1992. We also asked them to be mindful of demographic diversitywhere possible. The four organizations represented the following industries: Chemicalprocessing, manufacturing, consulting/mining, and software. To ensure the inclusion ofengineers who had followed less traditional paths, we also reached out to senior engineersemployed in public service, finance, university leadership and social impact enterprises. In theend, 28 senior engineers consented to participate. Despite our intention to diversify our sample

Conference Session

Innovative and Impactful Engineering Leadership Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Mihee Park, Pennsylvania State University; Ashley N. Patterson, Pennsylvania State University; John Jongho Park, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

organizations, low levels ofretention and promotion of racial minorities and women in the workplace indicate a lack ofinclusion within workplace cultures (Cook & Glass, 2013; Giscombe & Mattis, 2002; Hom &Ellis, 2008). With this in mind, ABET’s approach to Criteria 3 specifically identifies the abilityto create inclusive environments in engineering teams. Creating these inclusive environments requires individuals to practice behaviors thatfoster individuals’ feelings of belonging. Shore, Randel, Chung, and Dean (2011) go one stepbeyond belongingness in their definition of inclusion to include “the degree to which anemployee perceives that he or she is an esteemed member of the work group throughexperiencing treatment that satisfies

Conference Session

Innovative and Impactful Engineering Leadership Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Alisha L. Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; John Brooks Slaughter P.E., University of Southern California; Meagan C. Pollock, Engineer Inclusion; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

must help engineering leadership studentsdevelop a growth mindset and discover the sophistication of mind to celebrate diversity, equity,and inclusion in their daily lives, school, and workplace. This requires us to consider inclusiveleadership as a foundational approach to engineering leadership development.Inclusive leadership has been shown to positively impact team performance, decision-making,collaboration, innovation, and motivation. Inclusive leaders celebrate differences and recognizeand challenge attacks on DEI. As engineering leadership educators, we must lead by example,model inclusive leadership behavior, and have courage to infuse these concepts into ourcurriculum.This paper assembles the collective thoughts, perspectives

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence Holloway, University of Kentucky; Thomas Ward Lester, University of Kentucky; Joseph Anthony Colella, University of Kentucky College of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

500corporations and small start-ups. Others have served in legislative and agency leadershippositons at the federal and state level. These individuals felt strongly that their engineeringeducation prepared them to assume the diverse roles they were to later play as professionals, butmost also opined that they felt unprepared when confronted with their first leadership challengesfollowing graduation. The Engineering Leadership program at the University of Kentucky wasinitiated to address this.The program was established in 2007 through the support and active involvement of L. StanleyPigman, an alumnus of the College, and with the following goals in mind: 1. Program Goal 1: To develop a pilot program in the college for the enhancement of career

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

Paper ID #21233But How Do You Feel?Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he was the Associate Director of Leadership Programs at Cornell’s College of Engineering from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Zorman received his M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Technology in Vienna. He worked for 23+ years in the telecom industry in Europe and North America as engineer, leader, mentor, coach and leadership development professional. After a long and fulfilling customer-facing career, Mr

Conference Session

Career Advancement Through Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michele Norton, Texas A&M University; Ben Behbood Zoghi, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

Paper ID #32495Exploring the Role of Ambiguity Tolerance in an EngineeringProfessional’s Identity as a LeaderDr. Michele Norton, Texas A&M University Michele Norton is a Postdoctoral Research Associate that is working with the METM program at Texas A&M on research related to narrative inquiry, engineering leadership education, leading technical teams, personal and team emotional intelligence, creativity, innovation and learnings on teams, coaching, uti- lizing design-based learning experiences to develop both individuals and teams, and a holistic view of designing and flourishing as the best-loved self and the best

Conference Session

Continuous Improvement in Engineering Leadership Development Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University; Beth Koufteros, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

Paper ID #25944Meaning and Impact: A Review of Personal Leadership PortfoliosMr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. He’s earned master’s degrees in business administration and international affairs and a bachelor’s of science in industrial distribution.Beth Koufteros, Texas A&M University Beth Koufteros is the Assistant Director of the Zachry Leadership program at

Conference Session

Literature and Research Perspectives on Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James N Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

. Lastly, we note that the student groupswe examined in this study are certainly not the only groups of interest regarding sorting ofstudent characteristics; various extra-curricular student clubs and project teams (including thoseexplicitly within engineering) may also experience systemic student sorting. We were unable toreliably measure student participation in such groups within the practical limits of our study, butfollow-on research to examine these other groups would benefit the community of EL educators.ConclusionsThe heterogeneity of the engineering student population implies an onus for EL educators toconsider the student composition in EL course cohorts – and to be mindful of the effects ofcohort composition upon the learning