Paper ID #14123Engineering Leadership: A New Engineering DisciplineDr. Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso Roger V. Gonzalez, Ph.D., P.E., is the Director of the Leadership Engineering program for the College of Engineering and Professor and Chair of Engineering Education and Leadership. Dr. Gonzalez earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1986 from UTEP. He earned his M.S. in Biomedical Engineering and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and was a Post-Doctoral Fellow and the premier Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Northwestern Medical School. Professor Gonza
lecture and in-class activities contributions to learning were ranked 4.8 and 4.9 respectively, indicating almostunanimous student approval of the program.Student FeedbackCandidates provided a substantial amount of written feedback on the program in courseevaluations. Selected quotes include:“GEL is very different from the various leadership programs that I have been exposed to in mycareer. First of all, it is not a generic leadership program that has been tailored for an Page 23.399.13application but instead is a program that was designed with the engineering leader in mind. Ibelieve that its unique blend of technical content and real world
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Leadership as Principled NonconformityFour years at MIT permanently solders some primary circuits of the mind, and perhaps for that reason some modes of thinking seem permanently closed to me. --Richard Meehan, Getting Sued and Other Tales of the Engineering Life, p. 18As a recent review article in the Leadership Quarterly (2014)1 reported, “Leadershipdevelopment has emerged as an active field of theory building and research, providing a morescientific and evidence-based foundation to augment the long-standing practitioner interested inthe topic” (p. 63). Like many of the papers submitted to the Engineering
EPICS(Purdue), EFELTS(Tufts) and EWB(several) or higher educationinstitutions starting community engaged engineering learn by doing and solving real community Page 26.1577.5needs kinds of programs.The Purdue session was a wealth of information. There were good tools for assessment andalignment with ABET a-k criteria. There was a sense of growing momentum…pioneers were sohappy to have a large gathering of like-minded faculty and staff from across North Americainterested in service learning in engineering. They suggested a Community of CommunityEngagement Practitioners. They noted that ASEE’s Community Engagement division was thequickest new division
Paper ID #11412Engineering Leadership Education - The Path ForwardDr. Richard J. Schuhmann, The Landing School For two decades, Dr. Schuhmann has been affiliated with engineering leadership programs at the Penn- sylvania State University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He now serves as the President of the Landing School of Boatbuilding and Design in Arundel, Maine.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. Erdman has also taken courses at RPI, Union, UCLA, UCSB, MIT, and Dartmouth. At Rocket
bemore fully understood and then creatively reconceived” (Damrosch 1995). With this in Page 23.847.8mind, we now turn to the question, how can we creatively reconceive our approaches toteaching? “What” Are We Teaching, and “How” Are We Teaching It?One approach to the question of “how” that resonates with engineers is the concept ofbackwards design (Wiggins and McTighe, 2006) a design approach adapted for curricularreform. Backwards design starts with the end goals in mind and works “backwards” towardthe
of leadership perceptions among faculty andadministrators, a by-discipline analysis was conducted. Table 5 shows the general lack ofconsensus as to the degree to which professional skills detract from technical content acrossengineering disciplines. Within this analysis, ANOVA indicated that Program Chairs andAssociate Deans showed no significant differences. Mechanical engineering faculty differedsignificantly from bioengineering/biomedical, civil, industrial, and electrical engineering at theα=0.05 level. The overall stronger agreement among mechanical engineers seems to suggest amore technically minded mechanical engineering discipline from other disciplines within thisstudy. If one considers the nature of bioengineering/biomedical, civil
themaking of public policy and in the administration of government and industry.” 16 Nevertheless,current engineering leadership programs, along with those currently under development willneed to include additional skills such as the ability to control a group, critical thinking, how to bea visionary, inspirational, influential, adaptable, open-minded, people-centered, action-oriented,equitable, interpersonal, likeable, determined, confident, good communicator, credible,honorable, fair, and a networker; to ensure that engineering professionals and future engineersare prepared to flourish as leaders 27. Page 26.406.6Shell Eco MarathonSEM is an
Briggs Personality Type Inventory. While these two tools provide students with useful insights about their personalities, behaviours and habits of mind, our findings suggest that engineering educators who use these tools with their students would be well advised to discuss them as temporally-contextualized orientations rather than immutable categories. If they can critically examine these two typologies and expose students to multiple ways of influencing, supporting and relating to their colleagues, the next generation of engineers will learn the value and practice of flexibility while opening themselves to qualitatively diverse forms of professional development. 2) If it proves to be the case that female
Paper ID #17468Developing Engineering Leaders Using a Reflective Autobiographical Exer-cise ˜ Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. David Nino, David Ni˜no, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer in the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, where he has a strong commitment to the development of leadership among undergraduates and graduate students across MIT and among engineers, more broadly. In addition to MIT teaching, he is active in an international consortium of engineering leadership centers and a founding officer of the Engineering Leadership Development Division of the American Society of
Paper ID #11895Leading Large-Scale Change in an Engineering ProgramDr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin
immensenumber of activities and university ethics regulations, only a few case study examples aredescribed here.Leadership in Cross-Disciplinary GroupsUndergraduate Music Society: In 2008, a group of like-minded undergraduate students withclassical music training sought to establish a music society specifically for engineering studentsto support the education and awareness around acoustical and noise engineering. This grouprequested financial support to purchase musical instruments that could be used by anyengineering student without access to their own instruments, either due to residence livingarrangements or cost, which would also be used in scientific demonstrations and related lecturesregarding the physics of music. After being successfully funded
. Support at that level made it a fundraising priority inthe college and the first course was offered within one year. That support was essential to theprogram’s development and implementation.Institutional mission and contextThe vision for this program is rooted in the Jesuit mission of the institution, which names “thedevelopment of leadership expressed in service to others…for the common benefit of the humancommunity” as one of its four pillars.[6] In addition, the charisms found in the Jesuit’s historyvalue educating the whole person – mind and heart. The call for the type of engineer and leaderthe university hopes to graduate is clear. As a result, the models of leadership chosen to guidethe program and student participants are rooted in this
Paper ID #18207Engineering Leadership Development using an Interdisciplinary Competition-based ApproachDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Gerald Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Ohio Uni- versity’s Coal Research Center, part of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Envi- ronment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute and director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project) He is engaged in the development of energy and environmental technology such as producing algal-based
Paper ID #10204Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Education for Engineering Stu-dentsDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Page 24.207.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Education for Engineering StudentsAbstractRegardless of the approach taken to help engineering student develop their leadership potential,the engineering leadership development community faces challenges in assessing theeffectiveness of the educational approach. Soft skills, while assessable, are much
consortium of university engineering leadership programs, otherwise known as theCommunity of Practice for Engineering Leadership Education for 21st Century Engineers(COMPLETE) has been meeting regularly since 2010. This body of like-minded educators andpractitioners also played an instrumental role in the formation of the ASEE Leadership Division(LEAD). One of the goals of COMPLETE and the ASEE LEAD Division is to further researchin this area.PurposeThe purpose of the research project is to identify specific leadership competencies thatapplicants, specifically undergraduates, should possess when applying for full-time employmentpositions. The three-phase research uses mixed methods to answer this question. First, in-personinterviews with college
Paper ID #11557DEVELOPMENT OF THE JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY UNDERGRAD-UATE ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP PROGRAMDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Assistant Professor at James Madison University (United States) in the Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) and the Center for Materials Science. He has taught courses per- taining to topics for first-year engineering, materials science and engineering, engineering design, systems thinking and engineering leadership. He has a PhD in Polymer, Fiber Science from Clemson University. His research background is in the synthesis of polymer
management. 4 Leadership SkillsOur thinking about leadership skills follows the work of two teams of engineering leadershipresearchers. John Farr and his colleagues were the first to identify leadership qualities relevant toengineers. These include: big thinker, ethical and courageous, masters of change, risk taker,mission that matters, decision-maker, uses power wisely, team builder and good communicator35, 36 . While this list of competencies was developed with an audience of engineers in mind,Simon Pitts and his colleagues took their list a step further by generating it in collaboration withprofessional engineers working in industry. Pitts et al
Paper ID #15222’Lion Leadership Lessons Video Series’ - Delivering Engineering LeadershipLessons to a Broad AudienceDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is currently the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that
Paper ID #16992Mixed Method Study of the Evolution of Leadership Traits during a Leader-ship ExperienceMs. Luisa Ruiz Mendoza, University of Texas - El Paso Luisa is a recipient of the Gates Millennium Scholarship since 2009. In May 2013, Luisa graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in Business Management. Then, in December 2014 she received a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Ms. Ruiz plans to pursue a doctorate degree in Educational Leadership and Foundations with a concentration in Engineering Leadership at UTEP. She would like to work on a
Paper ID #16052Completing the Pass: Leadership ’On’ and ’In’ the FieldDr. Mary B. Vollaro, Western New England University Mary B. Vollaro is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Vollaro received her Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut, her M.S. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and her B.S.M.E. at Western New England University. She has held engineering positions in industry (in particular, the materials science area) and was Chair of the ASEE Materials Division. She has written in the area of materials science education and is now working on
Paper ID #13092Training for Leadership and Team Skills from Freshman Year ForwardDr. Mary B. Vollaro, Western New England University Mary B. Vollaro is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Vollaro received her Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut, her M.S. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and her B.S.M.E. at Western New England University. She has held engineering positions in industry (in particular, the materials science area) and was Chair of the ASEE Materials Division. She has written in the area of materials science education and is now
20.90 –2.00Instructor B’s Class 37.21 39.68 2.47 23.25 20.57 –2.68Instructors’ scores were not correlated with students’ post-course scores on either the systemicscale (p = 0.618) or the hierarchical scale (p = 0.368). Participation in student organizations alsohad no significant effect on either dimension (p-Systemic = 0.075; p-Hierarchical = 0.114). Thelow number of matched respondents prevented meaningful comparisons on the basis of gender,race, country of origin, international living, or military service.DiscussionThis engineering leadership course was not designed with the Adaptive Challenges Model3 orEcological Leadership Theory4 in mind. Instead, the Leadership Attitudes and Beliefs Scale
Paper ID #19866Development of Leadership Through Hands-On Learning Activities in a FlippedMicroprocessors ClassroomDr. Ricky T. Castles, East Carolina University Dr. Ricky Castles is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He is primarily affiliated with the ECU Electrical Engineering concentration. His research work focuses on the use of wireless sensor networks, microcontrollers, and physiological data collection for a variety of applications. His primary interest is in the area of adaptive tutorial systems, but he has ongoing projects in the area of hospital patient health
Paper ID #9937Leadership in Multidisciplinary Project Teams: Investigating the emergentnature of leadership in an engineering education contextMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
Paper ID #14416How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Anotherfrom a Student Perspective?Dr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing authentic engineering learning experiences for students from grades K through Ph.D. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Another
open-minded to ideas.”Students recognized that exercising leadership did not rely require a dominant personality, andthat dominant team members might actually be detrimental. Said one participant, “I guess [myidea of leadership] has changed a little bit, because now I look a lot more to the quiet person,because they usually aren’t as overbearing in their ideas, so it’s more of a collaborative process.”Problem-Solving. Conventional wisdom holds that engineers are problem solvers. Problem-Solving is also recognized as a characteristic of leaders,17 particularly those in creative ortechnical organizations.22, 23 In addition to behaviors such as identifying technical problems andseeking solutions, this category included seeking improvement in team
Charlie by surprise: “When you first start, you think you can just go talk to whomever, which is the way it should be. [However] it was kind of eye-opening. You have to be a bit reserved sometimes as to who you talk to, about what.”This is an important change in outlook, and shows how an organization’s culture might influencethe perceptions and behaviours of early career engineers. As Charlie reflected: “It's very toughfor you to actually learn [if] you sit there and you're afraid to ask questions. Asking questions ishuge.” By putting doubt into his mind about which questions he could ask of whom caused himto reflect on whether his leadership behaviours were appropriate, arguably hindering hisdevelopment. On the other hand, it
Paper ID #8942An Experiential Learning Approach to Develop Leadership Competencies inEngineering and Technology StudentsDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global
published on various aspects of communication in sociotechnical systems, including the use of sentence-headline design for PowerPoint slides. Page 24.1007.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Problem Framing as a Teachable Skill: A Practical Approach to Teaching Leadership CommunicationIn the preface to the 2011 edition of Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership (1995/2011),Howard Gardner notes “the explosion of interest in the topic of leadership” (p. xv) that occurredbetween the two editions of the book.4 The Engineering Leadership Constituent