five courses,attend a leadership seminar series, and complete an international work-based, research-based orstudy-based experience. The minor courses are taught by faculty in the College of Engineeringincluding in-house communications faculty; the School of Public Policy; the Institute’sLeadership Education and Development (LEAD) Program, and executive-level engineeringpractitioners. The pedagogy model integrates leadership instruction into the broader context ofglobal societal grand challenges such as water availability and quality, air quality, urbanization,megaprojects, disasters, transportation, cities and sustainable development. A number of courseshave embedded study abroad experiences to foster global awareness, cross-cultural
programs present and presenting. COMPLETE 2014 offered achance to network with 14 other universities with Engineering Leadership programs. There is much in common in terms of the challenges to changing the status quo in how engineering education is done. Leadership is viewed as important, but extra-curricular with rigorous engineering curriculum making it difficult to insert leadership classes while displacing core engineering curriculum. Feedback from alumni and business is that leadership is much more emphasized in practice than it is in academic preparation. A key comment from an industry presenter who hires a lot of engineers: “Engineers are hired for technical skills. Engineers are fired for
Makers design experiments and systems (b, c) solve problems (e),possess the ability to engage in life-long learning (i), and utilize techniques and skills toaccomplish goals (k).In order to achieve these goals educators may be able to apply Making opportunities to theengineering education curriculum. This can be achieved especially through project-basedlearning, a teaching method suggested in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of theField28. Design projects allow for students to integrate knowledge and develop skills28. Studentsoperating in self-managed teams would be able to develop leadership skills through operating invarious roles5. By taking on the typical role of “team lead” students are able to developleadership roles as
in a curriculum underconstant pressure to cover broadening technical fields. Often these leadership courses areoffered as options on top of existing requirements, resulting in students taking additional credits,at significant cost to them. The Engineering Leadership Development (ELD) Program at Penn State University hasoffered an 18 credit minor in Engineering Leadership Development for over 20 years, with over600 graduates. While approximately two times that many students have benefitted by takingcourses in engineering leadership during that period, it still represents a fraction of the more than20,000 who have graduated from the College of Engineering in the same time span. Further,anecdotal evidence has shown that, while many
contact with instructors, and active engagement inreal world projects. Yet we struggle to find feasible paths to take action. Pressures toincrease enrollment and cut budgets challenge us to find ways to do more with less withoutdiluting the learning experience. Administrators embrace the need to update curriculum toremain current and relevant, yet there is no room to add in a tightly packed four-yearprogram. These tensions require innovative approaches to engineering education andleadership development to meet the challenges of the future.Introduction – An Overall FrameworkThere is general agreement that a renewed focus on leadership development is critical to thefuture success of the engineering discipline (NAE 2004). Our thinking begins to
instruments (HPLC, UV,TOC,GC, KF—etc.) and also monitoring drug shelf life through both accelerated and shelf life stability programs. After which started at GlaxoSmithKline Beecham Egypt in which i was a laboratory senior analyst an- alyzing all dosage forms as finished products dealing with all laboratory instruments with very good experience on HPLC and GC in addition of GLP and GMP knowledge, SOP writing and audits carry out internally then i was promoted to a section head of validation and quality assurance for the pharmaceuti- cal industry for both Lactam and non-Lactam areas in which i was responsible for sterile and non-sterile areas qualification, validation and periodic verification dealing with process
theireducation and that asking good questions and seeking help when they needed it is takingleadership along with coming to office hours, starting assignments early, and following throughon their delegated responsibilities by being an active participant in class activities. Other thansome initial discussion, there were mentions of leadership throughout the semester when theprofessor felt that students were not following through on their responsibilities and when somegroups were not keeping up with their assigned tasks and deadlines.Development of Leadership Through Hands-On Laboratory Exercises in Self-Selected TeamsIn many academic programs, leadership is not directly included in the curriculum. Students areoften encouraged to pursue internships and
educationprogramsStudents understood the importance of being technically competent as an engineering leader,however they had a lower confidence in their own technical leadership abilities. This gap Page 26.1424.10emphasized the importance of integrated learning within the engineering curriculum.Providing students with integrated engineering leadership experiences directly within thetechnical curriculum would allow the necessary leadership skills to be gained concurrentlywith an understanding how these skills will apply to an engineering career.Future DirectionsThe methods and results used in this pilot study will be applied to a variety of
skills such ascommunication, teamwork, planning, example-setting, result-driving, innovation-driving,rapport-building and enablement. Page 23.1011.2Addressing the concerns of the National Academy of Engineering[2], which calls for betterleadership development initiatives for engineering students, requires many strategies. Oneapproach would be for an engineering curriculum to incorporate leadership development coursesinto students’ requirements before graduation. This would speak to engineering students the needand the value of leadership skills, since it is accommodated in their engineering curriculum.However, such an approach may not be popular
-assessment and a leadership capabilities framework linked tointeractive leadership laboratories (LLabs). This is part of a curriculum that also includes theteaching of best practices in effective product development and the scientific principlesunderlying major engineering disciplines. Experience-based practice and mastery of methods isgained via the Challenge Project, an intense, tightly-scheduled, deliverable-orienteddemonstration of human leadership, project and resource management and engineering problemsolving.The Gordon Engineering Leadership Program (GEL), in the graduate school of engineering atNortheastern University, targets the development of the soft skills, organizational awareness andtechnical agility key to mastering leadership in an
greater pool of professional skills, Russell and Yao 10summarize, “an engineer is hired for her or his technical skills, fired for poor people skills, andpromoted for leadership and management skills.” 10 Gerhart, Carpenter, Grunow, and Hayes 11exemplify this perspective in describing the lack of upward progression by Lawrence Techgraduates as the motivation for starting Lawrence Tech’s 4-year leadership curriculum for allundergraduate students.Because leadership has been identified as an important skill for successful engineers, the purposeof our study is to investigate undergraduate engineers’ leadership development. Moreover, weseek to characterize the degree of alignment on views of leadership across different stakeholdersrelated to
Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation in the College of Technology at Purdue University.He has expertise in Human Resource Development and Curriculum Development. Page 24.973.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Pathways to Technology LeadershipAbstractTechnology-rich organizations need people who can pair technical knowledge, skills, andabilities with an ability to lead people. Organizations have historically focused on hiringemployees with either a strong technical competence or a strong leadership competence. The 21stcentury
Challenge. Particularly, participants prominently improved theirencouragement skills. Only the Challenge attribute displayed divergent improvements.Introduction Leadership traits are not always emphasized in the engineering curriculum of highereducation institutions. Once in college, if a student starts an engineering program, leadershipopportunities are typically only available through extracurricular activities or internships1. This islargely because traditional engineering programs are not able to accommodate specific coursesthat foster leadership traits in their degree plan. This lack of curriculum integration can often beattributed to the topic’s perceived complexity and the growth in the number of required corecourses that subsequently
suggests thatthere are ways to understand organizational culture and how, by extension, an organization’sleaders act with regard to its culture.2Schein defines culture as, "a pattern of shared basic assumptions learned by a group as it solvedits problems of external adaptation and internal integration, which has worked well enough to beconsidered valid, and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive,think, and feel in relation to those problems."2 Using Schein as a guide, a culture then is nothingmore than a collection of habits and values which are created as a byproduct of reaching theorganization’s goals, and then passed on to subordinates who are members of the unit. Largeorganizations have complex cultures because
experiences into the curriculum. Leadership strategies that may feel uncomfortable to undergraduate students will become increasingly relevant as they gain experience with organizational contexts outside of the university classroom, but it can be overwhelming for them to wait until they leave university to learn these skills. Two historically popular strategies for integrating workplace learning into engineering education are semester long co-op terms and 16-month internships. If these two options are not feasible in a particular institutional Page 26.1519.12 context, it is possible to infuse meaningful experiential
, the paper identifies biographicalinformation common to those who appear to be most engaged in the topic and compares it toexisting national faculty profiles. These findings are augmented through national survey ofengineering faculty. The survey investigated faculty perceptions on the importance ofengineering leadership development and the manner faculty think these materials should beincorporated in engineering curricula. These perceptions are investigated with respect toparticipant’s backgrounds and experiences outside the academy. This work will be of interest toboth faculty building commitment for and materials supporting integration of engineeringleadership in the curriculum and the engineering leadership profession.IntroductionMany of
Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level en- gineering education, including inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education, innovative and novel grad- uate education experiences, global learning, and preparation of engineering graduate students for future careers.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity, the Inaugural Director of the College of Engineering’s Leadership Minor, and the Director of the International Institute of Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). In 2013, she became founder and owner of STEMinent LLC, a company focused on STEM education assessment
apply to early career engineers.Another study from the leadership literature presents helpful perspectives on the practice ofengineering leadership. Alvesson and Jonsson (2016) conducted an in-depth single case study ofa middle manager in a large, international manufacturing company, completing ten interviewsand eight observations of the manager in meetings [8]. Their findings challenge the dominantperceptions of leadership in the literature which are based on “assumptions of coherence,integration, context and direction” (p.13). Instead, the researchers found fragmentation betweenthe manager’s leadership ideas and practice, with noticeable differences between espousedleadership meanings and their actual use in practice [8]. This paper adds
of a body of leadershipliterature that relates leadership performance to an ability to be accurately self-aware ofleadership capabilities25-26. Engineering leadership programs are also noting the importance ofincorporating self-awareness into program curriculum or training programs27-28. In a study todetermine behavioral frameworks for highly effective technical executives in NASA, self-awareness emerged as an integral part of the relational competency category29. The importanceof self-awareness demonstrated in these studies is evidence of the need to ensure leadershipdevelopment interventions intended to build self-awareness are incorporated into engineeringleadership development programs26. Further, effective interventions should include
Paper ID #6035Using Leadership Education Practices to Enhance Freshmen EngineeringStudent Interviewing SkillsDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Loehr professor of Mechanical Engineering and the director of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Environment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute, director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project), and director of the Ohio Coal Research Center at Ohio University, where he is engaged in the development of energy and environmental technology, such as
) and workplace behaviors. Other research interests include the use of political skill and interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Joshua’s post-graduation plans include pursuing a career as a Researcher and Professor in the College of Business at a research- oriented university.Mr. Kenneth D. Birchler, Southern Illinois UniversityMr. Joseph David Narusis, Southern Illinois UniversityDr. Rhonda K Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Rhonda K. Kowalchuk is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Methods at Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC). She also serves as the Director of Applied Research Consultants in the Department of Psychology at SIUC. She received her B.A. (Hons., 1990), M.A
from a Student Perspective?AbstractThis paper investigates student perceptions of the relationships between social media,engineering, and leadership. Participants in this study consisted of freshmen engineeringstudents enrolled in a first-semester introduction to engineering course at the University of SouthCarolina. A grounded theory approach was used, in which instructional activities and datacollection processes occurred concurrently, were guided by one another, and developed over thecourse of the study. The phrase “social media engineering leadership” is developed within thispaper to include social media mediated communication within an engineering leadership context.The results of this study suggest that social media engineering