video Steve Jobs’s 2005 commencement address at Stanford University asan example of a very personal life narrative from a leader in technology. Engineering studentscan especially relate to this speech and I ask students to attend to the nature of his stories andimportance of discovering strengths and a meaningful sense of life’s purpose. After thisdiscussion, I then introduce the RBS assignment as a structured methodology to begin thejourney toward learning one’s distinctive strengths and life narrative. The following provides myactual instructions for the assignment (in red) and brief explanations and suggestions.Phase One of the RBS Assignment Step One: Solicit feedback for this assignment 1. Identify 15-20 people who know you well and
Paper ID #17388Developing the Global Engineering Leader at a Leading Engineering Institu-tion in the SoutheastDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy’s research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infras- tructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systems to promote sustainable development. Kennedy earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structures) from Stanford University in 1994, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering (Transportation
Paper ID #14841’I Survived the Crisis!’ - Using Real World Scenarios to Teach Crisis Leader-ship Skills to Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Eva Andrijcic serves as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. in Systems and Information Engineering from University of Virginia, where she worked at the Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems. She received a B.S. in mathematics from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College. Her major interests are in the areas of risk analysis and management
of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Teaching Award, the Minnie Stevens Piper Foundation Award, and LeTourneau University’s top research and scholarship award. He was also a Finalist for the IEEE Global Humanitarian Engineer of the Year award in 2013. He serves as an engineering program evaluator for the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), the sole entity for accrediting engineering programs in the United States. Dr. Gonzalez is Founder and President of LIMBS International (www.limbs.org), a 501(c)3 non-profit humanitarian organization that designs, creates and deploys prosthetic devices to transform the lives of amputees in the developing world by restoring their ability to walk. Since its
Paper ID #15521Achieving Excellence in Master of Engineering Education: A Case Study ofNational University of Defense Technology’s PracticeProf. Fu zhongli, National University of Defense Technology FU,zhongli is deputy director of the Center for National Security and Strategic Studies, National Univer- sity of Defense Technology (NUDT).In this role, he manages NUDT’s continuing education reform and leads excellent engineer training research projects. He has conducted research on engineering education as a visiting scholar in Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2013. His research interests are in engineering
served on the research staff at Bell Labs where his work turned to document analysis, handwriting recognition, and biometric security. In 2003, Dr. Lopresti joined the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Lehigh where his research examines fundamental algorithmic and systems-related questions in pattern recognition, bioin- formatics, and security. In 2009 he became Chair of the CSE Department, and in 2014 he assumed the role of Interim Dean of the P. C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michi- gan Technological University. Adrienne’s
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)’s Gordon EngineeringInstitute of Leadership program is a well-established co-curricular programTechnology targeting undergraduate students. Students work experientially to(2007) develop hands on leadership skills, building towards a competency model, and a small subset complete a second year as senior fellows, running leadership labs and mentoring younger students to “learn by doing.”Northeastern Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership program offers aUniversity (2008) customized masters degree or a stand-alone graduate certificate for master’s students. The program offers courses on leadership and
Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri - Rolla, in 2012. Prior to her current leadership position she served as Associate Vice President for Strategic Research Initiatives and as Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and STEM education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
ofparticipation from members of the Civil, Engineering Management, Engineering Technology,and Industrial Engineering groups. The survey questions explored faculty perceptions ofengineering leadership and their perceived role of engineering leadership content in engineeringand engineering technology programs. The broader goal of this survey was to understand whatengineering educators identify as important topics in the concept of Engineering Leadership andtheir overall impression of the importance of Engineering Leadership in undergraduatecurricula.Data and FindingsBoth data collection methods collected demographic information from over 100 participants. Toprovide insight into the backgrounds and characteristics of authors actively publishing
Page 26.1424.2specifically within an engineering context5. Over the last decade there has been an increase inthe amount of research on engineering leadership. The following focuses on definitionsprovided by three well-known organizations.The Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL) provides a simpledefinition of engineering leadership as being “the technical leadership of change” includingthe innovation, implementation and invention of products and enabling technologies to meetthe needs of society6.In 2010, the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) outlined the need forpreparing students for the professional engineering practice by providing them with the“ability to apply principles of leadership”7. The NSPE
toexercise their leadership due to “the growing interdependence between technology and theeconomic and social foundations of modern society”16. ABET’s (2011) criteria for accreditingengineering programs for the United States in 2012–2013 include not only strong analyticalskills but also other skills indirectly related to leadership (e.g., the ability to communicateeffectively, to function in multidisciplinary teams, and to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in global and societal contexts)17. Unfortunately, Vandeveer found that manyundergraduate students within engineering departments do not receive the leadership ormanagement skills that are needed for them to succeed as leaders within future engineeringpositions 18.Engineering
]. Page 26.1519.9B OX 1 : S URVEY ITEMS U SED T O EVALUATE T HE SKILLS O F ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP EXEMPLARS A= Applying engineering knowledge • Solves problems using appropriate engineering principlesB= Using engineering tools, equipment or technology • Uses appropriate tools, equipment and technology based on a sound understanding of these principlesC= Protecting the public interest • Considers social, political and environmental implications of his/her work • Works in ways that serve the public good • Incorporates diversity and equity considerations into actionsD= Managing engineering activities • Helps team members adapt to changing circumstances • Works in ways that maximize the economic success of the business
program, students will have a concentration in engineering leadership notedon their transcript.Formal coursework is designed specifically for undergraduate engineering students. The coursesexplore topics including: self-awareness and emotional intelligence, leadership styles andtheories, servant leadership, team dynamics, motivating and guiding others, diversity in theworkplace (cultural, gender, etc.), communication, conflict management, ethical leadership,leading change, leading technology and innovation, market analysis, product development,entrepreneurship, and strategic and financial planning.A variety of assessment methods were employed in the first year. A pre- and post-testleadership inventory was administered to students to during the
Century, which undergraduate programs areadopting as evidence of continuous improvement in fulfillment of ABET, Inc. (formerly know asAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) Criterion 5 6,7. Roughly one-third ofASCE civil engineering outcomes, correlate with development of professional skills.Development of professional and leadership skills has been shown to improve through thecollege experience 8. Leadership principles covered in the curriculum have proven to makeimprovements in student development and studies have indicated faculty interaction also has apositive effect 8. Assessing student obtainment of fundamental professional skills and leadershipconcepts at lower levels of Blooms Taxonomy within the classroom is relatively
to lead outside the formal curriculum AbstractLeadership has historically been part of professional engineers’ work life, but until recently itwas not integrated into the formal engineering curriculum. With the support of the NationalAcademy of Engineering and Engineers Canada along with regulatory pressures from theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology and the Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board, committed engineering educators with ties to industry have begun to takeup this curricular challenge in greater numbers. Unfortunately, many of these programs touchonly a small segment of the student body because they remain on the periphery of engineeringfaculties. As a result, we know little about the
saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. At Rocketdyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Re- actor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Lockheed Martin), he conducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb
Challenges identified by the National Academy of Engineeringwould you choose to address, and how would you do it? Each team selected a differentchallenge, and was instructed to produce a video that described: • The challenge • The social impact • The national technological readiness to address the challenge • Possible avenues to solve the challengeTeams were instructed to create all-original video content using class/reading materials providedby the instructor and posted in the class Blackboard site. This included the NAE website and theuniversity library’s engineering database. Videos were posted to YouTube as either “Public” or“Unlisted,” and the URL emailed to the instructor. The videos were screened during the lastclass session of