video Steve Jobs’s 2005 commencement address at Stanford University asan example of a very personal life narrative from a leader in technology. Engineering studentscan especially relate to this speech and I ask students to attend to the nature of his stories andimportance of discovering strengths and a meaningful sense of life’s purpose. After thisdiscussion, I then introduce the RBS assignment as a structured methodology to begin thejourney toward learning one’s distinctive strengths and life narrative. The following provides myactual instructions for the assignment (in red) and brief explanations and suggestions.Phase One of the RBS Assignment Step One: Solicit feedback for this assignment 1. Identify 15-20 people who know you well and
Paper ID #17388Developing the Global Engineering Leader at a Leading Engineering Institu-tion in the SoutheastDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy’s research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infras- tructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systems to promote sustainable development. Kennedy earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structures) from Stanford University in 1994, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering (Transportation
Paper ID #14841’I Survived the Crisis!’ - Using Real World Scenarios to Teach Crisis Leader-ship Skills to Undergraduate Engineering StudentsDr. Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Eva Andrijcic serves as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. in Systems and Information Engineering from University of Virginia, where she worked at the Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems. She received a B.S. in mathematics from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College. Her major interests are in the areas of risk analysis and management
Paper ID #15521Achieving Excellence in Master of Engineering Education: A Case Study ofNational University of Defense Technology’s PracticeProf. Fu zhongli, National University of Defense Technology FU,zhongli is deputy director of the Center for National Security and Strategic Studies, National Univer- sity of Defense Technology (NUDT).In this role, he manages NUDT’s continuing education reform and leads excellent engineer training research projects. He has conducted research on engineering education as a visiting scholar in Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2013. His research interests are in engineering
implement decisions as they pursue interdisciplinaryproject work throughout the engineering curricula. In particular, a 2006 NSF study found that 60percent of the new courses introduced through ERCs had multidisciplinary content as well as asystems focus. Industry has recognized the competitive advantage of graduates from ERCeducational programs; nine in ten company supervisors report that former ERC students andgraduates are better prepared to work in industry than equivalent hires without ERC experience.Nearly 75 percent of those supervisors say employees with ERC experience were better able to 1develop new technologies. In addition, hiring students with ERC experience is one of the mostprized
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)’s Gordon EngineeringInstitute of Leadership program is a well-established co-curricular programTechnology targeting undergraduate students. Students work experientially to(2007) develop hands on leadership skills, building towards a competency model, and a small subset complete a second year as senior fellows, running leadership labs and mentoring younger students to “learn by doing.”Northeastern Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership program offers aUniversity (2008) customized masters degree or a stand-alone graduate certificate for master’s students. The program offers courses on leadership and
Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri - Rolla, in 2012. Prior to her current leadership position she served as Associate Vice President for Strategic Research Initiatives and as Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Schrader has an extensive record of publications and sponsored research in the systems, control and STEM education fields. She received the 2005 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
ofparticipation from members of the Civil, Engineering Management, Engineering Technology,and Industrial Engineering groups. The survey questions explored faculty perceptions ofengineering leadership and their perceived role of engineering leadership content in engineeringand engineering technology programs. The broader goal of this survey was to understand whatengineering educators identify as important topics in the concept of Engineering Leadership andtheir overall impression of the importance of Engineering Leadership in undergraduatecurricula.Data and FindingsBoth data collection methods collected demographic information from over 100 participants. Toprovide insight into the backgrounds and characteristics of authors actively publishing
Paper ID #17467Leadership, Entrepreneurship, Management, Policy: Intersections or Sepa-rate Domains?Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
University of Calgary the Georgia Institute of Technology, Marquette University,Pennsylvania State University, and the University of Toronto. The purpose of this survey was tocollect data on various program components utilized by engineering leadership developmentprograms across the nation and to collect qualitative data on specific innovative practices. Prior to creating the survey we found that there were no clear operational definitions ofengineering leadership development program components, so we sought to work with the teamof eight engineering faculty to create operational definitions so that we could ask follow-upquestions isolating the structure of specific components. Components were categorized asEngineering/Technical Leadership
use and/or increase energy saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. Erdman has also taken courses at RPI, Union, UCLA, UCSB, MIT, and Dartmouth. At Rocket- dyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL
. Laleh Behjat is an associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary. Her research interests include designing computer chips, electronic design automation and developing software for computer hardware. She has won several awards for her work on the development of software tools for computer engineering. In addition, Dr. Behjat has a passion for increasing the statues of women in Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Dr. Behjat was the recipient of 2015 Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Women in Engineering Champion Award.Dr. Lynne Gradon Cowe Falls P.Eng., University of Calgary Lynne Cowe Falls, PhD, P
Paper ID #16163Developing a Professional and Personal Network as a Method for DeepeningLessons in Engineering LeadershipMr. Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University Mr. Klosterman is a Director and Professor of the Practice in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Program at Northeastern University. He has over 25 years of experience in the high technology in computer architecture and systems design at the Digital Equipment Corporation and at startup Stellar Computer. He joined Sun Microsystems in 1990 as a microprocessor designer. At Sun, he led and managed hardware engineering, product design and systems engineering
to lead outside the formal curriculum AbstractLeadership has historically been part of professional engineers’ work life, but until recently itwas not integrated into the formal engineering curriculum. With the support of the NationalAcademy of Engineering and Engineers Canada along with regulatory pressures from theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology and the Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board, committed engineering educators with ties to industry have begun to takeup this curricular challenge in greater numbers. Unfortunately, many of these programs touchonly a small segment of the student body because they remain on the periphery of engineeringfaculties. As a result, we know little about the
technology such as producing algal-based fuels coupled with mitigation of greenhouse gases, bioreactor design, novel fluidized bed gasification, thermal process- ing of solid fuels, and adapting planar solid oxide fuel cells to coal-derived syngas. He has been principal investigator for over $18 million in externally funded research, holds several patents with three revenue generating licenses and one spin-off company, and over 60 peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Bayless for- merly worked for American Electric Power (Gavin and Amos Plants) and was an officer in the United States Navy. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (Profs. Richard Buckius and James
Paper ID #16052Completing the Pass: Leadership ’On’ and ’In’ the FieldDr. Mary B. Vollaro, Western New England University Mary B. Vollaro is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England University in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Vollaro received her Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut, her M.S. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and her B.S.M.E. at Western New England University. She has held engineering positions in industry (in particular, the materials science area) and was Chair of the ASEE Materials Division. She has written in the area of materials science education and is now working on
saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. At Rocketdyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Re- actor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Lockheed Martin), he conducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb
academic circles that ABET (formerly and perhaps moredescriptively called the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) and itscommission for the related sciences including safety management, ASAC (Applied ScienceAccreditation Commission) are not prescriptive about how much to teach ethics and how tomeasure it. The ABET ASAC General Criterion 3, student outcome f is, “an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility.”7 As Barry and Ohland suggest, among other authorswho have comments on this topic, “Even after multiple cycles of ABET accreditation, manyengineering programs are unsure of how much curriculum content is needed to meet therequirements of ABET’s Criterion 3.f”8 Note that while ABET itself prefers the use of
Challenges identified by the National Academy of Engineeringwould you choose to address, and how would you do it? Each team selected a differentchallenge, and was instructed to produce a video that described: • The challenge • The social impact • The national technological readiness to address the challenge • Possible avenues to solve the challengeTeams were instructed to create all-original video content using class/reading materials providedby the instructor and posted in the class Blackboard site. This included the NAE website and theuniversity library’s engineering database. Videos were posted to YouTube as either “Public” or“Unlisted,” and the URL emailed to the instructor. The videos were screened during the lastclass session of