Paper ID #15081Integrating a Capstone Leadership Project and the S-Triangle Pedagogy toGuide Engineering Leadership Development EducationDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Gerald Loehr Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Ohio Uni- versity’s Coal Research Center, part of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Envi- ronment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute and director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project) He is engaged in the development of energy and environmental
design. Multi- Sections are Two semester Sections are Projects designed semester described as capstone projects. described as to be one “teams” and span Required for some “companies”. semester, though multiple majors. Projects can span projects can carry semesters. semesters or on longer. All Projects can span years. Can undergraduate semesters. participate students at the Students can multiple
thecompetition was finalized by selecting the best project based on team “pitch,” the leadershipdevelopment continued with the students developing a leadership plan to launch their projects.This paper will present the details of the pedagogical approach, with a step-by-step explanationof the structure of a “capstone” leadership development project incorporating team dynamics,structured deliverables, and techniques of engagement of the business and engineering majors inthe context of a competitive sustainability challenge program. This paper will present collectedassessment data, an analysis of the data, and provide recommendations for improvement.IntroductionThe work described in this paper focuses on a capstone engineering leadership experience
months, where they lead infrastructure projects around their hostcommunity with a team of local Haitian foremen, skilled workers, and general laborers.While many other programs and student organizations provide leadership experience in aclassroom context through capstone projects and extra-curricular activities, CEDC interns aretasked with working with local citizens towards a common goal and tangible results. Interns aresupported by CEDC’s unique organizational structure that allows students in the classroom tolead design projects that are implemented by the interns in Haiti, with supervision from industryadvisors in the United States. CEDC’s project-oriented framework provides students real-worldresponsibility and accountability for small
leading a team, and enhancement of students’ understanding of the ―big picture,‖ such asethical and social concerns relevant to the engineering field.13 In addition, Nelson et al. (2014)state that learning and practicing how to collaborate with other students and working in teams is amain objective of the capstone program.15 Regular team meetings every week are seen to beeffective in improving the team functions, eventually resulting in developing leadership skills.27The objectives of team meetings are to better monitor the fulfillment of assignments and worktasks, argue ideas and thoughts for questions associated with team projects and responsibilities,and authorize team members to provide work plans for the upcoming week.27Other literature
use two orthree workshop sessions focusing on the deconstruction of definitions and on the self-commitment plan. Integrating these workshops into introductory courses would work well. Group Perspective The group perspective engages students with team development activities where studentsapply what they are studying about group processes to in-class simulations. Together, groupscreate a team contract; develop a team purpose and norms, member roles, and team goals tosuccessfully complete the final project. Teams undergo mid-module and post-module 360evaluation reviews, where students evaluate self and team members, and the instructor evaluatesindividuals and the team as one unit. The group module is ideal for
of their followers, as well as teach them why they make certaindecisions. Note that while students may think this effort is repetitive at first (e.g. one inventoryexercise is the same as another), if they are challenged to find the differences, they can criticallyunderstand the importance of each effort designed to help them learn more about themselves.The team concept is further built through multiple class interviews of visiting leaders. While theteambuilding is important to the capstone project, the immediate goal during the Fall seminar isfor the students to work together as a team in the interview of the visiting leader. It can beuncomfortable for students to ask probing and sometimes personal questions of noted leadersthat might wind
life of the surroundingcommunity. The program has three distinct yet interrelated curricular offerings, each targetedtowards participants at different levels of experience and mastery of leadership skills that drawfrom a common skills inventory and set of core values. These offerings are as follows: Leadership Enhancements to Existing Undergraduate Courses: Project-based first-year engineering courses and senior capstone design courses have been enhanced to include leadership modules with the goal of introducing skills to make project teams more effective. A key focus is the role of self-awareness in effective leadership (and followership). While these projects may have external stakeholders, project scope is
the CEE Department. Development of professional skillsculminates in a civil engineering capstone class were students work on multidisciplinary teams toachieve common design project goals and communicate their engineering findings to aprofessional and public audience. Specific CEE courses that develop student professional skillsare identified in Table 2 and are further described in an accompanying matrix provided in Table3 that summarizes mapping of 28 course objectives to levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Courseobjectives are mapped to Bloom’s Taxonomy levels and provide a collective view of curriculummapping for professional skills development. Half, 14 of 28, of the course goals aligned withprofessional skills development are from Professional
year students participate in culminatingpracticed leadership experiences in senior design/capstone project courses. Figure 2 illustratesthe integrated leadership development approach utilized.Figure 2 - Leadership Development at Brigham Young UniversityThe transition to experiential learning has been a gradual process. The Foundations of GlobalLeadership course has evolved in recent years from a more typical lecture-based course to anexperiential leadership development course. In recent years the course has included manypositive experiential learning activities including: student discussions, student-led activities,team-based projects, and opportunities for effective feedback. Even with these improvements thecourse has had its challenges
insolving problems. In this paper, we present curriculum design, early results andrecommendations from first year assessment of the program and plans for future programmaticelements and assessment.Students are accepted into the leadership program during sophomore year. The curriculum isdesigned to follow an intentional sequence of experiences that meet students’ developmentalreadiness and needs over the three years in the program. In each year, the student cohortsexplore one of three themes of the program (leading oneself, leading with others, or leadingtechnology and innovation) through a combination of three formal leadership courses, a varietyof experiential learning opportunities, and the completion of a capstone project. Uponcompletion of the
) Engineering Project Management (3 credits) International Business Cultures in Engineering and Technology (3 credits) Engineering Leadership Capstone (3 Credits) Intergroup Dialogue (1 credit) Elective (with advisor approval) Notes: Maximum of 6 credits may also be taken
. The intent of the tool is to provide students with acapability to: • Capture and describe professional development experiences (e.g., class projects or work experiences) • Evaluate the creativity, innovation, collaboration, and solution delivery practices and results from the professional experiences • Self-reflect on how the student would change (i.e., start, stop, or continue) his/her behavior on the.When the student is preparing for a job interview they can review this portfolio with prospectiveemployers. Part of the focus of the Engineering Leadership Capstone course within the minorand certificate will focus the student on developing their final portfolio.Idea/Creativity &
a major term project. The sophomore-level studentsworked on a non-technical “social change” project, and were for the most part in groups of five.The students in the capstone class worked on an engineering design project, and were generallyin teams of four.ProcedureA feedback procedure was developed for this study which incorporated many of the elements ofeffective feedback. These elements included: rater training, requiring justification of ratings, timefor reflection and goal setting, disclosure, as well as repetition and follow-up.In preparation for the evaluations students did some reading on supportive communication and Page
Humanities and Sciencesand Adjunct Professor of Engineering Management, Information, and Systems in the Lyle School of En-gineering. Currall previously worked at the University of California, Davis (UC Davis), where he servedas Senior Advisor to the Chancellor for Strategic Projects and Initiatives and as Professor of Management.As Chancellor’s Senior Advisor, Currall co-chaired campus- wide strategic visioning exercises to positionUC Davis as the ”University of the 21st Century.” He also led planning for an additional campus in theSacramento region, which included the academic strategy, financial plan, fundraising plan, analysis ofphysical facilities, organization of advisory groups, and liaison to the Academic Senate. He has servedas the Vice
in the open-ended responses about these team-basedapplied projects was that most occur at the end of the program, usually acting as a capstone orsenior project. As a result, many these projects occur as part of academic classes within theirrespective programs. Projects tend to be tailored to meet the needs of different majors, as well asthe current needs of industry and the community. For example, some of these projects maybenefit the community or a company by having students build a product that can be used (e.g., apiece of specialized equipment or a campus bridge). Likewise, these applied products help thestudent gain direct experience (e.g., skills and knowledge) working on a specialized project intheir field of interest (e.g., a
Paper ID #12326Surveying industry needs for leadership in entry-level engineering positionsBeth Lin Hartmann P.E., Iowa State University Beth L. Hartmann is a Lecturer of Construction Engineering at Iowa State University (ISU). A retired U.S. Navy Civil Engineer Corps officer (O-5), she currently teaches the design-build capstone course for civil and construction engineering students and the construction engineering learning community. Hartmann received her Bachelor of Art in Architecture and her Master or Science in Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Construction Engineering and Management from ISU in 1989 and 1996
Minor Undergraduate courses + capstone 2005 Development Minor (ELDM) project [21] B.Sc. in Leadership University of Texas El Paso B.Sc. Degree Undergraduate 4 years Fall 2014 Engineering1 if the engineering leadership program is not run directly through the University’s engineering school (Institution may be embeddedwithin)2 the ELP program was a pilot program that began in Fall
connection list, however, omits the idea of technology.Instead, people and organization appeared frequently at the connection between the leadershipand social media concepts.As the capstone project of this course, the Grand Challenges videos culminated in the applicationof the social media and engineering leadership connections explored throughout the course. Theproject required team leadership to choose and represent the challenge, some technology skill toproduce the video, and teamwork to complete the task as assigned. Written peer evaluations ofthe videos were conducted after each video was shown during a class period. Students wereasked to assess each video in terms of engineering design, communication, production,teamwork and promoting positive
nanocomposites and engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven- year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Meghan Daly, James Madison University Senior Engineering Student and Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Engineering, James Madison University.Mr. Cairo Jahan, Lakil Sherrell, James Madison University I am a senior engineering student at James Madison University. I expect to graduate with a B.S. of engineering and a mathematics minor in May 2015. I am pursuing a career in systems, sustainable, or environmental engineering while continuing to grow professionally by aiding my capstone project team
Paper ID #9063Developing engineers who lead: Are student, faculty and administrator per-spectives aligned?Lt. Col. Brian J Novoselich P.E., Virginia Tech Brian Novoselich is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and currently a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His is a former assistant professor at the United States Military Academy. His dissertation research interest is undergraduate student leadership development in capstone design teams.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the
participating on those teams associatewith leaders and leadership. Team members strongly associated five categories of behavior withleadership: Ideal Behavior, Individual Consideration, Project Management, TechnicalCompetence, and Communication. Other leadership behaviors, including Collaboration, Training& Mentoring, Problem-Solving, Motivating Others, Delegation, and Boundary-Spanning, wereless consistently recognized, and some behaviors were valued more highly within one team thanthe other. When asked to define leadership, most team members ascribed to a mainstream view.A few team members revealed a more mature understanding of the nonpositional andcollectivistic aspects of leadership.BackgroundThe Jets and the Sharks are the largest engineering
EngineeringLeadership, and (3) Engineering Leadership Capstone) within the minor are developed andtaught in-house. The final requirement involves experiential learning engagement. Studentprogress and leadership development are tracked as they complete the requirements of the minor. The elective courses are classified into four concentrations: (1) communication, (2)ethics, (3) creativity and innovation, and (4) global and societal impact. The four concentrationareas were created following research about other engineering leadership programs and thecourses available to engineering students across the university. The ‘communication’concentration includes courses that focus on the development of students' professional skills andengagement with technical
creation of a “CreativityMinor”. A cross-college committee was formed and the focus changed from creativity andinnovation to leadership, specifically leadership for engineers. The minor would help studentsdevelop the essential leadership skills necessary in engineering, including project management,working in teams, communication skills, global awareness, green engineering, and professionalethics.11 In 1995 the Plan was crystallized by the proposal for an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment Minor (ELDM) consisting of courses in leadership, organizational and businessskills, entrepreneurship, and a capstone course in science, technology and public policy.12Creativity and innovation, although the original focus of the proposed Minor and
Paper ID #6035Using Leadership Education Practices to Enhance Freshmen EngineeringStudent Interviewing SkillsDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Dr. Bayless is the Loehr professor of Mechanical Engineering and the director of Ohio University’s Center of Excellence in Energy and the Environment. He is also the director of the Robe Leadership Institute, director of the Center for Algal Engineering Research and Commercialization (an Ohio Third Frontier Wright Project), and director of the Ohio Coal Research Center at Ohio University, where he is engaged in the development of energy and environmental technology, such as
Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive psychology at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Robin also serves as the Director of Research for the Engineering Leadership Project at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering which aims to identify how engineers lead in the workplace
projects (course related and capstone), student designcompetitions, and internships. Durham, S. A., & Marshall, W. E.16 advocate “that studentorganizations are shown to have benefits realized though student leadership within theseorganizations and organizational activities.” They note that there are “opportunities for students,who fill the leadership roles, to learn non-technical skills such as people, time management, andmost importantly, people management.” Yu, R., & Simmons, D. R.17 reported that “studentinvolvement in out-of-class activities promoted the development of leadership skills, groupskills, and engagement.” Fisher, D. R., & Bagiati, A., & Sarma, S. 18 posed a “student skilldevelopment framework”, which included