Design Education,” in Design Education Today: Technical Contexts, Programs and Best Practices, D. Schaefer, G. Coates, and C. Eckert, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 61–90.[10] A. Patel and C. Dasgupta, “Scaffolding structured reflective practices in engineering design problem solving,” in Proceedings - IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2019, 2019, pp. 287–289.[11] D. M. Balint, “Supporting information literacy development of engineering students in research-based composition courses,” in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2016, vol. 10-13-April-2016, pp. 802–807.[12] K. Mercer, “Understanding Undergraduate Engineering
themselves to highethical standards of practice. Engineering students learn about professionalism through theiruniversity course work and from other engineers [2]. Students learn that an engineer’sprofessional responsibilities include protection of the public and the environment. Students needan understanding of the potential risks resulting from their work. Public safety andenvironmental protection must be at the forefront of their engineering work [3].The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) is a non-governmentalorganization that accredits post-secondary education programs. ABET accreditation is proof thata collegiate program meets standards essential for producing graduates ready to enter theengineering workforce [4
of the first of several new ME-Practice courses in the revised Mechanical Engineering curriculum. Page 26.1663.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using Direct Information Literacy Assessment to Improve Mechanical Engineering Student Learning A Report on Rubric Analysis of Student Research Assignments Abstract This quasiexperimental study examined the effectiveness of library instruction in a junior level mechanical engineering design process course during the Spring 2013 and Fall 2013 semesters. In the Spring of 2013 librarians delivered an
Page 22.981.3via the UoA Library Business subject web pages.Module 3 - ‘Cutting edge research?’ Apart from business best practices, your manager has alsoasked you to use your connection with the University and explore any new material that might bedeveloped. ‘Finding patents’ includes information on finding patents, and an activity using theDerwent Innovations Index databaseModule 4 - ‘Time to do testing’ After selecting the material for packaging, we now need to test it tosee if it fits the purpose. We want to do this correctly and in a standard way so that we have a goodmeans of comparison. ‘Finding standards’ concentrates on efficient searching of the New Zealandstandards database, but also provides information on other standards
thatwhat you see is a description for a book that we have in our library?” This led to a briefdiscussion of online and/or card catalogs available to them at their school libraries. Afew indicated that they still used card catalogs to find books. Despite the best intentionsof the librarians in planning the lecture, realistically, the SEE students were not going tobegin researching their topics by using the most appropriate subject headings.Introducing the databaseThe University Libraries subscribe to the online encyclopedia, AccessScience. Thischoice was more appropriate for locating background information. In hindsight, anonline encyclopedia may have been a better starting point than an online catalog. Thisresource features easy to locate subject
journals are worried about the rising occurrences of plagiarism in articlessubmitted for publication.3The Internet has changed way students plagiarize to some extent because it has changed the way Page 13.1367.2they research. A wealth of information is now at the researcher’s fingertips. A library ofinformation is brought straight to their desks. The phrase “cut and paste plagiarism” expressesthe ease of copying a sentence, paragraph, or more from an article into a term paper.Additionally, many in the upcoming generation view materials retrieved online differently thanthose obtained from other sources. Clifton Poole stated “there is a tendency to
(2010).4. Stec, E. Using best practices: librarians, graduate students and instruction - ProQuest. Reference Services Review 34, 97-116 (2006).5. Jacobs, H.L.M. & Jacobs, D. Transforming the One-Shot Library Session into Pedagogical Collaboration: Information Literacy and the English Composition Class. Reference & User Services Quarterly 49, 72-82 (2009).6. Badke, W. Ramping up the One-Shot. Online 33, 47-49 (2009).7. Martin, J. The Information Seeking Behavior of Undergraduate Education Majors: Does Library Instruction Play a Role? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 3, 4-17 (2008).8. Riggs, D.E. What’s in Store for Academic Libraries? Leadership and Management Issues. Journal of
in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE, group), whose diverse projects and group members are described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at
. "A survey of diversity and inclusiveness initiatives at Carnegie Doctoral Research Institutions libraries." Library Management 40 (1/2):23-33. doi: 10.1108/LM-10-2017-0117.Kreitz, Patricia A. 2008. "Best Practices for Managing Organizational Diversity." The Journal of Academic Librarianship 34 (2):101-120. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.12.001.Lee, Hyuk-Jin, and Diane Neal. 2010. "A new model for semantic photograph description combining basic levels and user-assigned descriptors." Journal of Information Science 36 (5):547-565. doi: 10.1177/0165551510374930.National Association of Social Workers. 2015. Standards and Indicators for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice. Washington, DC: National
issustainable and scalable for the Library. Despite increased workload for a librarian, the benefitsthat the students derive from the embedded librarian model are worthwhile and impactful. Thestudents learn more in depth research skills from these activities than from typical one shotlibrary lecture style outreach.References 1. Amekudzi, Adjo A., Lisha Li, and Michael Meyer. (2009). "Cultivating research and information skills in civil engineering undergraduate students." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 136.1, 24-29. 2. Texas A&M University. (2016). Diversity Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://engineering.tamu.edu/etid/about/diversity-facts-and-figures 3. Texas A&M University
Page 25.874.7reaches the end of its life-cycle (recycling or re-use, for example).4.4 Phase 4: What will it be like?Initially in this phase, the conceptual designs are evaluated to determine which solution will finallybe selected for implementation. This selection process requires the ideas generated previously befleshed in the form of basic configurations that can be evaluated, for instance, as a computer modelto determine whether these preliminary designs are feasible and practical. Often this is a hands-onphase of design, where the team makes simple or more sophisticated prototypes and conduct teststo see if they meet the design specifications. To facilitate testing of the ideas, an overall systemmight be decomposed into a series of sub
students need for four individual assignments and two group assignments. In theinterest of clarity for the user, the guide does not include specific resources for all assignmentsthat occur throughout the semester. Instead, the team identified the best candidates forbibliographic instruction relative to timing during the semester, the knowledge practices neededto complete an assignment, and skills needed across the entire course (see Appendix 2). Forexample, the course coordinator had identified poor student performance in using crediblesources as a major problem, so identifying sources and assessing credibility is emphasizedthroughout the redesigned Research Guide.Tabs were created for individual assignments as follows:• Review of an engineering
resource factors [3]. The medical information community believes it is ethically responsibleto share clinical trial data [4]. A survey of patients participating in a clinical trial revealed 85 %of the majority perceived the benefits of sharing de-identified data outweigh any negatives [5].There remains an ongoing debate regarding best practices, merits, challenges and approaches onseeking consent to data sharing [6] – [9].Despite research indicating benefits of sharing data, some researchers are unwilling to reportscientific findings. An investigation of 1329 researchers’ data practices indicates scientists do notmake their research data electronically available to other researchers [10]. An analysis of 160reviewed articles published in the
their very first discipline-specific class.On the graduate and Ph.D. level of both universities, original research and professionalpublication come again to the forefront. In recent years, there has been a growing push on manycampuses for additional Undergraduate Research programs where not only graduate students, butalso undergraduate students take an active part on current faculty research, including, in somecases, co-authoring with faculty on research articles. This changing environment offers newopportunities for information literacy training and engineering librarian partnerships withresearch groups.This diversity of needs means that the new engineering librarian must take time to carefullystudy the engineering college’s website and to
://www.sdsskateboards.com/stella.htm (1 pt) Any information that identified this site was most likely selling longboards and thus would have information on sizes and shapes, along with cost information. 2. For the citation given in the last question, state if you would use the resource in a research and design project, and explain why you would or would not use the information. (1 pt) Either yes or no was an acceptable answer, as long as the student could provide an acceptable justification. See a couple of examples below: No – the site is likely biased due to the .com address, and is trying to sell something so might not be the best source for documentation on longboards. Yes – as a
Paper ID #24617Understanding Undergraduate Engineering Student Information Access andNeeds: Results from a Scoping ReviewMs. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Kate Mercer is the liaison librarian for Systems Design Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering and Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of Waterloo. Kate’s main duties include providing instruction and research services to students, faculty and staff. Kate graduated with a MI from the Univer- sity of Toronto in 2011, and in addition to her job as a liaison librarian is a PhD Candidate at the University of Waterloo’s School of
practice information retrieval and evaluationskills. Students are asked to find the best sources to support their answers to the followingquestions (skills practiced noted in parentheses following each question): a. Who developed the patent for the Clif shot litter leash? What earlier innovations did it Page 14.761.5 build upon? (Requires a patent search.) b. Find two peer reviewed original research articles published in the last year about how climate change will affect hurricane frequency in the Atlantic. (Practices database search strategies and proper citation format) c. What is a ballast in a fluorescent light fixture
seating and desks. Soundproofing was added to both rooms as thestudents’ research showed that a more quiet study space was desirable. Carpet padding wasincluded in the East Reading Room design, and limp mass, acoustic foam, and sound panelingfor both areas.Through this project, the Director of Public Services and the Engineering Librarian were able toserve as a client of engineering students. The students learned how important it was to meet theneeds of their client, which may not always be the most optimal or best option from anengineering standpoint. For instance, the students’ final design relocated the Research Help Deskto the back wall. When this was presented to the entire library staff, the students receivedcomments that the staff
, students in this course have been offeredthe option of attending a hands-on library workshop and receiving extra credit on a relatedproject report. Since several hundred students enroll in over 25 sections of this course each fall,the workshop format was developed as an alternative to traditional one-shot library instruction,which is not practicable on this scale. To better assess how the workshops were serving thestudents in these large classes, a group of instructors from the class and the engineering librarianworked together to evaluate student success with research projects and overall informationliteracy within the freshman engineering curriculum. The first initiative was to design a citationstudy assessing submitted projects for quality and
, she worked as a reference librarian at Johnson & Wales University-Charlotte and Central Piedmont Community College. A large focus of her day-to-day work and research interests lies in the fields of data informed decision making, information seeking behavior, and student library engagement and motivation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Assessment of the Impact of Library Instructional Strategies on Engineering Students’ Information Literacy Jeffrey McAdams, MLS (Co-Principal Investigator) Assistant Professor and Engineering Librarian, J. Murrey Atkins Library Rebecca Croxton, MLIS, PhD (Co
Social Thought and a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from Dickinson College.Dr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Mr. Mikolaj Wilk, New York University Engineering Reference Associate at Bern Dibner Library c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
quite the same way. For example, students have commented on theirsearch pages that Google cannot give them the kind of scholarly sources they need tounderstand engineering concepts. Because of the librarian’s direct engagement in first aclassroom and then a faculty, the perception has changed – and for the better.In this way, we are able to approach the outcome that Brent argues for: learning aresearch process and “learning by inquiry in a collaborative environment” [18].Bibliography[1] A. Parker and N. Godavari (2007). “Information Literacy and the art of doing research within the context of an engineering technical communications course,” The Canadian Design Engineering Network (CDEN) and the Canadian Congress on Engineering
than 31% were aware of our departmental liaisonprogram. Only 18% of the respondents said that they got help from a librarian when citingsources or doing research BUT fewer than 25% of the undergraduates and graduate studentscould recognize a scholarly article from a list of different types of citations given in the survey.In the Spring 2018 semester, a library satisfaction survey for faculty was distributed. 544 facultywere requested to complete the survey, 28 responses were received at a response rate of 5%.Although the response rate was low, some responses were interesting and caused our liaisonlibrarians to think further on how to better market the library. Below are some examples to oneof the survey questions:How do you think a librarian
this paper is to share the lessons we learned by reflecting upon our experiences withtechnology lending and teaching workshops while examining data from checkout informationand personal surveys to draw conclusions about best practices and the impact we have on thecampus community.Technology LendingLibraries have very robust systems for lending books to their users, and often use these systemsto loan non-book items. At North Carolina State University Libraries, we have loaned a varietyof technology items (such as laptops and cameras) for over a decade through our TechnologyLending Service. Using the existing infrastructure, adding a new type of item requires only asmall amount of policy decision-making and staff training. For example, in 2010
or 1.10 in a particular subject area. 1.15 1.1 1.05 Ratio Score 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8Figure 2. Ratio scores for example FE Subject Matter Report.From the graph in Figure 2, we see that the mechanical engineering students at the exampleinstitution did the best in probability and statistics (ratio score of 1.12 and scaled score of 0.39)compared to all other students taking the exam. Conversely, the same students did the worst inmechanical design and analysis (ratio score of 0.93 and scaled score of -0.24). Comparison ofthese ratio scores over multiple tests and years facilitates the determination of long-term trends.The results
Paper ID #32837Online OER Champion Courses: How a Scrappy Solution to Cope WithCapacity Turned Into a Vital Tool to Build OER Awareness, Interest, andKnowledge on CampusEmily Bongiovanni, Colorado School of Mines Emily Bongiovanni is the Scholarly Communications Librarian at Mines, where she supports faculty and students throughout the research lifecycle and promotes Open Science. She went to Denison University for her undergraduate degree and earned her Masters of Library and Information Science at the University of Denver. Emily’s most recent scholarship and research endeavors center around Scholarly Commu- nications and
skills insummer 2021, and develop pre and post assessments for a more rigorous study on studentsdevelopment of professional skills. We are also working to pilot an additional program with the2021 Summer Undergraduate Research participants to explore how building electronic researchportfolios may reinforce professional development. Lastly, our work with undergraduatesindicates that many graduate students may be entering Masters and PhD programs lacking in avariety of research and professional skills. We are currently working with members of theengineering faculty to transition some of our workshops towards graduate students, with the hopeof designing a multiyear study on the impact of professional skill development on graduatestudent
Page 14.1380.9 culture. Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education, 12(2), 47-51. doi:10.1080/136031008019574189. Heath, F. (2007). The impact of evolving information-seeking behaviors upon research libraries: A case study. Journal of Library Administration, 46(2), 3-16. doi:10.1300/J111v46n02-0210. Huwe, T. K. (2007). Inquiry-based learning and library design. Computers in Libraries, 27(5), 34-36. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=24974584&site=ehost-live11. Leighton, P. D., & Weber, D. C. (1999). Planning academic and research library buildings (3rd ed.). Chicago: American Library Association.12. Narum, J. L. (2004). Transforming the physical environment
, 2015; Whitmire et al, 2015)). However, they also have concerns regarding the valueof data-sharing (Borgman, 2015). Several studies have revealed that disciplinary differences indata management requirements are significant (Weller and Monroe-Gulick, 2014; Akers andDoty, 2013; Kim and Stanton, 2016)). This is a major concern in designing a one-size-fits-alldata management scheme for researchers. It is also clear from the literature that faculty have notyet significantly changed their data management practices to conform to federal grant agencyand publisher mandates (Whitmire et al, 2015, Diekema et al, 2014). Overall, these observeddata management practices present many challenges for libraries when setting up datamanagement services and
of Technology and the University of Michigan are developing and testing a rubric for this purpose. In addition to the use of this rubric by individual librarians as a means of determining how closely a researcher has complied with the requirements issued by an NSF directorate, the rubric will enable standardized evaluations of DMPs across multiple institutions. Thus, the library community will have a tool that will produce meaningful Page 26.215.7comparisons that could lay the groundwork for identifying common issues and creating best practices to address them. This study made use of an early iteration of the DART Rubric and served as a